Abstract
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are highly dispersed, millisecond-duration radio bursts1,2,3. Recent observations of a Galactic FRB4,5,6,7,8 suggest that at least some FRBs originate from magnetars, but the origin of cosmological FRBs is still not settled. Here we report the detection of 1,863 bursts in 82 h over 54 days from the repeating source FRB 20201124A (ref. 9). These observations show irregular short-time variation of the Faraday rotation measure (RM), which scrutinizes the density-weighted line-of-sight magnetic field strength, of individual bursts during the first 36 days, followed by a constant RM. We detected circular polarization in more than half of the burst sample, including one burst reaching a high fractional circular polarization of 75%. Oscillations in fractional linear and circular polarizations, as well as polarization angle as a function of wavelength, were detected. All of these features provide evidence for a complicated, dynamically evolving, magnetized immediate environment within about an astronomical unit (au; Earth–Sun distance) of the source. Our optical observations of its Milky-Way-sized, metal-rich host galaxy10,11,12 show a barred spiral, with the FRB source residing in a low-stellar-density interarm region at an intermediate galactocentric distance. This environment is inconsistent with a young magnetar engine formed during an extreme explosion of a massive star that resulted in a long gamma-ray burst or superluminous supernova.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Raw data are available from the FAST Data Center, http://fast.bao.ac.cn. Owing to the large data volume, we encourage contacting the corresponding author for the data transfer. The directly related data that support the findings of this study can be found at the PSRPKU website, https://psr.pku.edu.cn/index.php/publications/frb20201124a/ and the Figshare website, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19688854.
Code availability
PSRCHIVE (http://psrchive.sourceforge.net)
TransientX (https://github.com/ypmen/TransientX)
BEAR (https://psr.pku.edu.cn/index.php/publications/frb180301/)
Change history
10 November 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05493-4
References
Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T. & Lorimer, D. R. Fast radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 4 (2019).
Cordes, J. M. & Chatterjee, S. Fast radio bursts: an extragalactic enigma. Annu Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57, 417–465 (2019).
Zhang, B. The physical mechanisms of fast radio bursts. Nature 587, 45–53 (2020).
The CHIME/FRB Collaboration. A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar. Nature 587, 54–58 (2020).
Bochenek, C. D. et al. A fast radio burst associated with a Galactic magnetar. Nature 587, 59–62 (2020).
Li, C. K. et al. HXMT identification of a non-thermal X-ray burst from SGR J1935+2154 and with FRB 200428. Nat. Astron. 5, 378–384 (2021).
Ridnaia, A. et al. A peculiar hard X-ray counterpart of a Galactic fast radio burst. Nat. Astron. 5, 372–377 (2021).
Mereghetti, S. et al. INTEGRAL discovery of a burst with associated radio emission from the magnetar SGR 1935+2154. Astrophys. J. Lett. 898, L29 (2020).
Lanman, A. E. et al. A sudden period of high activity from repeating fast radio burst 20201124A. Astrophys. J. 927, 59 (2022).
Fong, W.-f et al. Chronicling the host galaxy properties of the remarkable repeating FRB 20201124A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 919, L23 (2021).
Ravi, V. et al. The host galaxy and persistent radio counterpart of FRB 20201124A. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 513, 982–990 (2022).
Piro, L. et al. The fast radio burst FRB 20201124A in a star-forming region: constraints to the progenitor and multiwavelength counterparts. Astron. Astrophys. 656, L15 (2021).
Li, D. et al. A bimodal burst energy distribution of a repeating fast radio burst source. Nature 598, 267–271 (2021).
Hilmarsson, G. H., Spitler, L. G., Main, R. A. & Li, D. Z. Polarization properties of FRB 20201124A from detections with the Effelsberg 100-m radio telescope. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 5354–5361 (2021).
Michilli, D. et al. An extreme magneto-ionic environment associated with the fast radio burst source FRB 121102. Nature 553, 182–185 (2018).
Luo, R. et al. Diverse polarization angle swings from a repeating fast radio burst source. Nature 586, 693–696 (2020).
Kumar, P. et al. Circularly polarized radio emission from the repeating fast radio burst source FRB 20201124A. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 512, 3400–3413 (2022).
Kramer, M., Stappers, B. W., Jessner, A., Lyne, A. G. & Jordan, C. A. Polarized radio emission from a magnetar. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 377, 107–119 (2007).
Kumar, P., Lu, W. & Bhattacharya, M. Fast radio burst source properties and curvature radiation model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 2726–2739 (2017).
Yang, Y.-P. & Zhang, B. Bunching coherent curvature radiation in three-dimensional magnetic field geometry: application to pulsars and fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. 868, 31 (2018).
Hilmarsson, G. H. et al. Rotation measure evolution of the repeating fast radio burst source FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. Lett. 908, L10 (2021).
Johnston, S., Ball, L., Wang, N. & Manchester, R. N. Radio observations of PSR B1259–63 through the 2004 periastron passage. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 358, 1069–1075 (2005).
Piro, A. L. & Gaensler, B. M. The dispersion and rotation measure of supernova remnants and magnetized stellar winds: application to fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. 861, 150 (2018).
Metzger, B. D., Margalit, B. & Sironi, L. Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 4091–4106 (2019).
Planck Collaboration. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).
Chatterjee, S. et al. A direct localization of a fast radio burst and its host. Nature 541, 58–61 (2017).
Marcote, B. et al. A repeating fast radio burst source localized to a nearby spiral galaxy. Nature 577, 190–194 (2020).
Bhandari, S. et al. Characterizing the fast radio burst host galaxy population and its connection to transients in the local and extragalactic universe. Astron. J. 163, 69 (2022).
Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M. & Terlevich, R. Classification parameters for the emission-line spectra of extragalactic objects. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 93, 5–19 (1981).
Bhandari, S. et al. The host galaxies and progenitors of fast radio bursts localized with the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder. Astrophys. J. Lett. 895, L37 (2020).
Li, Y. & Zhang, B. A comparative study of host galaxy properties between fast radio bursts and stellar transients. Astrophys. J. Lett. 899, L6 (2020).
Tendulkar, S. P. et al. The host galaxy and redshift of the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. Lett. 834, L7 (2017).
Metzger, B. D., Berger, E. & Margalit, B. Millisecond magnetar birth connects FRB 121102 to superluminous supernovae and long-duration gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 841, 14 (2017).
Jiang, P. et al. The fundamental performance of FAST with 19-beam receiver at L band. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 20, 064 (2020).
The CHIME/FRB Collaboration. Recent high activity from a repeating Fast Radio Burst discovered by CHIME/FRB. The Astronomer’s Telegram, no. 14497 (2021).
Xu, H. et al. FAST detection and localization of FRB20201124A. The Astronomer’s Telegram, no. 14518 (2021).
Nimmo, K. et al. Milliarcsecond localization of the repeating FRB 20201124A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 927, L3 (2022).
Zhang, C. F. et al. Fast radio burst detection in the presence of coloured noise. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 5223–5231 (2021).
Men, Y. P. et al. Piggyback search for fast radio bursts using Nanshan 26 m and Kunming 40 m radio telescopes - I. Observing and data analysis systems, discovery of a mysterious peryton. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 3957–3971 (2019).
Oppermann, N., Yu, H.-R. & Pen, U.-L. On the non-Poissonian repetition pattern of FRB121102. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 5109–5115 (2018).
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. MULTINEST: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601–1614 (2009).
The CHIME/FRB Collaboration. Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source. Nature 582, 351–355 (2020).
Zou, J.-H. et al. Periodicity search on X-Ray bursts of SGR J1935+2154 using 8.5 yr of Fermi/GBM data. Astrophys. J. Lett. 923, L30 (2021).
Cai, C. et al. Search for gamma-ray bursts and gravitational wave electromagnetic counterparts with High Energy X-ray Telescope of Insight-HXMT. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 3910–3920 (2021).
Hobbs, G. B., Edwards, R. T. & Manchester, R. N. TEMPO2, a new pulsar-timing package – I. An overview. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, 655–672 (2006).
Cordes, J. M. & Lazio, T. J. W. NE2001.I. A new model for the Galactic distribution of free electrons and its fluctuations. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207156 (2002).
Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N. & Wang, N. A new electron-density model for estimation of pulsar and FRB distances. Astrophys. J. 835, 29 (2017).
Dolag, K., Gaensler, B. M., Beck, A. M. & Beck, M. C. Constraints on the distribution and energetics of fast radio bursts using cosmological hydrodynamic simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 4277–4289 (2015).
Deng, W. & Zhang, B. Cosmological implications of fast radio burst/gamma-ray burst associations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 783, L35 (2014).
Luo, R., Lee, K., Lorimer, D. R. & Zhang, B. On the normalized FRB luminosity function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 2320–2337 (2018).
Hotan, A. W., van Straten, W. & Manchester, R. N. PSRCHIVE and PSRFITS: an open approach to radio pulsar data storage and analysis. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 21, 302–309 (2004).
Desvignes, G. et al. Radio emission from a pulsar’s magnetic pole revealed by general relativity. Science 365, 1013–1017 (2019).
Sotomayor-Beltran, C. et al. Calibrating high-precision Faraday rotation measurements for LOFAR and the next generation of low-frequency radio telescopes. Astron. Astrophys. 552, A58 (2013).
Welter, G. L., Perry, J. J. & Kronberg, P. P. The rotation measure distribution of QSOs and of intervening clouds: magnetic fields and column densities. Astrophys. J. 279, 19–39 (1984).
Akahori, T., Ryu, D. & Gaensler, B. M. Fast radio bursts as probes of magnetic fields in the intergalactic medium. Astrophys. J. 824, 105 (2016).
Xu, J. & Han, J. L. Redshift evolution of extragalactic rotation measures. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 442, 3329–3337 (2014).
Noutsos, A., Karastergiou, A., Kramer, M., Johnston, S. & Stappers, B. W. Phase-resolved Faraday rotation in pulsars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 396, 1559–1572 (2009).
Cho, H. et al. Spectropolarimetric analysis of FRB 181112 at microsecond resolution: implications for fast radio burst emission mechanism. Astrophys. J. Lett. 891, L38 (2020).
Mezger, P. G. & Henderson, A. P. Galactic H II regions. I. Observations of their continuum radiation at the frequency 5 GHz. Astrophys. J. 147, 471–489 (1967).
Hessels, J. W. T. et al. FRB 121102 bursts show complex time–frequency structure. Astrophys. J. Lett. 876, L23 (2019).
Vedantham, H. K. & Ravi, V. Faraday conversion and magneto-ionic variations in fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, L78–L82 (2019).
Lomb, N. R. Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data. Astrophys. Space Sci. 39, 447–462 (1976).
Sazonov, V. N. Generation and transfer of polarized synchrotron radiation. Soviet Astron. 13, 396–402 (1969).
Huang, L. & Shcherbakov, R. V. Faraday conversion and rotation in uniformly magnetized relativistic plasmas. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416, 2574–2592 (2011).
Beniamini, P., Kumar, P. & Narayan, R. Faraday depolarization and induced circular polarization by multipath propagation with application to FRBs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 510, 4654–4668 (2022).
Oke, J. B. et al. The Keck low-resolution imaging spectrometer. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 107, 375 (1995).
Rockosi, C. et al. The low-resolution imaging spectrograph red channel CCD upgrade: fully depleted, high-resistivity CCDs for Keck. Proc. SPIE 7735, 77350R (2010).
Sheinis, A. I. et al. ESI, a new Keck Observatory Echellette Spectrograph and Imager. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 114, 851–865 (2002).
Perley, D. A. Fully automated reduction of longslit spectroscopy with the Low Resolution Imaging Spectrometer at the Keck Observatory. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 131, 084503 (2019).
Flewelling, H. A. et al. The Pan-STARRS1 database and data products. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 251, 7 (2020).
Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C. & Mathis, J. S. The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction. Astrophys. J. 345, 245–256 (1989).
Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey stellar spectra and recalibrating SFD. Astrophys. J. 737, 103 (2011).
Filippenko, A. V. The importance of atmospheric differential refraction in spectrophotometry. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 94, 715–721 (1982).
Wizinowich, P. L. et al. The W. M. Keck Observatory laser guide star adaptive optics system: overview. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 118, 297–309 (2006).
Gaia Collaboration. Gaia Data Release 2. The celestial reference frame (Gaia-CRF2). Astron. Astrophys. 616, A14 (2018).
Calzetti, D. et al. The dust content and opacity of actively star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 533, 682 (2000).
Heintz, K. E. et al. Host galaxy properties and offset distributions of fast radio bursts: implications for their progenitors. Astrophys. J. 903, 152 (2020).
Belfiore, F. et al. SDSS IV MaNGA – sSFR profiles and the slow quenching of discs in green valley galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 477, 3014–3029 (2018).
Blanc, G. A., Kewley, L., Vogt, F. P. A. & Dopita, M. A. IZI: inferring the gas phase metallicity (Z) and ionization parameter (q) of ionized nebulae using Bayesian statistics. Astrophys. J. 798, 99 (2015).
Mingozzi, M. et al. SDSS IV MaNGA: metallicity and ionisation parameter in local star-forming galaxies from Bayesian fitting to photoionisation models. Astron. Astrophys. 636, A42 (2020).
Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D. & Rix, H.-W. Detailed decomposition of galaxy images. II. Beyond axisymmetric models. Astron. J. 139, 2097–2129 (2010).
Holmberg, E. A photographic photometry of extragalactic nebulae. Medd. Lunds Astron. Obs. Ser. II 136, 1 (1958).
Tully, R. B. & Fisher, J. R. A new method of determining distances to galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 500, 105–117 (1977).
Ouellette, N. N. Q. et al. The spectroscopy and H-band imaging of Virgo Cluster Galaxies (SHIVir) survey: scaling relations and the stellar-to-total mass relation. Astrophys. J. 843, 74 (2017).
Law, D. R. et al. SDSS-IV MaNGA: refining strong line diagnostic classifications using spatially resolved gas dynamics. Astrophys. J. 915, 35 (2021).
Main, R. A. et al. Scintillation time-scale measurement of the highly active FRB20201124A. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 3172–3180 (2022).
Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A. & Trevena, J. Theoretical modeling of starburst galaxies. Astrophys. J. 556, 121–140 (2001).
Kauffmann, G. et al. The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 346, 1055–1077 (2003).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to L. C. Ho, H. Gao and R. Li for discussions. This work made use of data from the FAST. The FAST is a Chinese national megascience facility, built and operated by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences. We acknowledge the use of public data from the Fermi Science Support Center (FSSC). This work is supported by the National SKA Program of China (2020SKA0120100, 2020SKA0120200), the Natural Science Foundation of China (12041304, 11873067, 11988101, 12041303, 11725313, 11725314, 11833003, 12003028, 12041306, 12103089, U2031209, U2038105, U1831207), the National Program on Key Research and Development Project (2019YFA0405100, 2017YFA0402602, 2018YFA0404204, 2016YFA0400801), the Key Research Program of the CAS (QYZDJ-SSW-SLH021), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20211000), the Cultivation Project for FAST Scientific Payoff and Research Achievement of CAMS-CAS, the Strategic Priority Research Program on Space Science, the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grants XDA15360000, XDA15052700, XDB23040400), funding from the Max Planck Partner Group, the science research grants from the China Manned Space Project (CMS-CSST-2021-B11, CMS-CSST-2021-A11) and PKU development grant 7101502590. A.V.F.’s group at University of California, Berkeley is supported by the Christopher R. Redlich Fund, the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science (in which A.V.F. was a Miller Senior Fellow) and many individual donors. S.D. acknowledges support from the Xplorer Prize. B.B.Z. is supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (14380046) and the Program for Innovative Talents, Entrepreneur in Jiangsu. Some of the data presented herein were obtained at the W. M. Keck Observatory, which is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California and NASA; the observatory was made possible by the financial support of the W. M. Keck Foundation. We thank the Keck staff for their help during the observing runs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.X., J.R.N. and P.C. contributed equally and led the data analysis. K.J.L., W.W.Z., S.D. and B.Z. coordinated the observational campaign, cosupervised data analyses and interpretations, and led the paper writing. J.C.J. conducted the polarization and RM measurements. B.J.W., J.W.X., C.F.Z. and K.J.L. performed the timing analysis, periodicity search, DM measurement, burst searching and Faraday conversion measurement. Y.P.M. contributed to the searching software development. R.N.C., M.Z.C., L.F.H., Y.X.H., Z.Y.L., Z.X.L., Y.H.X. and J.P.Y. performed software testing. D.J.Z., Y.K.Z., P.W., Y.F., C.H.N., F.Y.W., X.F.W. and S.B.Z. contributed to radio data analysis. P.C., S.D., H.F., A.V.F., E.W.P., T.G.B., S.G.D., P.G., D.S., A.S., W.K.Z. and A.E. contributed to the optical observations and data reduction; A.V.F. also edited the manuscript in detail. P.C., S.D., H.F. and Y.L. contributed to analysing and interpreting the optical data. P.J., H.Q.G., J.L.H., H.L., L.Q., J.H.S., R.Y., Y.L.Y., D.J.Y. and Y.Zhu. aided with the FAST observations. J.L.H., D.L., M.W. and N.W. helped with observation coordination. K.J.L., B.Z., D.Z.L., W.Y.W., R.X.X., W.L., Y.P.Y., W.F.Y., Z.G.D. and R.L. provided theoretical discussions. C.C., C.K.L., X.Q.L., W.X.P., L.M.S., S.X., S.L.X., J.Y., X.Y., Q.B.Y., B.B.Z., S.N.Z., J.H.Z. and Y.Zhao contributed to the high-energy observations and data analyses.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Shami Chatterjee and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Extended data
is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05071-8.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Temporal variations of extra physical parameters.
a, Shape parameter (k) of Weibull distribution in event-rate inference. The error bar is at 68% confidence level. b,c, Daily burst energy and DM, in which the violin symbol indicates the distribution function, the green shaded strips indicate the 95% upper and lower bounds and the solid black curve is the median.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Fluence, equivalent width and energy distribution for detected bursts.
a,b, Cumulative distribution and histogram of the burst fluence; the dashed vertical red line at 53 mJy ms indicates the 95% completeness threshold. c, The 2D distribution of fluence and burst width. d, Histogram of burst width. e,f, Cumulative distribution and histogram of FRB 20201124A burst energy; the dashed vertical black line at 2 × 1036 erg indicates 95% completeness assuming a burst bandwidth of 185 MHz, the median of the burst bandwidths. The broken power law fit to the cumulative distribution of energy is the solid black curve, with the break point at 1.1 × 1038 erg indicated by a dot-dashed vertical line.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Waiting time distribution of FRB 20201124A.
a, The best fit using two log-normal functions (the blue curve), in which the two log-normal distributions peak at 39 ms and 106.7 s. b, The best fit (blue curve) using three log-normal functions, which are indicated with the dashed-line curves, peaking at 39 ms, 45.1 s and 162.3 s.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Apparent RM variation within individual bursts.
RM curve with 95% confidence level error bars (a), polarization profiles (b) and dynamic spectra (c). Bursts are dedispersed using corresponding structure-optimized DM values.
Extended Data Fig. 5 RM index.
a, Histogram of normalized RM index deviation defined as (β − 2)/σβ, in which σβ is the uncertainty of β with 68% confidence level. b, RM as a function of time. Orange dots are for selected bursts with (β − 2)/σβ ≤ 1 and the measurements not selected are blue dots.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Properties of the host galaxy at z = 0.098 in the optical and near-infrared.
a, i-Band and K′-band FRB 20201124A host-galaxy images by the LRIS and the NIRC2 camera, respectively, and the residual K′-band image after subtracting the disc component. The EVN localization of FRB 20201124A is indicated with the cyan circle, which is 60 mas in radius, that is, four times the uncertainty. The centre of the background galaxy (z = 0.553) is shown as the yellow asterisk. b, The Hα double-peaked profile shown in the medium-resolution ESI spectrum. Blue and red are for two different orders of the echelle spectrum. c, 2D spectroscopic image by the LRIS around the Hα emission line. A wavelength-dependent variation is clearly seen in the spatial direction. d, The Hα lines extracted from three different regions, which correspond to the three rectangles in panel c of the galaxy along the slit. e, The velocities at different projected distances in the slit direction relative to the continuum centre. The red line is the best-fit result of a simple rotation model The LRIS spectroscopic observations were taken with a seeing of 0.7″ (black bar), which sets the spatial resolution.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Properties of the galaxies and comparisons with other FRB hosts.
a, Hosts of FRB repeaters in the BPT diagram plotted with the SDSS DR8 MPA-JHU sample (black); parameter spaces of galaxies dominated by star formation and active galactic nuclei are separated by the dashed and solid black lines, respectively87,88. The host and background galaxies of FRB 20201124A are shown in red and yellow, respectively. b, The properties (FRB–galaxy offset in units of galaxy effective radius Re, gas-phase metallicity, sSFR and stellar mass) of the FRB 20201124A host galaxy (red star) compared with a literature sample of FRB hosts (available at https://web.archive.org/web/20211015143528/https://frbhosts.org/#explore) shown with dots (black, non-repeaters; red, repeaters). c, Emission lines from the background galaxy at z = 0.553 in the LRIS (blue) and ESI (red) spectra, with regions contaminated by the atmosphere of the Earth marked in green.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, H., Niu, J.R., Chen, P. et al. A fast radio burst source at a complex magnetized site in a barred galaxy. Nature 609, 685–688 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05071-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05071-8
This article is cited by
-
A link between repeating and non-repeating fast radio bursts through their energy distributions
Nature Astronomy (2024)
-
A highly magnetized environment in a pulsar binary system
Nature (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.