Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A high-mass X-ray binary descended from an ultra-stripped supernova


Ultra-stripped supernovae are different from other terminal explosions of massive stars, as they show little or no ejecta from the actual supernova event1,2. They are thought to occur in massive binary systems after the exploding star has lost its surface through interactions with its companion2. Such supernovae produce little to no kick, leading to the formation of a neutron star without loss of the binary companion, which itself may also evolve into another neutron star2. Here we show that a recently discovered high-mass X-ray binary, CPD −29 2176 (CD −29 5159; SGR 0755-2933)3,4,5,6, has an evolutionary history that shows the neutron star component formed during an ultra-stripped supernova. The binary has orbital elements that are similar both in period and in eccentricity to 1 of 14 Be X-ray binaries that have known orbital periods and eccentricities7. The identification of the progenitors systems for ultra-stripped supernovae is necessary as their evolution pathways lead to the formation of binary neutron star systems. Binary neutron stars, such as the system that produced the kilonova GW170817 that was observed with both electromagnetic and gravitational energy8, are known to produce a large quantity of heavy elements9,10.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Orbital properties of CPD −29 2176.
Fig. 2: The evolution of the binary system.

Data availability

The reduced spectroscopic data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. The raw data are available from the NOIR Lab archive. BPASS results and stellar models are available from

Code availability

The data analysis code used in this analysis is all open-source software. BPASS results and stellar models are available from


  1. De, K. et al. A hot and fast ultra-stripped supernova that likely formed a compact neutron star binary. Science 362, 201 (2018).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tauris, T. M., Langer, N. & Podsiadlowski, P. Ultra-stripped supernovae: progenitors and fate. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 2123 (2015).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barthelmy, S. D. et al. Swift detection of a likely new SGR: SGR 0755-2933. The Astronomer’s Telegram 8831, 1 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Archibald, R. F. et al. Swift XRT observations of SGR J0755-2933. The Astronomer’s Telegram 8868, 1 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Surnis, M. P. et al. Upper limits on the pulsed radio emission from SGR candidate SGR 0755-2933. The Astronomer’s Telegram 8943, 1 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doroshenko, V., Santangelo, A., Tsygankov, S. S. & Ji, L. SGR 0755-2933: a new high-mass X-ray binary with the wrong name. Astron. Astrophys. 647, 165 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reig, P. Be/X-ray binaries. Astrophys. Space Sci. 332, 1 (2011).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbott, B. P. et al. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L12 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chornock, R. et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. IV. Detection of near-infrared signatures of r-process nucleosynthesis with Gemini-South. Astrophys. J. Lett. 848, L19 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Watson, D. et al. Identification of strontium in the merger of two neutron stars. Nature 574, 497 (2019).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernie, J. D., Hiltner, W. A. & Kraft, R. P. Association II PUP and the classical Cepheid AQ Pup. Astron. J. 71, 999 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reed, B. C. & Fitzgerald, M. P. A photoelectric UBV catalogue of 610 stars in Puppis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 205, 241 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vijapurkar, J. & Drilling, J. S. MK spectral types for OB + stars in the southern Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Supp. Ser. 89, 293 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reed, B. C. Catalog of galactic OB stars. Astron. J 125, 2531 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lucy, L. B. Spectroscopic binaries with elliptical orbits. Astron. Astrophys. 439, 663 (2005).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eldridge J. J. & Tout C. A. The Structure and Evolution of Stars (World Scientific, 2019).

  17. Chevalier, C. & Ilovaisky, S. A. HIPPARCOS results on massive X-ray binaries. Astron. Astrophys. 330, 201 (1998).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Eldridge, J. J. et al. Binary population and spectral synthesis version 2.1: construction, observational verification, and new results. Pub. Astron. Soc. Aus. 34, 58 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stanway, E. R. & Eldridge, J. J. Re-evaluating old stellar populations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479, 75 (2018).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Woosley, S. E. & Heger, A. The remarkable deaths of 9-11 solar mass stars. Astrophys. J. 810, 34 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Podsiadlowski, P. H. et al. The effects of binary evolution on the dynamics of core collapse and neutron star kicks. Astrophys. J. 612, 1044 (2004).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shenar, T. et al. An X-ray quiet black hole born with a negligible kick in a massive binary within the Large Magellanic Cloud. Nat. Astron. 6, 1085 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Allan, A. P. et al. The possible disappearance of a massive star in the low-metallicity galaxy PHL 293B”. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 496, 1902 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Garmire, G. P. et al. X-ray and gamma-ray telescopes and instruments for astronomy. Proc. SPIE 4851, 28 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia data release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys. 616, 1 (2018). 1804.09365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. et al. Estimating distance from parallaxes. IV. Distances to 1.33 billion stars in Gaia data release 2. Astron. J. 156, 58 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rivinius, T. H. et al. Classical Be stars. Rapidly rotating B stars with viscous Keplerian decretion disks. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 21, 69 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Watson, C. L. et al. The international variable star index (VSX). In Proc. 25th Annual Conference of the Society for Astronomical Sciences, Vol. 25 (eds Warner B. D. et al.) 47–56 (Society for Astronomical Sciences, 2006).

  29. Samus’, N. N. et al. General catalogue of variable stars: version GCVS 5.1. Astron. Rep. 61, 80 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tokovinin, A. et al. CHIRON—a fiber fed spectrometer for precise radial velocities. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 125, 1336 (2013). 1309.3971.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Parades, L. et al. The solar neighborhood XLVIII: nine giant planets orbiting nearby K dwarfs, and the CHIRON spectrograph’s radial velocity performance. Astron. J. 162, 176 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lenz, P. & Breger, M. Period04 user guide. Commun. Asteroseismol. 146, 53 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pablo, H. et al. The most massive heartbeat: an in-depth analysis of Orionis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 2494 (2017).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prša, A. et al. Physics of eclipsing binaries. II. Toward the increased model fidelity. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 227, 29 (2016). 1609.08135.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Barton, C. & Milson, N. BinaryStarSolver: orbital elements of binary stars solver. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2012.004 (; 2020).

  36. Bailer-Jones, C. A. L. et al. Estimating distances from parallaxes. V. Geometric and photogeometric distances to 1.47 billion stars in gaia early data release 3. Astron. J. 161, 147 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Berger, D. H. & Gies, D. R. A search for high-velocity Be stars. Astrophys. J. 555, 364 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Boubert, D. & Evans, N. W. galpy: a python library for galactic dynamics. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 216, 29 (2015).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bovy, J. On the kinematics of a runaway Be star population. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 5261 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


C.P. acknowledges support from the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’s Undergraduate Research Institute and the Arizona Space Grant. This research was partially supported through the Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’s Faculty Innovative Research in Science and Technology (FIRST) Program. The spectroscopy from CTIO was collected through the NOIR Lab program nos. 2018B-0137 and 2020A-0054. This research has used data from the CTIO/SMARTS 1.5m telescope, which is operated as part of the SMARTS Consortium by RECONS ( members T. Henry, H. James, W.-C. Jao and L. Paredes. At the telescope, observations were carried out by R. Aviles and R. Hinojosa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



The project was started and the spectroscopy was proposed by H.P., N.D.R. and A.-N.C. J.H. and G.Y. confirmed the astrometry of the neutron star with Swift and Chandra observations, showing it to be coincident with the Be star. C.P. reduced and analysed the spectroscopic data with guidance from N.D.R. The Galactic kinematics were done by P.W. and D.R.G. J.J.E. modelled the binary evolution of the system. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noel D. Richardson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks John Antoniadis and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 A typical spectrum of CPD −29 2176 around the He II λ 4686 absorption line.

Gaussian fits to the line were performed with the fitted minimum position representing our derived radial velocity for use in the orbital fits.

Extended Data Fig. 2 The Fourier spectrum of the radial velocities shown in Extended Data Table 1.

The peak at 0.016 d−1 is our derived period for the system, and the noise level in the Fourier spectrum is denoted with a horizontal dashed line at that frequency, showing a 3 σ significance for this peak.

Extended Data Table 1 Measured Radial Velocities of He II 4686 absorption line

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richardson, N.D., Pavao, C.M., Eldridge, J.J. et al. A high-mass X-ray binary descended from an ultra-stripped supernova. Nature 614, 45–47 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing