Abstract
The carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide electroreduction reactions, when powered using low-carbon electricity, offer pathways to the decarbonization of chemical manufacture1,2. Copper (Cu) is relied on today for carbon–carbon coupling, in which it produces mixtures of more than ten C2+ chemicals3,4,5,6: a long-standing challenge lies in achieving selectivity to a single principal C2+ product7,8,9. Acetate is one such C2 compound on the path to the large but fossil-derived acetic acid market. Here we pursued dispersing a low concentration of Cu atoms in a host metal to favour the stabilization of ketenes10—chemical intermediates that are bound in monodentate fashion to the electrocatalyst. We synthesize Cu-in-Ag dilute (about 1 atomic per cent of Cu) alloy materials that we find to be highly selective for acetate electrosynthesis from CO at high *CO coverage, implemented at 10 atm pressure. Operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy indicates in situ-generated Cu clusters consisting of <4 atoms as active sites. We report a 12:1 ratio, an order of magnitude increase compared to the best previous reports, in the selectivity for acetate relative to all other products observed from the carbon monoxide electroreduction reaction. Combining catalyst design and reactor engineering, we achieve a CO-to-acetate Faradaic efficiency of 91% and report a Faradaic efficiency of 85% with an 820-h operating time. High selectivity benefits energy efficiency and downstream separation across all carbon-based electrochemical transformations, highlighting the importance of maximizing the Faradaic efficiency towards a single C2+ product11.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Data availability
The datasets supporting the findings of this article are included in the article and its Supplementary Information.
References
Dinh, C. T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).
Li, C. W., Ciston, J. & Kanan, M. W. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature 508, 504–507 (2014).
Zhong, M. et al. Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 581, 178–183 (2020).
Lum, Y. & Ager, J. W. Evidence for product-specific active sites on oxide-derived Cu catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 2, 86–93 (2019).
Luc, W. et al. Two-dimensional copper nanosheets for electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide to acetate. Nat. Catal. 2, 423–430 (2019).
Wang, X. et al. Efficient upgrading of CO to C3 fuel using asymmetric C-C coupling active sites. Nat. Commun. 10, 5186 (2019).
Jhong, H. R. M., Ma, S. & Kenis, P. J. Electrochemical conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals: current status, remaining challenges, and future opportunities. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2, 191–199 (2013).
Birdja, Y. Y. et al. Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat. Energy 4, 732–745 (2019).
Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).
Jouny, M. et al. Formation of carbon–nitrogen bonds in carbon monoxide electrolysis. Nat. Chem. 11, 846–851 (2019).
Kibria, M. G. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction into chemical feedstocks: from mechanistic electrocatalysis models to system design. Adv. Mater. 31, 1807166 (2019).
Fernández, L. Production Capacity of Acetic Acid Worldwide in 2018 and 2023 (Statista, 2021); https://www.statista.com/statistics/1063215/acetic-acid-production-capacity-globally/#statisticContainer.
Le Berre, C., Serp, P., Kalck, P. & Torrence, G. P. in Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry (Ed. Ley, C.) 1−34 (Wiley-VCH, 2014).
Kiefer, D., Merkel, M., Lilge, L., Henkel, M. & Hausmann, R. From acetate to bio-based products: underexploited potential for industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 39, 397–411 (2021).
Bozzano, G. & Manenti, F. Efficient methanol synthesis: perspectives, technologies and optimization strategies. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 56, 71–105 (2016).
Dimian, A. C. & Kiss, A. A. Novel energy efficient process for acetic acid production by methanol carbonylation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 159, 1–12 (2020).
Kätelhön, A. et al. Methodology cm.chemicals. Version A (Carbon Minds, accessed 1 June 2021); www.carbon-minds.com/cm_chemicals_methodology_V1.00_2021.pdf.
Xia, C. et al. Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices. Nat. Energy 4, 776–785 (2019).
Ripatti, D. S., Veltman, T. R. & Kanan, M. W. Carbon monoxide gas diffusion electrolysis that produces concentrated C2 products with high single-pass conversion. Joule 3, 240–256 (2019).
Zhu, P. et al. Direct and continuous generation of pure acetic acid solutions via electrocatalytic carbon monoxide reduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2010868118 (2021).
Zang, D. et al. Interface engineering of Mo8/Cu heterostructures toward highly selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide into acetate. Appl. Catal. B 281, 119426 (2021).
Li, Y. et al. A novel fuel electrode enabling direct CO2 electrolysis with excellent and stable cell performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 20833–20842 (2017).
Hauch, A. et al. Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis. Science 370, eaba6118 (2020).
Ozden, A. et al. Cascade CO2 electroreduction enables efficient carbonate-free production of ethylene. Joule 5, 706–719 (2021).
Jouny, M., Hutchings, G. S. & Jiao, F. Carbon monoxide electroreduction as an emerging platform for carbon utilization. Nat. Catal. 2, 1062–1070 (2019).
Hori, Y., Murata, A. & Takahashi, R. Formation of hydrocarbons in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide at a copper electrode in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 85, 2309–2326 (1989).
Zhan, C. et al. Revealing the CO coverage-driven C-C coupling mechanism for electrochemical CO2 reduction on Cu2O nanocubes via operando Raman spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 11, 7694–7701 (2021).
Deshpande, S., Maxson, T. & Greeley, J. Graph theory approach to determine configurations of multidentate and high coverage adsorbates for heterogeneous catalysis. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 79 (2020).
Kim, D., Resasco, J., Yu, Y., Asiri, A. M. & Yang, P. Synergistic geometric and electronic effects for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide using gold-copper bimetallic nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 5, 4948 (2014).
Guo, H., Chen, Y., Ping, H., Wang, L. & Peng, D. L. One-pot synthesis of hexagonal and triangular nickel-copper alloy nanoplates and their magnetic and catalytic properties. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 8336–8344 (2012).
Li, J. et al. Copper adparticle enabled selective electrosynthesis of n-propanol. Nat. Commun. 9, 4614 (2018).
Zhang, X. et al. Molecular engineering of dispersed nickel phthalocyanines on carbon nanotubes for selective CO2 reduction. Nat. Energy 5, 684–692 (2020).
Karapinar, D. et al. Electroreduction of CO2 on single-site copper-nitrogen-doped carbon material: selective formation of ethanol and reversible restructuration of the metal sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 15098–15103 (2019).
Ma, M. et al. Local reaction environment for selective electroreduction of carbon monoxide. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 2470–2478 (2022).
Ma, S. et al. One-step electrosynthesis of ethylene and ethanol from CO2 in an alkaline electrolyzer. J. Power Sources 301, 219–228 (2016).
Ji, Y. et al. Selective CO-to-acetate electroreduction via intermediate adsorption tuning on ordered Cu–Pd sites. Nat. Catal. 5, 251–258 (2022).
Hjorth Larsen, A. et al. The atomic simulation environment - a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).
Montoya, J. H., Shi, C., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. Theoretical insights into a CO dimerization mechanism in CO2 electroreduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2032–2037 (2015).
Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metalamorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 1169–11186 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).
Wang, X. et al. Gold-in-copper at low *CO coverage enables efficient electromethanation of CO2. Nat. Commun. 12, 3387 (2021).
Wang, X. et al. Efficient methane electrosynthesis enabled by tuning local CO2 availability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 3525–3531 (2020).
Wang, X. et al. Efficient electrosynthesis of n-propanol from carbon monoxide using a Ag–Ru–Cu catalyst. Nat. Energy 7, 170–176 (2022).
Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964).
Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965).
Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Sorantin, P. & Trickey, S. B. Full-potential, linearized augmented plane wave programs for crystalline systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 59, 399–415 (1990).
Perdew, J. P. & Wang, Y. Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy. Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244–13249 (1992).
Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. Theoretical approaches to x-ray absorption fine structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654 (2000).
Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–541 (2005).
Freire, R. M. et al. Natural arrangement of AgCu bimetallic nanostructures through oleylamine reduction. Inorg. Chem. Front. 7, 4902–4912 (2020).
Li, F. et al. Molecular tuning of CO2-to-ethylene conversion. Nature 577, 509–513 (2020).
Zhang, B. et al. Manganese acting as a high-performance heterogeneous electrocatalyst in carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 10, 2980 (2019).
Ogihara, H., Maezuru, T., Ogishima, Y. & Yamanaka, I. Electrocatalytic activity of Co-4,4′dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridine supported on Ketjenblack for reduction of CO2 to CO using PEM reactor. Electrocatalysis 9, 220–225 (2018).
Acknowledgements
Y.P. acknowledges financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (grant number 2022YFC2106000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 11874164) and the Innovation Fund of Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics. J.J. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 52006085) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant numbers 2019TQ0104 and 2020M672343). L.M. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 52127816 and 51832004) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2020YFA0715000). J.L. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number BE3250011), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant number 2022YFA1505100) and Shanghai Jiao Tong University (grant number WH220432516). E.H.S. acknowledges financial support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery programme (grant number RGPIN-2017-06477) and the Ontario Research Fund (grant number ORF-RE08-034). J.W. acknowledges support from the NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship – Doctoral (PGS-D). Z.W. acknowledges financial support from the Marsden Fund Council for Government funding (grant number 21-UOA-237) and the Catalyst: Seeding General Grant (grant number 22-UOA-031-CGS), managed by the Royal Society Te Apārangi. C.W. acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 51972129 and 52272202). Figure 1a was created with BioRender.com. The DFT computations in Fig. 1 exploring reaction pathways were carried out on the Niagara supercomputer at the SciNet HPC Consortium. SciNet is funded by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, the Government of Ontario, the Ontario Research Fund Research Excellence Program and the University of Toronto. This work made use of the EPIC facility of Northwestern University’s NUANCE Center, which has received support from the SHyNE Resource (grant number NSF ECCS-2025633), the IIN and Northwestern’s MRSEC programme (grant number NSF DMR-1720139). Part of the research described in this paper was carried out at the Canadian Light Source, a national research facility of the University of Saskatchewan, which is supported by the Canada Foundation for Innovation, NSERC, the National Research Council, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Government of Saskatchewan and the University of Saskatchewan. We thank beamline BL14W1 (X-ray absorption fine structure) at SSRF for providing the beamtime, and also acknowledge the support of the Analytical and Testing Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology for X-ray diffraction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy, SEM and TEM measurements.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.P., E.H.S., D.S., Z.W. and L.M. supervised the project. J.J. designed the high-pressure electrocatalytic system and carried out electrochemical experiments. Q.M. completed catalyst synthesis and most of its characterization (TEM, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and inductively coupled plasma). J.W. carried out DFT calculations. J.L., P.P., J.W., Y.H., M.S., Q.X., J.M., Y.W., Y.X., Y.P. and Z.J. carried out XAS measurements, and J.L. analysed the XAS data. L.M., R.L., P.Q., Y.P., Z.C., W.Z. and K.Y. carried out Raman characterization, and J.W. analysed the Raman data. R.L. and Y.M. conducted vibrational frequency calculations. J.J., G.S. and Q.M. carried out membrane electrode assembly stability tests. Y.X. and A.O. contributed preliminary stability measurements. J.S. and X.J. carried out NMR measurements. Q.M., Y.L., D.W. and P.Q. carried out SEM measurements. X.H. and V.P.D. carried out the HAADF scanning TEM measurements. Y.-M.Y. and T.-K.S. completed the XANES fitting. J.W. conducted the techno-economic assessment. P.O., X.W., Z.W., C.W., B.Y.X. and D.S. contributed to data analysis. J.J., J.W., Q.M., J.L., Y.P. and E.H.S. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and assisted during manuscript preparation.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Feng Jiao, Yongge Wei and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains details regarding the techno-economic analysis, Supplementary Figs. 1–43, Tables 1–31, a Note (Adsorption of C2 intermediates on low Cu concentration surfaces) and References (see contents page for details).
Supplementary Data
DFT source data (corresponding to Supplementary Table 31).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, J., Wicks, J., Min, Q. et al. Constrained C2 adsorbate orientation enables CO-to-acetate electroreduction. Nature 617, 724–729 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05918-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05918-8
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
