Correspondence | Published:

Forensic genealogy and the power of defaults

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    FamilyTreeDNA. Updates. https://mailchi.mp/familytreedna/updates-to-our-terms-of-service-and-privacy-policy-march19?e=dfef197239 (12 March 2019).

  2. 2.

    Aldhous, P. This genealogy database helped solve dozens of crimes. But its new privacy rules will restrict access by cops. BuzzFeed News https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/this-genealogy-database-helped-solve-dozens-of-crimes-but (19 May 2019).

  3. 3.

    Regalado, A. More than 26 million people have taken an at-home ancestry test. MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/s/612880/more-than-26-million-people-have-taken-an-at-home-ancestry-test/ (11 February 2019).

  4. 4.

    Hernandez, S. One of the biggest at-home DNA testing companies is working with the FBI. BuzzFeed News https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/salvadorhernandez/family-tree-dna-fbi-investigative-genealogy-privacy (31 January 2019).

  5. 5.

    FamilyTreeDNA. https://perma.cc/A6TW-SW5P (1 April 2019).

  6. 6.

    FamilyTreeDNA. A letter to our customers. https://mailchi.mp/familytreedna/letter-to-customers?e (3 February 2019).

  7. 7.

    Fleming, S. M., Thomas, C. L. & Dolan, R. J. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6005–6009 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Beshears, J. et al. The limitations of defaults. National Bureau of Economic Research, Retirement Research Center http://www.nber.org/programs/ag/rrc/NB10-02%20Beshears,%20Choi%20et%20al%20SUMMARY.pdf (September 2010).

  9. 9.

    Ram, N. Genetic privacy after Carpenter. Va. Law Rev. (in the press); https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3265827

  10. 10.

    Erlich, Y., Shor, T., Pe’er, I. & Carmi, S. Science 362, 690–694 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by a Greenwall Foundation Faculty Scholars Grant.

Author information

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Jessica L. Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article