Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News Feature
  • Published:

Phage therapy’s latest makeover

Nature Biotechnology volume 37, pages 581–586 (2019)Cite this article

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 21 May 2019

This article has been updated

As issues of product consistency, standardization and specificity are being tackled, can phage therapeutics—long oversold and overhyped—finally realize their antibacterial potential?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Change history

  • 21 May 2019

    In the version of this article initially published, we listed 13 companies that were developing phage therapies a decade ago and stated that only a few are still active today. Missing from the active list was Phico Therapeutics of Bourn, UK. In addition, a location (Canada) has been added for PhageTech, and “Last May” has been changed to “In May” at the beginning of the article. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

References

  1. Dedrick, R. M. et al. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0437-z (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thiel, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 31–36 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schooley, R. T. et al. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e00954–17 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. van Kessel, J. C. & Hatfull, G. F. Nat. Methods 4, 147–152 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Price, M. N. et al. Nature 557, 503–509 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, B. K. et al. Evol. Med. Public Health 2018, 60–66 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jault, P. et al. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, 35–45 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Salmond, G. P. & Fineran, P. C. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 777–786 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomaa, A. A. MBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00928-13 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M. & Lu, T. K. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1141–1145 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Citorik, R. J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1141–1145 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Portland, Maine, USA

    Charles Schmidt

Authors
  1. Charles Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, C. Phage therapy’s latest makeover. Nat Biotechnol 37, 581–586 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0133-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0133-z

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing