This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history
07 October 2019
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
References
Laestadius, L. I., Rich, J. R. & Auer, P. L. Genet. Med. 19, 513–520 (2017).
Ducharme, J. A major drug company now has access to 23andMe’s genetic data. Should you be concerned? Time (26 July 2018).
Kolata, G. & Murphy, H. The Golden State Killer is tracked through a thicket of DNA, and experts shudder. The New York Times (27 April 2018).
Wee S. L. China uses DNA to track its people, with the help of American expertise. The New York Times (21 February 2019).
Winkler, R. 23andMe’s growth slows. WSJ Online (8 February 2019).
Nakamoto, S. Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf (2009).
Goldwasser, S., Micali, S. & Rackoff, C. The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems. in Proc. Seventeenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 291–304 (ACM, 1985).
Erlich, Y., Shor, T., Pe’er, I. & Carmi, S. Science 362, 690–694 (2018).
Shaban, H. DNA testing service MyHeritage says 92 million customer email addresses were exposed. Washington Post (5 June 2018).
Haag, M. FamilyTreeDNA admits to sharing genetic data with F.B.I. The New York Times (4 February 2019).
Sawers, P. How ProtonMail is pushing email privacy standards. VentureBeat https://venturebeat.com/2018/05/13/how-protonmail-is-pushing-email-privacy-standards/ (2018).
Shamir, A. Commun. ACM 22, 612–613 (1979).
Armstrong, S. BMJ 361, k1996 (2018).
Heston, T. F. Int. J. Curr. Res. 9, 60587–60588 (2017).
Ali, M., Nelson, J., Blankstein, A., Shea, R. & Freedman, M. J. Blockstack technical whitepaper v 2.0. https://blockstack.org/whitepaper.pdf (2019).
Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. Science 352, 1278–1280 (2016).
Raisaro, J. L. et al. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 16, 1328–1341 (2018).
Cho, H., Wu, D. J. & Berger, B. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 547–551 (2018).
Zuckerberg, M. A privacy-focused vision for social networking. Facebook https://www.facebook.com/notes/mark-zuckerberg/a-privacy-focused-vision-for-social-networking/10156700570096634/ (2019; accessed 27 June 2019).
Etherington, D. Apple is now the privacy-as-a-service company. TechCrunch (3 June 2019).
Evangelho, J. Why you should ditch Google search and use DuckDuckGo. Forbes Magazine (3 October 2018).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank J. Lunshof for critical discussion and feedback on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
D.G. and K.O. are employees of Nebula Genomics, Inc., and G.M.C. is a cofounder.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grishin, D., Obbad, K. & Church, G.M. Data privacy in the age of personal genomics. Nat Biotechnol 37, 1115–1117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0271-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0271-3
This article is cited by
-
Communication-efficient federated learning via knowledge distillation
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy
Nature Reviews Genetics (2022)
-
Citizen-centered, auditable and privacy-preserving population genomics
Nature Computational Science (2021)
-
Can Blockchain Solve the Dilemma in the Ethics of Genomic Biobanks?
Science and Engineering Ethics (2021)
-
Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging
Nature Machine Intelligence (2020)