Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Enhanced interactions of interlayer excitons in free-standing heterobilayers

Abstract

Strong, long-range dipole–dipole interactions between interlayer excitons (IXs) can lead to new multiparticle correlation regimes1,2, which drive the system into distinct quantum and classical phases2,3,4,5, including dipolar liquids, crystals and superfluids. Both repulsive and attractive dipole–dipole interactions have been theoretically predicted between IXs in a semiconductor bilayer2,6,7,8, but only repulsive interactions have been reported experimentally so far3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. This study investigated free-standing, twisted (51°, 53°, 45°) tungsten diselenide/tungsten disulfide (WSe2/WS2) heterobilayers, in which we observed a transition in the nature of dipolar interactions among IXs, from repulsive to attractive. This was caused by quantum-exchange-correlation effects, leading to the appearance of a robust interlayer biexciton phase (formed by two IXs), which has been theoretically predicted6,7,8 but never observed before in experiments. The reduced dielectric screening in a free-standing heterobilayer not only resulted in a much higher formation efficiency of IXs, but also led to strongly enhanced dipole–dipole interactions, which enabled us to observe the many-body correlations of pristine IXs at the two-dimensional quantum limit. In addition, we firstly observed several emission peaks from moiré-trapped IXs at room temperature in a well-aligned, free-standing WSe2/WS2 heterobilayer. Our findings open avenues for exploring new quantum phases with potential for applications in non-linear optics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Room-temperature moiré exciton emissions in free-standing WS2/WSe2 heterobilayers.
Fig. 2: Temperature-dependent dynamics of moiré-trapped IXs in free-standing and SiO2-supported WS2/WSe2 heterobilayers.
Fig. 3: Reinforced exciton correlations in free-standing WSe2/WS2 heterobilayers.
Fig. 4: Repulsive and attractive dipolar interactions in free-standing WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer with large twist angle.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Shilo, Y. et al. Particle correlations and evidence for dark state condensation in a cold dipolar exciton fluid. Nat. Commun. 4, 2335 (2013).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laikhtman, B. & Rapaport, R. Exciton correlations in coupled quantum wells and their luminescence blue shift. Phys. Rev. B 80, 195313 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stern, M., Umansky, V. & Bar-Joseph, I. Exciton liquid in coupled quantum wells. Science 343, 55–57 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lahaye, T., Menotti, C., Santos, L., Lewenstein, M. & Pfau, T. The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases. Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 126401 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Astrakharchik, G., Boronat, J., Kurbakov, I. & Lozovik, Y. E. Quantum phase transition in a two-dimensional system of dipoles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 060405 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bondarev, I. V. & Vladimirova, M. R. Complexes of dipolar excitons in layered quasi-two-dimensional nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B 97, 165419 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, R., Drummond, N. & Needs, R. Exciton–exciton interaction and biexciton formation in bilayer systems. Phys. Rev. B 79, 125308 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fogler, M., Butov, L. & Novoselov, K. High-temperature superfluidity with indirect excitons in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 5, 4555 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan, L. et al. Twist-angle-dependent interlayer exciton diffusion in WS2–WSe2 heterobilayers. Nat. Mater. 19, 617–623 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tran, K. et al. Evidence for moiré excitons in van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 567, 71–75 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, W., Lu, X., Dubey, S., Devenica, L. & Srivastava, A. Dipolar interactions between localized interlayer excitons in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 19, 624–629 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kremser, M. et al. Discrete interactions between a few interlayer excitons trapped at a MoSe2–WSe2 heterointerface. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 4, 8 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Seyler, K. L. et al. Signatures of moiré-trapped valley excitons in MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers. Nature 567, 66–70 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jin, C. et al. Observation of moiré excitons in WSe2/WS2 heterostructure superlattices. Nature 567, 76–80 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jin, C. et al. Identification of spin, valley and moiré quasi-angular momentum of interlayer excitons. Nat. Phys. 15, 1140–1144 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baek, H. et al. Highly energy-tunable quantum light from moiré-trapped excitons. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba8526 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Merkl, P. et al. Ultrafast transition between exciton phases in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Mater. 18, 691–696 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jauregui, L. A. et al. Electrical control of interlayer exciton dynamics in atomically thin heterostructures. Science 366, 870–875 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rivera, P. et al. Observation of long-lived interlayer excitons in monolayer MoSe2–WSe2 heterostructures. Nat. Commun. 6, 6242 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, B. et al. Long-lived direct and indirect interlayer excitons in van der Waals heterostructures. Nano Lett. 17, 5229–5237 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ciarrocchi, A. et al. Polarization switching and electrical control of interlayer excitons in two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Photon. 13, 131–136 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Paik, E. Y. et al. Interlayer exciton laser of extended spatial coherence in atomically thin heterostructures. Nature 576, 80–84 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Z. et al. Evidence of high-temperature exciton condensation in two-dimensional atomic double layers. Nature 574, 76–80 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagler, P. et al. Interlayer exciton dynamics in a dichalcogenide monolayer heterostructure. 2D Mater. 4, 025112 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexeev, E. M. et al. Resonantly hybridized excitons in moiré superlattices in van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 567, 81–86 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kunstmann, J. et al. Momentum-space indirect interlayer excitons in transition-metal dichalcogenide van der Waals heterostructures. Nat. Phys. 14, 801–805 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu, X., Littlewood, P., Hybertsen, M. S. & Rice, T. Exciton condensate in semiconductor quantum well structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1633 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schinner, G. et al. Confinement and interaction of single indirect excitons in a voltage-controlled trap formed inside double InGaAs quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 127403 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ovesen, S. et al. Interlayer exciton dynamics in van der Waals heterostructures. Commun. Phys. 2, 23 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu, H., Liu, G.-B., Tang, J., Xu, X. & Yao, W. Moiré excitons: from programmable quantum emitter arrays to spin-orbit-coupled artificial lattices. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701696 (2017).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, N. et al. Moiré intralayer excitons in a MoSe2/MoS2 heterostructure. Nano Lett. 18, 7651–7657 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Unuchek, D. et al. Valley-polarized exciton currents in a van der Waals heterostructure. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 1104–1109 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Choi, J. et al. Moiré potential impedes interlayer exciton diffusion in van der Waals heterostructures. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba8866 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Alloing, M., Lemaitre, A. & Dubin, F. Quantum signature blurred by disorder in indirect exciton gases. Europhys. Lett. 93, 17007 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, J. et al. Diffusivity reveals three distinct phases of interlayer excitons in MoSe2/WSe2 heterobilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 106804 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, J. et al. Optical generation of high carrier densities in 2D semiconductor heterobilayers. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0145 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Phillips, R., Lovering, D., Denton, G. & Smith, G. Biexciton creation and recombination in a GaAs quantum well. Phys. Rev. B 45, 4308 (1992).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Birkedal, D., Singh, J., Lyssenko, V., Erland, J. & Hvam, J. M. Binding of quasi-two-dimensional biexcitons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 672 (1996).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. You, Y. et al. Observation of biexcitons in monolayer WSe2. Nat. Phys. 11, 477–481 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shang, J. et al. Observation of excitonic fine structure in a 2D transition-metal dichalcogenide semiconductor. ACS Nano 9, 647–655 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pei, J. et al. Excited state biexcitons in atomically thin MoSe2. ACS Nano 11, 7468–7475 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Haedler, A. T. et al. Long-range energy transport in single supramolecular nanofibres at room temperature. Nature 523, 196–199 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sharma, A. et al. Supertransport of excitons in atomically thin organic semiconductors at the 2D quantum limit. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 116 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Clark, K. A., Krueger, E. L. & Vanden Bout, D. A. Direct measurement of energy migration in supramolecular carbocyanine dye nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. 5, 2274–2282 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mikhnenko, O. V., Blom, P. W. & Nguyen, T.-Q. Exciton diffusion in organic semiconductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1867–1888 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Du, P., Lin, X. & Zhang, X. Dielectric constants of PDMS nanocomposites by conducting polymer nanowires. In 16th IEEE International Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems Conference 645–648 (IEEE, 2011).

  47. Laturia, A., Van de Put, M. L. & Vandenberghe, W. G. Dielectric properties of hexagonal boron nitride and transition metal dichalcogenides: from monolayer to bulk. npj 2D Mater. Appl. 2, 1 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding support from ANU PhD student scholarship, Australian Research Council (grant no. DP220102219, DP180103238, LE200100032) and ARC Centre of Excellence in Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (project number CE170100012), and National Heart Foundation (ARIES ID: 35852). The authors thank C. Jagadish, D. MacDonald and H. Nguyen from the Australian National University for their facility support. T.L. acknowledges T. Wu and S. Fang from the Information and Network Centre of Xiamen University for their help with the computing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.L. conceived and supervised this study. Y.Z. fabricated sample 2 and X.S. fabricated all the other samples used in this study. X.S. and Y.Z. performed the optical experiments. X.S., H.Q., B.L. and S.R. contributed to second-harmonic generation measurements. H.Q., Y.T. and Y.Z. contributed to experimental setup. T.L. did simulations using the quantum-electrostatic heterostructure method. T.Y. contributed to simulation and fitting. Y.L. analysed the data, developed the models and interpreted the results. X.S. processed experimental raw data with fittings and created all the figure plots. Y.L., X.S. and Y.Z. drafted the manuscript, and all authors participated in manuscript editing and discussion.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuerui Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Christopher Gies and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Angle-resolved second-harmonic-generation (SHG).

The polarization-dependent SHG signal measured on the monolayer WSe2 (blue circles) and WS2 (red circles) regions of samples and the corresponding fittings (blue and red curves), which confirm the twist angles of 0 ± 0.5° (a), 3 ± 0.5° (b), 45 ± 0.5° (c) and 51 ± 0.5° (d), between WSe2 and WS2 layers. Samples in (a) and (b) are R-type stacked heterobilayers, which are confirmed by the enhanced SHG signal in experiments from WSe2/WS2 hetero-structure region comparing with the corresponding WSe2 and WS2 monolayer regions. Samples in (c) and (d) are H-type stacked heterobilayers, which are confirmed by the quenched SHG signal in experiments from WSe2/WS2 hetero-structure region comparing with the corresponding WSe2 and WS2 monolayer regions.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Temperature-dependent PL spectra of IX from sample 1.

Zoomed in temperature dependent PL spectra with fitting curves for interlayer exciton peaks: IX1 (blue), IX2 (red) and IX3 (green), from free-standing heterobilayer sample (sample 1, close-to-zero twist angle). Black and dark yellow curves are experimental data and accumulative fitting curve, respectively. A 532 nm CW laser was used for excitation and the power used was 8.83 µW.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Dielectric screening dependent IX emissions in WS2/WSe2 heterobilayers.

ac, Measured PL spectra at 83 K from: (a) sample 1. Inset: schematic cross-section diagram for free-standing (region A) and SiO2-supported (region C) WS2/WSe2. (b) Sample 5 (twist angle 52 ± 0.5°). A WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer sample was firstly deposited on a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate and then it was mechanically transferred to a SiO2/Si substrate (with a pre-patterned circular hole). But during the transfer process, the heterobilayer was broken, and the hole-region sample remained on the PDMS (as shown by inset). PDMS-supported part (region B) and the SiO2-supported part (region C) have the same twist angle. (c) Sample #6 (twist angle 5 ± 0.5°). Inset: SiO2-supported part (region C), hBN-SiO2 encapsulated part (region D) and hBN-hBN encapsulated (region E) have the same twist angle. d, Extracted beta ratio (βXC) of samples with different dielectric screening, using the measured PL spectra displayed in (a–c), as a function of the top and bottom dielectric constants. βX is the β value (defined in main text) measured from sample in region X (X = A, B, C, D, E), and βC is the β value measured from the corresponding SiO2-supported sample part (from the same heterobilayer flake with region X and thus has the same twist angle with X). This beta ratio can exclude the contribution of sample twist angles, when we compare the beta values from various heterobilayer samples as shown in (a–c). The mean of βC was set to be 1. The error bars represent the experimental variation (standard deviations) observed from multiple (>5) measurements. Note: The dielectric constants of air, PDMS46, SiO2 and hBN47 (Extended Data Fig. 3) are 1, 2.3, 3.9 and 5.1, respectively. The dielectric constant of hBN was calculated by using \(\sqrt{{\varepsilon }_{i}^{\perp }\cdot {\varepsilon }_{i}^{||}}\), where \({\varepsilon }_{i}^{\perp }\) and \({\varepsilon }_{i}^{||}\) are the out-of-plane and in-plane dielectric constants47.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Twist angle dependence.

a, Measured IX formation efficiency β as a function of twist angle, for both suspended and SiO2-supported WSe2/WS2 heterobilayer sample at 83K. The error bars represent variations (standard deviations) from multiple measurements (>5). The data points without error bars showed a beta value (β) of zero, which means the IX emissions were not detected from those samples. b, the highest temperature where we started to observe IX emissions as a function of twist angle, for the free-standing WSe2/WS2 heterobilayers.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Temperature-dependent PL spectra from the free-standing WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer (sample 2).

a, Measured temperature-dependent PL spectra from the suspended WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer (sample 2, H-type stacking, measured twist angle 51°) with fitting curves for interlayer exciton peaks: IX1 (blue), IX2 (red) and IX3 (green). The excitation power is around 3.5 µW. Black and dark yellow curves are experimental data and accumulative fitting curve, respectively. b, Extracted PL peak energy as a function of temperature, for three interlayer exciton peaks, labelled as IX1, IX2 and IX3. c, Extracted integrated PL intensity as a function of temperature, for three interlayer exciton PL peaks. d, Extracted full width at half maximum (FWHM) of interlayer exciton peaks as a function of temperature. The error bars in (b)–(d) represent the fitting uncertainty (standard deviations) obtained from multiple (>3) fitting analysis.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Power-dependent PL spectra from the free-standing WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer (sample 2) at 83 K.

a, Zoomed in PL spectra with fitting curves for two interlayer peaks: IX1 (blue) and IX2 (red). Black and dark yellow curves are experimental data and accumulative fitting curve, respectively. b, Extracted full width at half maximum (FWHM) of interlayer excitons as a function of excitation power. c, Extracted PL peak energy as a function of excitation power, for WS2 exciton. The negligible energy shift of the A excitons from the WS2 over the entire power range used (< 1 meV) suggests that the laser induced thermal effect in the power-dependent PL measurements was negligible and it does not affect the analysis of our power dependent PL results. The error bars in (b) and (c) represent the fitting uncertainty (standard deviations) obtained from multiple (>3) fitting analysis.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Calculation of interaction energy and dielectric function.

a, Calculated interaction energy of two IXs \({E}_{{XX}}\) (in unit of Rydberg energy \({R}_{y}^{* }\)) as a function of interlayer exciton distance \(\triangle {\rho }^{{XX}}\) (in unit of Bohr radius \({a}_{B}\)). \({E}_{{XX}}\) shows a minimum energy at \({\triangle \rho }_{0}^{{XX}}\). b, Zoom in plot of calculated dielectric function \(\varepsilon \left(q\right)\) for free-standing WSe2/WS2, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 10(a). The solid vertical line is \(q=1/{\triangle \rho }_{0}^{{XX}}\).

Extended Data Fig. 8 Repulsive and attractive dipolar interactions in free-standing WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer with twist angle of 53 degree (sample 3).

a, Measured excitation power dependent PL spectra from a free-standing WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer (H-type stacking, measured twist angle 53 ± 0.5°) at 83 K with 532 nm CW laser. Two interlayer exciton PL peaks are highlighted by blue and red arrows. b, Measured PL peak energy of interlayer exciton IX1 (blue balls) and IX2 (red balls) as a function of exciton density at 83 K. c, Extracted integrated PL intensity of IX1 and IX2 as a function of pumping power. From the fitting curve, integrated PL intensities of IX 1 and IX2 grew sub-linearly (α = 0.80) and super-linearly (α = 1.39), respectively, with the increase of excitation power. The error bars in (b) and (c) represent the fitting uncertainty (standard deviations) obtained from multiple (>3) fitting analysis.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Power-dependent PL at 83K from a WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer with twist angle of 45 degree (sample 4).

a, Measured excitation power-dependent PL spectra from a WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer (H-type stacking, measured twist angle 45 ± 0.5°) at 83 K using 532 nm CW laser. b, Zoomed in PL spectra for IX emissions, with fitting curves for three IX peaks labelled as IXX (red), IX 1 (green), IX 2 (purple). Black and dark yellow curves are experimental data and accumulative fitting curve, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Repulsive and attractive dipolar interactions in a WS2/WSe2 heterobilayer with twist angle of 45 degree (sample 4).

ac, Extracted PL peak energy as a function of excitation power, for three interlayer exciton peaks, labelled as IXX (a), IX 1 (b) and IX 2 (c). The inset in (b) shows the energy difference between IX1 and IXX as a function a excitation power. d, Extracted full width at half maximum (FWHM) of IXX, IX 1 and IX 2 as a function of excitation power. e, Extracted integrated PL intensity of three interlayer peaks as a function of excitation power, the fitting curve give rise to a slope of 1.58 for IXX (red), a slope of 1.01 for IX 1 (green) and a slope of 1.18 for IX 2 (purple). f, Extracted PL peak energy of the A excitons from the WS2 layer in the heterobilayer, as a function of excitation power. The negligible energy shift of the A excitons from the WS2 over the entire power range used (< 0.5 meV) suggests that the laser induced thermal effect in the power-dependent PL measurements was negligible and it does not affect the analysis of our power dependent PL results. The error bars in all the panels represent the fitting uncertainty (standard deviations) obtained from multiple (>3) fitting analysis.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10, Notes 1–11, Table 1 and references.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, X., Zhu, Y., Qin, H. et al. Enhanced interactions of interlayer excitons in free-standing heterobilayers. Nature 610, 478–484 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05193-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05193-z

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing