Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Electrocatalytic metal hydride generation using CPET mediators

Nature volume 607, pages 499–506 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Transition metal hydrides (M-H) are ubiquitous intermediates in a wide range of enzymatic processes and catalytic reactions, playing a central role in H+/H2 interconversion1, the reduction of CO2 to formic acid (HCOOH)2 and in hydrogenation reactions. The facile formation of M-H is a critical challenge to address to further improve the energy efficiency of these reactions. Specifically, the easy electrochemical generation of M-H using mild proton sources is key to enable high selectivity versus competitive CO and H2 formation in the CO2 electroreduction to HCOOH, the highest value-added CO2 reduction product3. Here we introduce a strategy for electrocatalytic M-H generation using concerted proton–electron transfer (CPET) mediators. As a proof of principle, the combination of a series of CPET mediators with the CO2 electroreduction catalyst [MnI(bpy)(CO)3Br] (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) was investigated, probing the reversal of the product selectivity from CO to HCOOH to evaluate the efficiency of the manganese hydride (Mn-H) generation step. We demonstrate the formation of the Mn-H species by in situ spectroscopic techniques and determine the thermodynamic boundary conditions for this mechanism to occur. A synthetic iron–sulfur cluster is identified as the best CPET mediator for the system, enabling the preparation of a benchmark catalytic system for HCOOH generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: CPET-mediated metal hydride formation.
Fig. 2: Catalytic activity and spectroscopic characterization of relevant intermediates of CPET-mediated CO2RR activity of MnI-cat.
Fig. 3: Thermodynamic and kinetic considerations for catalytic CPET-mediated metal hydride formation.
Fig. 4: CO2RR activity of MnI-cat in the presence of various CPET mediators.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study (catalytic activity tests, cyclic voltammograms, NMR, UV–Vis and IRSEC spectra) are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files.

References

  1. Bullock, R. M. & Helm, M. L. Molecular electrocatalysts for oxidation of hydrogen using Earth-abundant metals: shoving protons around with proton relays. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 2017–2026 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Francke, R., Schille, B. & Roemelt, M. Homogeneously catalyzed electroreduction of carbon dioxide—methods, mechanisms, and catalysts. Chem. Rev. 118, 4631–4701 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Elgrishi, N., Kurtz, D. A. & Dempsey, J. L. Reaction parameters influencing cobalt hydride formation kinetics: implications for benchmarking H2-evolution catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 239–244 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, T., Rountree, E. S., Traywick, A. P., Bayoumi, M. & Dempsey, J. L. Switching between stepwise and concerted proton-coupled electron transfer pathways in tungsten hydride activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 14655–14669 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurtz, D. A. et al. Redox-induced structural reorganization dictates kinetics of cobalt(III) hydride formation via proton-coupled electron transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 3393–3406 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Noh, H. et al. Redox-mediator-assisted electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water by a molybdenum sulfide-functionalized metal–organic framework. ACS Catal. 8, 9848–9858 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rausch, B., Symes, M. D. & Cronin, L. A bio-inspired, small molecule electron-coupled-proton buffer for decoupling the half-reactions of electrolytic water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 13656–13659 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dutta, A., Appel, A. M. & Shaw, W. J. Designing electrochemically reversible H2 oxidation and production catalysts. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 244–252 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, N. E., Bernskoetter, W. H. & Hazari, N. The role of proton shuttles in the reversible activation of hydrogen via metal–ligand cooperation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 17350–17360 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Badalyan, A. & Stahl, S. S. Cooperative electrocatalytic alcohol oxidation with electron-proton-transfer mediators. Nature 535, 406–410 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McLoughlin, E. A., Armstrong, K. C. & Waymouth, R. M. Electrochemically regenerable hydrogen atom acceptors: mediators in electrocatalytic alcohol oxidation reactions. ACS Catal. 10, 11654–11662 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Galvin, C. M. & Waymouth, R. M. Electron-rich phenoxyl mediators improve thermodynamic performance of electrocatalytic alcohol oxidation with an iridium pincer complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 19368–19378 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chalkley, M. J., Garrido-Barros, P. & Peters, J. C. A molecular mediator for reductive concerted proton–electron transfers via electrocatalysis. Science 369, 850–854 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anson, C. W. & Stahl, S. S. Cooperative electrocatalytic O2 reduction involving Co(salophen) with p-hydroquinone as an electron–proton transfer mediator. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 18472–18475 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bourrez, M., Molton, F., Chardon-Noblat, S. & Deronzier, A. [Mn(bipyridyl)(CO)3Br]: an abundant metal carbonyl complex as efficient electrocatalyst for CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50, 9903–9906 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Takeda, H., Koizumi, H., Okamoto, K. & Ishitani, O. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction using a Mn complex as a catalyst. Chem. Commun. 50, 1491–1493 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, X. et al. Site-isolated manganese carbonyl on bipyridine-functionalities of periodic mesoporous organosilicas: efficient CO2 photoreduction and detection of key reaction intermediates. Chem. Sci. 8, 8204–8213 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rønne, M. H. et al. Ligand-controlled product selectivity in electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction using manganese bipyridine catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 4265–4275 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bhattacharya, M., Sebghati, S., VanderLinden, R. T. & Saouma, C. T. Toward combined carbon capture and recycling: addition of an amine alters product selectivity from CO to formic acid in manganese catalyzed reduction of CO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 17589–17597 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Saouma, C. T., Morris, W. D., Darcy, J. W. & Mayer, J. M. Protonation and proton-coupled electron transfer at S-ligated [4Fe-4S] clusters. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 9256–9260 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tilset, M. & Parker, V. D. Solution homolytic bond dissociation energies of organotransition-metal hydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 6711–6717 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Senger, M. et al. Proton-coupled reduction of the catalytic [4Fe-4S] cluster in [FeFe]-hydrogenases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 56, 16503–16506 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Camba, R. et al. Mechanisms of redox-coupled proton transfer in proteins: role of the proximal proline in reactions of the [3Fe-4S] cluster in Azotobacter vinelandii ferredoxin I. Biochemistry 42, 10589–10599 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Albers, A. et al. Fast proton-coupled electron transfer observed for a high-fidelity structural and functional [2Fe–2S] Rieske model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 3946–3954 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kennepohl, P. & Solomon, E. I. Electronic structure contributions to electron-transfer reactivity in iron−sulfur active sites: 3. Kinetics of electron transfer. Inorg. Chem. 42, 696–708 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sigfridsson, E., Olsson, M. H. M. & Ryde, U. Inner-sphere reorganization energy of iron−sulfur clusters studied with theoretical methods. Inorg. Chem. 40, 2509–2519 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jordan, R. F. & Norton, J. R. in Mechanistic Aspects of Inorganic Reactions (eds Rorabacher, D. B. & Endicott, J. F.) ACS Symposium Series Vol. 198, Ch. 17, 403–423 (American Chemical Society, 1982).

  29. Franco, F. et al. Local proton source in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction with [Mn(bpy–R)(CO)3Br] complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 23, 4782–4793 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cotton, F. A., Down, J. L. & Wilkinson, G. Infrared spectra of manganese carbonyl hydride and deuteride. J. Chem. Soc. 833–837 (1959).

  31. Machan, C. W., Sampson, M. D., Chabolla, S. A., Dang, T. & Kubiak, C. P. Developing a mechanistic understanding of molecular electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction using infrared spectroelectrochemistry. Organometallics 33, 4550–4559 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Riplinger, C., Sampson, M. D., Ritzmann, A. M., Kubiak, C. P. & Carter, E. A. Mechanistic contrasts between manganese and rhenium bipyridine electrocatalysts for the reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 16285–16298 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mayer, J. M. Understanding hydrogen atom transfer: from bond strengths to Marcus theory. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 36–46 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Waldie, K. M., Ostericher, A. L., Reineke, M. H., Sasayama, A. F. & Kubiak, C. P. Hydricity of transition-metal hydrides: thermodynamic considerations for CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 8, 1313–1324 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ceballos, B. M. & Yang, J. Y. Directing the reactivity of metal hydrides for selective CO2 reduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12686–12691 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Parsell, T. H., Yang, M.-Y. & Borovik, A. S. C−H Bond cleavage with reductants: re-investigating the reactivity of monomeric MnIII/IV−oxo complexes and the role of oxo ligand basicity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 2762–2763 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pattanayak, S. et al. Spectroscopic and reactivity comparisons of a pair of bTAML complexes with FeV═O and FeIV═O units. Inorg. Chem. 56, 6352–6361 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Qiu, G. & Knowles, R. R. Rate–driving force relationships in the multisite proton-coupled electron transfer activation of ketones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2721–2730 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Madsen, M. R. et al. Promoting selective generation of formic acid from CO2 using Mn(bpy)(CO)3Br as electrocatalyst and triethylamine/isopropanol as additives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 20491–20500 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, P. T., Weng, S. & Chang, C. J. An NADH-inspired redox mediator strategy to promote second-sphere electron and proton transfer for cooperative electrochemical CO2 reduction catalyzed by iron porphyrin. Inorg. Chem. 59, 9270–9278 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Grunwald and A. Mouchfiq for technical assistance and preliminary studies, and R. Verel for assistance with NMR studies. We acknowledge funding from Agence Nationale pour la Recherche, ANR Jeune Chercheur-Jeune Chercheuse ANR-17-CE05-0021 (S.D., V.M.); European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 853064 (S.D., F.M., V.M.)); and Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) project funding (grant no. 200021_197153 / 1 (V.M.)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Subal Dey, Fabio Masero, Enzo Brack & Victor Mougel

  2. Laboratoire de Chimie des Processus Biologiques, UMR 8229 CNRS, Collège de France, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France

    Subal Dey & Marc Fontecave

Authors
  1. Subal Dey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabio Masero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enzo Brack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marc Fontecave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Victor Mougel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.D. and V.M. conceptualized the study and were responsible for the methodology. S.D., F.M. and E.B. undertook the investigations. V.M. was responsible for funding acquisition and supervision. M.F. and V.M. administered the project. S.D., F.M. and V.M. wrote the original draft. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Mougel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary data and discussion, figures, tables and references.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dey, S., Masero, F., Brack, E. et al. Electrocatalytic metal hydride generation using CPET mediators. Nature 607, 499–506 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04874-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04874-z

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing