Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

US Congress mandates silliness, USDA complies

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Anonymous Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1169 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Miller, H. & Stier, J. Viewpoint: mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods deserves a warning label of its own. Genetic Literacy Project https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/10/09/viewpoint-mandatory-labeling-of-genetically-engineered-foods-deserves-a-warning-label-of-its-own/ (2013).

  3. 3.

    Public Law 114-216, 114th Congress. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-114publ216/html/PLAW-114publ216.htm (2016).

  4. 4.

    Agricultural Marketing Service. National Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard. Federal Register https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/12/21/2018-27283/national-bioengineered-food-disclosure-standard (2018).

  5. 5.

    United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. International Dairy Foods Association MIF v. Amestoy https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1210635.html (1996).

  6. 6.

    Supreme Court of the United States. Reed et al v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona, et al. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/13-502_9olb.pdf (2015).

  7. 7.

    Liptak, A. Court’s free-speech expansion has far-reaching consequences. The New York Times A15 (17 August 2015).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry I. Miller.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

H.I.M. was the founding director of the FDA's Office of Biotechnology. He is at the Pacific Research Institute, which promotes policies that emphasize a free economy, private initiative and limited government. H.I.M. and D.L.K. have advocated regulatory policies favorable to biotechnology companies, including those that use recombinant DNA technology for agricultural applications.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miller, H.I., Kershen, D.L. US Congress mandates silliness, USDA complies. Nat Biotechnol 37, 497–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0117-z

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing