Abstract
Depolymerization is a promising strategy for recycling waste plastic into constituent monomers for subsequent repolymerization1. However, many commodity plastics cannot be selectively depolymerized using conventional thermochemical approaches, as it is difficult to control the reaction progress and pathway. Although catalysts can improve the selectivity, they are susceptible to performance degradation2. Here we present a catalyst-free, far-from-equilibrium thermochemical depolymerization method that can generate monomers from commodity plastics (polypropylene (PP) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)) by means of pyrolysis. This selective depolymerization process is realized by two features: (1) a spatial temperature gradient and (2) a temporal heating profile. The spatial temperature gradient is achieved using a bilayer structure of porous carbon felt, in which the top electrically heated layer generates and conducts heat down to the underlying reactor layer and plastic. The resulting temperature gradient promotes continuous melting, wicking, vaporization and reaction of the plastic as it encounters the increasing temperature traversing the bilayer, enabling a high degree of depolymerization. Meanwhile, pulsing the electrical current through the top heater layer generates a temporal heating profile that features periodic high peak temperatures (for example, about 600 °C) to enable depolymerization, yet the transient heating duration (for example, 0.11 s) can suppress unwanted side reactions. Using this approach, we depolymerized PP and PET to their monomers with yields of about 36% and about 43%, respectively. Overall, this electrified spatiotemporal heating (STH) approach potentially offers a solution to the global plastic waste problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data supporting this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The code used in this study is available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Häußler, M., Eck, M., Rothauer, D. & Mecking, S. Closed-loop recycling of polyethylene-like materials. Nature 590, 423–427 (2021).
Sharuddin, S. D. A., Abnisa, F., Daud, W. M. A. W. & Aroua, M. K. A review on pyrolysis of plastic wastes. Energy Convers. Manag. 115, 308–326 (2016).
Jambeck, J. R. et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347, 768–771 (2015).
Falco, F. D., Cocca, M., Avella, M. & Thompson, R. C. Microfiber release to water, via laundering, and to air, via everyday use: a comparison between polyester clothing with differing textile parameters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 3288–3296 (2020).
Ragaert, K., Delva, L. & Geem, K. V. Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste. Waste Manage. 69, 24–58 (2017).
Korley, L. T. J., Epps, T. H., Helms, B. A. & Ryan, A. J. Toward polymer upcycling—adding value and tackling circularity. Science 373, 66–69 (2021).
Williams, E. A. & Williams, P. T. Analysis of products derived from the fast pyrolysis of plastic waste. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 40, 347–363 (1997).
Ellis, L. D. et al. Chemical and biological catalysis for plastics recycling and upcycling. Nat. Catal. 4, 539–556 (2021).
Liu, S., Kots, P. A., Vance, B. C., Danielson, A. & Vlachos, D. G. Plastic waste to fuels by hydrocracking at mild conditions. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8283 (2021).
Algozeeb, W. A. et al. Flash graphene from plastic waste. ACS Nano 14, 15595–15604 (2020).
Sun, H., Rosenthal, C. & Schmidt, L. D. Oxidative pyrolysis of polystyrene into styrene monomers in an autothermal fixed-bed catalytic reactor. ChemSusChem 5, 1883–1887 (2012).
Kaminsky, W. & Franck, J. Monomer recovery by pyrolysis of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 19, 311–318 (1991).
Zolghadr, A. et al. On the method of pulse-heated analysis of solid reactions (PHASR) for polyolefin pyrolysis. ChemSusChem 13, 4214–4227 (2021).
Demirbaş, A. Recovery of chemicals and gasoline-range fuels from plastic wastes via pyrolysis. Energy Sources 27, 1313–1319 (2005).
Lin, Y.-H. & Sharratt, P. N. Catalytic conversion of polyolefins to chemicals and fuels over various cracking catalysts. Energy Fuels 12, 767–774 (1998).
Scotp, D. S., Majerski, P., Piskorz, J., Radlein, D. & Barnickel, M. Production of liquid fuels from waste plastics. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 77, 1021–1027 (1999).
Lovás, P., Hudec, P., Jambor, B., Hájeková, E. & Horňáček, M. Catalytic cracking of heavy fractions from the pyrolysis of waste HDPE and PP. Fuel 203, 244–252 (2017).
Encinar, J. M. & González, J. F. Pyrolysis of synthetic polymers and plastic wastes. Kinetic study. Fuel Process. Technol. 89, 678–686 (2008).
Arandes, J. M., Ereña, J., Azkoiti, M. J., López-Valerio, D. & Bilbao, J. Valorization by thermal cracking over silica of polyolefins dissolved in LCO. Fuel Process. Technol. 85, 125–140 (2004).
Dimitrov, N., Krehula, L. K., Siročić, A., & Hrnjak-Murgić, Z. Analysis of recycled PET bottles products by pyrolysis-gas chromatography. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 98, 972–979 (2013).
Yoshioka, T., Grause, G., Eger, C., Kaminsky, W. & Okuwaki, A. Pyrolysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) in a fluidised bed plant. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 86, 499–504 (2004).
Jia, H., Ben, H., Luo, Y. & Wang, R. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of poly (ethylene terephthalate) (PET) with zeolite and nickel chloride. Polymers 12, 705 (2020).
Dong, Q. et al. Programmable heating and quenching for efficient thermochemical synthesis. Nature 605, 470–476 (2022).
Williams, P. T. & Williams, E. Recycling plastic waste by pyrolysis. J. Energy Inst. 71, 81–93 (1998).
Huang, J. B., Zeng, G. S., Li, X. S., Cheng, X. C. & Tong, H. Theoretical studies on bond dissociation enthalpies for model compounds of typical plastic polymers. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 167, 012029 (2018).
John, P. C. S., Guan, Y., Kim, Y., Kim, S. & Paton, R. S. Prediction of organic homolytic bond dissociation enthalpies at near chemical accuracy with sub-second computational cost. Nat. Commun. 11, 2328 (2020).
Marongiu, A., Faravelli, T. & Ranzi, E. Detailed kinetic modeling of the thermal degradation of vinyl polymers. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 78, 343–362 (2007).
Vollmer, I. et al. Beyond mechanical recycling: giving new life to plastic waste. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 59, 15402–15423 (2020).
van Duin, A. C. T., Dasgupta, S., Lorant, F. & Goddard, W. A. ReaxFF: a reactive force field for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9396–9409 (2001).
Chenoweth, K., van Duin, A. C. T. & Goddard, W. A. ReaxFF reactive force field for molecular dynamics simulations of hydrocarbon oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 1040–1053 (2008).
Chen, T. B. Y. et al. Characterisation of pyrolysis kinetics and detailed gas species formations of engineering polymers via reactive molecular dynamics (ReaxFF). J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 153, 104931 (2021).
Lele, A., Kwon, H., Ganeshan, K., Xuan, Y. & Duin, A. C. T. V. ReaxFF molecular dynamics study on pyrolysis of bicyclic compounds for aviation fuel. Fuel 297, 120724 (2021).
Gracida-Alvarez, U. R., Orcid, M. K. M., Sacramento-Rivero, J. C. & Shonnard, D. R. Effect of temperature and vapor residence time on the micropyrolysis products of waste high density polyethylene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 1912–1923 (2018).
Zhao, D., Wang, X., Miller, J. B. & Huber, G. W. The chemistry and kinetics of polyethylene pyrolysis: a process to produce fuels and chemicals. ChemSusChem 13, 1764–1774 (2020).
Montaudo, G., Puglisi, C. & Samperi, F. Primary thermal degradation mechanisms of PET and PBT. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 42, 13–28 (1993).
Shields, B. J. et al. Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590, 89–96 (2021).
Wismann, S. T. et al. Electrified methane reforming: a compact approach to greener industrial hydrogen production. Science 364, 756–759 (2019).
Zhao, X. et al. Hydrothermal treatment of e-waste plastics for tertiary recycling: product slate and decomposition mechanisms. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 1464–1473 (2019).
Lu, Q. et al. Influence of pyrolysis temperature and time on the cellulose fast pyrolysis products: analytical Py-GC/MS study. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 92, 430–438 (2011).
Aktulga, H. M., Fogarty, J. C., Pandit, S. A. & Grama, A. Y. Parallel reactive molecular dynamics: numerical methods and algorithmic techniques. Parallel Comput. 38, 245–259 (2012).
Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).
Kowalik, M. et al. Atomistic scale analysis of the carbonization process for C/H/O/N-based polymers with the ReaxFF reactive force field. J. Phys. Chem. B 123, 5357–5367 (2019).
Mao, Q., Rajabpour, S., Kowalik, M. & van Duin, A. C. T. Predicting cost-effective carbon fiber precursors: unraveling the functionalities of oxygen and nitrogen-containing groups during carbonization from ReaxFF simulations. Carbon 159, 25–36 (2020).
Rajabpour, S. et al. Low-temperature carbonization of polyacrylonitrile/graphene carbon fibers: a combined ReaxFF molecular dynamics and experimental study. Carbon 174, 345–356 (2021).
Zhang, L. et al. Converting PBO fibers into carbon fibers by ultrafast carbonization. Carbon 159, 432–442 (2020).
Johnston, H. S. & Parr, C. Activation energies from bond energies. I. Hydrogen transfer reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 2544–2551 (1963).
Senftle, T. P. et al. The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2, 15011 (2016).
Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).
Kwon, H. et al. ReaxFF-based molecular dynamics study of bio-derived polycyclic alkanes as potential alternative jet fuels. Fuel 279, 118548 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This work is not directly funded. L.H. acknowledges support from the University of Maryland A. James Clark School of Engineering. Y.J. acknowledges US Department of Energy (DOE) grant support for the Plasma Science Center (DOE DE-SC0020233) and DOE Basic Energy Sciences (BES) grant DE-SC0021135. S.C. and D.L. acknowledge support from the DOE Office of Fossil Energy (DE-FE0031877). J.M. acknowledges the Richard and Judith Wien Professorship for unrestricted support. The authors acknowledge the Maryland NanoCenter, the Surface Analysis Center and the AIM Lab.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.H. and Q.D. conceived the concept and designed the STH approach. L.H. and Q.D. designed the reactors, with input from S.C. and Y.L. Q.D., S.L., M.G., M.C., T.L. and A.Q. collected the experimental data. X.Z. conducted the temperature measurement, with help from Q.D. and S.L. A.D.L. and Y.J. conducted the molecular dynamics simulations. S.C. and D.L. analysed the gaseous products. Y.W. and X.P. analysed the liquid products. I.G.K. and J.M. helped with the data analysis and improved the manuscript. L.X. helped with the writing and figure design. L.H., Q.D. and A.H.B. collectively wrote the paper, with input from all authors. L.H. and Y.J. supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Q.D., S.C., D.L., Y.J. and L.H. report a PCT patent application of ‘High temperature, pulsed heating reactor and methods for polymer recycling’.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 The assembly of the STH system.
A thinner layer of carbon felt (about 2.3 mm) is used as the top heater layer. The two ends of the top heater layer are wrapped with Cu foil electrodes for Joule heating. The top and bottom layers are placed in soft contact (without external pressure) for the STH process. A quartz tube with 10.5 mm inner diameter was used to contain the carbon bilayer structure and the reactant reservoir. The bottom image shows the heater layer exhibiting a bright orange colour as we apply an electrical current through the top heater layer, demonstrating its Joule-heating capabilities.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Characterization of the wicked PP melt.
a, Schematic showing the position of the cross-sections cut from the reactor layer after STH operation for about 6 min (0.11 s power on at about 22 V, 0.99 s power off; small-scale reaction system). b–d, Representative optical microscopy images showing the wicking of PP in the reactor layer. The images correspond to the cross-sections shown in a. The white species are wicked plastic melt. The black objects are the cut pieces of the porous reactor layer with cross-sections facing out.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Temperature measurement using the customized quartz tube with a small opening.
a, Temperature maps of the heater and reactor layers at various time points during one heating cycle of 1.10 s (power on time: 0.11 s at about 22 V; power off time: 0.99 s), measured in the customized quartz tube with a small opening (about 7 × 14 mm) on the tube wall. The temperature scale is the same that as shown in Fig. 2g. This temperature measurement features better accuracy, as the bilayer structure is housed in a quartz tube setup similar to the real STH process but has lower spatial resolution because of the limited size of the opening on the quartz tube wall and background noise from the quartz tube for differentiating the position of the heater and reactor layers compared with the measurement using the environmental chamber. b, Comparing the temporal temperature profiles measured using the lab-built environmental chamber and the customized quartz tube at the position labelled in red as shown in Fig. 2c. c, Comparing the temporal temperature profiles measured using the lab-built environmental chamber and the customized quartz tube at the position labelled in pink as shown in Fig. 2c.
Extended Data Fig. 4 A typical gas chromatograph of the PP pyrolysis products by STH (0.11 s power on at about 22 V and 0.99 s power off).
Inset, the gas bag used to collect the reaction products in the gas phase, which is connected downstream in the STH system.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Reactive molecular dynamics simulations of PP pyrolysis at 1,527 °C.
a–d, A series of representative images of the simulated space, showing the transition from PP (0 ns; a) to a large number of C3H6 monomers (about 5.5 ns; b), and then to various aromatic species (about 28–100 ns; c and d) owing to dehydrogenation and aromatization under extended continuous heating. e, The counts of C3H6 and H2 molecules throughout the simulated reaction time frame. The number of C3H6 monomers reaches a peak concentration within a short period of time (about 5.5 ns), followed by a gradual drop owing to dehydrogenation, C–C bond coupling, aromatization etc., whereas the number of H2 molecules continues increasing as the reaction approaches chemical equilibrium.
Extended Data Fig. 6 The larger-scale STH system.
Schematic (a) and images (b) of the larger-scale STH system. A quartz tube with 34 mm inner diameter was used to contain the carbon bilayer structure and reactant reservoir. This system allowed us to react up to 1.0 g of PP material within 35 min in a batch reaction mode.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Temperature measurement during the PET depolymerization by STH.
a, Temperature maps of the heater and reactor layers at various time points during one heating cycle of 1.10 s (power on time: 0.11 s at about 26 V; power off time: 0.99 s). b, The temporal heating profiles of the four representative positions shown in Fig. 2c. The orange region indicates power on, whereas the blue region indicates power off.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Gas chromatograph by GC-MS of the liquid products from PET pyrolysis by means of STH using a heating duration of 0.11 s at about 26 V in a period of 1.10 s.
Inset, digital image showing the collected products (about 2 wt% in acetone) after three batches of the STH process with PET. A fraction of the products was collected downstream with the carrier gas. The rest of the products condensed in the quartz tube, which was rinsed off using acetone and combined with the downstream products.
Extended Data Fig. 9 A typical gas chromatograph by GC-FID of the gaseous products from the STH process with PET using a heating duration of 0.11 s at about 26 V in a period of 1.10 s.
Acetylene is observed as one of the gaseous products, which is consistent with the β-CH hydrogen-transfer mechanism35. Note that acetylene is prone to secondary reactions, therefore the measured content does not directly reflect the total amount of acetylene produced along with the formation of 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid.
Extended Data Fig. 10 A prototype design of a continuous STH process that involves melting, wicking, vaporization and reaction, along with pulsed electrical heating for recycling commodity plastics such as polyolefins and polyesters.
The recycling system integrates commercially available tools and materials, demonstrating the potential practicality of the STH approach.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Tables 1–4 and Supplementary Discussions 1 and 2.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dong, Q., Lele, A.D., Zhao, X. et al. Depolymerization of plastics by means of electrified spatiotemporal heating. Nature 616, 488–494 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05845-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05845-8
This article is cited by
-
Recycling polyolefin plastic waste at short contact times via rapid joule heating
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Distributed electrified heating for efficient hydrogen production
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Flash heating process for efficient meat preservation
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Continuous and low-carbon production of biomass flash graphene
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Depolymerizable and recyclable luminescent polymers with high light-emitting efficiencies
Nature Sustainability (2024)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
