Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Pulsed hydraulic-pressure-responsive self-cleaning membrane

Abstract

Pressure-driven membranes is a widely used separation technology in a range of industries, such as water purification, bioprocessing, food processing and chemical production1,2. Despite their numerous advantages, such as modular design and minimal footprint, inevitable membrane fouling is the key challenge in most practical applications3. Fouling limits membrane performance by reducing permeate flux or increasing pressure requirements, which results in higher energetic operation and maintenance costs4,5,6,7. Here we report a hydraulic-pressure-responsive membrane (PiezoMem) to transform pressure pulses into electroactive responses for in situ self-cleaning. A transient hydraulic pressure fluctuation across the membrane results in generation of current pulses and rapid voltage oscillations (peak, +5.0/−3.2 V) capable of foulant degradation and repulsion without the need for supplementary chemical cleaning agents, secondary waste disposal or further external stimuli3,8,9,10,11,12,13. PiezoMem showed broad-spectrum antifouling action towards a range of membrane foulants, including organic molecules, oil droplets, proteins, bacteria and inorganic colloids, through reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and dielectrophoretic repulsion.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Piezoelectricity and microstructural and morphology characterization of the MnO/BTO grains and membranes.
Fig. 2: Piezoelectric effect and fouling reduction induced by hydraulic pressure.
Fig. 3: Universal PiezoMem antifouling.
Fig. 4: Mechanism of membrane self-cleaning.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are included within the paper and its Supplementary Information and are available from the corresponding author on request.

References

  1. Shannon, M. A. et al. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452, 301–310 (2008).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Werber, J. R., Osuji, C. O. & Elimelech, M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16018 (2016).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ronen, A., Walker, S. L. & Jassby, D. Electroconductive and electroresponsive membranes for water treatment. Rev. Chem. Eng. 32, 533–550 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hou, X., Hu, Y. H., Grinthal, A., Khan, M. & Aizenberg, J. Liquid-based gating mechanism with tunable multiphase selectivity and antifouling behaviour. Nature 519, 70–73 (2015).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, K. et al. Cation-controlled wetting properties of vermiculite membranes and its promise for fouling resistant oil–water separation. Nat. Commun. 11, 1097 (2020).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Seo, D. H. et al. Anti-fouling graphene-based membranes for effective water desalination. Nat. Commun. 9, 683 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, Q. & Zhang, Y. Fouling-resistant biofilter of an anaerobic electrochemical membrane reactor. Nat. Commun. 10, 4860 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, X. & Jassby, D. Electroactive membranes for water treatment: enhanced treatment functionalities, energy considerations, and future challenges. Acc. Chem. Res. 52, 1177–1186 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Formoso, P., Pantuso, E., De Filpo, G. & Nicoletta, F. P. Electro-conductive membranes for permeation enhancement and fouling mitigation: a short review. Membranes 7, 115219 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Q. Y. et al. Interlaced CNT electrodes for bacterial fouling reduction of microfiltration membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 9176–9183 (2017).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, Q. Y. & Vecitis, C. D. Conductive CNT-PVDF membrane for capacitive organic fouling reduction. J. Membr. Sci. 459, 143–156 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuscer, D. et al. Integrated piezoelectric vibration system for fouling mitigation in ceramic filtration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 540, 277–284 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, J. et al. Endowing piezoelectric and anti-fouling properties by directly poling β-phase PVDF membranes with green diluents. AIP Adv. 9, 115219 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao, Y., Gu, Y. N. & Gao, G. D. Piezoelectricity induced by pulsed hydraulic pressure enables in situ membrane demulsification and oil/water separation. Water Res. 215, 118245 (2022).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. You, Y. M. et al. An organic-inorganic perovskite ferroelectric with large piezoelectric response. Science 357, 306–309 (2017).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, R., Tang, E., Yang, G. & Han, Y. Experimental research on dynamic response of PZT-5H under impact load. Ceram. Int. 46, 2868–2876 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Park, D. Y. et al. Self-powered real-time arterial pulse monitoring using ultrathin epidermal piezoelectric sensors. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702308 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yan, Y., Zhou, J. E., Maurya, D., Wang, Y. U. & Priya, S. Giant piezoelectric voltage coefficient in grain-oriented modified PbTiO3 material. Nat. Commun. 7, 13089 (2016).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, W. et al. Piezoelectricity of single-atomic-layer MoS2 for energy conversion and piezotronics. Nature 514, 470–474 (2014).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mao, H. et al. Self-cleaning piezoelectric membrane for oil-in-water separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 18093–18103 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao, B., Dong, Y., Ma, N. & Du, P. Formation of sol–gel in situ derived BTO/NZFO composite ceramics with considerable dielectric and magnetic properties. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 1240–1247 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huan, Y., Wang, X., Fang, J. & Li, L. Grain size effects on piezoelectric properties and domain structure of BaTiO3 ceramics prepared by two-step sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 3369–3371 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghosh, D. et al. Domain wall displacement is the origin of superior permittivity and piezoelectricity in BaTiO3 at intermediate grain sizes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 885–896 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, J. B., Clarkson, C., Mant, C., Drinkwater, A. & May, E. Fat, oil and grease deposits in sewers: characterisation of deposits and formation mechanisms. Water Res. 46, 6319–6328 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang, R. et al. Engineering amphiphilic nanofiltration membrane surfaces with a multi-defense mechanism for improved antifouling performances. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 7892–7902 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liang, Z., Yan, C.-F., Rtimi, S. & Bandara, J. Piezoelectric materials for catalytic/photocatalytic removal of pollutants: recent advances and outlook. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 241, 256–269 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yi, Q. et al. Singlet oxygen triggered by superoxide radicals in a molybdenum cocatalytic Fenton reaction with enhanced REDOX activity in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 9725–9733 (2019).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Saito, Y. et al. Lead-free piezoceramics. Nature 432, 84–87 (2004).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu, Y., Zaiden, N., Liu, X., Mukherjee, M. & Cao, B. Responses of exogenous bacteria to soluble extracellular polymeric substances in wastewater: a mechanistic study and implications on bioaugmentation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 6919–6928 (2020).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pradel, K. C., Sohn, K. & Huang, J. Cross-flow purification of nanowires. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 3412–3416 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Asatekin, A. & Mayes, A. M. Oil industry wastewater treatment with fouling resistant membranes containing amphiphilic comb copolymers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 4487–4492 (2009).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tangsubkul, N., Parameshwaran, K., Lundie, S., Fane, A. G. & Waite, T. D. Environmental life cycle assessment of the microfiltration process. J. Membr. Sci. 284, 214–226 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lan, Y., Groenen-Serrano, K., Coetsier, C. & Causserand, C. Nanofiltration performances after membrane bioreactor for hospital wastewater treatment: fouling mechanisms and the quantitative link between stable fluxes and the water matrix. Water Res. 146, 77–87 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21976085) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant nos. 2016YFA0203104 and 2017YFE010720). G.G. thanks J.D. and C.S. for the measurement of pore size distribution and porosity, L.T.P. for their efforts in preparing the new PiezoMem to enable long-term running and Nanjing Wondux Environmental Protection Technology Corp. Ltd. for their assistance in scaling up the new PiezoMem and carrying out long-term experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.G. conceived the idea, supervised this work and revised the manuscript. Y.Z. designed and carried out the experiments (not including the preparation of the redesigned and improved new PiezoMem, and its long-term and scale-up experiments) and drafted the manuscript. B.L. and Y.G simulated and verified dielectrophoresis. Y.Y. measured the morphology of PiezoMem. C.S. discussed and revised the manuscript. C.D.V. discussed the data, proposed the dielectrophoresis antifouling mechanism and revised the manuscript. J.G. and S.Z. proposed the new PiezoMem in the revision of this manuscript. All authors analysed and interpreted the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guandao Gao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Suzana Nunes and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Membrane poling and periodical pressure cycling membrane filtration devices.

Devices of the membrane poling process (ac), piezoelectricity determination (d) and the periodical pressure cycling membrane filtration (e).

Extended Data Fig. 2 Characterization of PiezoMem.

The enhanced membrane strength of MnO/BTO PiezoMem without crack after filtration compared with the pure BTO membrane (a). Pore (b) and grain size (c) distributions of the PiezoMem after sintering. ESEM and the corresponding EDS elemental mapping images (corresponding ESEM images scale bar, 1 mm) of the PiezoMem (d). HRTEM image of the grain (e). STEM-HAADF EDS results (f) from the selected region of the MnO/BTO grain in Fig 1d. The pore size distribution measured by the mercury porosimetry method (g).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Characterization and properties of piezoelectric particles, membrane and foulants.

XRD patterns (a), underwater oil contact angle (b), permittivity (c), d33 values of the membranes (d) and the piezo outputs of the PiezoMem in response to a weight of 300 g in O/W emulsion (e). DLVO energy as a function of separation distance between O/W particle membranes (f,g) and the grain size distribution and zeta potential of foulants (h).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Optimization of pressure operation cycles.

The corresponding changing pressure on antifouling (ad). PiezoMem resists the sudden and transient high content feed solution up to 5,000 ppm (e) by regulating pressure operation (f). The flux of PiezoMem under lower pressure conditions (<2 bar) (g) and corresponding antifouling properties (h). Four parallel tests under the cycle condition (70-(2-7) s, 2 bar) with a high 2,500-ppm O/W emulsion (i).

Extended Data Fig. 5 Foulants in the pores and surfaces of PiezoMem and non-PiezoMem.

ESEM images of the membranes after O/W emulsion (a), BSA (b), SiO2 (c) and Al2O3 (d) filtration. EDS elemental mapping images in a and b correspond to the cross-section ESEM images. (e), flux50 permeation of the membranes. (f), Typical element content of foulants on the membrane surface after pressure cycling filtration according to the EDX results. (Note that the content of BSA was 50 ppm, whereas those of oil, SiO2 and Al2O3 were all 2,500 ppm).

Extended Data Fig. 6 Antibacterial performance.

Images of the PiezoMem and non-PiezoMem (ad) towards E. coli.

Extended Data Fig. 7 COMSOL simulation.

Modelling dielectrophoresis (ae) and electrostatic interaction (f) results.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains the COMSOL simulation and legends for supplementary videos.

Supplementary Video 1.

Supplementary Video 2.

Supplementary Video 3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Gu, Y., Liu, B. et al. Pulsed hydraulic-pressure-responsive self-cleaning membrane. Nature 608, 69–73 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04942-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04942-4

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing