Carbon storage by the ocean and by the land is usually quantified separately, and does not fully take into account the land-to-ocean transport of carbon through inland waters, estuaries, tidal wetlands and continental shelf waters—the ‘land-to-ocean aquatic continuum’ (LOAC). Here we assess LOAC carbon cycling before the industrial period and perturbed by direct human interventions, including climate change. In our view of the global carbon cycle, the traditional ‘long-range loop’, which carries carbon from terrestrial ecosystems to the open ocean through rivers, is reinforced by two ‘short-range loops’ that carry carbon from terrestrial ecosystems to inland waters and from tidal wetlands to the open ocean. Using a mass-balance approach, we find that the pre-industrial uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide by terrestrial ecosystems transferred to the ocean and outgassed back to the atmosphere amounts to 0.65 ± 0.30 petagrams of carbon per year (±2 sigma). Humans have accelerated the cycling of carbon between terrestrial ecosystems, inland waters and the atmosphere, and decreased the uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide from tidal wetlands and submerged vegetation. Ignoring these changing LOAC carbon fluxes results in an overestimation of carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems by 0.6 ± 0.4 petagrams of carbon per year, and an underestimation of sedimentary and oceanic carbon storage. We identify knowledge gaps that are key to reduce uncertainties in future assessments of LOAC fluxes.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
No code was used to generate the figures in this study.
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press 2013).
Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).
Billen, G., Lancelot, C. & Meybeck, M. in Ocean Margin Processes in Global Change: Report of the Dahlem Workshop on Ocean Margin Processes in Global Change (eds Mantoura, R. F. C. et al.) 19–44 (Wiley, 1991).
Ludwig, W., Probst, J. L. & Kempe, S. Predicting the oceanic input of organic carbon by continental erosion. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 10, 23–41 (1996).
Mackenzie, F. T., De Carlo, E. H. & Lerman, A. in Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science (eds Middelburg, J. J. & Laane, R.) Ch. 5.10 (Elsevier, 2012).
Meybeck, M. Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus transport by world rivers. Am. J. Sci. 282, 401–450 (1982).
Regnier, P. et al. Anthropogenic perturbation of the carbon fluxes from land to ocean. Nat. Geosci. 6, 597–607 (2013). A study quantifying the anthropogenic perturbation of the LOAC carbon fluxes, highlighting the need to include the LOAC in anthropogenic carbon budgets.
Battin, T. J. et al. The boundless carbon cycle. Nat. Geosci. 2, 598–600 (2009).
Borges, A. V., Dellile, B. & Frankignoulle, M. Budgeting sinks and sources of CO2 in the coastal ocean: diversity of ecosystems counts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L14601 (2005).
Cai, W.-J., Dai, M. & Wang, Y. Air–sea exchange of carbon dioxide in ocean margins: a province-based synthesis. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L12603 (2006).
Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10, 171–184 (2007). Pioneering study highlighting the much larger inland water carbon fluxes and the need to revise the ‘river pipeline’ model.
Mulholland, P. J. & Elwood, J. W. The role of lake and reservoir sediments as sinks in the perturbed global carbon cycle. Tellus 34, 490–499 (1982).
Richey, J. E. in The Global Carbon Cycle, Integrating Humans, Climate, and the Natural World Vol. 17 (eds Field, C. B. & Raupach, M. R.) 329–340 (Island Press, 2004).
Tranvik, L. J. et al. Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2298–2314 (2009).
Wollast, R. & Mackenzie, F. T. in Climate and Geo-Sciences (eds Berger, A. et al.) 453–473 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989).
Mackenzie, F. T., Andersson, A. J., Lerman, A. & Ver, L. M. in The Sea Vol. 13 (eds Robinson, A. R. & Brink, K. H.) 193–225 (Harvard Univ. Press, 2005). A landmark study revealing the quantitative significance of the LOAC for the global carbon budget.
Ciais, P. et al. Current systematic carbon‐cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy‐relevant carbon observing system. Biogeosciences 11, 3547–3602 (2014).
Raymond, P. A. et al. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503, 355–359 (2013). A spatially resolved assessment of CO2 emissions from the global inland water network, revealing the very efficient carbon turnover between terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems.
Bauer, J. E. et al. The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean. Nature 504, 61–70 (2013).
Sarmiento, J. L. & Sundquist, E. T. Revised budget for the oceanic uptake of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Nature 356, 589–593 (1992). A study quantifying the pre-industrial land-to-ocean carbon transfers and the resulting open-ocean outgassing.
Amiotte-Suchet, P. & Probst, J.-L. A global model for present day atmospheric/soil CO2 consumption by chemical erosion of continental rocks (GEM-CO2). Tellus B 47, 273–280 (1995).
Jacobson, A. R., Fletcher, S. E. M., Gruber, N., Sarmiento, J. L. & Gloor, M. A joint atmosphere–ocean inversion for surface fluxes of carbon dioxide: 1. Methods and global-scale fluxes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB1019 (2007).
Resplandy, L. et al. Revision of global carbon fluxes based on a reassessment of oceanic and riverine carbon transport. Nat. Geosci. 11, 504–509 (2018). A recent study advocating for an upward revision of the pre-industrial riverine and oceanic carbon transports, suggesting a tighter connection between the land and ocean carbon cycles.
Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 405–448 (2018a).
Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 2141–2194 (2018b).
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 3269–3340 (2020).
Galy, V., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. & Eglinton, T. Global carbon export from the terrestrial biosphere controlled by erosion. Nature 521, 204–207 (2015).
Lacroix, F., Ilyina, T. & Hartmann, J. Oceanic CO2 outgassing and biological production hotspots induced by pre-industrial river loads of nutrients and carbon in a global modelling approach. Biogeosciences 17, 55–88 (2020).
Li, M. et al. The carbon flux of global rivers: a re‐evaluation of amount and spatial patterns. Ecol. Indic. 80, 40–51 (2017).
Li, M. et al. Modeling global riverine DOC flux dynamics from 1951 to 2015. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 514–530 (2019).
Luijendijk, E., Gleeson, T. & Moosdorf, N. Fresh groundwater discharge insignificant for the world’s oceans but important for coastal ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 11, 1260 (2020). A global, spatially resolved quantitative assessment of carbon fluxes through the subsurface, suggesting a relatively minor contribution of the fresh groundwater pathway to the land–ocean exchanges.
Wagner, S. et al. Soothsaying DOM: a current perspective on the future of oceanic dissolved organic carbon. Front. Marine Sci. 7, 341 (2019).
Duarte, C. M. Reviews and syntheses: hidden forests, the role of vegetated coastal habitats in the ocean carbon budget. Biogeosciences 14, 301–310 (2017).
Krause-Jensen, D. & Duarte, C. M. Substantial role of macroalgae in marine carbon sequestration. Nat. Geosci. 9, 737–742 (2016).
Laruelle, G. G. et al. Global multi-scale segmentation of continental and coastal waters from the watersheds to the continental margins. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 2029–2051 (2013).
Roobaert, A. et al. The spatiotemporal dynamics of the sources and sinks of CO2 in the global coastal ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 1693–1714 (2019).
Windham-Myers, L. et al. in Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sustained Assessment Report (eds Cavallaro, N. et al.) Ch. 15 (US Global Change Research Program, 2018).
Bourgeois, T. et al. Coastal-ocean uptake of anthropogenic carbon. Biogeosciences 13, 4167–4185 (2016). A study quantifying the anthropogenic perturbation of CO2 uptake by continental shelf waters, suggesting a small pre-industrial sink as further corroborated by the recent work by ref. 55.
Chmura, G. L., Anisfeld, S. C., Cahoon, D. R. & Lynch, J. C. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1111 (2003).
Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J. & Caraco, N. Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 2, 1–8 (2005). Pioneering study highlighting the quantitative role of coastal vegetation in the fixation, burial and lateral carbon exports to the open ocean and their anthropogenic perturbation.
LaRowe, D. E. et al. Organic carbon and microbial activity in marine sediments on a global scale throughout the quaternary. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 286, 227–247 (2020).
Smith, R. W., Bianchi, T. S., Allison, M., Savage, C. & Galy, V. High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nat. Geosci. 8, 450–453 (2015).
O’Mara, N. & Dunne, J. Hot spots of carbon and alkalinity cycling in the coastal oceans. Sci. Rep. 9, 4434 (2019).
Ouyang, X. & Lee, S. Updated estimates of carbon accumulation rates in coastal marsh sediments. Biogeosciences 11, 5057–5071 (2014).
Holgerson, M. A. & Raymond, P. A. Large contribution to inland water CO2 and CH4 emissions from very small ponds. Nat. Geosci. 9, 222–226 (2016).
Lauerwald, R., Laruelle, G. G., Hartmann, J., Ciais, P. & Regnier, P. A. G. Spatial patterns in CO2 evasion from the global river network. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 534–554 (2015).
Marx, A. et al. A review of CO2 and associated carbon dynamics in headwater streams: a global perspective. Rev. Geophys. 55, 560–585 (2017).
Mendonça, R. et al. Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs. Nat. Commun. 8, 1694 (2017). A study proposing a significant downward revision of the global inland water carbon burial, corroborating the model results on the anthropogenic perturbation by ref. 52.
Lauerwald, R., Regnier, P., Guenet, B., Friedlingstein, P. & Ciais, P. How simulations of the land carbon sink are biased by ignoring fluvial carbon transfers: a case study for the Amazon Basin. One Earth 3, 226–236 (2020).
Lapierre, J.-F., Guillemette, F., Berggren, M. & del Giorgio, P. A. Increases in terrestrially derived carbon stimulate organic carbon processing and CO2 emissions in boreal aquatic ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 4, 2972 (2013).
Maavara, T., Lauerwald, R., Regnier, P. & Van Cappellen, P. Global perturbation of organic carbon cycling by river damming. Nat. Commun. 8, 15347 (2017).
Andersson, A. J., MacKenzie, F. T. & Lerman, A. Coastal ocean and carbonate systems in the high CO2 world of the anthropocene. Am. J. Sci. 305, 875–918 (2005).
Hastie, A., Lauerwald, R., Ciais, P., Papa, F. & Regnier, P. Historical and future contributions of inland waters to the Congo Basin carbon balance. Earth Syst. Dyn. 12, 37–62 (2021).
Lacroix, F., Ilyina, T., Laruelle, G. G., & Regnier, P. Reconstructing the preindustrial coastal carbon cycle through a global ocean circulation model: was the global continental shelf already both autotrophic anda CO2 sink? Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 35, e2020GB006603 (2021)
Landschützer, P., Gruber, N., Bakker, D. C. E. & Schuster, U. Recent variability of the global ocean carbon sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 28, 927–949 (2014).
Rödenbeck, C. et al. Global surface-ocean pCO2 and sea–air CO2 flux variability from an observation-driven ocean mixed-layer scheme. Ocean Sci. 9, 193–216 (2013).
Chau, T. T. T., Gehlen, M. & Chevallier, F. A seamless ensemble-based reconstruction of surface ocean pCO2 and air–sea CO2 fluxes over the global coastal and open oceans. Biogeosciences 19, 1087–1109 (2022).
DeVries, T. et al. Decadal trends in the ocean carbon sink. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11646–11651 (2019).
Gruber, N. et al. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2 from 1994 to 2007. Science 363, 1193–1199 (2019).
Gaillardet, J., Dupre, B., Louvat, P. & Allègre, C. J. Global silicate weathering and CO2 consumption rates deduced from the chemistry of large rivers. Chem. Geol. 159, 3–30 (1999).
Hartmann, J., Jansen, N., Dürr, H. H., Kempe, S. & Köhler, P. Global CO2 consumption by chemical weathering: what is the contribution of highly active weathering regions? Glob. Planet. Change 69, 185–194 (2009).
Aumont, O. et al. Riverine-driven interhemispheric transport of carbon. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 393–405 (2001).
Cai, W. J. Estuarine and coastal ocean carbon paradox: CO2 sinks or sites of terrestrial carbon incineration? Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 3, 123–145 (2011).
Maher, D. T. & Eyre, B. D. Benthic fluxes of dissolved organic carbon in three temperate Australian estuaries: implications for global estimates of benthic DOC fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. 115, G04039 (2010).
Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J. & Caraco, N. Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 2, 1–8 (2005).
MacCreadie, P. et al. The future of blue carbon science. Nat. Commun. 10, 3998 (2019).
McLeod, E. et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 552–560 (2011).
Pendleton, L. et al. Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS ONE 7, e43542 (2012).
Krumhansl, K. A. et al. Global patterns of kelp forest change over the past half-century. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13785–13790 (2016).
Duarte, C. M., Losada, I. J., Hendriks, I. E., Mazarrasa, I. & Marbà, N. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 961–968 (2013).
Liu, X. et al. Simulating water residence time in the coastal ocean: a global perspective. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 13910–13919 (2019).
Dittmar, T., Hertkorn, N., Kattner, G. & Lara, R. J. Mangroves, a major source of dissolved organic carbon to the oceans. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 20, GB1012 (2006).
Barrón, C., Apostolaki, E. T. & Duarte, C. M. Dissolved organic carbon fluxes by seagrass meadows and macroalgal beds. Front. Mar. Sci. 1, 42 (2014).
Maher, D. T., Call, M., Santos, I. R. & Sanders, C. J. Beyond burial: lateral exchange is a significant atmospheric carbon sink in mangrove forests. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180200 (2018).
Bogard, M. J. et al. Hydrologic export is a major component of coastal wetland carbon budgets. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 34, e2019GB006430 (2020).
Frischknecht, M., Münnich, M. & Gruber, N. Origin, transformation, and fate: the three-dimensional biological pump in the California Current System. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 123, 7939–7962 (2018).
Ciais, P. et al. Empirical estimates of regional carbon budgets imply reduced global soil heterotrophic respiration. Natl Sci. Rev. 8, nwaa145 (2021).
Lovelock, C. E. & Reef, R. Variable impacts of climate change on blue carbon. One Earth 3, 195–211 (2020).
Striegl, R. G., Dornblaser, M. M., McDonald, C. P., Rover, J. R. & Stets, E. G. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from the Yukon River system. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 26, GB0E05 (2012).
Butman, D. S. et al. Aquatic carbon cycling in the conterminous United States and implications for terrestrial carbon accounting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 58–63 (2016).
Wallin, M. B. et al. Evasion of CO2 from streams—the dominant component of the carbon export through the aquatic conduit in a boreal landscape. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 785–797 (2013).
Drake, T. W., Raymond, P. A. & Spencer, R. G. M. Terrestrial carbon inputs to inland waters: a current synthesis of estimates and uncertainty. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 3, 132–142 (2018).
Maberly, S. C., Barker, P. A., Stott, A. W. & De Ville, M. M. Catchment productivity controls CO2 emissions from lakes. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 391–394 (2013).
Borges, A. V. et al. Globally significant greenhouse-gas emissions from African inland waters. Nat. Geosci. 8, 637–642 (2015).
Tian, H. et al. Anthropogenic and climatic influences on carbon fluxes from eastern North America to the Atlantic Ocean: a process-based modeling study. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 757–772 (2015). A pioneering study representing the land-to-ocean carbon transfers in a land-surface scheme of an Earth system model.
Gommet, C. A. S. et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and drivers of terrestrial dissolved organic carbon (DOC) leaching to the European river network. Earth Syst. Dyn. 13, 393–418 (2022).
Lauerwald, R. et al. ORCHILEAK (revision 3875): a new model branch to simulate carbon transfers along the terrestrial-aquatic continuum of the Amazon Basin. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 3821–3859 (2017).
Ciais, P. et al. The impact of lateral carbon fluxes on the European carbon balance. Biogeosciences 5, 1259–1271 (2008).
Luyssaert, S. et al. The European land and inland water CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O balance between 2001 and 2005. Biogeosciences 9, 3357–3380 (2012).
Cavallaro, N. G. et al. in Second State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR2): A Sustained Assessment Report (eds Cavallaro, N. et al). 1–878 (US Global Change Research Program, 2018).
Hastie, A. et al. CO2 evasion from boreal lakes: revised estimate, drivers of spatial variability, and future projections. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 711–728 (2018).
Aufdenkampe, A. K. et al. Riverine coupling of biogeochemical cycles between land, oceans, and atmosphere. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 53–60 (2011).
Richey, J. E., Melack, J. M., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Ballester, V. M. & Hess, L. L. Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source of atmospheric CO2. Nature 416, 617–620 (2002).
Abril, G. & Borges, A. V. Ideas and perspectives: carbon leaks from flooded land: do we need to replumb the inland water active pipe? Biogeosciences 16, 769–784 (2019).
Hastie, A., Lauerwald, R., Ciais, P. & Regnier, P. Aquatic carbon fluxes dampen the overall variation of net ecosystem productivity in the Amazon Basin: an analysis of the interannual variability in the boundless carbon cycle. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2094–2111 (2019).
Gómez-Gener, L. et al. Global carbon dioxide efflux from rivers enhanced by high nocturnal emissions. Nat. Geosci. 14, 289–294 (2021).
Abril, G. et al. Technical note: large overestimation of pCO2 calculated from pH and alkalinity in acidic, organic-rich freshwaters. Biogeosciences 12, 67–78 (2015).
Golub, M., Desai, A. R., McKinley, G. A., Remucal, C. K. & Stanley, E. H. Large uncertainty in estimating pCO2 from carbonate equilibria in lakes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 2909–2924 (2017).
Heathcote, A. J., Anderson, N. J., Prairie, Y. T., Engstrom, D. R. & del Giorgio, P. A. Large increases in carbon burial in northern lakes during the Anthropocene. Nat. Commun. 6, 10016 (2015).
Kastowski, M., Hinderer, M. & Vecsei, A. Long-term carbon burial in European lakes: analysis and estimate. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, GB3019 (2011).
Seitzinger, S. P. et al. Global river nutrient export: a scenario analysis of past and future trends. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB0A08 (2010).
Mayorga, E. et al. Global Nutrient Export from WaterSheds 2 (NEWS 2): model development and implementation. Environ. Model. Softw. 25, 837–853 (2010).
Ren, W. et al. Century-long increasing trend and variability of dissolved organic carbon export from the Mississippi River Basin driven by natural and anthropogenic forcing. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 1288–1299 (2016).
Jones, J. B., Stanley, E. H. & Mulholland, P. J. Long‐term decline in carbon dioxide supersaturation in rivers across the contiguous United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1495 (2003).
Ran, L. et al. Substantial decrease in CO2 emissions from Chinese inland waters due to global change. Nat. Commun. 12, 1730 (2021).
Park, J. H. et al. Reviews and syntheses: anthropogenic perturbations to carbon fluxes in Asian river systems—concepts, emerging trends, and research challenges. Biogeosciences 15, 3049–3069 (2018).
Kicklighter, D. W. et al. Insights and issues with simulating terrestrial DOC loading of Arctic river networks. Ecol. Appl. 23, 1817–1836 (2013).
Bowring, S. P. K. et al. ORCHIDEE MICT-LEAK (r5459), a global model for the production, transport, and transformation of dissolved organic carbon from Arctic permafrost regions—Part 2: model evaluation over the Lena River Basin. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 507–520 (2020).
Laruelle, G. G., Goossens, N., Arndt, S., Cai, W.-J. & Regnier, P. Air–water CO2 evasion from US East Coast estuaries. Biogeosciences 14, 2441–2468 (2017).
St-Laurent, P. et al. Relative impacts of global changes and regional watershed changes on the inorganic carbon balance of the Chesapeake Bay. Biogeosciences 17, 3779–3796 (2020).
Durr, H. H. et al. Worldwide typology of nearshore coastal systems: defining the estuarine filter of river inputs to the oceans. Estuaries Coast. 34, 441–458 (2011).
Laruelle, G. G. et al. Continental shelves as a variable but increasing global sink for atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nat. Commun. 9, 454 (2018).
Lacroix, F., Ilyina, T., Mathis, M., Laruelle, G. G. & Regnier, P. Historical increases in land-derived nutrient inputs may alleviate effects of a changing physical climate on the oceanic carbon cycle. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 5491–5513 (2021).
Cotovicz, L. Jr, Knoppers, B., Brandini, N., Santos, S. & Abril, G. A strong CO2 sink enhanced by eutrophication in a tropical coastal embayment (Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Biogeosciences 12, 6125–6146 (2015).
P.R. and P.C. acknowledge funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska‐Curie grant agreement number 643052 (C-CASCADES). P.R. also received financial support from BELSPO through the project ReCAP, which is part of the Belgian research programme FedTwin and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements number 776810 (VERIFY) and number 101003536 (ESM2025–Earth System Models for the Future). P.C. has been co-funded by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) Convergence Lab Changement climatique et usage des terres (CLAND), the European Space Agency Climate Change Initiative ESA-CCI RECCAP2 project 1190 (ESRIN/ 4000123002/18/I-NB) and Observation-based system for monitoring and verification of greenhouse gases (VERIFY, grant agreement number 776810). L.R. gratefully acknowledges support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship, the Princeton Catalysis Initiative at Princeton University and the NASA OCO‐2 Science Team Grant 80NSSC18K0893. R.G.N. acknowledges support from NASA Carbon Cycle Science and Interdisciplinary Science Programs and NSF Chemical Oceanography Program. This study benefitted from discussions with W.-J. Cai, A. Coppola, P. Friedlingstein and N. Gruber.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information
Nature thanks David Butman, Galen McKinley and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Regnier, P., Resplandy, L., Najjar, R.G. et al. The land-to-ocean loops of the global carbon cycle. Nature 603, 401–410 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04339-9