Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.


Worldwide CRISPR patent landscape shows strong geographical biases

A survey of the CRISPR patent landscape shows the improvement of technology, a diversity of potential sectors of application, and a new geopolitical balance of forces in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Geographical repartition and evolution of patent families related to the CRISPR gene editing system.
Fig. 2: Number of patent families related to the CRISPR system per technical category.


  1. Jinek, M. et al. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cong, L. et al. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mali, P. et al. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison, C. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 209 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim, D. Pharm. Pat. Anal. 7, 141–145 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sherkow, S. CRISPR J. 1, 309–311 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parthasarathy, S. Nature 562, 486–488 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Egelie, K. J., Graff, G. D., Strand, S. P. & Johansen, B. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1025–1031 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, J. A., Arshad, Z., Thomas, H., Carr, A. J. & Brindley, D. A. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 210–214 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maus, M. V. & Levine, B. L. Oncologist 21, 608–617 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng, W. et al. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 6545–6556 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferreira, R., David, F. & Nielsen, J. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 45, 467–480 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ricroch, A. E., Ammann, K. & Kuntz, M. EMBO Rep. 17, 1365–1369 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhat, S. A. et al. Vet. World 10, 1361–1366 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sherkow, J. S. Yale J. Biol. Med. 90, 667–672 (2017a).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sherkow, J. S. J. Law Biosci. 4, 565–576 (2017b).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sherkow, J. S. EMBO Rep. 18, 1047–1051 (2017c).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Callaway, E. Nature 560, 16 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez-Navarro, A. & Narin, F. Sci. Public Policy 45, 14–23 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuntz, M. & Berezow, A. Timidity and a hostility to competition have left Europe a scientific wasteland. The Telegraph (5 September 2017).

  21. Belda, I., Penas, G., Marquina, D. & Santos, A. Trends Biotechnol. 32, 393–395 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brinegar, K. et al. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 37, 1–12 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Rassenfosse, G. & Raiteri, E. Technology protectionism and the patent system: strategic technologies in China. SSRN. (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The contributions of U. Del Ghingaro and M. Jamet to early stages of this work are gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank M. Brites Teixeira for comments and Patent Pulse for allowing us temporary free access to their database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnès E. Ricroch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Note

Criteria used for patent selection and for further categorization

Supplementary Table 1

CRISPR patent compilation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin-Laffon, J., Kuntz, M. & Ricroch, A.E. Worldwide CRISPR patent landscape shows strong geographical biases. Nat Biotechnol 37, 613–620 (2019).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research