Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Sunlight-powered sustained flight of an ultralight micro aerial vehicle

Abstract

Limited flight duration is a considerable obstacle to the widespread application of micro aerial vehicles (MAVs)1,2,3, especially for ultralightweight MAVs weighing less than 10 g, which, in general, have a flight endurance of no more than 10 min (refs. 1,4). Sunlight power5,6,7 is a potential alternative to improve the endurance of ultralight MAVs, but owing to the restricted payload capacity of the vehicle and low lift-to-power efficiency of traditional propulsion systems, previous studies have not achieved untethered sustained flight of MAVs fully powered by natural sunlight8,9. Here, to address these challenges, we introduce the CoulombFly, an electrostatic flyer consisting of an electrostatic-driven propulsion system with a high lift-to-power efficiency of 30.7 g W1 and an ultralight kilovolt power system with a low power consumption of 0.568 W, to realize solar-powered sustained flight of an MAV under natural sunlight conditions (920 W m2). The vehicle’s total mass is only 4.21 g, within 1/600 of the existing lightest sunlight-powered aerial vehicle6.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The integrated vehicle and its sunlight-powered sustained flight operation.
Fig. 2: Structure design, working principle and output characteristics of the electrostatic-driven propulsion system.
Fig. 3: Topology and characteristic curves of the ultralight kilovolt power system.
Fig. 4: Size comparison and miniaturization of the vehicle.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analysed for this paper are included in the published article, Methods and Supplementary Information. Original videos and sensor data are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. Floreano, D. & Wood, R. J. Science, technology and the future of small autonomous drones. Nature 521, 460–466 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Phan, H. V. & Park, H. C. Insect-inspired, tailless, hover-capable flapping-wing robots: recent progress, challenges, and future directions. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 111, 100573 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrell Helbling, E. & Wood, R. J. A review of propulsion, power, and control architectures for insect-scale flapping-wing vehicles. Appl. Mech. Rev. 70, 010801 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan, M. & Ebel, T. in Titanium for Consumer Applications (eds Froes, F. et al.) 91–113 (Elsevier, 2019).

  5. Zhu, X., Guo, Z. & Hou, Z. Solar-powered airplanes: a historical perspective and future challenges. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 71, 36–53 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goh, C. S., Kuan, J. R., Yeo, J. H., Teo, B. S. & Danner, A. A fully solar-powered quadcopter able to achieve controlled flight out of the ground effect. Prog. Photovolt. 27, 869–878 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boucher, R. J. Sunrise, the world’s first solar-powered airplane. J. Aircr. 22, 840–846 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jafferis, N. T., Helbling, E. F., Karpelson, M. & Wood, R. J. Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle. Nature 570, 491–495 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaltenbrunner, M. et al. Flexible high power-per-weight perovskite solar cells with chromium oxide–metal contacts for improved stability in air. Nat. Mater. 14, 1032–1039 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alvissalim, M. S. et al. Swarm quadrotor robots for telecommunication network coverage area expansion in disaster area. In Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers (SICE) 2256–2261 (IEEE, 2012).

  11. Bi, Y. C., Lan, M. L., Li, J. X., Lai, S. P. & Chen, B. A lightweight autonomous MAV for indoor search and rescue. Asian J. Control 21, 1732–1744 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerdes, J. W., Gupta, S. K. & Wilkerson, S. A. A review of bird-inspired flapping wing miniature air vehicle designs. J. Mech. Robot. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005525 (2012).

  13. De Croon, G., De Clercq, K., Ruijsink, R., Remes, B. & De Wagter, C. Design, aerodynamics, and vision-based control of the DelFly. Int. J. Micro Air Veh. 1, 71–97 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steltz, E., Seeman, M., Avadhanula, S. & Fearing, R. S. Power electronics design choice for piezoelectric microrobots. In 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 1322–1328 (IEEE, 2007).

  15. Wood, R. J. The first takeoff of a biologically inspired at-scale robotic insect. IEEE Trans. Rob. 24, 341–347 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Graule, M. A. et al. Perching and takeoff of a robotic insect on overhangs using switchable electrostatic adhesion. Science 352, 978–982 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, Y. F. et al. Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles. Nature 575, 324–329 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim, S. et al. Laser-assisted failure recovery for dielectric elastomer actuators in aerial robots. Sci. Robot. 8, eadf4278 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Z., Yan, X., Qi, M., Zhang, X. & Lin, L. Low-voltage electromagnetic actuators for flapping-wing micro aerial vehicles. Sens. Actuators A 265, 1–9 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zou, Y., Zhang, W. & Zhang, Z. Liftoff of an electromagnetically driven insect-inspired flapping-wing robot. IEEE Trans. Rob. 32, 1285–1289 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. James, J., Iyer, V., Chukewad, Y., Gollakota, S. & Fuller, S. B. Liftoff of a 190 mg laser-powered aerial vehicle: the lightest wireless robot to fly. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 3587–3594 (IEEE, 2018).

  22. Ozaki, T., Ohta, N., Jimbo, T. & Hamaguchi, K. A wireless radiofrequency-powered insect-scale flapping-wing aerial vehicle. Nat. Electron. 4, 845–852 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elkunchwar, N., Chandrasekaran, S., Iyer, V. & Fuller, S. B. Toward battery-free flight: duty cycled recharging of small drones. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 5234–5241 (IEEE, 2021).

  24. Jefimenko, O. Electrostatic Motors: Their History, Types and Principles of Operation (Integrity Research Institute, 2010).

  25. Ludois, D. C. et al. Macroscale electrostatic rotating machines and drives: a review and multiplicative gain performance strategy. IEEE J. Emerging Sel. Top. Power Electron. 10, 14–34 (2020).

  26. Fan, L. S., Tai, Y. C. & Muller, R. S. IC-processed electrostatic micro-motors. Tech. Digest International Electron Devices Meeting 666–669 (IEEE, 1988).

  27. Livermore, C. et al. A high-power MEMS electric induction motor. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 13, 465–471 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yasseen, A. A., Mitchell, J. N., Klemic, J. F., Smith, D. A. & Mehregany, M. A rotary electrostatic micromotor 1/spl times/8 optical switch. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 5, 26–32 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee, S., Kim, D., Bryant, M. D. & Ling, F. F. A micro corona motor. Sens. Actuators A 118, 226–232 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Leng, J. et al. Design and analysis of a corona motor with a novel multi-stage structure. J. Electrostat. 109, 103538 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang, J.-S., Lawless, P. A. & Yamamoto, T. Corona discharge processes. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 19, 1152–1166 (1991).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Deng, S., Percin, M. & van Oudheusden, B. Aerodynamic characterization of ‘DelFly Micro’ in forward flight configuration by force measurements and flow field visualization. Procedia Eng. 99, 925–929 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Park, S., Drew, D. S., Follmer, S. & Rivas-Davila, J. Lightweight high voltage generator for untethered electroadhesive perching of micro air vehicles. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 5, 4485–4492 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ravi, V. & Lakshminarasamma, N. Steady state voltage gain of flyback converters for high voltage low power applications. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES) 1–6 (IEEE, 2016).

  35. Kewei, H., Jie, L., Xiaolin, H. & Ningjun, F. Analysis and simulation of the influence of transformer parasitics to low power high voltage output flyback converter. In 2008 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics 305–310 (IEEE, 2008).

  36. Zhiguo, Z. & Lin, Z. Analysis and design of isolated flyback voltage-multiplier converter for low-voltage input and high-voltage output applications. IET Power Electron. 6, 1100–1110 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dall’Asta, M. S., Fuerback, V. B. & Lazzarin, T. B. DCM forward-flyback converter integrated with a 5-order Cockcroft–Walton voltage multiplier: a steady-state and resonant current analysis. In 2017 Brazilian Power Electronics Conference (COBEP) 1–6 (IEEE, 2017).

  38. Serrano-Vargas, J. A., Oliver, J. A. & Alou, P. Forward–flyback converter with Cockcroft–Walton voltage multiplier in DCM: steady-state analysis considering the parasitic capacitances to achieve the optimal valley-switching operation with 95.11% efficiency at 3 kV/1.5 W. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 10, 2351–2361 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan, X., Qi, M. & Lin, L. Self-lifting artificial insect wings via electrostatic flapping actuators. In 2015 28th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) 22–25 (IEEE, 2015).

  40. Drew, D. S. & Pister, K. S. J. First takeoff of a flying microrobot with no moving parts. In 2017 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS) 1–5 (IEEE, 2017).

  41. Chen, N. et al. A self-rotating, single-actuated UAV with extended sensor field of view for autonomous navigation. Sci. Robot. 8, eade4538 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Johnson, K. et al. Toward sub-gram helicopters: designing a miniaturized flybar for passive stability. In 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2701–2708 (IEEE, 2023).

  43. Quan, Q. Introduction to Multicopter Design and Control (Springer 2017).

  44. Shastry, A. K., Kothari, M. & Abhishek, A. Generalized flight dynamic model of quadrotor using hybrid blade element momentum theory. J. Aircr. 55, 2162–2168 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Xiao, K., Meng, Y., Dai, X., Zhang, H. & Quan, Q. A lifting wing fixed on multirotor UAVs for long flight ranges. In 2021 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) 1605−1610 (IEEE, 2021).

  46. Harrington, A. M. Optimal Propulsion System Design for A Micro Quad Rotor (Univ. Maryland, 2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 52272384). Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.Q. and X.Y. proposed and designed the research. W.S. and J.P. designed and built the ultralight MAV. W.S., R.M. and J.W. conducted the experimental work on the electrostatic-driven propulsion system. J.P. and J. Li conducted the experimental work on the ultralight kilovolt power system. Z.L. and J. Leng contributed to the modelling and data analysis. W.S., J.P. and M.Q. drafted the paper. All authors provided feedback.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaojun Yan or Mingjing Qi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 The structural composition and assembly diagram of the miniaturized prototype.

It can be seen that the vehicle has a very simple structure, making it suitable for further miniaturization.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Characteristics of the electrostatic-driven propulsion system.

a, System photo (an electrostatic motor and a propeller, 1.96 g in mass). b, Power consumption concerning applied high DC voltages, with error bars defined in s.d. c-d, The lift-to-power efficiency characteristics of the propulsion system with four different propellers. e-f, The lift and current curves of propulsion systems from different production batches (A, B, C, D) under different applied voltages.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Experiment and simulation for the electrostatic motor.

a, Voltage-speed curves of electrostatic motors with 0.2 mm width and 3.8 mm width electrode plates. It can be seen that the wide electrode configuration outperforms the narrow electrode configuration. Meanwhile, the rotational speed of the narrow electrode configuration has reached its peak at 6 kV, and the electrostatic motor shows a slight discharge at this voltage, which indicates that the electric field strength to break through the air has been reached. b, Two-dimensional simulation for the electrostatic field of the two electrode configurations. It can be seen that the electrostatic field strength of the wide electrode configuration is consistently higher throughout the entire rotation area (as indicated by the darker color). In contrast, although obtaining a higher electrostatic field strength near the electrodes, the narrow electrode configuration suffers a rapid decline as the distance from the electrodes increases, leading to an overall driving effect that is inferior to that of the wide electrode configuration.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Processing and assembly of electrostatic motors.

The electrostatic motor is mainly assembled into a three-dimensional structure with two-dimensional components.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Detailed characteristics of the high-voltage power converter. The relationship between circuit characteristics and switching frequency, duty cycle, and load resistance when the input voltage is 3.7 V.

A 3.7 V Li-ion battery powers the HVPC and supplies high output voltage for different resistances (100 MΩ, 200 MΩ, 500 MΩ and 1 GΩ). The current through the load resistance is measured, the output voltage is calculated by the equation U = IR, the output power is calculated by Pout = I2R. With a suitable range of frequency and duty cycle, we can ensure that the power conversion efficiency of the HVPC remains constant, allowing for a wide range of output voltage adjustments.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Fabrication process of flexible PCB for the ultra-light kilovolt power system.

a, Attach copper foil to the polyimide film. b, Use laser cutting to create the desired circuit traces without damaging the underlying polyimide film. c, Remove excess copper foil. d, Place adhesive patches. e, Cover the top layer with polyimide containing holes in the shape of solder pads. f, Apply external pressure to compress the layers and heat them at high temperature for 2 h.

Extended Data Table 1 Main parameters for the vehicle components during flight operation
Extended Data Table 2 Main parameters for the HVPC components

Supplementary information

Peer Review File

Supplementary Video 1

The integrated vehicle and its sunlight-powered untethered flight. When the sunlight hits the vehicle, the integrated vehicle successfully takes off and performs a sustained flight. When the shading board blocks the sunlight, the vehicle loses power and descends. The sunlight hits the solar cells at an inclination of 48° with a light intensity of about 920 W m−2 (1 sun = 1,000 W m−2).

Supplementary Video 2

Working principle and process of the electrostatic motor. The video shows the process of charge transfer in the electrostatic motor, demonstrating its working principle from a microscopic perspective. During the rotation of the rotor, the rotor blades pass through the electrode plates and come into contact with the electric brushes, while the rotor blades acquire an electric charge through the brushes.

Supplementary Video 3

Stalling test of the electrostatic motor. The current characteristics of the electrostatic motor are opposite to those of traditional electromagnetic motors, which produce maximum current when starting or in a stalled state. The video shows that the electrostatic motor has almost zero current in a stalled state and the current recovers after releasing the rotor.

Supplementary Video 4

Operating temperature comparison of the electromagnetic motor and the electrostatic motor. Benefiting from the characteristic of low current of the electrostatic motor, the power consumption of the electrostatic motor is 0.181 W on average and no heat is generated during the rotation. The video shows that when driving the same propeller at the same rotating speed, the temperature of the electrostatic motor remained at its initial temperature after extended operation, while the traditional electromagnetic motor’s temperature rose rapidly under the same load.

Supplementary Video 5

Long-term test for flight operation. In the video, we conducted a durability test on the vehicle for one hour, and the vehicle remained in flight throughout the experiment. The subsequent experimental results show that the electrostatic motor is still able to work normally and the performance remains stable after one hour of continuous operation.

Supplementary Video 6

An 8-mm ultralight prototype. In the video, we create an 8-mm prototype (mass 9 mg) with low power consumption (0.97 mW) and achieve tethered flight with the lift-to-power efficiency of 9.2 g W−1. To our knowledge, it is the smallest micro-aircraft currently and can fly along vertical guide rails, with a maximum lift-to-weight ratio of 2.3.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, W., Peng, J., Ma, R. et al. Sunlight-powered sustained flight of an ultralight micro aerial vehicle. Nature 631, 537–543 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07609-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07609-4

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing