Reconstructing kinase network topologies from phosphoproteomics data reveals cancer-associated rewiring

Abstract

Understanding how oncogenic mutations rewire regulatory-protein networks is important for rationalizing the mechanisms of oncogenesis and for individualizing anticancer treatments. We report a chemical phosphoproteomics method to elucidate the topology of kinase-signaling networks in mammalian cells. We identified >6,000 protein phosphorylation sites that can be used to infer >1,500 kinase–kinase interactions and devised algorithms that can reconstruct kinase network topologies from these phosphoproteomics data. Application of our methods to primary acute myeloid leukemia and breast cancer tumors quantified the relationship between kinase expression and activity, and enabled the identification of hitherto unknown kinase network topologies associated with drug-resistant phenotypes or specific genetic mutations. Using orthogonal methods we validated that PIK3CA wild-type cells adopt MAPK-dependent circuitries in breast cancer cells and that the kinase TTK is important in acute myeloid leukemia. Our phosphoproteomic signatures of network circuitry can identify kinase topologies associated with both phenotypes and genotypes of cancer cells.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Profiling kinase-inhibitor fingerprints to assign phosphorylation sites to upstream kinases.
Fig. 2: Empirical inference of kinase network circuitry from downstream kinase targets.
Fig. 3: Comparative analysis of network circuitries identifies cell-specific kinase network topologies.
Fig. 4: Multivariate regression models reveal kinase network topologies associated to drug responses.
Fig. 5: Contribution of kinase expression and phosphorylation to kinase activity and network topologies.
Fig. 6: Network analysis of breast cancer identifies the impact of genetic mutations on kinase network circuitries.

Data availability

The mass spectrometry phosphoproteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository54 with the dataset identifier PXD015943. Additional data are available from http://chemphopro.org.

Code availability

Code is available from the GitHub repository: https://github.com/CutillasLab/ebdt

References

  1. 1.

    Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Tanabe, M., Sato, Y. & Morishima, K. KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D353–D361 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fabregat, A. et al. Reactome pathway analysis: a high-performance in-memory approach. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 142 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sacco, F., Perfetto, L. & Cesareni, G. Combining phosphoproteomics datasets and literature information to reveal the functional connections in a cell phosphorylation network. Proteomics 18, 1700311 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tape, C. J. et al. Oncogenic KRAS regulates tumor cell signaling via stromal reciprocation. Cell 165, 910–920 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Terfve, C. D., Wilkes, E. H., Casado, P., Cutillas, P. R. & Saez-Rodriguez, J. Large-scale models of signal propagation in human cells derived from discovery phosphoproteomic data. Nat. Commun. 6, 8033 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Invergo, B. M. & Beltrao, P. Reconstructing phosphorylation signalling networks from quantitative phosphoproteomic data. Essays Biochem. 62, 525–534 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Donnella, H. J. et al. Kinome rewiring reveals AURKA limits PI3K-pathway inhibitor efficacy in breast cancer. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 768–777 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lachmann, A. & Ma’ayan, A. KEA: kinase enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 25, 684–686 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Johnson, H. et al. Molecular characterization of EGFR and EGFRvIII signaling networks in human glioblastoma tumor xenografts. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 1724–1740 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ficarro, S. B. et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 301–305 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Casado, P. et al. Kinase-substrate enrichment analysis provides insights into the heterogeneity of signaling pathway activation in leukemia cells. Sci. Signal. 6, rs6 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ochoa, D. et al. An atlas of human kinase regulation. Mol. Sys. Biol. 12, 888 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Drake, J. M. et al. Phosphoproteome integration reveals patient-specific networks in prostate cancer. Cell 166, 1041–1054 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Casado, P. et al. Proteomic and genomic integration identifies kinase and differentiation determinants of kinase inhibitor sensitivity in leukemia cells. Leukemia 32, 1818–1822 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Singh, R., Xu, J. & Berger, B. Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks with application to functional orthology detection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12763–12768 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sharan, R. & Ideker, T. Modeling cellular machinery through biological network comparison. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 427–433 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Creixell, P. et al. Kinome-wide decoding of network-attacking mutations rewiring cancer signaling. Cell 163, 202–217 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pan, C., Olsen, J. V., Daub, H. & Mann, M. Global effects of kinase inhibitors on signaling networks revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2796–2808 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Alcolea, M. P., Casado, P., Rodriguez-Prados, J. C., Vanhaesebroeck, B. & Cutillas, P. R. Phosphoproteomic analysis of leukemia cells under basal and drug-treated conditions identifies markers of kinase pathway activation and mechanisms of resistance. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 453–466 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Klaeger, S. et al. The target landscape of clinical kinase drugs. Science 358, eaan4368 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wilkes, E. & Cutillas, P. R. Label-free phosphoproteomic approach for kinase signaling analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1636, 199–217 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wilkes, E. H., Terfve, C., Gribben, J. G., Saez-Rodriguez, J. & Cutillas, P. R. Empirical inference of circuitry and plasticity in a kinase signaling network. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7719–7724 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Alessi, D. R., Caudwell, F. B., Andjelkovic, M., Hemmings, B. A. & Cohen, P. Molecular basis for the substrate specificity of protein kinase B; comparison with MAPKAP kinase-1 and p70 S6 kinase. FEBS Lett. 399, 333–338 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ubersax, J. A. & Ferrell, J. E. Jr. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 530–541 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hernandez-Armenta, C., Ochoa, D., Goncalves, E., Saez-Rodriguez, J. & Beltrao, P. Benchmarking substrate-based kinase activity inference using phosphoproteomic data. Bioinformatics 33, 1845–1851 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Barabási, A.-L. & Pósfai, M. Network Science (Cambridge Univ., 2016).

  28. 28.

    Jeong, H., Mason, S. P., Barabasi, A. L. & Oltvai, Z. N. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature 411, 41–42 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ciaccio, M. F., Wagner, J. P., Chuu, C. P., Lauffenburger, D. A. & Jones, R. B. Systems analysis of EGF receptor signaling dynamics with microwestern arrays. Nat. Methods 7, 148–155 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Vincent, A. M. & Feldman, E. L. Control of cell survival by IGF signaling pathways. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 12, 193–197 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mertins, P. et al. Proteogenomics connects somatic mutations to signalling in breast cancer. Nature 534, 55–62 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zhang, H. et al. Integrated proteogenomic characterization of human high-grade serous ovarian Cancer. Cell 166, 755–765 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mason, J. M. et al. Functional characterization of CFI-402257, a potent and selective Mps1/TTK kinase inhibitor, for the treatment of cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3127–3132 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Bachman, K. E. et al. The PIK3CA gene is mutated with high frequency in human breast cancers. Cancer Biol. Ther. 3, 772–775 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Samuels, Y. et al. Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell 7, 561–573 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhao, L. & Vogt, P. K. Helical domain and kinase domain mutations in p110α of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase induce gain of function by different mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2652–2657 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Barbareschi, M. et al. Different prognostic roles of mutations in the helical and kinase domains of the PIK3CA gene in breast carcinomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 6064–6069 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Davies, S. P., Reddy, H., Caivano, M. & Cohen, P. Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem. J. 351, 95–105 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hornbeck, P. V. et al. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D512–D520 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Perfetto, L. et al. SIGNOR: a database of causal relationships between biological entities. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D548–D554 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Carlson, S. M. et al. Large-scale discovery of ERK2 substrates identifies ERK-mediated transcriptional regulation by ETV3. Sci. Signal. 4, rs11 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shah, K., Liu, Y., Deirmengian, C. & Shokat, K. M. Engineering unnatural nucleotide specificity for Rous sarcoma virus tyrosine kinase to uniquely label its direct substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3565–3570 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Xue, L., Geahlen, R. L. & Tao, W. A. Identification of direct tyrosine kinase substrates based on protein kinase assay-linked phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 2969–2980 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Cohen, P. & Knebel, A. KESTREL: a powerful method for identifying the physiological substrates of protein kinases. Biochem. J. 393, 1–6 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ferguson, F. M. & Gray, N. S. Kinase inhibitors: the road ahead. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 353–377 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Schwanhausser, B. et al. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473, 337–342 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Adams, J. A. Activation loop phosphorylation and catalysis in protein kinases: is there functional evidence for the autoinhibitor model? Biochemistry 42, 601–607 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Juric, D. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase α-selective inhibition with alpelisib (BYL719) in PIK3CA-altered solid tumors: results from the first-in-human study. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 1291–1299 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sarker, D. et al. First-in-human phase I study of pictilisib (GDC-0941), a potent pan-class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 77–86 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rajeeve, V., Pearce, W., Cascante, M., Vanhaesebroeck, B. & Cutillas, P. R. Polyamine production is downstream and upstream of oncogenic PI3K signalling and contributes to tumour cell growth. Biochem. J. 450, 619–628 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gruhler, A. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 310–327 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Larsen, M. R., Thingholm, T. E., Jensen, O. N., Roepstorff, P. & Jorgensen, T. J. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 873–886 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Montoya, A., Beltran, L., Casado, P., Rodriguez-Prados, J. C. & Cutillas, P. R. Characterization of a TiO2 enrichment method for label-free quantitative phosphoproteomics. Methods 54, 370–378 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Vizcaino, J. A. et al. 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D447–D456 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M. & Cottrell, J. S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Cutillas, P. R. & Vanhaesebroeck, B. Quantitative profile of five murine core proteomes using label-free functional proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1560–1573 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Tsou, C. C. et al. IDEAL-Q, an automated tool for label-free quantitation analysis using an efficient peptide alignment approach and spectral data validation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 131–144 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bateman, N. W. et al. Maximizing peptide identification events in proteomic workflows using data-dependent acquisition (DDA). Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 329–338 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lawrence, R. T., Searle, B. C., Llovet, A. & Villen, J. Plug-and-play analysis of the human phosphoproteome by targeted high-resolution mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 13, 431–434 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fabian, M. A. et al. A small molecule–kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 329–336 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Elkins, J. M. et al. Comprehensive characterization of the published kinase inhibitor set. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 95–103 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kuhn, M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–26 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Kim, S. Y. & Volsky, D. J. PAGE: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment. BMC Bioinformatics 6, 144 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Horn, H. et al. KinomeXplorer: an integrated platform for kinome biology studies. Nat. Methods 11, 603–604 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was primarily funded by the BBSRC (BB/M006174/1). Barts and The London Charity (297/2249), CRUK (C15966/A24375 and C16420/A18066) and the QMUL Life Science Initiative also contributed to funding.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.H. designed and conducted experiments, analyzed data and edited the manuscript; R.S. performed bioinformatic experiments, analyzed data and edited the manuscript; V.R. performed mass spectrometry experiments; C.B. conceived the study, performed bioinformatic experiments, analyzed data and edited the manuscript; P.R.C. conceived the study and the EBDT approach, designed experiments, performed bioinformatic experiments, analyzed and interpreted data, prepared figures and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro R. Cutillas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.R.C. is a co-founder of Kinomica Ltd. The other authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Assessment of data variability, quality and summary of PDT database.

(a) Comparison of kinase inhibitor selectivity as determined by a Discover-X assay (this study) and Klaeger et al. (Science 358, 2017) for compounds present in both datasets. (b) Coefficients of variation of phosphopeptide peak areas in basal (DMSO controls) samples as a function of peak area cut-off values (n = 4 independent experiments). (c) Number of phosphopeptides quantified as a function of peak area intensity cut-off values. (d) Number of phosphorylation sites with CV<50% in basal (untreated) cells. (e) Number of unique phosphorylation sites found to be putative downstream targets (PDTs) of at least one kinase. (f) Number of kinases with at least five PDTs.

Supplementary Figure 2 Overview of the ChemPhoPro relational database web interface.

The ChemPhoPro allows the community to browse our experimental results and identified PDTs. The front page (a) provides a search box into which the name of protein or perturbagen (e.g. inhibitor) can be entered. If the name entered is recognized as a kinase, the kinase view (b) is displayed. In this view, the perturbagens panel provides information about perturbagens reported to affect the activity of the kinase, together with the corresponding results of our own DiscoverX studies. The following panel details putative downstream targets (PDTs) of the kinase identified by our analysis (organized by cell line) and the underlying experimental data can be accessed by clicking a PDT’s graph icon. The final panel in this view lists known kinase-substrate relationships extracted from UniProt and provides links to heatmaps (c) showing the behavior of these substrates in our experimental data. The protein view (d) shows reported substrates and PDTs in the context of their protein location. Clicking the graph icon of a PDT reveals its behavior by cell line and inhibitor. Finally, the perturbagen view (e) provides basic information about the inhibitors that we have used in this study, and data about their activity (both previously reported, and determined by our DiscoverX assays). Throughout the interface, links allow easy navigation between kinase, protein and perturbagen pages. An application programming interface (API) is available for programmatic access to the database. The database may be accessed at http://chemphopro.org.

Supplementary Figure 3 Motif analysis of phosphopeptides in selected PDTs.

Phosphopeptides were matched to predefined phosphorylation motifs that are common in kinase substrates (a) or to predicted kinase-substrate (Netphorest) groups (b). Enrichment was calculated as Log2[(k/m)/(q/t)] for (a) or as (k/m)/(q/t) for (b), where k is number of phosphosites in PDT that match the named motif/Netphorest group, m is total number of phosphosites in PDTs, q is total number of phosphosites in motif/Netphorest group, and t is total number of phosphosites. Full sets of motif/Netphorest groups in different PDTs are shown in Supplementary Dataset 4.

Supplementary Figure 4 Kinase signaling analysis using PDTs and previous databases of kinase-phosphosite relationships.

(a) Number of downstream targets of kinases poorly annotated in previous databases of K-P relationships. (b) Number of K-P relationships and number of kinases present in different databases of K-P relationships. (c) Experimental design of phosphoproteomic experiment of P31/Fuj cells treated with the named kinase inhibitors, and summary of results. P-values were calculated using two-sided paired t-test of log transformed data and FDR was calculated by adjusting p-values for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. These statistics were applied to the mean phosphoproteomics data of two independent experiments performed in technical replicate. (d) Results of changes in kinase activities as a function of treatment with the named kinase inhibitors (as determined by KSEA) when using different databases of K-P relationships as input of the KSEA algorithm. Z-scores were calculated using the PAGE method as in (BMC Bioinformatics 6, 144, 2005) and (PNAS 112, 7719-7724, 2015) and p-values using a two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as in (PNAS 102, 15545-15550, 2005). FDR was calculated by adjusting p-values for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method.

Supplementary Figure 5 Validation of groups of phosphorylation sites as markers of kinase network edges.

(a) Motif enrichment analysis in phosphorylation site groups that define the named network edges. Z-scores values are shown in y-axes and x-axes show the number of phosphopeptides with the labeled motif. For clarity not all data-points are labeled. Enrichment was calculated as in Supplementary Fig. 3. (b) Enrichment of kinase network axes as a function of treatments with EFG or IGF-I for the indicated times. (c) Enrichment of phosphopeptides in the named edges in predicted kinase-substrate (Netphorest) groups. Enrichment was calculated as in Supplementary Fig. 3. (d) Enrichment of edges in P31/Fuj as a function of treatments with the named kinase inhibitors; z-scores were calculated using the PAGE method as in (BMC Bioinformatics 6, 144, 2005) and (PNAS 112, 7719-7724, 2015) and p-values using a two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as in (PNAS 102, 15545-15550, 2005). FDR was calculated by adjusting p-values for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method (n = 2 independent experiments performed in technical replicate).

Supplementary Figure 6 Comparison of signaling across cell lines.

(a) Comparison of PDT kinase enrichment across the named cell models. Z-scores were calculated using the PAGE method as in (BMC Bioinformatics 6, 144, 2005) and (PNAS 112, 7719-7724, 2015) and p-values using a two-sided Kolmogorov-Smirnov test as in (PNAS 102, 15545-15550, 2005). FDR was calculated by adjusting p-values for multiple testing using the Benjamin-Hochberg method. These statistics were applied to the mean phosphoproteomics data of four independent experiments. For clarify not all kinases are labeled. (b) Phosphopeptides ion intensities (summed peak area) of phosphopeptides containing the named phosphorylation site across the named cell models (n = 3 independent experiments performed in technical replicate). Boxplots show median and interquartile ranges. P-values were calculated by Annova using R (ggpubr).

Supplementary Figure 7 Accuracy of multivariate models for drug sensitivity prediction based on different readouts of kinase expression and network circuitry.

Accuracy was determined as the difference between calculated and actual drug responses (in Fig. 4 of main text) divided by actual response. Boxplots show median, interquartile and max-min ranges. RMSE, root mean square error (n=36 AML cases).

Supplementary Figure 8 Kinase network topologies associated to drug responses.

Association between edge enrichment and drug response by Spearman correlation. The kinase axes showing greater importance to the statistical learning models shown in Fig. 4 were plotted as a function of responses of 36 primary AML cells to the named kinase inhibitors (each data point represents the quantification of the named edge in a primary sample and thus, because of missing data points from Casado et al. (Leukemia 32, 1818-1822, 2018), sample size are edge specific).

Supplementary Figure 9 Kinase network topologies and kinase activities associated to kinase protein expression and phosphorylation.

(a) Kinase protein expression, phosphorylation extent (calculated as the sum of intensities of peptides or phosphopeptides, respectively, derived from a given kinase) or their ratio was correlated to the enrichment of edges defined by the same kinase (top graphs) or to the predicted kinase activity (bottom graphs). Numbers refer to positively correlated edges (Spearman r > 0, bottom row) or those with Spearman r >0.28 (p<0.01, top row). Network edge enrichment as well as protein and phosphoprotein expression were calculated for 30 primary AML cases and for 83 primary breast cancer samples from a meta-analysis of their proteomes and phosphoproteomes from Casado et al. (Leukemia 32, 1818-1822, 2018) and Mertins et al. (Nature 534, 55-62, 2016). Violin plots show the kernel density of the data, in which probability is related to the width of the plot. Boxplots within violin plots (top graphs) show the median, interquartile ranges, and max-min ranges. Statistical significance of differences between the spearman rank values for each analysis was calculated using a two-sided Kruskal-Wallis test. (b) Association between number of kinase downstream targets (PDTs) and the correlation of kinase activity with phosphokinase expression. (c) Relationship between number of phosphorylation sites detected in kinase with the association between kinase activity and phosphokinase expression. (d) Relationship between number of phosphorylation sites detected in kinase with the association between kinase activity and the expression of unmodified kinase. P-values were calculated using Pearson (n=69 ovarian samples).

Supplementary Figure 10 Impact of common genetic mutations on kinase network rewiring.

(a) Difference in kinase network edge enrichment between AML primary cells positive for NRAS mutation relative to wild-type cases. Fold difference was calculated as average in network edge weight in NRAS positive tumors minus the average in wild-type tumors (n = 7 and 20 for mutant and wild-type, respectively) P-values were calculated using the Wilcoxon test (two-sided). FDR was calculated by adjusting p-values for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. For clarity not all data points are labeled. (b) Values of node centrality were calculated from a network reconstructed using the network edges increased in NRAS mutant relative to wild-type cells. (c) A centrality index was calculated as the product between betweenness and degree values – as in (b) – for network nodes associated with the mutations shown. The phosphoproteomics data from which kinase network topologies were determined were obtained from Casado et al (Leukemia 32, 1818-1822, 2018). (d) Cell death was measured in the named AML models using a Guava assay as a function of treatment with the named inhibitors for 3 days. Values are mean ± SD (n=3 independent experiments). (e) Area under the curve (AUC) of the data in (d). Boxplots show median and interquartile ranges. Statistical significance was calculated in R by two sided paired t-test of log transformed data.

Supplementary Figure 11 Phosphoproteomic analysis of CRC cell lines isogenic for PIK3CA KD and HD mutations.

(a) Summary of results of phosphoproteomic experiments comparing CRC cell lines isogenic for PIK3CA KD and HD mutations. P-values were calculated using two-sided paired t-test of log transformed data without adjustments for multiple comparisons. These statistics were applied to the mean phosphoproteomics data of two independent experiments performed in technical replicate (b) Expression of selected markers of PI3K and MAPK pathway activity using LC-MS/MS (left panel) or Western blot (right panel). Western blot assays were performed in two independent experiments. *p< 0.05, **p< 0.01 and ***p< 0.005. Full scans of WBs are shown in Supplementary Fig. 13. (c) Correlation of circuitry markers of PI3K/MTOR and MAPK1/3 activities showing significant anti-correlation in primary breast cancers (n = 86) and CRC cell lines (n = 2 independent experiments performed in technical replicates). P-values were determined by Spearman rank test. (d) Cell viability of PIK3CA MUT isogenic cell lines as a function of treatments with the named inhibitors at the concentrations shown. Data points are mean ± SD (n = 4 technical replicates).

Supplementary Figure 12 PDTs present in PhosphoSitePlus as a function of EBDT parameter tuning and relationship between number of compounds in kinase inhibitor fingerprint and PDT size.

Number of phosphosites in PDTs matched that were present in PhosphoSitePlus for the same kinase as a function of tuning the EBDT algorithm with different probability thresholds (a) or site-kinase inhibition ratio thresholds (b). (c) Number of phosphosites found to be PDTs of given kinases as a function of number of compounds in kinase inhibitors fingerprints for the respective kinase. Total number of PDTs in dataset is 6,206. Boxplots show median, interquartile ranges, and ranges. Outliers are shown as individual data points.

Supplementary Figure 13 Western blot analysis of CRC cell lines isogenic for PIK3CA KD and HD mutations.

Full scans of all the blots shown in Supplementary Fig. 11. Named markers of PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways were probed in two independent experiments confirming results of LC-MS analysis of the same markers in independent experiments. Click inside this box and insert image for Supplementary Fig. 14. For best results, use Insert menu to select a saved file; do not paste images. Source images must be JPEGs (no larger than 10 MB) saved in RBG color profile, at a resolution of 150–300 dpi. Optimize panel arrangement to a 2:3 height-to-width ratio; maximum online display is 600h x 900w pixels. Reduce empty space between panels and around image. Keep each image to a single page.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–13 and Supplementary Notes.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Dataset 1

Kinase-inhibitor selectivity.

Supplementary Dataset 2

Phosphopeptides identified.

Supplementary Dataset 3

PDTs identified in the study.

Supplementary Dataset 4

Results of motif enrichment analysis.

Supplementary Dataset 5

Comparison of KSEA using different K–P databases.

Supplementary Dataset 6

Markers of kinase–kinase relationships.

Supplementary Dataset 7

Impact of recurrent genetic mutations on the wiring of breast cancer and AML kinase networks.

Supplementary Dataset 8

Impact of mutations on CRC isogenic cell lines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hijazi, M., Smith, R., Rajeeve, V. et al. Reconstructing kinase network topologies from phosphoproteomics data reveals cancer-associated rewiring. Nat Biotechnol 38, 493–502 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0391-9

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing