Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Immune regulation by fungal strain diversity in inflammatory bowel disease

Nature volume 603, pages 672–678 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 20 July 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

The fungal microbiota (mycobiota) is an integral part of the complex multikingdom microbial community colonizing the mammalian gastrointestinal tract and has an important role in immune regulation1,2,3,4,5,6. Although aberrant changes in the mycobiota have been linked to several diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease3,4,5,6,7,8,9, it is currently unknown whether fungal species captured by deep sequencing represent living organisms and whether specific fungi have functional consequences for disease development in affected individuals. Here we developed a translational platform for the functional analysis of the mycobiome at the fungal-strain- and patient-specific level. Combining high-resolution mycobiota sequencing, fungal culturomics and genomics, a CRISPR–Cas9-based fungal strain editing system, in vitro functional immunoreactivity assays and in vivo models, this platform enables the examination of host–fungal crosstalk in the human gut. We discovered a rich genetic diversity of opportunistic Candida albicans strains that dominate the colonic mucosa of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Among these human-gut-derived isolates, strains with high immune-cell-damaging capacity (HD strains) reflect the disease features of individual patients with ulcerative colitis and aggravated intestinal inflammation in vivo through IL-1β-dependent mechanisms. Niche-specific inflammatory immunity and interleukin-17A-producing T helper cell (TH17 cell) antifungal responses by HD strains in the gut were dependent on the C. albicans-secreted peptide toxin candidalysin during the transition from a benign commensal to a pathobiont state. These findings reveal the strain-specific nature of host–fungal interactions in the human gut and highlight new diagnostic and therapeutic targets for diseases of inflammatory origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: C. albicans expands in the colonic mucosa of patients with UC and promotes inflammation in a mouse model of colitis.
Fig. 2: Cell damage and proinflammatory immunity induced by human-gut-derived C. albicans are strain dependent.
Fig. 3: HD C. albicans promotes intestinal pro-inflammatory immunity through the Efg1–Ece1-dependent factor candidalysin.
Fig. 4: The ability of patient-specific C. albicans strains to induce IL-1β reflects UC disease severity and anti-IL-1R antibody treatment ameliorates disease in mice.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

ITS sequencing data are publicly available in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject ID PRJNA610042. The data from whole-genome sequencing of human gut-derived C. albicans isolates are publicly available in the NCBI SRA under BioProject ID PRJNA702809. Raw sequencing data for representative C. albicans strains were downloaded from the NCBI SRA under BioProject ID PRJNA432884 (ref. 43). Other data necessary to evaluate the paper are provided within the Article and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

Change history

References

  1. The Human Microbiome Project Consortium. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).

    Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature 569, 655–662 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chehoud, C. et al. Fungal signature in the gut microbiota of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 21, 1948–1956 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoarau, G. et al. Bacteriome and mycobiome interactions underscore microbial dysbiosis in familial Crohn’s disease. mBio 7, e01250–16 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Liguori, G. et al. Fungal dysbiosis in mucosa-associated microbiota of Crohn’s disease patients. J. Crohn’s Colitis 10, 296–305 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sokol, H. et al. Fungal microbiota dysbiosis in IBD. Gut 66, 1039–1048 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ott, S. J. et al. Fungi and inflammatory bowel diseases: alterations of composition and diversity. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 43, 831–841 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Limon, J. J. et al. Malassezia is associated with Crohn’s disease and exacerbates colitis in mouse models. Cell Host Microbe 25, 377–388 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, U. et al. Debaryomyces is enriched in Crohn’s disease intestinal tissue and impairs healing in mice. Science 371, 1154–1159 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan, G. G. The global burden of IBD: from 2015 to 2025. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 12, 720–727 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Israeli, E. et al. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies as predictors of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 54, 1232–1236 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, J. D. et al. Inflammation, antibiotics, and diet as environmental stressors of the gut microbiome in pediatric Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe 18, 489–500 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaffer, T. et al. Anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae mannan antibodies (ASCA) of Crohn’s patients crossreact with mannan from other yeast strains, and murine ASCA IgM can be experimentally induced with Candida albicans. Inflamm. Bowel dis. 13, 1339–1346 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Standaert-Vitse, A. et al. Candida albicans colonization and ASCA in familial Crohn’s disease. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104, 1745–1753 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Doron, I. et al. Human gut mycobiota tune immunity via CARD9-dependent induction of anti-fungal IgG antibodies. Cell 184, 1017–1031 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Leonardi, I. et al. CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes control immunity to intestinal fungi. Science 359, 232–236 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen, R., Roth, F. J., Delgado, E., Ahearn, D. G. & Kalser, M. H. Fungal flora of the normal human small and large intestine. N. Engl. J. Med. 280, 638–641 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sovran, B. et al. Enterobacteriaceae are essential for the modulation of colitis severity by fungi. Microbiome 6, 152 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Danese, S. & Fiocchi, C. Ulcerative colitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 1713–1725 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan, D. et al. Activation of HIF-1α and LL-37 by commensal bacteria inhibits Candida albicans colonization. Nat. Med. 21, 808–814 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jawhara, S. et al. Colonization of mice by Candida albicans is promoted by chemically induced colitis and augments inflammatory responses through galectin-3. J. Infect. Dis. 197, 972–980 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marakalala, M. J. et al. Differential adaptation of Candida albicans in vivo modulates immune recognition by dectin-1. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003315 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Liang, S. H. et al. Hemizygosity enables a mutational transition governing fungal virulence and commensalism. Cell Host Microbe 25, 418–431.e6 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Schonherr, F. A. et al. The intraspecies diversity of C. albicans triggers qualitatively and temporally distinct host responses that determine the balance between commensalism and pathogenicity. Mucosal Immunol. 10, 1335–1350 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Forche, A. et al. Selection of Candida albicans trisomy during oropharyngeal infection results in a commensal-like phenotype. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008137 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tso, G. H. W. et al. Experimental evolution of a fungal pathogen into a gut symbiont. Science 362, 589–595 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kasper, L. et al. The fungal peptide toxin candidalysin activates the NLRP3 inflammasome and causes cytolysis in mononuclear phagocytes. Nat. Commun. 9, 4260 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wellington, M., Koselny, K., Sutterwala, F. S. & Krysan, D. J. Candida albicans triggers NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis in macrophages. Eukaryot. Cell 13, 329–340 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Uwamahoro, N. et al. The pathogen Candida albicans hijacks pyroptosis for escape from macrophages. mBio 5, e00003–14 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Moyes, D. L. et al. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532, 64–68 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Verma, A. H. et al. Oral epithelial cells orchestrate innate type 17 responses to Candida albicans through the virulence factor candidalysin. Sci. Immunol. 2, eaam8834 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Naglik, J. R., Gaffen, S. L. & Hube, B. Candidalysin: discovery and function in Candida albicans infections. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 52, 100–109 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pierce, J. V. & Kumamoto, C. A. Variation in Candida albicans EFG1 expression enables host-dependent changes in colonizing fungal populations. mBio 3, e00117–12 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Witchley, J. N. et al. Candida albicans morphogenesis programs control the balance between gut commensalism and invasive infection. Cell Host Microbe 25, 432–443 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li, X. et al. Response to fungal dysbiosis by gut-resident CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes aggravates allergic airway disease. Cell Host Microbe 24, 847–856 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Rohde, C. M. et al. Metabonomic evaluation of Schaedler altered microflora rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 20, 1388–1392 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schaedler, R. W., Dubos, R. & Costello, R. The development of the bacterial flora in the gastrointestinal tract of mice. J. Exp. Med. 122, 59–66 (1965).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Witchley, J. N., Basso, P., Brimacombe, C. A., Abon, N. V. & Noble, S. M. Recording of DNA-binding events reveals the importance of a repurposed Candida albicans regulatory network for gut commensalism. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1002–1013 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Vyas, V. K. et al. New CRISPR mutagenesis strategies reveal variation in repair mechanisms among fungi. mSphere 3, e00154–18 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Vyas, V. K., Barrasa, M. I. & Fink, G. R. A Candida albicans CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500248 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Selmecki, A., Forche, A. & Berman, J. Genomic plasticity of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell 9, 991–1008 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. MacCallum, D. M. et al. Property differences among the four major Candida albicans strain clades. Eukaryot. Cell 8, 373–387 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Ropars, J. et al. Gene flow contributes to diversification of the major fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Nat. Commun. 9, 2253 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Butler, G. et al. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459, 657–662 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Drummond, R. A. et al. CARD9+ microglia promote antifungal immunity via IL-1β- and CXCL1-mediated neutrophil recruitment. Nat. Immunol. 20, 559–570 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Shouval, D. S. et al. Interleukin 1β mediates intestinal inflammation in mice and patients with interleukin 10 receptor deficiency. Gastroenterology 151, 1100–1104 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Friedrich, M. et al. IL-1-driven stromal–neutrophil interactions define a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease that does not respond to therapies. Nat. Med. 27, 1970–1981 (2021).

  48. Mogavero, S. et al. Candidalysin delivery to the invasion pocket is critical for host epithelial damage induced by Candida albicans. Cell. Microbiol. 23, e13378 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Longman, R. S. et al. CX3CR1+ mononuclear phagocytes support colitis-associated innate lymphoid cell production of IL-22. J. Exp. Med. 211, 1571–1583 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Hepworth, M. R. et al. Group 3 innate lymphoid cells mediate intestinal selection of commensal bacteria-specific CD4+ T cells. Science 348, 1031–1035 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Tang, J., Iliev, I. D., Brown, J., Underhill, D. M. & Funari, V. A. Mycobiome: approaches to analysis of intestinal fungi. J. Immunol. Methods 421, 112–121 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Zheng, X. et al. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics 28, 3326–3328 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Gu, Z., Gu, L., Eils, R., Schlesner, M. & Brors, B. circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R. Bioinformatics 30, 2811–2812 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Bankevich, A. et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477 (2012).

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Wick, R. R., Schultz, M. B., Zobel, J. & Holt, K. E. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31, 3350–3352 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Iliev laboratory for suggestions relating to the manuscript; W. Jin and C. Guo, who shared cloning reagents and equipment; G. Fink, V. K. Vyas and D. A. Bernstein for providing plasmids and protocols and all contributing members of the JRI IBD Live Cell Bank Consortium; and the staff at the Microbiome Core Laboratory of Weill Cornell Medicine. Support for sample acquisition through the JRI IBD Live Cell Bank is provided by the JRI, Jill Roberts Center for IBD, Cure for IBD, the Rosanne H. Silbermann Foundation and Weill Cornell Medicine Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. X.V.L. is supported by fellowship from the Charles H. Revson Foundation. I.L. is supported by fellowships from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation (568319). W.D.F. is supported by a fellowship from the NIH (F32DK120228). J.R.N is supported by the Wellcome Trust (214229_Z_18_Z), NIH (R37-DE022550) and IS-BRC-1215-20006. B.H. is supported by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) within the Cluster of Excellence ‘Balance of the Microverse’, under Germany’s Excellence Strategy, EXC 2051, Project-ID 390713860. Research in the Iliev laboratory is supported by US National Institutes of Health (R01DK113136, R01DK121977, R21AI146957 and R01AI163007), the Irma T. Hirschl Career Scientist Award, the Kenneth Rainin Foundation, the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust and the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease (PATH) Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastroenterology and Hepatology Division, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

    Xin V. Li, Irina Leonardi, Alexa Semon, William D. Fiers, Takato Kusakabe, Woan-Yu Lin, Iris H. Gao, Itai Doron, Alejandra Gutierrez-Guerrero, Guilhermina M. Carriche, Ellen J. Scherl & Iliyan D. Iliev

  2. The Jill Roberts Institute for Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

    Xin V. Li, Irina Leonardi, Gregory G. Putzel, Alexa Semon, William D. Fiers, Takato Kusakabe, Woan-Yu Lin, Iris H. Gao, Itai Doron, Alejandra Gutierrez-Guerrero, Meghan B. DeCelie, Guilhermina M. Carriche, Marissa Mesko & Iliyan D. Iliev

  3. Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

    Woan-Yu Lin, Iris H. Gao & Iliyan D. Iliev

  4. Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Chen Yang

  5. Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK

    Julian R. Naglik

  6. Department of Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knoell Institute, Jena, Germany

    Bernhard Hube

  7. Institute of Microbiology, FriedrichSchiller University, Jena, Germany

    Bernhard Hube

  8. The Jill Roberts Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Ellen J. Scherl

  9. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, NY, USA

    Iliyan D. Iliev

Authors
  1. Xin V. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Irina Leonardi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gregory G. Putzel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alexa Semon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William D. Fiers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Takato Kusakabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Woan-Yu Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Iris H. Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Itai Doron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Alejandra Gutierrez-Guerrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Meghan B. DeCelie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Guilhermina M. Carriche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Marissa Mesko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Chen Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Julian R. Naglik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Bernhard Hube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Ellen J. Scherl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Iliyan D. Iliev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

X.V.L. and I.D.I. conceived and designed experiments. X.V.L. performed experiments. I.L., A.S., W.D.F., T.K., W.-Y.L., I.H.G., I.D., A.G.-G., M.B.D., G.M.C. and M.M. helped with experiments and assays. A.S. and X.V.L. established strain collection and identification. A.S. and I.L. performed the ITS sequencing and analysis. G.G.P. performed the whole-genome analysis. C.Y. performed histology scoring. X.V.L., I.L. and G.G.P. generated figures from analysed data. X.V.L. designed, performed and validated CRISPR–Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of C. albicans isolates. J.R.N. and B.H. provided the ece1Δ/Δ mutant, a parental strain and contributed to related data interpretation. E.J.S. provided samples and advice. X.V.L. and I.D.I. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Iliyan D. Iliev.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

I.D.I. and X.L. are inventors on a US provisional patent application US 63/287,233 filed by Cornell University, covering inventions described in this manuscript. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Gordon Brown and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Relative abundance of intestinal fungal genera in non-IBD and patients with UC.

a, Alpha diversity analysis was analysed using the Shannon diversity index among fungi communities at the fungal OTU level in colonic mucosa (MUC) enriched samples from non-IBD or ulcerative colitis-affected (UC) individuals. Based on quality control one non-IBD sample was excluded from further mycobiome sequencing and analysis. b, Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of distance ordination based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities for fungal ITS1 OTUs in colonic mucosa (MUC) enriched samples from non-IBD or ulcerative colitis-affected (UC) individuals. Analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) statistics. c, Relative genus abundance of intestinal fungal genera. Boxplots in a and c, the lower and upper hinges correspond to the first and third quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles). The horizontal line shows the median. a–c, Each dot represents an individual human subject, non-IBD (n = 37) or ulcerative colitis-affected (UC, n = 40) individuals. Analysis performed with two-sided, non-paired, Mann-Whitney test, Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) corrected for data in a and c.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Intestinal colonization by C. albicans does not cause spontaneous colitis during homeostasis nor does it aggravate DSS-induced colitis.

a, Faecal C. albicans burdens were assessed after 3 days of C. albicans colonization in mice that received either control feeding water (n = 4) or DSS water (n = 5) for 4 days. Dots represent individual mice. b–g, Mice, after being gavaged with PBS (n = 5) or C. albicans (n = 5) for 14 days, were induced by 3% DSS water for 7 days. b, Schematic figure of DSS-induced colitis model of mice with intestinal colonization by C. albicans. c, H&E staining and histology score of colon sections. n=  9 (DSS + control PBS) and n = 7 (DSS + C. albicans). The scale bar 200 μm. Data in c are pooled from two independent experiments with similar results. d, e, Representative flow cytometry plot and quantification of Foxp3+ (d) and RORγt+ CD4+ T (e) cells. f, g, Mice were gavaged twice per week with PBS (n = 5) or C. albicans WT SC5314 (n = 5). Mice were sacrificed four months later for colon length (f) and histology evaluation, the scale bar 100 μm (g). Each dot represents an individual mouse. Data in a–e are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. Data in f, g representative of two independent experiments with similar results. Data in a, c, and d–g are shown as mean ± s.e.m., unpaired, two-tailed, Mann-Whitney test.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 C. albicans expands and promotes intestinal inflammation under immunosuppression therapy for UC.

a, Medication data summary for UC patients (n = 5609) who visited New York-Presbyterian Hospital from 2015–2018. Corticosteroids (CS, n = 2522); Others include Mercaptopurine, Azathioprine, Methotrexate, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine and biologics (n = 3057). Some individuals were being treated with two or more treatments. b, Faecal C. albicans burdens were measured after 3 days of C. albicans colonization in mice that received either PBS (n = 5) or prednisolone daily (10 mg/kg/day, n = 5). c–e, WT SPF mice were fed PBS (n = 5), P. kudriavzevii (Pk, n = 5), or Candida albicans (n = 5) while receiving prednisolone treatment (prednisolone + PBS, prednisolone + P. kudriavzevii, or prednisolone + C. albicans). 3% DSS drinking water was used to induce colitis for 7 days. Mice were sacrificed three days after the DSS water was removed. c, Faecal fungal burdens upon sacrifice. d, Colon length was assessed. e, Representative flow cytometry plots and quantification of the frequency IL-17A+CD4+ T cells in the colons. Results in b–f are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Each dot represents an individual mouse. Data in b–e are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. Unpaired, two-tailed, Mann-Whitney test (b, c) or one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (d, e).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Gut-derived C. albicans isolates exhibit different phenotypic responses in a filamentation assay.

a, Gut C. albicans isolates were cultured on Spider agar at 37 °C for 5 days followed by assessment of the edge of wrinkled and smooth colonies. Percentage of the filamentation phenotypes of gut C. albicans isolates in Fig. 2a on spider agar. b–i, Filamentation phenotype of representative gut C. albicans isolates used in Fig. 2a. b, C. albicans IDB311, IDB312, and IDB313 isolates from UC patient IDB31. c, C. albicans IDB831, IDB832, and IDB833 isolates from UC patient IDB83. d, C. albicans IDB101, IDB102, and IDB104 isolates from UC patient IDB10. e, C. albicans IDC481, IDC482, and IDC483 isolates from UC patient IDC48. f, C. albicans IDB071, IDB072, and IDB073 isolates from UC patient IDB07. g, C. albicans IDA651, IDA652, and IDA653 isolates from UC patient IDA65. h, C. albicans IDA921, IDA922, and IDA923 isolates from UC patient IDA92. i, C. albicans IDC561, IDC562, and IDC563 isolates from non-IBD individual IDC56. Data are representative of three independent experiments with same results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 High-damaging strains induce greater proinflammatory immune responses.

a–c, WT germ-free (GF) mice were colonized with C. albicans strains for three weeks. PBS (n = 5), LD-Ca (IDC561, n = 5), HD-Ca (IDB311, n = 6). a, Gating strategy to analyse CD4+ T cells in colonic lamina propria cells. Representative flow cytometry plots and quantification of CD4+IL-17A+IL-17F+ (b, from left to right) and CD4+RORγt+ cells (c, from left to right) in the colon. d–f, ASF mice were colonized with Ca strains for three weeks. PBS (n = 6), LD-Ca (IDC561, n = 6), and HD-Ca (IDB311, n = 6). d, C. albicans burden in the faeces at day 21. e, Frequency of colonic CD4+IL-17A+ TH17 cells. f, Frequency of colonic CD4+RORγt+ cells. g, h, ASF mice were colonized with LD-Ca (IDB891, n = 5) or HD-Ca (IDB101, n = 6) for three weeks. g, C. albicans burden in the faeces at day 21. h, Frequency of CD4+IL-17A+ TH17 cells in the colon were assessed. i, j, ASF mice were colonized with LD-Ca (IDC662, n = 6) or HD-Ca (IDC711, n = 6) for three weeks. i, C. albicans burden in the faeces at day 21. j, Frequencies of CD4+IL-17A+ and CD4+IL-17A+ IL-17F+ TH17 cells in the colon were assessed. k, SPF WT mice were with Ca strains colonized and treated with prednisolone followed by DSS-induced murine colitis. PBS (n = 10), HD-Ca IDB311 (n = 9) and LD-Ca IDC561 (n = 7). Faecal C. albicans burdens were assessed upon sacrifice. Results in b–k are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Each dot represents an individual mouse. Data in b, c are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. Data in d–k are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. Unpaired, two-tailed, Mann-Whitney test (d–k) or one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (b, c).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Efg1-dependent candidalysin is required for cell damage in high-damaging C. albicans strains from the human gut.

a, Caco-2 cells were infected with live C. albicans for 12 h, and both the EFG1 expression of C. albicans. HD/C.a IDB311 and LD/C.a IDC561 strains, and respective efg1Δ/Δ (efg1) strains were used in this experiment. Data shown as mean ± s.d. Data points indicate technical well replicates (n = 3). Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. b, Dendrogram showing SNP-based distances between EFG1 sequences of isolates. Each isolate was obtained from an individual subject from the non-IBD (n = 8) or UC patient (n = 10) group. c, Caco-2 cells were infected with C. albicans and LDH release of Caco-2 cells was assessed. HD-Ca IDB101, HD-Ca IDB101 efg1Δ/Δ mutant (efg1), LD-Ca IDB891, and LD-Ca IDB891 efg1Δ/Δ mutant (efg1) were used. d, C. albicans HD-Ca IDB311, HD-Ca IDB101 and the respective EFG1 mutants were cultured on Spider agar at 37 °C for 5 days followed by assessment of the filamentation phenotype. Data are representative of two independent experiments with same results. e, f, GF mice were colonized with PBS (GF, n = 5), HD-Ca IDB311 (HD, n = 6) or HD-Ca IDB311 efg1 (HD efg1, n = 6) strains for three weeks. e, Frequencies of IL-17A+CD4+ T cells; f, Frequencies, and total cell numbers of IL-17A+IL-17F+CD4+ T cells, in the colon were assessed by flow cytometry. g, ECE1 gene expression in C. albicans cells were assessed upon EFG1 gene deletion. Data shown as mean ± s.d. Data points indicate technical well replicates (n = 3). Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. h, Log2 transformed ratio of gene expression between EFG1 mutant and WT C. albicans strain upon colonization of the large intestine represented as a volcano plot. Data were obtained and analysed from a recent resource dataset from Witchley et al. 2021. i, LDH release were assessed from Caco-2 cells. HD-Ca IDB101, LD-Ca IDB891 and respective ECE1 mutant strains were used. Data shown as mean ± s.d. Data points indicate technical well replicates (n = 3). Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. j–m, GF mice were colonized with C a strains for three weeks. PBS GF (n = 8), HD-Ca IDB311 (HD, n = 10), HD ece1 (n = 10), LD-Ca IDC561 (LD, n = 7), and LD ece1 (n = 7). j, Quantification of the frequencies of IL-17A+CD4+ T cells; k, Quantification of the frequencies, and total cell numbers of IL-17A+IL-17F+CD4+ T cells in the colon. l, Faecal C. albicans burden were measured at day 21. Each dot represents an individual mouse. m, HD and LD C. albicans strains both colonize the intestine and form a mixture of yeast and hyphal morphotypes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was utilized to visualize the morphology of C. albicans HD-Ca IDB311, LD-Ca IDC561, and respective ECE1 mutant strains (HD-Ca IDB311 ece1Δ/Δ and LD-Ca IDC561 ece1Δ/Δ) in the colon tissue after 21 days of mono-colonization of C. albicans. The nuclei of colonic epithelial cells were stained with DAPI (blue), colonic mucin was stained with a FITC- conjugated Ulex europaeus agglutinin (UEA-I, lectin) (green), and C. albicans was stained with a Cy3-coupled pan-fungal-specific probe (red). The colon tissue of germ-free mice was used as a control. The scale bar 25 μm. Results in e, f and j–l are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Data in e, f are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. Data in j–m are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. Unpaired, two-tailed, Mann-Whitney test (a, g), One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (e, f, j, k, l).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Genomic comparative analysis of genetic polymorphisms in CPH1, UME6, FLO8 and ECE1 among high- and low-damaging strains.

a–c, Dendrogram showing SNP-based distances between CPH1 (a), UME6 (b), FLO8 (c) and ECE1 (d) sequences of isolates. Each isolate was obtained from an individual subject from the non-IBD (n = 8) or UC patient (n = 10) group.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Gut C. albicans promotes intestinal pro-inflammatory immunity through candidalysin.

a, b, Cell damage by C. albicans. mBMDMs (a) and Caco-2 cells (b) were incubated with live C. albicans (m.o.i. = 5) wild-type parental (Ca Pare) or C. albicans ece1Δ/Δ (Ca ece1) strains for 16 h and LDH release in the supernatants was measured. Results are shown as mean ± s.d. Data points indicate technical well replicates (n = 3). Data are representative of three independent experiments. Unpaired, two-tailed, student test. c–e, ASF mice were colonized with C. albicans  Pare or C. albicans ece1 strains for three weeks. n = 6 mice in each group. c, d, Frequency and total cell numbers of CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils (c, from left to right) and IL-17A+CD4+ T cells (d, from left to right) in the colon. e, Faecal C. albicans burdens were measured at day 21. f–j, WT SPF mice were colonized with or without C. albicans Pare or C. albicans ece1 strain, DSS colitis was induced followed by treatment with prednisolone. f, Faecal C. albicans burden were measured upon sacrifice. g, representative H&E colon section. The scale bar 200 μm. h, Histology scores. PBS (n = 14), C. albicans Pare (n = 15), and C. albicans ece1 (n = 13). Data are pooled from two independent experiment with similar results. i, Frequency of colonic lamina propria neutrophils. j, IL-17A+CD4+ T cells were assessed upon sacrifice. Results in c–f and h–j are shown as mean ± s.e.m. Each dot represents an individual mouse. Data in c–f and i, j are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. Unpaired, two-tailed, Mann-Whitney test (e, f) or one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (c, d, h–j).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 C. albicans clonal expansion, and microevolution occur in the human gut.

a, Dendrogram showing genome-wide SNP-based distances among two or three human gut C. albicans isolates obtained from the same individual subject. Strains isolated from non-IBD subjects (nIBD), UC patients (UC), and refence strain C. albicans SC5314 (Ref. Strain). b, Heatmap showing genome-wide density of heterozygous SNPs from two or three human gut C. albicans isolates obtained from the same individual subject. Strains isolated from non-IBD subjects (nIBD), UC patients (UC), and refence strain C. albicans SC5314 (Ref. Strain) are labelled. Color density indicates the number of heterozygous SNPs detected in each 10 kbp window of an isolate’s genome. Arrows point to the genomic locations of ECE1 and EFG1 genes. c, Multiple sequence alignment of candidalysin (SK1 peptide) amino acid sequences across multiple isolates of C. albicans. Each isolate was obtained from an individual subject from the non-IBD or UC patient group. Four variants of candidalysin across strains show no association/clustering of specific variant with HD or LD strain. Two haplotypes are shown for isolates that are heterozygous in this region.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Immune mediators released by macrophage upon infection with gut -derived C. albicans strains.

a, LDH release measured in culture supernatants of hMDM after infection with C. albicans parental strain (Pare), C. albicans ece1Δ/Δ (Ca ece1) and an untreated group (Ctrl) for 16 h. b, Macrophage-released mediators measured by cytometric bead assays from cultures in Extended Data Fig. 10a. c, IL-1β release measured in culture supernatants of LPS-primed hMDMs infected with C. albicans parental strain, C. albicans ece1, and in uninfected group. Parallel experiments were performed with a. Results a–c are shown as mean ± s.d. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. d–f, Cytokine release in culture supernatants of unprimed human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) after incubation with live gut derived-C. albicans isolates (m.o.i. = 5). d, IL-6 cytokine production was measured by ELISA. hMDM damage measured (LDH assay) in the same experiment was correlated with specific cytokine release. e, f, Correlation between TNF-α and IL-6 cytokine from hMDM induced by patient-specific gut C. albicans and Mayo score in corresponding UC patients (n = 10). Dot is shown as an average value of three technical repeats, Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. The simple linear regression was performed, where P-value calculated by a F test. g, h, Mice colonized with or without HD-Ca IBD311 were treated with prednisolone (Pred) followed by DSS-mediated induction of colitis. Each mouse further treated with 1 mg anti-IL-1R1 IgG (αIL1R) or isotype IgG (IgG) at the time point indicated in the schematic figure of experimental layout (g). IgG+PBS (n = 8), IgG+C. albicans (n = 9) and αIL-1R1+C. albicans (n = 7). h, Representative flow cytometry plots of IL-17A+IL-17F+CD4+ T cells. Data in d–h are representative of three independent experiments with similar results. One-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s post hoc test (a–c).

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables

Supplementary Tables 1–4.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X.V., Leonardi, I., Putzel, G.G. et al. Immune regulation by fungal strain diversity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 603, 672–678 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04502-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04502-w

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research