This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 27 June 2022
BMC Genomics Open Access 12 February 2021
Generation of myostatin edited horse embryos using CRISPR/Cas9 technology and somatic cell nuclear transfer
Scientific Reports Open Access 24 September 2020
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The Carlson et al. whole-genome sequencing data are available from NCBI SRA: https://trace.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Traces/sra/?study=SRP072240.
Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015).
Cameron, P. et al. Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage. Nat. Methods 14, 600–606 (2017).
Bolger, A.M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
Kosicki, M., Tomberg, K. & Bradley, A. Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 765–771 (2018).
Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).
Carlson, D. F. et al. Production of hornless dairy cattle from genome-edited cell lines. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 479–481 (2016).
Tan, W. et al. Efficient nonmeiotic allele introgression in livestock using custom endonucleases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16526–16531 (2013).
Medugorac, I. et al. Bovine polledness—an autosomal dominant trait with allelic heterogeneity. PLoS ONE 7, e39477 (2012).
Olsen, P. A., Gelazauskaite, M., Randol, M. & Krauss, S. Analysis of illegitimate genomic integration mediated by zinc-finger nucleases: implications for specificity of targeted gene correction. BMC Mol. Bi.ol 11, 35 (2010).
Radecke, S., Radecke, F., Cathomen, T. & Schwarz, K. Zinc-finger nuclease-induced gene repair with oligodeoxynucleotides: wanted and unwanted target locus modifications. Mol. Ther. 18, 743–753 (2010).
Dickinson, D. J., Ward, J. D., Reiner, D. J. & Goldstein, B. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9-triggered homologous recombination. Nat. Methods 10, 1028–1034 (2013).
Gutierrez-Triana, J.A. et al. Efficient single-copy HDR by 5′ modified long dsDNA donors. Elife 7, e39468 (2018).
Skryabin, B.V. et al. Pervasive head-to-tail insertions of DNA templates mask desired CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing events. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/570739 (2019).
We acknowledge Recombinetics, Inc. for generating the animals and sharing the sequencing data through NCBI SRA. We appreciate A. Van Eenennaam, C. T. Brown and T. Mansour for helpful discussions concerning our discovery of the template plasmid integration. We thank M. Mikhailov and F.-J. Luo for technical expertise, as well as H. Howard, A. Fidler and K. Underwood for veterinary expertise.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Integrated supplementary information
Shown are all sequencing reads that aligned to the linearized plasmid backbone, with origins, genes, and gene promoters listed. For each sample, the coverage track is shown above the individual sequencing read pairs, for which lines connect the mate pairs. The template-plasmid junctions are indicated by discordantly mapped pairs and split reads. In discordant pairs, the read’s mate is aligned to the template, not the plasmid. In split reads, the mismatched bases at an end of the read are the template sequence, because the read spans the template-plasmid junction. In both genome-edited calves, the reads span the entire length of the plasmid, and at a coverage consistent with heterozygosity (~10X coverage). The unedited parental cell lines have sparse, low-level coverage of the plasmid, consistent with contamination. The coverage track scale is uniform across samples (0-19 reads). Reads at the start and end of the plasmid sequence are artifacts of linearization of the circular plasmid.
Compared to the naturally occurring Pc sequence (a), the chromosome with the template plasmid integration (b) adds two novel junctions created by the plasmid and flanking template sequences. The junctions are evidenced by the aligned sequencing reads, shown here for a representative sample (SRR3290615) in IGV (c). The plasmid sequence is inverted as a result of the antisense insertion of the repair template at the TOPO site during cloning. For each template-plasmid junction, the left (L) and right (R) breakpoints are indicated. The first novel junction’s breakpoints are the end of the first template copy (bt9 chr1:2,429,911; 1L) with the start of the plasmid (pCR2.1-TOPO:294-bp(-); 1R). The second novel junction’s breakpoints are the end of the plasmid (pCR2.1-TOPO:295-bp(-); 2L) and the start of the second template copy (bt9 chr1:2,428,500; 2R).
In the Carlson, et al. study, two primer sets, btHP and HP1748 (Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Methods), were used for confirming Pc homozygosity of the genome-edited calves (Nature Biotechnology 34, 479–481, 2016). Neither primer set detected the template plasmid integration by gel electrophoresis or Sanger sequencing of the TOPO-cloned amplicon. The btHP primers overlapped Pc, while the HP1748 primers flanked Pc. In HP1748, the forward primer was 154-bp upstream of the start of the repair template, and the reverse primer at the end of the repair template. For both primer sets, amplicons containing the plasmid would be prohibitively large (6,098-bp and 7,255-bp, respectively). With regards to the second copy of the repair template, the doubled amount of Pc amplicons for primer set btHP (591-bp) would be difficult to detect without a quantitative method, and the HP1748 primer set does not amplify the second copy because the HP1748 forward primer was upstream of the repair template.
About this article
Cite this article
Norris, A.L., Lee, S.S., Greenlees, K.J. et al. Template plasmid integration in germline genome-edited cattle. Nat Biotechnol 38, 163–164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0394-6
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2022)
A transgene-free method for rapid and efficient generation of precisely edited pigs without monoclonal selection
Science China Life Sciences (2022)
CRISPR/Cas tool designs for multiplex genome editing and its applications in developing biotic and abiotic stress-resistant crop plants
Molecular Biology Reports (2022)
BMC Genomics (2021)
Nature Biotechnology (2021)