Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) convert light into electricity by using photosensitizers adsorbed on the surface of nanocrystalline mesoporous titanium dioxide (TiO2) films along with electrolytes or solid charge-transport materials1,2,3. They possess many features including transparency, multicolour and low-cost fabrication, and are being deployed in glass facades, skylights and greenhouses4. Recent development of sensitizers5,6,7,8,9,10, redox mediators11,12,13 and device structures14 has improved the performance of DSCs, particularly under ambient light conditions14,15,16,17. To further enhance their efficiency, it is pivotal to control the assembly of dye molecules on the surface of TiO2 to favour charge generation. Here we report a route of pre-adsorbing a monolayer of a hydroxamic acid derivative on the surface of TiO2 to improve the dye molecular packing and photovoltaic performance of two newly designed co-adsorbed sensitizers that harvest light quantitatively across the entire visible domain. The best performing cosensitized solar cells exhibited a power conversion efficiency of 15.2% (which has been independently confirmed) under a standard air mass of 1.5 global simulated sunlight, and showed long-term operational stability (500 h). Devices with a larger active area of 2.8 cm2 exhibited a power conversion efficiency of 28.4% to 30.2% over a wide range of ambient light intensities, along with high stability. Our findings pave the way for facile access to high-performance DSCs and offer promising prospects for applications as power supplies and battery replacements for low-power electronic devices18,19,20 that use ambient light as their energy source.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 per month
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
O’Regan, B. & Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 353, 737–740 (1991).
Bach, U. et al. Solid-state dye-sensitized mesoporous TiO2 solar cells with high photo-to-electron conversion efficiencies. Nature 395, 583–585 (1998).
Cao, Y. et al. 11% efficiency solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with copper(II/I) hole transport materials. Nat. Commun. 8, 15390 (2017).
Fakharuddin, A. et al. A perspective on the production of dye-sensitized solar modules. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3952–3981 (2014).
Ren, Y. et al. A stable blue photosensitizer for color palette of dye-sensitized solar cells reaching 12.6% efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2405–2408 (2018).
Kurumisawa, Y. et al. Renaissance of fused porphyrins: substituted methylene-bridged thiophene-fused strategy for high-performance dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 9910–9919 (2019).
Zhang, L. et al. 13.6% Efficient organic dye-sensitized solar cells by minimizing energy losses of the excited state. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 943–951 (2019).
Zeng, K. et al. Efficient solar cells based on concerted companion dyes containing two complementary components: an alternative approach for cosensitization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 5154–5161 (2020).
Ji, J.-M. et al. 14.2% Efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells by co-sensitizing novel thieno[3,2-b]indole-based organic dyes with a promising porphyrin sensitizer. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2000124 (2020).
Jiang, H. et al. Phenanthrene-fused-quinoxaline as a key building block for highly efficient and stable sensitizers in copper-electrolyte-based dye-sensitized solar cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 9324–9329 (2020).
Saygili, Y. et al. Copper bipyridyl redox mediators for dye-sensitized solar cells with high photovoltage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15087–15096 (2016).
Rui, H. et al. Stable dye-sensitized solar cells based on copper(II/I) redox mediators bearing a pentadentate ligand. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 16156–16163 (2021).
Higashino, T. & Imahori, H. Emergence of copper(I/II) complexes as third-generation redox shuttles for dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 1926–1938 (2022).
Cao, Y. et al. Direct contact of selective charge extraction layers enables high-efficiency molecular photovoltaics. Joule 2, 1108–1117 (2018).
Freitag, M. et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells for efficient power generation under ambient lighting. Nat. Photon. 11, 372–378 (2017).
Michaels, H. et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells under ambient light powering machine learning: towards autonomous smart sensors for the internet of things. Chem. Sci. 11, 2895–2906 (2020).
Zhang, D. et al. A molecular photosensitizer achieves a Voc of 1.24 V enabling highly efficient and stable dye-sensitized solar cells with copper(II/I)-based electrolyte. Nat. Commun. 12, 1777 (2021).
Haight, R., Haensch, W. & Friedman, D. Solar-powering the Internet of Things. Science 353, 124–125 (2016).
Mathews, I., Kantareddy, S. N., Buonassisi, T. & Peters, I. M. Technology and market perspective for indoor photovoltaic cells. Joule 3, 1415–1426 (2019).
Michaels, H., Benesperi, I. & Freitag, M. Challenges and prospects of ambient hybrid solar cell applications. Chem. Sci. 12, 5002–5015 (2021).
Hardin, B. E., Snaith, H. J. & McGehee, M. D. The renaissance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Nat. Photon. 6, 162–169 (2012).
Yella, A. et al. Porphyrin-sensitized solar cells with cobalt (II/III)-based redox electrolyte exceed 12% efficiency. Science 334, 629–634 (2011).
Kakiage, K. et al. Highly-efficient dye-sensitized solar cells with collaborative sensitization by silyl-anchor and carboxy-anchor dyes. Chem. Commun. 51, 15894–15897 (2015).
Zhang, M. et al. Judicious selection of a pinhole defect filler to generally enhance the performance of organic dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2939–2943 (2013).
Aung, S. H., Hao, Y., Oo, T. Z. & Boschloo, G. 2-(4-Butoxyphenyl)-N-hydroxyacetamide: an efficient preadsorber for dye-sensitized solar cells. ACS Omega 2, 1820–1825 (2017).
Vaissier, V. & Van Voorhis, T. Geometry of molecular motions in dye monolayers at various coverages. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 12562–12568 (2017).
Lim, J. et al. Thermodynamic control over the competitive anchoring of N719 dye on nanocrystalline TiO2 for improving photoinduced electron generation. Langmuir 27, 14647–14653 (2011).
Liu, J. et al. The structure–property relationship of organic dyes in mesoscopic titania solar cells: only one double-bond difference. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 3545–3551 (2011).
Pecunia, V., Occhipinti, L. G. & Hoye, R. L. Z. Emerging indoor photovoltaic technologies for sustainable internet of things. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100698 (2021).
Ito, S. et al. Fabrication of thin film dye sensitized solar cells with solar to electric power conversion efficiency over 10%. Thin Solid Films 516, 4613–4619 (2008).
Ellis, H. et al. PEDOT counter electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells prepared by aqueous micellar electrodeposition. Electrochim. Acta 107, 45–51 (2013).
Bisquert, J. Theory of the impedance of electron diffusion and recombination in a thin layer. J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 325–333 (2002).
Fabregat-Santiago, F., Garcia-Belmonte, G., Mora-Seró, I. & Bisquert, J. Characterization of nanostructured hybrid and organic solar cells by impedance spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 9083–9118 (2011).
de Mello, J. C., Wittmann, H. F. & Friend, R. H. An improved experimental determination of external photoluminescence quantum efficiency. Adv. Mater. 9, 230–232 (1997).
Kelly, C. A., Farzad, F., Thompson, D. W., Stipkala, J. M. & Meyer, G. J. Cation-controlled interfacial charge injection in sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2. Langmuir 15, 7047–7054 (1999).
Santos, T. D. et al. Injection limitations in a series of porphyrin dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 3276–3279 (2010).
Wang, P. et al. Stable and efficient organic dye-sensitized solar cell based on ionic liquid electrolyte. Joule 2, 2145–2153 (2018).
We are grateful to O. Ouellette for help with PL measurements, M. Chang and J.-H. Yum for help with ATR–FTIR measurements, A. Krishna for assisting in device stability tests, Q. Feng for help with 1H NMR (800 MHz) spectra measurements, and D. Türkay for the current–voltage measurements at the PV lab of IEM in Neuchâtel. Y.R., S.M.Z. and M.G. acknowledge financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 826013. D.Z., J.S. and A.H. are grateful for the financial support of the Swiss National Science Foundation under contract SNSF 200020_185041.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature thanks Alessandro Abbotto, Chun-Guey Wu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Methods, Figs. 1–33, Notes 1–6, Tables 1–5 and refs. 1–7.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, Y., Zhang, D., Suo, J. et al. Hydroxamic acid pre-adsorption raises the efficiency of cosensitized solar cells. Nature 613, 60–65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05460-z
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.