Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals

Abstract

The pursuit of discovering new high-temperature superconductors that diverge from the copper-based model1,2,3 has profound implications for explaining mechanisms behind superconductivity and may also enable new applications4,5,6,7,8. Here our investigation shows that the application of pressure effectively suppresses the spin–charge order in trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals, leading to the emergence of superconductivity with a maximum critical temperature (Tc) of around 30 K at 69.0 GPa. The d.c. susceptibility measurements confirm a substantial diamagnetic response below Tc, indicating the presence of bulk superconductivity with a volume fraction exceeding 80%. In the normal state, we observe a strange metal behaviour, characterized by a linear temperature-dependent resistance extending up to 300 K. Furthermore, the layer-dependent superconductivity observed hints at a unique interlayer coupling mechanism specific to nickelates, setting them apart from cuprates in this regard. Our findings provide crucial insights into the fundamental mechanisms underpinning superconductivity, while also introducing a new material platform to explore the intricate interplay between the spin–charge order, flat band structures, interlayer coupling, strange metal behaviour and high-temperature superconductivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Pressure-dependent lattice structure and phase diagram of La4Ni3O10-δ.
Fig. 2: Magnetic susceptibility, resistivity and specific heat of La4Ni3O10−δ single crystal at ambient pressure.
Fig. 3: Temperature-dependent resistances and d.c. susceptibilities of La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals under various pressures.
Fig. 4: Magnetic field effects on the superconducting transition in La4Ni3O10−δ.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Bednorz, J. G. & Müller, K. A. Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba–La–Cu–O system. Z. Phys. B Condens. Matter 64, 189–193 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X. G. Doping a Mott insulator: physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17–85 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scalapino, D. J. A common thread: the pairing interaction for unconventional superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1383–1417 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamihara, Y., Watanabe, T., Hirano, M. & Hosono, H. Iron-based layered superconductor La[O1−xFx]FeAs (x = 0.05–0.12) with Tc = 26 K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296–3297 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maeno, Y. et al. Superconductivity in a layered perovskite without copper. Nature 372, 532–534 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, F. & Senthil, T. Twisted Hubbard model for Sr2IrO4: magnetism and possible high temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 136402 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, Y. K., Sung, N. H., Denlinger, J. D. & Kim, B. J. Observation of a d-wave gap in electron-doped Sr2IrO4. Nat. Phys. 12, 37–41 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anisimov, V. I., Bukhvalov, D. & Rice, T. M. Electronic structure of possible nickelate analogs to the cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 59, 7901–7906 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, K.-W. & Pickett, W. E. Infnite-layer LaNiO2: Ni1+ is not Cu2+. Phys. Rev. B 70, 165109 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chaloupka, J. & Khaliullin, G. Orbital order and possible superconductivity in LaNiO3/LaMO3 superlattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016404 (2008).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, J. et al. Stacked charge stripes in the quasi-2D trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O8. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 8945–8950 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lechermann, F. Late transition metal oxides with infinite-layer structure: nickelates versus cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 101, 081110 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, D. et al. Superconductivity in an infinite-layer nickelate. Nature 572, 624–627 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeng, S. et al. Phase diagram and superconducting dome of infinite-layer Nd1−xSrxNiO2 thin films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 147003 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan, G. A. et al. Superconductivity in a quintuple-layer square-planar nickelate. Nat. Mater. 21, 160–164 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding, X. et al. Critical role of hydrogen for superconductivity in nickelates. Nature 615, 50–55 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun, H. et al. Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure. Nature 621, 493–498 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Y. et al. High-temperature superconductivity with zero-resistance and strange metal behavior in La3Ni2O7−δ. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2307.14819 (2023).

  19. Zhou, Y. et al. Evidence of filamentary superconductivity in pressurized La3Ni2O7. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2311.12361 (2023).

  20. Wang, G. et al. Pressure-induced superconductivity in polycrystalline La3Ni2O7−δ. Phys. Rev. X 14, 011040 (2024).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dai, P. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 855–896 (2015).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ling, C. D. et al. Neutron diffraction study of La3Ni2O7: structural relationships among n = 1, 2, and 3 phases Lan+1NinO3n+1. J. Solid State Chem. 152, 517–525 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu, Y. et al. Effective model and pairing tendency in bilayer Ni-based superconductor La3Ni2O7. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2306.07275 (2023).

  24. Scott, B. A. et al. Layer dependence of the superconducting transition temperature of HgBa2Can−1CunO2n+2+δ. Physica C 230, 239–245 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuzemskaya, I. G., Kuzemsky, A. L. & Cheglokov, A. A. Superconducting properties of the family of mercurocuprates and role of layered structure. J. Low-Temp. Phys. 118, 147–152 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Iyo, A. et al. Tc vs n relationship for multilayered high-Tc superconductors. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 094711 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schilling, A., Cantoni, M., Guo, J. D. & Ott, H. R. Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg–Ba–Ca–Cu–O system. Nature 363, 56–58 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gao, L. et al. Superconductivity up to 164 K in HgBa2Cam−1CumO2m+2+δ (m = 1, 2, and 3) under quasihydrostatic pressures. Phys. Rev. B 50, 4260–4263 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Chakravarty, S., Kee, H.-Y. & Völker, K. An explanation for a universality of transition temperatures in families of copper oxide superconductors. Nature 428, 53–55 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Berg, E., Orgad, D., Kivelson, & Steven, A. Route to high-temperature superconductivity in composite systems. Phys. Rev. B 78, 094509 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Botana, A. S., Pardo, V. & Norman, M. R. Electron doped layered nickelates: spanning the phase diagram of the cuprates. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 021801 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nica, E. M. et al. Theoretical investigation of superconductivity in trilayer square-planar nickelates. Phys. Rev. B 102, 020504 (2020).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cheng, J.-G. et al. Pressure effect on the structural transition and suppression of the high-spin state in the triple-layer T’-La4Ni3O8. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 236403 (2012).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang, J. et al. High oxygen pressure floating zone growth and crystal structure of the metallic nickelates R4Ni3O10 (R = La, Pr). Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 083402 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, H. et al. Fermiology and electron dynamics of trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10. Nat. Commun. 8, 704 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, J. et al. Intertwined density waves in a metallic nickelate. Nat. Commun. 11, 6003 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu, W. Z. et al. Origin of the spin density wave instability in AFe2As2 (A = Ba, Sr) as revealed by optical spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 257005 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li, J. et al. Structural transition, electric transport, and electronic structures in the compressed trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 117403 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yuan, N. et al. High-pressure crystal growth and investigation of the metal-to-metal transition of Ruddlesden–Popper trilayer nickelates La4Ni3O10. J. Cryst. Growth 627, 127511 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu, G., Neumeier, J. J. & Hundley, M. F. Magnetic susceptibility, heat capacity, and pressure dependence of the electrical resistivity of La3Ni2O7 and La4Ni3O10. Phys. Rev. B 63, 245120 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gurvitch, M. & Fiory, A. T. Resistivity of La1.825Sr0.175CuO4 and YBa2Cu3O7 to 1100 K: absence of saturation and its implications. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1337–1340 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kasahara, S. et al. Evolution from non-Fermi- to Fermi-liquid transport via isovalent doping in BaFe2 (As41-xPx)2 superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 81, 184519 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yuan, J. et al. Scaling of the strange-metal scattering in unconventional superconductors. Nature 602, 431–436 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang, X. et al. Interplay between superconductivity and the strange-metal state in FeSe. Nat. Phys. 19, 365–371 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, K. et al. Linear-in-temperature resistivity for optimally superconducting (Nd,Sr)NiO2. Nature 619, 288–292 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, J. et al. Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2309.01148 (2023).

  47. Wang, F. et al. The electron pairing of KxFe2−ySe2. Europhys. Lett. 93, 57003 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Luo, X. et al. Electronic origin of high superconducting critical temperature in trilayer cuprates. Nat. Phys. 19, 1841–1847 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Drozdov, A. P., Eremets, M. I., Troyan, I. A., Ksenofontov, V. & Shylin, S. I. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 525, 73–76 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Deng, L. et al. Higher superconducting transition temperature by breaking the universal pressure relation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2004–2008 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Prozorov, R. & Kogan, V. G. Effective demagnetizing factors of diamagnetic samples of various shapes. Phys. Rev. APP. 10, 014030 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Grissonnanche, G. et al. Direct measurement of the upper critical field in cuprate superconductors. Nat. Commun. 5, 3280 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ando, Y. et al. Resistive upper critical fields and irreversibility lines of optimally doped high-Tc cuprates. Phys. Rev. B 60, 12475 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Johnston, D. C. The puzzle of high temperature superconductivity in layered iron pnictides and chalcogenides. Adv. Phys. 59, 803–1061 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Thompson, J. D., Maley, M. P., Newkirk, L. R. & Bartlett, R. J. High-field properties and scaling in CVD-prepared Nb3Ge. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 977–982 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Meier, Q. N. et al. Preempted phonon-mediated superconductivity in the infinite-layer nickelates. Phys. Rev. B 109, 184505 (2024).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ouyang, Z., Gao, M. & Lu Z.-Y. Absence of phonon-mediated superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under pressure. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2403.14400 (2024).

  58. Leonov, I. V. Electronic structure and magnetic correlations in trilayer nickelate superconductor La4Ni3O10 under pressure. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2401.07350 (2024).

  59. Tian, P., Ma, H.-T., Ming, X., Zheng, X.-J. & Li, H. Effective model and electron correlations in trilayer nickelate superconductor La4Ni3O10. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2402.02351 (2024).

  60. Wang, J., Ouyang, Z., He, R.-Q. & Lu, Z.-Y. Non-Fermi liquid and Hund correlation in La4Ni3O10 under high pressure. Phys. Rev. B 109, 165140 (2024).

  61. LaBollita, H., Kapeghian, J., Norman, M. R. & Botana, A. S. Electronic structure and magnetic tendencies of trilayer La4Ni3O10 under pressure: Structural transition, molecular orbitals, and layer differentiation. Phys. Rev. B 109, 195151 (2024).

  62. Zhang, Y., Lin, L.-F., Moreo, A., Maier, T. A. & Dagotto, E. Prediction of s±-wave superconductivity enhanced by electronic doping in trilayer nickelates La4Ni3O10 under pressure. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2402.05285 (2024).

  63. Yang, Q.-G., Jiang, K.-Y., Wang, D., Lu, H.-Y. & Wang, Q.-H. Effective model and s±-wave superconductivity in trilayer nickelate La4Ni3O10. Preprint at arxiv.org/html/2402.05447v2 (2024).

  64. Lu, C., Pan, Z., Yang, F. & Wu, C. Superconductivity in La4Ni3O10 under pressure. Preprint at arxiv.org/abs/2402.06450 (2024).

  65. Zhang, M. et al. Effects of pressure and doping on Ruddlesden-Popper phases Lan+1NinO3n+1. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 185, 147–154 (2024).

  66. Sakakibara, H. et al. Theoretical analysis on the possibility of superconductivity in the trilayer Ruddlesden-Popper nickelate La4Ni3O10 under pressure and its experimental examination: comparison with La3Ni2O7. Phys. Rev. B 109, 144511 (2024).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Li, Q. et al. Signature of superconductivity in pressurized La4Ni3O10. Chinese Phys. Lett. 41, 017401 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 12234006), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2022YFA1403202), the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (grant no. 2024ZD0300103), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (grant no. Z200005) and the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (grant no. 2019SHZDZX01). Y.Z. was supported by the Youth Foundation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 12304173). H.W. was supported by the Youth Foundation of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 12204108). B.P. was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (grant no. ZR2020YQ03). D.P. and Q.Z. acknowledge the financial support from the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (no. 22JC1410300) and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Material Frontiers Research in Extreme Environments (no. 22dz2260800). A portion of this work was carried out at the Synergetic Extreme Condition User Facility (SECUF). A portion of this research used resources at the High Flux Isotope Reactor, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. A portion of this research used resources at the beamline 15U1 of Shanghai synchrotron radiation facility.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.Z. planned the project; Y.Z., E.Z. and L.C. synthesized the single-crystal samples; Y.Z., F. Liu, E.Z., L.C., H.W., Yiqing Gu and Yimeng Gu performed the thermodynamic and transport measurements at ambient conditions; E.Z., B.P., Xu Chen, D.P., W.W. and J.W. performed the resistance measurements under pressure with the support of J.G., Q.Z., L.J. and J.Z.; H.R., T.Y., Xiaolong Chen and Y.S. assisted the resistance measurement under pressure. D.P. and Z.X. conducted the susceptibility measurements under pressure with the support of Q.Z.; N.L., Y.Z., D.P. and F. Lan performed the synchrotron XRD measurements and analysis with the support of W.Y. and Q.Z.; J.H. and Y.Z. conducted the S/TEM characterization with the support of C.Z.; D.J., Y.Z. and Y.H. performed the in-house powder and single-crystal diffraction measurements under pressure and data analysis with the support of H.G., H.C. and J.Z.; Y.H. performed the neutron single-crystal diffraction measurements and data analysis; J.Z., Y.Z. and F. Liu analysed the data; and J.Z., B.P. and Y.Z. wrote the paper. All authors provided comments on the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qiaoshi Zeng, Jian-gang Guo or Jun Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Pierre Toulemonde, Weiwei Xie and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 XRD measurements of La4Ni3O10-δ single crystals and powdered single crystals.

a, XRD measurements of a La4Ni3O10-δ single crystal along the ab plane, revealing no detectable impurity phases. The measurements were carried out on a Bruker D8 Discover diffractometer, utilizing Cu Kα radiation. The inset displays a photograph of a La4Ni3O10-δ single crystal, grown using the high-pressure floating-zone method. b, Rietveld refinement of synchrotron-based powder XRD pattern of La4Ni3O10-δ at ambient pressure and room temperature. The olive solid lines and red circles represent the fitted and experimental data, respectively. The blue solid lines indicate the intensity difference between the data and calculations. The short vertical bars indicate the Bragg peak positions. The data can be well described with the space group P21/a. The data were collected using a powdered La4Ni3O10-δ single crystal. The refinement parameters are summarized in Supplementary Table 3.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Lab-based XRD measurements of a powdered La4Ni3O10-δ single crystal at various pressures at room temperature.

a, XRD measurements at various indicated pressures. The black arrows indicate the intensities from stainless steel. Upon releasing pressure to ambient condition, the diffraction pattern (black solid line) remains essentially unaltered in comparison to the data obtained prior to applying pressure, indicating that the process is reversible and the sample is stable against pressure. The structural transition observed in synchrotron-based XRD was not resolved in this measurement due to limited resolution. b, Measurements of empty cell with stainless steel gasket at indicated pressures at room temperature.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Synchrotron-based XRD measurements of powdered La4Ni3O10-δ single crystals under various pressures, using a helium DAC at room temperature.

a, XRD measurements under various pressures. b, An enlarge view of diffraction peaks within the range of 12.5° < 2θ < 14°, illustrating the merging of the monoclinic (0 2 0)M and (−2 0 1)M peaks into the tetragonal (1 1 0)T peak, a clear indication of the structural phase transition from monoclinic to tetragonal. c, Rietveld refinement of XRD pattern of La4Ni3O10-δ at 2.5 GPa. d, Rietveld refinement of XRD pattern of La4Ni3O10-δ at 34.0 GPa. The refinement parameters are summarized in Supplementary Table 3.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Temperature-dependent resistances of sample 4 (S4) in a helium DAC.

a, Temperature-dependent resistances of S4 under various pressures between 2 K and 300 K. b, Detailed resistance profile from 2 K to 150 K. Zero resistance below Tc is observed above 45 GPa. c, An enlarged view of the resistance curve below Tc, providing a closer examination of the zero-resistance state. The inset is a photograph depicting the electrodes used for the measurement.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Magnetic field effects on the superconducting transition in La4Ni3O10-δ in a KBr DAC.

a, Field dependences of electrical resistance at 57.3 GPa for sample S1. b, Field dependences of electrical resistance at 61.0 GPa for sample S2. c, Field dependences of electrical resistance at 69.0 GPa for sample S2. The green dashed lines depict the linear fit of the normal state resistances. d, The Ginzburg–Landau fittings of the upper critical fields at 57.3 (S1) and 69.0 GPa (S2). The magnetic fields are applied perpendicular to the ab plane.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 6 STEM-HAADF and integrated differential phase contrast (iDPC) measurements of La4Ni3O10-δ crystals.

a, The cleavage plane of a La4Ni3O10-δ single crystal. b, The STEM-HAADF image of a La4Ni3O10-δ crystal along the [110] direction on the scale of 5 nm. c, Atomic EDX mapping results and STEM-HAADF image in the same region. d, The STEM-HAADF image of La4Ni3O10-δ sample along the [110] direction on the scale of 2 nm. e, iDPC result in the same region and f, an enlarged view of the iDPC image. The oxygen atoms are clearly revealed through the iDPC imaging, aligning well with the crystal structure of La4Ni3O10-δ determined by neutron diffraction and XRD measurements.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Single-crystal refinements using neutron and X-ray diffraction data for La4Ni3O10-δ.

a, Combined single-crystal refinement results using neutron and X-ray diffraction data for La4Ni3O10-δ. The integrated intensities of Bragg reflections from a La4Ni3O10-δ single crystal, collected at room temperature and ambient pressure, are plotted against their calculated counterparts. Details of the refined parameters are provided in Supplementary Table 1. b, Single-crystal refinements of X-ray diffraction data. Integrated intensities of the Bragg reflections collected on a La4Ni3O10-δ single crystal at room temperature and 19.5 GPa are plotted against their calculated counterparts. The refinement parameters are summarized in Supplementary Table 2. The refinements suggest a structural phase transition from monoclinic P21/a to tetragonal I4/mmm in La4Ni3O10-δ under pressure.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Temperature-dependendent d.c. susceptibilities of sample 5 (S5) under various pressures.

a, Temperature dependent magnetization curves at 38.0 GPa under a magnetic field of 20 Oe applied perpendicular to the ab plane using the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) modes. The inset shows the photo of the crystal in the nitrogen mini-DAC. b, 40.0 GPa and 10 Oe. c, 42.0 GPa and 20 Oe. d, 50.0 GPa and 10 Oe. The black arrows indicate the superconducting transition temperatures. The broadening of the superconducting transition with increasing pressure could be attributed to the gradual deterioration of hydrostaticity in the nitrogen pressure-transmitting medium. This broadening is less pronounced in a smaller sample (S6), which contains more pressure-transmitting medium and, consequently, exhibits improved hydrostaticity (Fig. 3f–i).

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Temperature dependent superconducting volume fractions of La4Ni3O10-δ single crystals determined through d.c. susceptibility measurements in Fig. 3 (S6) and Extended Data Fig. 8 (S5).

Superconducting volume fractions for S6 under a, 40.0 GPa; b, 47.0 GPa; c, 50.0 GPa; d, 55.0 GPa. Superconducting volume fractions for S5 under e, 38.0 GPa; f, 40.0 GPa; g, 42.0 GPa; h, 50.0 GPa.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Temperature-dependendent magnetization curves of sample 7 (S7) under various pressures under a magnetic field applied perpendicular to the ab plane using the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) modes.

a, 2.0 GPa and10 Oe b, 2.0 GPa 20 Oe. Temperature dependent magnetization curves at 5.0 GPa under magnetic fields of c, 5.0 GPa and 20 Oe and d, 5.0 GPa and 50 Oe. e, 15.0 GPa and 5 Oe; f, 15.0 GPa and 20 Oe; g, 15.0 GPa and 50 Oe; h, 15.0 GPa and 100 Oe. i, 30.0 GPa and 5 Oe; j, 30.0 GPa and 20 Oe; k, 30.0 GPa and 50 Oe; l, 30.0 GPa and 100 Oe. m, 49.0 GPa and 5 Oe; n, 49.0 GPa and 10 Oe; o, 49.0 GPa and 20 Oe; p, 49.0 GPa and 100 Oe. The inset shows the photo of the crystal in the mini-DAC.

Source Data

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Y., Peng, D., Zhang, E. et al. Superconductivity in pressurized trilayer La4Ni3O10−δ single crystals. Nature 631, 531–536 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07553-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07553-3

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing