Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Origination of the modern-style diversity gradient 15 million years ago

Nature volume 614, pages 708–712 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) is a prevalent feature of modern ecosystems across diverse clades1,2,3,4. Recognized for well over a century, the causal mechanisms for LDGs remain disputed, in part because numerous putative drivers simultaneously covary with latitude1,3,5. The past provides the opportunity to disentangle LDG mechanisms because the relationships among biodiversity, latitude and possible causal factors have varied over time6,7,8,9. Here we quantify the emergence of the LDG in planktonic foraminifera at high spatiotemporal resolution over the past 40 million years, finding that a modern-style gradient arose only 15 million years ago. Spatial and temporal models suggest that LDGs for planktonic foraminifera may be controlled by the physical structure of the water column. Steepening of the latitudinal temperature gradient over 15 million years ago, associated with an increased vertical temperature gradient at low latitudes, may have enhanced niche partitioning and provided more opportunities for speciation at low latitudes. Supporting this hypothesis, we find that higher rates of low-latitude speciation steepened the diversity gradient, consistent with spatiotemporal patterns of depth partitioning by planktonic foraminifera. Extirpation of species from high latitudes also strengthened the LDG, but this effect tended to be weaker than speciation. Our results provide a step change in understanding the evolution of marine LDGs over long timescales.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The emergence of a modern-day LDG in planktonic foraminifera over the past 40 Myr.
Fig. 2: Spatial autoregressive model coefficients from analyses examining the relationship between richness and four environmental predictors within 2.5-Myr time bins.
Fig. 3: The dynamics of depth partitioning for planktonic foraminiferal assemblages across space and time.
Fig. 4: Macroevolutionary processes structuring LDGs over the past 40 Myr.

Data availability

All data to reproduce our analyses are provided in https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21355467. The spatiotemporal planktonic foraminiferal occurrence data were derived from Triton, an open-source database32.

Code availability

All code to reproduce the analyses is provided in https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21355467. Our custom code relied on the following R packages: HH R package v.3.1-47, spatialreg R package v.1.2-3, geosphere R package, vegan R package v.2.5-7 and mapast R package v.0.1.

References

  1. Fine, P. V. Ecological and evolutionary drivers of geographic variation in species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 369–392 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hillebrand, H. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 163, 192–211 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mittelbach, G. G. et al. Evolution and the latitudinal diversity gradient: speciation, extinction and biogeography. Ecol. Lett. 10, 315–331 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Willig, M. R., Kaufman, D. M. & Stevens, R. D. Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity: pattern, process, scale, and synthesis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 273–309 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pontarp, M. et al. The latitudinal diversity gradient: novel understanding through mechanistic eco-evolutionary models. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 211–223 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crame, J. A. Taxonomic diversity gradients through geological time. Divers Distrib. 7, 175–189 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mannion, P. D., Upchurch, P., Benson, R. B. J. & Goswami, A. The latitudinal biodiversity gradient through deep time. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 42–50 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell, M. G. Latitudinal diversity gradients for brachiopod genera during late Palaeozoic time: links between climate, biogeography and evolutionary rates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 519–528 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Powell, M. G., Beresford, V. P. & Colaianne, B. A. The latitudinal position of peak marine diversity in living and fossil biotas. J. Biogeogr. 39, 1687–1694 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hillebrand, H. Strength, slope and variability of marine latitudinal gradients. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 273, 251–267 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beaugrand, G., Rombouts, I. & Kirby, R. R. Towards an understanding of the pattern of biodiversity in the oceans. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 440–449 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tittensor, D. P. et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pianka, E. R. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. Am. Nat. 100, 33–46 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saupe, E. E. et al. Spatio-temporal climate change contributes to latitudinal diversity gradients. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1419–1429 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stehli, F. G., Douglas, R. G. & Newell, N. D. Generation and maintenance of gradients in taxonomic diversity. Science 164, 947–949 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rutherford, S., D’Hondt, S. & Prell, W. Environmental controls on the geographic distribution of zooplankton diversity. Nature 4000, 749–752 (1999).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Klopfer, P. H. Environmental determinants of faunal diversity. Am. Nat. 93, 337–342 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haffer, J. & Prance, G. T. Climatic forcing of evolution in Amazonia during the Cenozoic: on the refuge theory of biotic differentiation. Amazoniana 16, 579–607 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dynesius, M. & Jansson, R. Evolutionary consequences of changes in species’ geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9115–9120 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Dobzhansky, T. Evolution in the tropics. Am. Sci. 38, 209–221 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Williams, C. B. Patterns in the Balance of Nature (Academic Press, 1964).

  22. Paine, R. T. Food web complexity and species diversity. Am. Nat. 100, 65–75 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schemske, D. W., Mittelbach, G. G., Cornell, H. V., Sobel, J. M. & Roy, K. Is there a latitudinal gradient in the importance of biotic interactions? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 245–269 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Currie, D. J. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal and plant species richness. Am. Nat. 137, 27–49 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Connell, J. H. & Orias, E. The ecological regulation of species diversity. Am. Nat. 98, 399–414 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenzweig, M. L. Species Diversity in Space and Time (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

  27. Fenton, I. S. et al. The impact of Cenozoic cooling on assemblage diversity in planktonic foraminifera. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150224 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yasuhara, M. et al. Past and future decline of tropical pelagic biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 12891–12896 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yasuhara, M., Hunt, G., Dowsett, H. J., Robinson, M. M. & Stoll, D. K. Latitudinal species diversity gradient of marine zooplankton for the last three million years. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1174–1179 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jablonski, D., Roy, K. & Valentine, J. W. Out of the tropics: evolutionary dynamics of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Science 314, 102–106 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yasuhara, M., Tittensor, D. P., Hillebrand, H. & Worm, B. Combining marine macroecology and palaeoecology in understanding biodiversity: microfossils as a model. Biol. Rev. 92, 199–215 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fenton, I. S. et al. Triton, a new species-level database of Cenozoic planktonic foraminiferal occurrences. Sci. Data 8, 160 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yasuhara, M. & Deutsch, C. A. Paleobiology provides glimpses of future ocean. Science 375, 25–26 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yasuhara, M. et al. Time machine biology cross-timescale integration of ecology, evolution, and oceanography. Oceanography 33, 16–28 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Westerhold, T. et al. An astronomically dated record of Earth’s climate and its predictability over the last 66 million years. Science 369, 1383–1387 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Al-Sabouni, N., Kucera, M. & Schmidt, D. N. Vertical niche separation control of diversity and size disparity in planktonic foraminifera. Mar. Micropaleontol. 63, 75–90 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lowery, C. M., Bown, P. R., Fraass, A. J. & Hull, P. M. Ecological response of plankton to environmental change: thresholds for extinction. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 48, 403–429 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lear, C. H., Elderfield, H. & Wilson, P. A. Cenozoic deep-sea temperatures and global ice volumes from Mg/Ca in benthic foraminiferal calcite. Science 287, 269–272 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Weiner, A., Aurahs, R., Kurasawa, A., Kitazato, H. & Kučera, M. Vertical niche partitioning between cryptic sibling species of a cosmopolitan marine planktonic protist. Mol. Ecol. 21, 4063–4073 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schneider, E. & Kennett, J. P. Segregation and speciation in the Neogene planktonic foraminiferal clade Globoconella. Paleobiology 25, 383–395 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Raja, N. B. & Kiessling, W. Out of the extratropics: the evolution of the latitudinal diversity gradient of Cenozoic marine plankton. Proc. Biol. Sci. 288, 20210545 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Allen, A. P. & Gillooly, J. F. Assessing latitudinal gradients in speciation rates and biodiversity at the global scale. Ecol. Lett. 9, 947–954 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Irigoien, X., Huisman, J. & Harris, R. P. Global biodiversity patterns of marine phytoplankton and zooplankton. Nature 429, 863–886 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Schiebel, R. & Hemleben, C. Planktic Foraminifers in the Modern Ocean (Springer-Verlag, 2017).

  45. Ruddimann, W. F. Recent planktonic foraminifera: dominance and diversity in North Atlantic surface sediments. Science 164, 1164–1167 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Bé, A. W. H. & Tolderlund, D. S. in Micropaleontology of Marine Bottom Sediments (eds Funnell, B. M. & Riedel, W. K.) 105–149 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1971).

  47. Sibert, E., Norris, R., Cuevas, J. & Graves, L. Eighty-five million years of Pacific Ocean gyre ecosystem structure: long-term stability marked by punctuated change. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283, 20160189 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chaudhary, C., Richardson, A. J., Schoeman, D. S. & Costello, M. J. Global warming is causing a more pronounced dip in marine species richness around the equator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015094118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Worm, B. & Tittensor, D. P. A Theory of Global Biodiversity (Princeton Univ. Press, 2018).

  50. Boscolo-Galazzo, F. et al. Temperature controls carbon cycling and biological evolution in the ocean twilight zone. Science 371, 1148–1152 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Boscolo-Galazzo, F. et al. Late Neogene evolution of modern deep-dwelling plankton. Biogeosciences 19, 743–762 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Aze, T. et al. A phylogeny of Cenozoic macroperforate planktonic foraminifera from fossil data. Biol. Rev. 86, 900–927 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Matthews, K. J. et al. Global plate boundary evolution and kinematics since the late Paleozoic. Glob. Planet. Change 146, 226–250 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Gyldenfeldt, A.-B. V., Carstens, J. & Meincke, J. Estimation of the catchment area of a sediment trap by means of current meters and foraminiferal tests. Deep Sea Res. Part II 47, 1701–1717 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Qiu, Z., Doglioli, A. M. & Carlotti, F. Using a Lagrangian model to estimate source regions of particles in sediment traps. Sci. China Earth Sci. 57, 2447–2456 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Siegel, D. A. & Deuser, W. G. Trajectories of sinking particles in the Sargasso Sea: modeling of statistical funnels above deep-ocean sediment traps. Deep Sea Res. Part I 44, 1519–1541 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Waniek, J., Koeve, W. & Prien, R. D. Trajectories of sinking particles and the catchment areas above sediment traps in the Northeast Atlantic. J. Mar. Res. 58, 983–1006 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing http://www.R-project.org (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).

  59. Alroy, J. The fossil record of North American mammals: evidence for a Paleocene evolutionary radiation. Syst. Biol. 48, 107–118 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Marcot, J. D. The fossil record and macroevolutionary history of North American ungulate mammals: standardizing variation in intensity and geography of sampling. Paleobiology 40, 238–255 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gaston, K. J., Williams, P. H., Eggleton, P. & Humphries, C. J. Large scale patterns of biodiversity: spatial variation in family richness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 149–154 (1995).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. Valdes, P. J. et al. The BRIDGE HadCM3 family of climate models: HadCM3@Bristol v1.0. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 3715–3743 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Cox, P. M. et al. The impact of new land surface physics on the GCM simulation of climate and climate sensitivity. Clim. Dyn. 15, 183–203 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Sagoo, N., Valdes, P., Flecker, R. & Gregoire, L. J. The Early Eocene equable climate problem: can perturbations of climate model parameters identify possible solutions? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20130123 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kiehl, J. T. & Shields, C. A. Sensitivity of the Palaeocene–Eocene thermal maximum climate to cloud properties. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371, 20130093 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cox, M. D. A Primitive Equation, 3-Dimensional Model of the Ocean. GFDL Ocean Group Technical Report No. 1 (GFDL Princeton Univ., 1984).

  67. Collins, M., Tett, S. F. B. & Cooper, C. The internal climate variability of HadCM3, a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Clim. Dyn. 17, 61–81 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Farnsworth, A. et al. Climate sensitivity on geological timescales controlled by nonlinear feedbacks and ocean circulation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 9880–9889 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Valdes, P. J., Scotese, C. R. & Lunt, D. J. Deep ocean temperatures through time. Clim. Past 17, 1483–1506 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Farnsworth, A. et al. Past East Asian monsoon evolution controlled by paleogeography, not CO2. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax1697 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Jones, L. A., Mannion, P. D., Farnsworth, A., Bragg, F. & Lunt, D. J. Climatic and tectonic drivers shaped the tropical distribution of coral reefs. Nat. Commun. 13, 3120 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Scotese, C. R. & Wright, N. PALEOMAP paleodigital elevation models (PaleoDEMS) for the Phanerozoic. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5460860 (2018).

  73. Foster, G. L., Royer, D. L. & Lunt, D. J. Future climate forcing potentially without precedent in the last 420 million years. Nat. Commun. 8, 14845 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Gough, D. O. Solar interior structure and luminosity variations. Sol. Phys. 74, 21–34 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Farnsworth, A. et al. Paleoclimate model-derived thermal lapse rates: towards increasing precision in paleoaltimetry studies. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 564, 116903 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Bahcall, J. N., Pinsonneault, M. H. & Basu, S. Solar models: current epoch and time dependences, neutrinos, and helioseismological properties. Astrophys. J. 555, 990–1012 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Hawkins, E. & Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 90, 1095–1108 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kraus, E. B. & Turner, J. S. A one-dimensional model of the seasonal thermocline II. The general theory and its consequences. Tellus 19, 98–105 (1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Foreman, S. J. The Ocean Model Report. Unified Model Documentaiton Paper Number 40 (The Met Office, 2005).

  80. HH: Statistical Analysis and Data Display: Heiberger and Holland. R package version 3.1-47 (2022).

  81. Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Bivand, R., Millo, G. & Piras, G. A review of software for spatial econometrics in R. Mathematics 9, 1276 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. 57, 289–300 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  84. Cooper, N. & Purvis, A. Body size evolution in mammals: complexity in tempo and mode. Am. Nat. 175, 727–738 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. geosphere: Spherical Trigonometry. R package version 1.5-14 (2021).

  86. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7 (2020).

  87. Wade, B. S., Pearson, P. N., Berggren, W. A. & Pälike, H. Review and revision of Cenozoic tropical planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and calibration to the geomagnetic polarity and astronomical time scale. Earth Sci. Rev. 104, 111–142 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Woodhouse, G. Antell, P. Hull, H. Johnson, H. Bouman and W. Kiessling for informative discussions; we are grateful to Triton and Neptune database contributors, from which Triton heavily draws. E.E.S. was supported by Leverhulme Trust grant RPG-201170, the Leverhulme Prize and the Natural Environment Research Council grant NE/V011405/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

    Isabel S. Fenton & Erin E. Saupe

  2. School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Tracy Aze

  3. School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Alexander Farnsworth & Paul Valdes

  4. State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Alexander Farnsworth

Authors
  1. Isabel S. Fenton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tracy Aze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander Farnsworth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Paul Valdes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Erin E. Saupe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

E.E.S. conceptualized the study. E.E.S. and I.S.F. devised the methodology. I.S.F., E.E.S., A.F. and P.V. conducted the investigation. T.A., I.S.F. and E.E.S. performed visualization. E.E.S. acquired funding. E.E.S. conducted project administration. E.E.S. supervised the study. E.E.S. wrote the original draft of the manuscript. E.E.S., I.S.F., T.A., A.F. and P.V. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin E. Saupe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Moriaki Yasuhara and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figs. 1–44 and Supplementary Tables 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fenton, I.S., Aze, T., Farnsworth, A. et al. Origination of the modern-style diversity gradient 15 million years ago. Nature 614, 708–712 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05712-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05712-6

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing