Galaxies with stellar masses as high as roughly 1011 solar masses have been identified1,2,3 out to redshifts z of roughly 6, around 1 billion years after the Big Bang. It has been difficult to find massive galaxies at even earlier times, as the Balmer break region, which is needed for accurate mass estimates, is redshifted to wavelengths beyond 2.5 μm. Here we make use of the 1–5 μm coverage of the James Webb Space Telescope early release observations to search for intrinsically red galaxies in the first roughly 750 million years of cosmic history. In the survey area, we find six candidate massive galaxies (stellar mass more than 1010 solar masses) at 7.4 ≤ z ≤ 9.1, 500–700 Myr after the Big Bang, including one galaxy with a possible stellar mass of roughly 1011 solar masses. If verified with spectroscopy, the stellar mass density in massive galaxies would be much higher than anticipated from previous studies on the basis of rest-frame ultraviolet-selected samples.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Open Access 22 May 2023
Nature Astronomy Open Access 13 April 2023
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The HST data are available in the MAST (http://archive.stsci.edu), under program ID 1345. Photometry, EAZY template set, fiducial redshifts and stellar masses of the sources presented here are available at https://github.com/ivolabbe/red-massive-candidates.
Glazebrook, K. et al. A massive, quiescent galaxy at a redshift of 3.717. Nature 544, 71–74 (2017).
Riechers, D. A. et al. Rise of the Titans: gas excitation and feedback in a binary hyperluminous dusty starburst galaxy at z ~ 6. Astrophys. J. 907, 62 (2021).
Stefanon, M. et al. Galaxy stellar mass functions from z ~ 10 to z ~ 6 using the deepest Spitzer/infrared array camera data: no significant evolution in the stellar-to-halo mass ratio of galaxies in the first gigayear of cosmic time. Astrophys. J. 922, 29 (2021).
Brammer, G. & Matharu, J. gbrammer/grizli: Release 2021. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/record/7767790#.ZCRGM-zMJxY (2021).
Schaerer, D. & de Barros, S. The impact of nebular emission on the ages of z ≈ 6 galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 502, 423–426 (2009).
Shim, H. et al. z ~ 4 Hα emitters in the great observatories origins deep survey: tracing the dominant mode for growth of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 738, 69 (2011).
Labbé, I. et al. The spectral energy distributions of z ~ 8 galaxies from the IRAC ultra deep fields: emission lines, stellar masses, and specific star formation rates at 650 Myr. Astrophys. J. 777, L19 (2013).
Stark, D. P. et al. Keck spectroscopy of 3. Astrophys. J. 763, 129 (2013).
Smit, R. et al. Evidence for ubiquitous high-equivalent-width nebular emission in z ~ 7 galaxies: toward a clean measurement of the specific star-formation rate using a sample of bright, magnified galaxies. Astrophys. J. 784, 58 (2014).
Smit, R. et al. High-precision photometric redshifts from Spitzer/IRAC: extreme [3.6]–[4.5] colors identify galaxies in the redshift range z ~ 6.6–6.9. Astrophys. J. 801, 122 (2015).
Faisst, A. L. et al. A coherent study of emission lines from broadband photometry: specific star formation rates and [O III]/Hβ ratio at 3 < z < 6. Astrophys. J. 821, 122 (2016).
De Barros, S. et al. The GREATS Hβ + [O III] luminosity function and galaxy properties at z ~ 8: walking the way of JWST. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 2355–2366 (2019).
Naidu, R. P. et al. Two remarkably luminous galaxy candidates at z ≈ 10–12 revealed by JWST. Astrophys. J. 940, L14 (2022).
Endsley, R. et al. A JWST/NIRCam study of key contributors to reionization: the star-forming and ionizing properties of UV-faint z ~ 7–8 galaxies. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14999 (2022).
Stefanon, M. et al. Blue rest-frame UV-optical colors in z~8 galaxies from GREATS: very young stellar populations at 650 Myr of cosmic time. Astrophys. J. 927, 48 (2022).
Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G. & Coppi, P. EAZY: a fast, public photometric redshift code. Astrophys. J. 686, 1503–1513 (2008).
Leja, J., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., van Dokkum, P. G. & Byler, N. Deriving physical properties from broadband photometry with Prospector: description of the model and a demonstration of its accuracy using 129 galaxies in the local universe. Astrophys. J. 837, 170 (2017).
Smit, R. et al. Inferred Hα flux as a star formation rate indicator at z ~ 4–5: implications for dust properties, burstiness, and the z = 4–8 star formation rate functions. Astrophys. J. 833, 254 (2016).
Barro, G. et al. CANDELS: the progenitors of compact quiescent galaxies at z ~ 2. Astrophys. J. 765, 104 (2013).
Roberts-Borsani, G. et al. Interpreting the Spitzer/IRAC colours of 7 ≤ z ≤ 9 galaxies: distinguishing between line emission and starlight using ALMA. Astrophys. J. 497, 3440 (2020).
Laporte, N. et al. Probing cosmic dawn: ages and star formation histories of candidate z ≥ 9 galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 505, 3336–3346 (2021).
Topping, M. W. et al. The ALMA REBELS Survey: specific star formation rates in the reionization era. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 975–991 (2022).
Whitler, L. et al. Star formation histories of UV-luminous galaxies at z ≃ 6.8: implications for stellar mass assembly at early cosmic times. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, 5859–5881 (2023).
Hashimoto, T. et al. The onset of star formation 250 million years after the Big Bang. Nature 557, 392 (2018).
Roberts-Borsani, G. et al. Improving z ∼ 7–11 galaxy property estimates with JWST/NIRCam medium-band photometry. Astrophys. J. 910, 86 (2021).
Duncan, K. et al. The mass evolution of the first galaxies: stellar mass functions and star formation rates at 4 < z < 7 in the CANDELS GOODS-South field. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, 2960–2984 (2014).
Davidzon, I. et al. The COSMOS2015 galaxy stellar mass function: thirteen billion years of stellar mass assembly in ten snapshots. Astron. Astrophys. 605, A70 (2017).
Song, M. et al. The evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function at z = 4–8: a steepening low-mass-end slope with increasing redshift. Astrophys. J. 825, 5 (2016).
Roberts-Borsani, G. W. et al. z ≳ 7 Galaxies with red spitzer/IRAC [3.6]–[4.5] colors in the full CANDELS data set: the brightest-known galaxies at z ~ 7–9 and a probable spectroscopic confirmation at z = 7.48. Astrophys. J. 823, 143 (2016).
van Dokkum, P. G. et al. Dense cores in galaxies out to z = 2.5 in SDSS, UltraVISTA, and the five 3D-HST/CANDELS fields. Astrophys. J. 791, 45 (2014).
Boylan-Kolchin, M. Stress testing ΛCDM with high-redshift galaxy candidates. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.01611 (2022).
Menci, N. et al. High-redshift galaxies from early JWST observations: constraints on dark energy models. Astrophys. J. 938, L5 (2022).
Finkelstein S. et al. CEERS key paper I: an early look into the first 500 Myr of galaxy formation with JWST. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05792 (2022).
Astropy Collaboration. The Astropy Project: sustaining and growing a community-oriented open-source project and the latest major release (v5.0) of the core package. Astrophys. J. 935, 167 (2022).
Treu, T. et al. The initial mass function of early-type galaxies. Astrophys. J. 709, 1195 (2010).
Bradley, L. et al. astropy/photutils: 1.5.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6825092 (2022).
Boyer, M. L. et al. The JWST resolved stellar populations early release science program I.: NIRCam flux calibration. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.03348 (2022).
Nardiello D. et al. Photometry and astrometry with JWST–I. NIRCam point spread functions and the first JWST colour-magnitude diagrams of a globular cluster. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.06547 (2022).
Skelton, R. E. et al. 3D-HST WFC3-selected photometric catalogs in the five CANDELS/3D-HST fields: photometry, photometric redshifts, and stellar masses. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 214, 24 (2014).
Kriek, M. et al. The MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey: rest-frame optical spectroscopy for ~1500 H- selected galaxies at 1.37 < z < 3.8. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 218, 15 (2015).
Zitrin, A. et al. Lyman-α emission from a luminous z = 8.68 galaxy: implications for galaxies as tracers of cosmic reionization. Astrophys. J. 810, L12 (2015).
Salpeter, E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161 (1955).
Cappellari, M. et al. Systematic variation of the stellar initial mass function in early-type galaxies. Nature 544, 485–488 (2012).
Conroy, C. & van Dokkum, P. The stellar initial mass function in early-type galaxies from absorption line spectroscopy. II. Results. Astrophys. J. 760, 71 (2012).
van Dokkum, P. et al. The stellar initial mass function in early-type galaxies from absorption line spectroscopy. III. Radial gradients. Astrophys. J. 841, 68 (2017).
Schaerer, D. et al. First look with JWST spectroscopy: resemblance among z ∼ 8 galaxies and local analogs. Astron. Astrophys. 665, L4 (2022).
Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C. & Speagle, J. S. Stellar population inference with prospector. Astrophys. J.S. 254, 22 (2021).
Leja, J. et al. An older, more quiescent universe from panchromatic SED fitting of the 3D-HST survey. Astrophys. J. 877, 140 (2019).
Choi, J. et al. Mesa isochrones and stellar tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled models. Astrophys. J. 823, 102 (2016).
Dotter, A. MESA isochrones and stellar tracks (MIST) 0: methods for the construction of stellar isochrones. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 222, 8 (2016).
Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E. & White, M. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. I. The relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evolution and the initial mass function to the derived physical properties of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 699, 486 (2009).
Conroy, C. & Gunn, J. E. The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling. III. Model calibration, comparison, and evaluation. Astrophys. J. 712, 833 (2010).
Leja, J., Carnall, A. C., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C. & Speagle, J. S. How to measure galaxy star formation histories. II. Nonparametric models. Astrophys. J. 876, 3 (2019).
Byler, N., Dalcanton, J. J., Conroy, C. & Johnson, B. D. Nebular continuum and line emission in stellar population synthesis models. Astrophys. J. 840, 44 (2017).
Speagle, J. DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132–3158 (2020).
Leja, J. et al. A new census of the 0.2. Astrophys. J. 893, 111 (2020).
Wang, B. et al. Inferring more from less: Prospector as a photometric redshift engine in the era of JWST. Astrophys. J. 944, L58 (2023).
Bell, E. & de Jong, R. Stellar mass-to-light ratios and the Tully-Fisher relation. Astrophys. J. 550, 1 (2001).
Carnall, A. et al. Inferring the star formation histories of massive quiescent galaxies with BAGPIPES: evidence for multiple quenching mechanisms. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 4379–4401 (2018).
Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 1000–1028 (2003).
Feroz, F. et al. Importance nested sampling and the MultiNest algorithm. Open J. of Astrophys. 2, 10 (2019).
Salim, S., Boquien, M. & Lee, J. C. Dust attenuation curves in the local universe: demographics and new laws for star-forming galaxies and high-redshift analogs. Astrophys. J. 859, 11 (2018).
Chevallard, J. et al. Insights into the content and spatial distribution of dust from the integrated spectral properties of galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 432, 2061 (2013).
Steinhardt. C. L. et al. Templates for fitting photometry of ultra-high-redshift galaxies. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07879 (2022).
Trenti, M. & Stiavelli, M. Cosmic variance and its effect on the luminosity function determination in deep high-z surveys. Astrophys. J. 676, 767–780 (2008).
We are grateful to the CEERS team for providing these exquisite public JWST data so early in the mission. We thank M. Boylan-Kolchin for helpful discussions on the theoretical context of this work. Cloud-based data processing and file storage for this work is provided by the AWS Cloud Credits for Research program. The Cosmic DAWN Center is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation. K.W. wishes to acknowledge funding from Alfred P. Sloan Foundation grant no. FG-2019-12514. M.S. acknowledges project no. PID2019-109592GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion - Agencia Estatal de Investigacion.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature thanks James Dunlop and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
The offsets are estimated by the ratio of the observed fluxes to the EAZY best-fit model fluxes for 5,000–10,000 sources at 0.1 < z < 5 in the CEERS field. The offsets are calculated separately for each detector (1–4), module (A/B), and filter. Symbols are slightly spread out in wavelength for clarity. a. The first in-flight NIRCam flux calibration update of 29 July 2022 (jwst_0942.pmap) introduced significant offsets in NIRCam short-wavelength zeropoints. b. After adopting our fiducial zeropoints, residual offsets are ~<3% across all bands. This paper adopts a 5% minimum systematic error for all photometric redshift and stellar population fits.
The galaxies satisfy the color-color selection and have fiducial masses log(M*/M☉) < 10. The layout and panels of the figure are identical to Fig. 2 in the main text. Each cutout has a size of 2.4″ × 2.4″. The filters range from the 0.6 μm F606W filter of HST/ACS to the 4.4 μm F444W JWST/NIRCam filter.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Spectral energy distributions of all 13 galaxies that satisfy the color-color selection.
a.The layout of the figure is identical to Fig. 3a in the main text. In addition, an alternative model fit (model E, see Methods) is shown that produces low stellar masses (blue), but generally requires extremely young ages (<5 Myr) at specific narrow redshift intervals. b.The panel at the lower right shows the averaged rest-frame SED of the seven galaxies with fiducial log(M*/M☉) < 10, compared to previously-found galaxies at similar redshifts (see Fig. 3).
Masses (a), redshifts (b), and the chi-squared fit quality (c) of the 13 galaxies that satisfy the color-color selection. For each galaxy seven different measurements are shown, as well as the median of the seven that is adopt as the fiducial value (see Methods section). These medians are listed in Extended Data Table 2.
The line-dominated model is a 5 Myr old constant SFH with nebular emission lines. The continuum dominated model is a 50 Myr old CSF without emission lines. Two colors differences involving the line-sensitive F410M filter are shown: F356W-F410M (green) and F410M-F444W (red) and the sum of their absolute values. When Hα and Hβ+[OIII] move through the filters with redshift, the emission line sensitive medium-band F410M filter produces a strong signature, except at z = 5.6, 6.9, 7.7, where the lines transition between filters. Here continuum and line-dominated SEDs produce similar colors due to undersampling of the SED by the filters.
The P(z) were derived using Bagpipes (as described in Methods). Redshifts of a high mass solution are shown in red (model B: Salim dust attenuation law, rising SFH, linear age prior, continuum dominated) and a low mass solution are shown in blue (model E: SMC dust, logarithmic age prior, emission line dominated). Other high mass fits (e.g., Prospector, EAZY) and low mass fits produce similar P(z). Solid curves show expected selection function under the assumption of continuum (red) or line-dominated models (blue). The high-mass continuum-dominated P(z) broadly traces the expected selection functions. The low-mass line-dominated P(z) is not expected for selection of a line-dominated model. The P(z) is concentrated at narrow redshifts around z = 5.6, 6.9, 7.7 (black dotted lines) where the line-sensitive F410M cannot distinguish between continuum and strong lines due to aliasing.
About this article
Cite this article
Labbé, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E. et al. A population of red candidate massive galaxies ~600 Myr after the Big Bang. Nature 616, 266–269 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2
This article is cited by
Nature Astronomy (2023)
Nature Astronomy (2023)
Nature Astronomy (2023)