Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Differential clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock

Abstract

Rapid progress in optical atomic clock performance has advanced the frontiers of timekeeping, metrology and quantum science1,2,3. Despite considerable efforts, the instabilities of most optical clocks remain limited by the local oscillator rather than the atoms themselves4,5. Here we implement a ‘multiplexed’ one-dimensional optical lattice clock, in which spatially resolved strontium atom ensembles are trapped in the same optical lattice, interrogated simultaneously by a shared clock laser and read-out in parallel. In synchronous Ramsey interrogations of ensemble pairs we observe atom–atom coherence times of 26 s, a 270-fold improvement over the measured atom–laser coherence time, demonstrate a relative instability of \(9.7(4)\times {10}^{-18}/\sqrt{\tau }\) (where τ is the averaging time) and reach a relative statistical uncertainty of 8.9 × 10−20 after 3.3 h of averaging. These results demonstrate that applications involving optical clock comparisons need not be limited by the instability of the local oscillator. We further realize a miniaturized clock network consisting of 6 atomic ensembles and 15 simultaneous pairwise comparisons with relative instabilities below \(3\times {10}^{-17}/\sqrt{\tau }\), and prepare spatially resolved, heterogeneous ensemble pairs of all four stable strontium isotopes. These results pave the way for multiplexed precision isotope shift measurements, spatially resolved characterization of limiting clock systematics, the development of clock-based gravitational wave and dark matter detectors6,7,8,9,10,11,12 and new tests of relativity in the lab13,14,15,16.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Multiplexed OLC configuration and procedure for loading two ensembles.
Fig. 2: Characterization of atom–atom coherence time by synchronous clock comparisons.
Fig. 3: Low relative instability with multiplexed Ramsey interrogation.
Fig. 4: Prospects for multiplexed OLC comparisons.

Data availability

The experimental data presented in this manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code used for experimental control, data analysis and simulation in this work are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E. & Schmidt, P. O. Optical atomic clocks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637–701 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, S. L. et al. A Fermi-degenerate three-dimensional optical lattice clock. Science 358, 90–94 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGrew, W. F. et al. Atomic clock performance enabling geodesy below the centimetre level. Nature 564, 87–90 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schioppo, M. et al. Ultrastable optical clock with two cold-atom ensembles. Nat. Photon. 11, 48–52 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oelker, E. et al. Demonstration of 4.8 × 10−17 stability at 1 s for two independent optical clocks. Nat. Photon. 13, 714–719 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Safronova, M. S. et al. Search for new physics with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolkowitz, S. et al. Gravitational wave detection with optical lattice atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. D 94, 124043 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stadnik, Y. V. & Flambaum, V. V. Improved limits on interactions of low-mass spin-0 dark matter from atomic clock. spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A 94, 022111 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Derevianko, A. & Pospelov, M. Hunting for topological dark matter with atomic clocks. Nat. Phys. 10, 933–936 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arvanitaki, A., Huang, J. W. & Van Tilburg, K. Searching for dilaton dark matter with atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. D 91, 015015 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wcisło, P. et al. New bounds on dark matter coupling from a global network of optical atomic clocks. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau4869 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, C. J. et al. Precision metrology meets cosmology: improved constraints on ultralight dark matter from atom-cavity frequency comparisons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 201302 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chou, C. W., Hume, D. B., Rosenband, T. & Wineland, D. J. Optical clocks and relativity. Science 329, 1630–1633 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takano, T. et al. Geopotential measurements with synchronously linked optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photon. 10, 662–666 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grotti, J. et al. Geodesy and metrology with a transportable optical clock. Nat. Phys. 14, 437–441 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Takamoto, M. et al. Test of general relativity by a pair of transportable optical lattice clocks. Nat. Photon. 14, 411–415 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hinkley, N. et al. An atomic clock with 10−18 instability. Science 341, 1215–1218 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bloom, B. J. et al. An optical lattice clock with accuracy and stability at the 10−18 level. Nature 506, 71–75 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marti, G. E. et al. Imaging optical frequencies with 100 μHz precision and 1.1 μm resolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 103201 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bothwell, T. et al. JILA SrI optical lattice clock with uncertainty of 2.0 × 10−18. Metrologia 56, 065004 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boulder Atomic Clock Optical Network (BACON) Collaboration. Frequency ratio measurements at 18-digit accuracy using an optical clock network. Nature 591, 564–569 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Itano, W. M. et al. Quantum projection noise: population fluctuations in two-level systems. Phys. Rev. A 47, 3554 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dick, G. J., Prestage, J. D., Greenhall, C. A. & Maleki, L. Local oscillator induced degradation of medium-term stability in passive atomic frequency standards. In Proc. 22nd Precise Time and Time Interval Meeting (Ed.Sydnor, R. L.) 487–508 (NASA, 1990).

  24. Kim, M. E. et al. Optical coherence between atomic species at the second scale: improved clock comparisons via differential spectroscopy. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09540 (2021).

  25. Nicholson, T. L. et al. Comparison of two independent Sr optical clocks with 1 × 10−17 stability at 103 s. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 230801 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Clements, E. R. et al. Lifetime-limited interrogation of two independent 27Al+ clocks using correlation spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 243602 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Young, A. W. et al. Half-minute-scale atomic coherence and high relative stability in a tweezer clock. Nature 588, 408–413 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matei, D. G. et al. 1.5 μm lasers with sub-10 mHz linewidth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 263202 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Swallows, M. D. et al. Suppression of collisional shifts in a strongly interacting lattice clock. Science 331, 1043–1046 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, M. J. et al. A quantum many-body spin system in an optical lattice clock. Science 341, 632–636 (2013).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Blatt, S. et al. Rabi spectroscopy and excitation inhomogeneity in a one-dimensional optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. A 80, 052703 (2009).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hutson, R. B. et al. Engineering quantum states of matter for atomic clocks in shallow optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 123401 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pedrozo-Peñafiel, E. et al. Entanglement on an optical atomic-clock transition. Nature 588, 414–418 (2020).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Beloy, K. et al. Faraday-shielded dc stark-shift-free optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 183201 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, W. et al. Ultrastable silicon cavity in a continuously operating closed-cycle cryostat at 4 K. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 243601 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Milner, W. R. et al. Demonstration of a timescale based on a stable optical carrier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 173201 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Norcia, M. A. et al. Seconds-scale coherence on an optical clock transition in a tweezer array. Science 366, 93–97 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dörscher, S. et al. Lattice-induced photon scattering in an optical lattice clock. Phys. Rev. A 97, 063419 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Boyd, M. M. et al. Nuclear spin effects in optical lattice clocks. Phys. Rev. A 76, 022510 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Delaunay, C., Ozeri, R., Perez, G. & Soreq, Y. Probing atomic Higgs-like forces at the precision frontier. Phys. Rev. D 96, 093001 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Berengut, J. C. et al. Probing new long-range interactions by isotope shift spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 091801 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Takano, T., Mizushima, R. & Katori, H. Precise determination of the isotope shift of 88Sr – 87Sr optical lattice clock by sharing perturbations. Appl. Phys. Express 10, 072801 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Miyake, H., Pisenti, N. C., Elgee, P. K., Sitaram, A. & Campbell, G. K. Isotope-shift spectroscopy of the 1S03P1 and 1S03P0 transitions in strontium. Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 033113 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Counts, I. & Hur, J. et al. Evidence for nonlinear isotope shift in Yb+ search for new boson. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 123002 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Taichenachev, A. V. et al. Magnetic field-induced spectroscopy of forbidden optical transitions with application to lattice-based optical atomic clocks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 083001 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Madjarov, I. S. et al. An atomic-array optical clock with single-atom readout. Phys. Rev. X 9, 041052 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Gil, L. I. R., Mukherjee, R., Bridge, E. M., Jones, M. P. A. & Pohl, T. Spin squeezing in a Rydberg lattice clock. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 103601 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Van Damme, J., Zheng, X., Saffman, M., Vavilov, M. G. & Kolkowitz, S. Impacts of random filling on spin squeezing via Rydberg dressing in optical clocks. Phys. Rev. A 103, 023106 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bothwell, T. et al. Resolving the gravitational redshift within a millimeter atomic sample. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04349-7 (2022).

  50. Lemonde, P. & Wolf, P. Optical lattice clock with atoms confined in a shallow trap. Phys. Rev. A 72, 033409 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Campbell, G. K. et al. The absolute frequency of the 87Sr optical clock transition. Metrologia 45, 539 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Schmid, S., Thalhammer, G., Winkler, K., Lang, F. & Denschlag, J. H. Long distance transport of ultracold atoms using a 1D optical lattice. New J. Phys. 8, 159 (2006).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ma, L. S., Jungner, P., Ye, J. & Hall, J. L. Delivering the same optical frequency at two places: accurate cancellation of phase noise introduced by an optical fiber or other time-varying path. Opt. Lett. 19, 1777–1779 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Falke, S., Misera, M., Sterr, U. & Lisdat, C. Delivering pulsed and phase stable light to atoms of an optical clock. Appl. Phys. B 107, 301–311 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Swallows, M. D. et al. Operating a 87Sr optical lattice clock with high precision and at high density. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 59, 416–425 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Ye, A. Kaufman, J. Thompson, T. Bothwell and A. Jayich for insightful discussions and helpful feedback on the manuscript. This work was supported in part by the NIST Precision Measurement Grants program, the Northwestern University Center for Fundamental Physics and the John Templeton Foundation through a Fundamental Physics grant, the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, the Army Research Office through agreement number W911NF-21-1-0012 and a Packard Fellowship for Science and Engineering.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.Z. designed and built the experimental apparatus with assistance from J.D., V.L., H.L. and B.N.M., and with guidance from S.K. All authors contributed to maintenance and operation of the experimental apparatus, data collection, data analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimon Kolkowitz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers who contributed to the peer review of this paper. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Lattice and clock path.

Schematic diagram showing the lattice and clock beam paths for the interrogation the \(|{}^{1}{S}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 5/2\rangle \leftrightarrow |{}^{3}{P}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 3/2\rangle \sigma \)-transition. To interrogate the \(|{}^{1}{S}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 9/2\rangle \leftrightarrow |{}^{3}{P}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 9/2\rangle \)-transition, the first order diffraction clock beam is overlapped with the lattice by first using a long-pass dichroic beam splitter and subsequently transmitting through the polarized beam splitter, shown in the dashed blue box. The inset shows the corresponding orientations of the bias magnetic field (B) and the lattice and clock polarizations (ε). Abbreviations: PBS, polarized beam-splitter; DBS, dichroic beam-splitter; AOM, acousto-optic-modulator; PD, photo-diode; HWP, half-waveplate; QWP, quarter-waveplate.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Energy levels diagram.

a, Energy level diagram for strontium. The double-arrow lines correspond to the relevant transitions, including the 461-nm 1S01P1 transition for the first-stage MOT and imaging, the 689-nm 1S03P1 transition for narrow-linewidth MOT, spin-polarization and in-lattice-cooling, the 679-nm 3P03S1 and 707-nm 3P23S1 transitions for repumping, and the 698-nm 1S03P0 transition for clock interrogation. The wavy lines correspond to spontaneous emission. b, Hyperfine clock states. Red double arrows represent clock interrogation of the \(|{}^{1}{S}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 9/2\rangle \leftrightarrow |{}^{3}{P}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 9/2\rangle \) transition. Blue double arrows represent clock interrogation of the \(|{}^{1}{S}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 5/2\rangle \leftrightarrow |{}^{3}{P}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 3/2\rangle \) transition. Grey dashed lines stand for transitions for coherent transfer of atoms from \(|{}^{1}{S}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 9/2\rangle \) states to \(|{}^{3}{P}_{0},{m}_{F}=\pm 3/2\rangle \) states.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Timing diagram.

a, Typical timing diagram for a Ramsey spectroscopy sequence, in which laser cooling, state preparation and camera imaging contribute to about 1.6 s dead time, with clock interrogation time ranging from 10 ms to 20 s. b, c, The corresponding lattice retro detuning, lattice velocity and lattice acceleration for loading two ensembles at 1 cm separation.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Comparison of bias correction.

a, b, Comparison of ‘closed-loop’ analysis with (a) and without (b) bias correction. 197 unique ‘closed-loop’ combinations are shown, with each datum corresponds to the sum frequency within each loop. Shaded area represents a window of 1 × 10−18.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Differential density shift.

a, Measured differential density shift as a function of atom number difference between two symmetrically prepared ensembles at 1 cm separation. The data is taken at 20 Erec lattice trap depth with 6 s interrogation time. Dashed line is the linear fitting, in which the slope is extracted as −8.5(6) × 10−19 shift per 100 atom number difference. b, Scaling of differential density shift per 100 atom number difference between ensemble pairs with lattice trap depth U. The dashed line is a fit to the expected αU5/4 + β scaling20, where α and β are fit parameters.

Source data

Extended Data Table 1 Measured coherence times
Extended Data Table 2 Differential frequencies from 6 ensemble measurement

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Information, including Supplementary Figs. 1–8 and additional references.

Peer Review File

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, X., Dolde, J., Lochab, V. et al. Differential clock comparisons with a multiplexed optical lattice clock. Nature 602, 425–430 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04344-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04344-y

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing