Abstract
Efficient and accurate termination is required for gene transcription in all living organisms1,2. Cellular RNA polymerases in both bacteria and eukaryotes can terminate their transcription through a factor-independent termination pathway3,4—called intrinsic termination transcription in bacteria—in which RNA polymerase recognizes terminator sequences, stops nucleotide addition and releases nascent RNA spontaneously. Here we report a set of single-particle cryo-electron microscopy structures of Escherichia coli transcription intrinsic termination complexes representing key intermediate states of the event. The structures show how RNA polymerase pauses at terminator sequences, how the terminator RNA hairpin folds inside RNA polymerase, and how RNA polymerase rewinds the transcription bubble to release RNA and then DNA. These macromolecular snapshots define a structural mechanism for bacterial intrinsic termination and a pathway for RNA release and DNA collapse that is relevant for factor-independent termination by all RNA polymerases.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Data availability
The cryo-EM map and coordinates have deposited in Protein Data Bank with accession numbers 7YP9 (TTC pause), 7YPA (TTC hairpin) and 7YPB (TTC release) and in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under accession numbers EMD-33996 (TTC pause), EMD-33997 (TTC hairpin) and EMD-33998 (TTC release). Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Ray-Soni, A., Bellecourt, M. J. & Landick, R. Mechanisms of bacterial transcription termination: all good things must end. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 85, 319–347 (2016).
Proudfoot, N. J. Transcriptional termination in mammals: stopping the RNA polymerase II juggernaut. Science 352, aad9926 (2016).
Arimbasseri, A. G. & Maraia, R. J. Mechanism of transcription termination by rna polymerase III utilizes a non-template strand sequence-specific signal element. Mol. Cell 58, 1124–1132 (2015).
Yarnell, W. S. & Roberts, J. W. Mechanism of intrinsic transcription termination and antitermination. Science 284, 611–615 (1999).
Vannini, A. & Cramer, P. Conservation between the RNA polymerase I, II, and III transcription initiation machineries. Mol. Cell 45, 439–446 (2012).
Porrua, O. & Libri, D. Transcription termination and the control of the transcriptome: why, where and how to stop. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 190–202 (2015).
Roberts, J. W. Mechanisms of bacterial transcription termination. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 4030–4039 (2019).
Nielsen, S., Yuzenkova, Y. & Zenkin, N. Mechanism of eukaryotic RNA polymerase III transcription termination. Science 340, 1577–1580 (2013).
Mairhofer, J., Wittwer, A., Cserjan-Puschmann, M. & Striedner, G. Preventing T7 RNA polymerase read-through transcription-A synthetic termination signal capable of improving bioprocess stability. ACS Synth. Biol. 4, 265–273 (2015).
Peters, J. M., Vangeloff, A. D. & Landick, R. Bacterial transcription terminators: the RNA 3′-end chronicles. J. Mol. Biol. 412, 793–813 (2011).
Chen, Y. J. et al. Characterization of 582 natural and synthetic terminators and quantification of their design constraints. Nat. Methods 10, 659–664 (2013).
Gusarov, I. & Nudler, E. The mechanism of intrinsic transcription termination. Mol. Cell 3, 495–504 (1999).
Kang, J. Y. et al. RNA polymerase accommodates a pause RNAhairpin by global conformational rearrangements that prolong pausing. Mol. Cell 69, 802–815.e801 (2018).
Guo, X. et al. Structural basis for NusA stabilized transcriptional pausing. Mol. Cell 69, 816–827.e814 (2018).
Vos, S. M., Farnung, L., Urlaub, H. & Cramer, P. Structure of paused transcription complex Pol II–DSIF–NELF. Nature 560, 601–606 (2018).
Kang, J. Y. et al. Structural basis of transcription arrest by coliphage HK022 Nun in an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase elongation complex. eLife 6, e25478 (2017).
Vvedenskaya, I. O. et al. Interactions between RNA polymerase and the "core recognition element" counteract pausing. Science 344, 1285–1289 (2014).
Larson, M. H. et al. A pause sequence enriched at translation start sites drives transcription dynamics in vivo. Science 344, 1042–1047 (2014).
Zhu, C. et al. Transcription factors modulate RNA polymerase conformational equilibrium. Nat. Commun. 13, 1546 (2022).
Yang, Y. et al. Structural visualization of transcription activated by a multidrug-sensing MerR family regulator. Nat. Commun. 12, 2702 (2021).
Lubkowska, L., Maharjan, A. S. & Komissarova, N. RNA folding in transcription elongation complex: implication for transcription termination. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 31576–31585 (2011).
King, R. A., Markov, D., Sen, R., Severinov, K. & Weisberg, R. A. A conserved zinc binding domain in the largest subunit of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase modulates intrinsic transcription termination and antitermination but does not stabilize the elongation complex. J. Mol. Biol. 342, 1143–1154 (2004).
Toulokhonov, I. & Landick, R. The flap domain is required for pause RNA hairpin inhibition of catalysis by RNA polymerase and can modulate intrinsic termination. Mol. Cell 12, 1125–1136 (2003).
Ray-Soni, A., Mooney, R. A. & Landick, R. Trigger loop dynamics can explain stimulation of intrinsic termination by bacterial RNA polymerase without terminator hairpin contact. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E9233–E9242 (2017).
Komissarova, N., Becker, J., Solter, S., Kireeva, M. & Kashlev, M. Shortening of RNA:DNA hybrid in the elongation complex of RNA polymerase is a prerequisite for transcription termination. Mol. Cell 10, 1151–1162 (2002).
Larson, M. H., Greenleaf, W. J., Landick, R. & Block, S. M. Applied force reveals mechanistic and energetic details of transcription termination. Cell 132, 971–982 (2008).
Santangelo, T. J. & Roberts, J. W. Forward translocation is the natural pathway of RNA release at an intrinsic terminator. Mol. Cell 14, 117–126 (2004).
Epshtein, V., Cardinale, C. J., Ruckenstein, A. E., Borukhov, S. & Nudler, E. An allosteric path to transcription termination. Mol. Cell 28, 991–1001 (2007).
Kashlev, M. & Komissarova, N. Transcription termination: primary intermediates and secondary adducts. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 14501–14508 (2002).
Bellecourt, M. J., Ray-Soni, A., Harwig, A., Mooney, R. A. & Landick, R. RNA polymerase clamp movement aids dissociation from DNA but is not required for RNA release at intrinsic terminators. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 696–713 (2019).
Park, J. S. & Roberts, J. W. Role of DNA bubble rewinding in enzymatic transcription termination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4870–4875 (2006).
Ryder, A. M. & Roberts, J. W. Role of the non-template strand of the elongation bubble in intrinsic transcription termination. J. Mol. Biol. 334, 205–213 (2003).
Shankar, S., Hatoum, A. & Roberts, J. W. A transcription antiterminator constructs a NusA-dependent shield to the emerging transcript. Mol. Cell 27, 914–927 (2007).
Harden, T. T. et al. Alternative transcription cycle for bacterial RNA polymerase. Nat. Commun. 11, 448 (2020).
Kang, W. et al. Transcription reinitiation by recycling RNA polymerase that diffuses on DNA after releasing terminated RNA. Nat. Commun. 11, 450 (2020).
Dey, S. et al. Structural insights into RNA-mediated transcription regulation in bacteria. Mol. Cell 82, 3885–3900.e3810 (2022).
Pei, H. H. et al. The delta subunit and NTPase HelD institute a two-pronged mechanism for RNA polymerase recycling. Nat. Commun. 11, 6418 (2020).
Kouba, T. et al. Mycobacterial HelD is a nucleic acids-clearing factor for RNA polymerase. Nat. Commun. 11, 6419 (2020).
Newing, T. P. et al. Molecular basis for RNA polymerase-dependent transcription complex recycling by the helicase-like motor protein HelD. Nat. Commun. 11, 6420 (2020).
Hou, H. et al. Structural insights into RNA polymerase III-mediated transcription termination through trapping poly-deoxythymidine. Nat. Commun. 12, 6135 (2021).
Girbig, M. et al. Architecture of the yeast Pol III pre-termination complex and pausing mechanism on poly(dT) termination signals. Cell Rep. 40, 111316 (2022).
Hudson, B. P. et al. Three-dimensional EM structure of an intact activator-dependent transcription initiation complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19830–19835 (2009).
Hein, P. P. et al. RNA polymerase pausing and nascent-RNA structure formation are linked through clamp-domain movement. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 794–802 (2014).
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
Ha, K. S., Toulokhonov, I., Vassylyev, D. G. & Landick, R. The NusA N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for enhancement of transcriptional pausing via interaction with the RNA exit channel of RNA polymerase. J. Mol. Biol. 401, 708–725 (2010).
Chakraborty, A. et al. Opening and closing of the bacterial RNA polymerase clamp. Science 337, 591–595 (2012).
Feklistov, A. et al. RNA polymerase motions during promoter melting. Science 356 863-866 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS XDB29020000 (Y. Zhang), National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFA0903701 (Y. Zhang), Basic Research Zone Program of Shanghai JCYJ-SHFY-2022-012 (Y. Zhang), Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation program (19JC1415900) (Y. Zhang), and US National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH (GM38660) (R.L.). We thank L. Kong, F. Wang, G. Li and J. Duan at the Cryo-EM Center of NFPS in Shanghai and S. Chang at the Cryo-EM Center of Zhejiang University for assistance in cryo-EM data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.Y. collected the cryo-EM data and solved the cryo-EM structures. L.Y., E.O.O., C.Y. and R.A.M. designed, performed and analysed biochemical experiments. J.S., L.S., X.W., A.W., D.H., Y. Zeng and Y.F. assisted in structure determination. R.L. and Y. Zhang designed experiments, analysed data and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 The processing pipeline for single-particle reconstitution of E. coli TTC-pause.
a. Elution peaks of TTC pause (peak1) from a size-exclusion column. b. The SDS-PAGE and c. the native-PAGE of peak 1. The gel was first stained with SYBR Gold for nucleic acids and then with Coomassie Brilliant Blue for proteins. The experiment has been repeated three times with similar results. d. The flowchart of data processing of TTC pause. e. The 3D FSC plot. The dotted line represents 0.143 cutoff of the global FSC curve. f. The angular distribution of single-particle projections by number of particles of each projection. g. The cryo-EM map of TTC pause colored by local resolution. h. The cryo-EM map of TTC pause in front and side views.
Extended Data Fig. 2 The detailed analysis of TTC-pause structure.
a. The previously determined consensus sequence for elemental pause sites18. b. The consensus sequence features from 100 previously identified E. coli intrinsic terminators11. c. The structural comparison of downstream dsDNA between TTC pause (pink and red) and TEC (gray). d. The structural comparison of RNA-DNA hybrid between TTC pause (pink and red) and TEC (gray). e. The path of single-stranded ntDNA of the transcription bubble in RNAP. f. The detailed interactions between single-stranded ntDNA of the transcription bubble and RNAP. Blue mesh, the cryo-EM map. Black dash, H-bond.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Disruption of NT –4 pocket interaction does not affect termination efficiency or pre-termination pausing.
a. NT –4 pocket with R180, R465 and V469 shown as sticks. An adenine on the non-template DNA is flipped into the pocket and hydrogen bonds with R465. b. DNA template encoding λPR promoter and λtR2 terminator used for promoter-initiated, in vitro transcription assay of the effects of pocket mutants on termination. c. Effect of pocket mutants on the termination efficiency of wild-type λtR2 terminator. d. Effect of pocket mutants on the termination efficiency of a λtR2 terminator containing a different downstream DNA. e. Effect of pocket mutants on the termination efficiency of ϕ82t500 terminator. f. Effect of pocket mutants on the termination efficiency of a scaffold-based λtR2 terminator in the absence or presence of E. coli NusA. Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3 biologically independent experiments for c-f. g. Effect of pocket mutants on pre-termination pausing at U7 and U8. A variant of λtR2 terminator lacking the upstream half of the terminator hairpin (pRM1234; Supplementary Table 1) and an antisense DNA to prevent backtracking of G33 complexes were used. See legend to Extended Data Fig. 8c and methods for more details. Results from a single replicate are shown. Raw data for the gels in this figure can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1a–d.
Extended Data Fig. 4 The complex assembly and processing pipeline for cryo-EM map construction of TTC hairpin.
a. The flowchart of data processing of TTC hairpin. b. The 3D FSC plot. The dotted line represents 0.143 cutoff of the global FSC curve. c. The angular distribution of single-particle projections by number of particles of each projection. d. The cryo-EM map colored by local resolution. (e) The cryo-EM map of TTC hairpin in front and side views.
Extended Data Fig. 5 The detailed analysis of TTC-hairpin structure.
a. The comparison of nuclei-acid scaffolds in TTC hairpin (red) and TTC pause (gray). b. A clear path across the cleft between β CTR and β′ ZBD for the 5′-end ssRNA that leads into the bottom of the RNA exit channel. The insert shows a positively charged groove that likely guides 5′-proximal ssRNA upstream of the hairpin stem out of the RNA exit channel. The modeled 5′-proximal ssRNA is shown in green. The electrostatic potential surface of RNAP was generated using APBS tools in Pymol. c. Structural comparison of the upstream RNA-DNA hybrids in TTC hairpin (blue and pink) and TEC (gray; PDB: 6ALF). The two structures were superimposed based on the RNAP-β′ rudder and lid motifs. d. The schematic presentation of the register of the RNA-DNA hybrid in TTC hairpin and a TEC in a pre-translocation state. e. G(–10) of the tDNA (cyan) is modeled to flip from its previous position (gray) through the tunnel to pair with the C(–10) of the ntDNA. f. The cryo-EM map shows that the −10 base pair has the weakest signal in the RNA-DNA hybrid.
Extended Data Fig. 6 The complex assembly and processing pipeline for cryo-EM map construction of TTC release.
a. Elution peaks of TTC pause (peak1) from a size-exclusion column. b. The SDS-PAGE of TTC-pause. c. The native-PAGE of TTC pause and TTC release. The gel was visualized by Cy5-fluorescein labeled at the 5′ terminus of the nascent RNA. d. The flowchart of data processing of TTC release. e. The 3D FSC plot. The dotted line represents 0.143 cutoff of the global FSC curve. f. The angular distribution of single-particle projections by number of particles of each projection of map A. g. The map A colored by local resolution. h. The cryo-EM map of TTC release in front and side views.
Extended Data Fig. 7 The detailed analysis of the TTC-release structure.
a. The comparison of upstream dsDNA in TTC release (pink and red) and TTC hairpin (gray). The last base pair of the upstream DNA in TTC release and TTC hairpin was colored as blue and green, respectively. The dashes indicate helical axis of the upstream DNA of the two structures. b. The modeled upstream base pairs (–17 to –12; gray) show loss of contact with RNAP and explain loss of cryo-EM map signals in TTC release. The map and model of the upstream DNA in TTC release are shown in red and pink. c. The comparison of downstream dsDNA in TTC release (pink and red) and TEC (gray; PDB: 6ALF). d. The comparison of main cleft in TTC release (brown) and TEC (green).
Extended Data Fig. 8 Rewinding of transcription bubble triggers RNA release.
a. The sequence of DNA templates used in Fig. 3g. b. The in vitro transcription assay suggests that dsDNA rewinding is required for intrinsic termination at the ϕ82t500 terminator. Data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3 biologically independent experiments, ****P < 0.0001; two-tailed unpair t-tests. Raw data for the gels can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1g. c. Mapping the hairpin stem distance from U8 that triggers termination at U7 or U8. A template encoding a variant of λtR2 terminator lacking the upstream half of the terminator hairpin was used (from pRM1234, Supplementary Table 1). Core-RNAP was halted at G33, and backtracking was prevented by addition of asDNA (#14483). Transcription was restarted after adding different asRNAs and a master mix with (ATP + GTP + CTP to yield final concentrations of 150 μM, and UTP to 10 μM). Samples were collected and mixed with stop buffer after 10, 20, 30, and 60 sec. The remaining fraction was then chased by all 4 NTPs to a final concentration of 650 μM each. Termination starts taking place when the hairpin is −11 away from U8. Results from a single replicate are shown. Raw data for the gel can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1h.
Extended Data Fig. 9 The proposed pathways of hairpin extension after the TTC -hairpin intermediate.
The choice between the alternative pathways of hybrid-shearing and hypertranscloation depends on terminator sequences26. It is also possible that hairpin completion follows a third alternative pathway, ‘hairpin invasion’12,25,28,36, in which the RNAP clamp opens to allow hairpin extension into the main cleft. Although clamp opening cannot be obligatory for RNA release30, the RNAP clamp is in constant thermal motion52,53, can open fully in some conditions36,37,38,39, and thus in principle could open upon DNA rewinding and allow the hairpin stem to extend into the main cleft without steric hinderance. After hairpin extension aided by bubble collapse, RNA release leads to TTC release (see Fig. 4).
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
A list of oligonucleotides and plasmids (Supplementary Table 1) and uncropped blots (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Supplementary Video 1
Cryo-EM map and structural analysis of TTC pause.
Supplementary Video 2
Cryo-EM map and structural analysis of TTC hairpin.
Supplementary Video 3
A proposed route for rewinding of the −10 nucleotides.
Supplementary Video 4
Cryo-EM map and structural analysis of TTC release.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
You, L., Omollo, E.O., Yu, C. et al. Structural basis for intrinsic transcription termination. Nature 613, 783–789 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05604-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05604-1
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
