Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Single-year radiocarbon dating anchors Viking Age trade cycles in time

Nature volume 601, pages 392–396 (2022)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Recent discoveries of rapid changes in the atmospheric 14C concentration linked to solar particle events have spurred the construction of new radiocarbon annual calibration datasets1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. With these datasets, radiocarbon dating becomes relevant for urban sites, which require dates at higher resolution than previous calibration datasets could offer. Here we use a single-year radiocarbon calibration curve to anchor the archaeological stratigraphy of a Viking Age trade centre in time. We present absolutely dated evidence for artefact finds charting the expansion of long-distance trade from as far away as Arctic Norway and the Middle East, which we linked to the beginning of the Viking Age at ad 790 ± 10. The methods developed here enable human interactions and cultural, climatic and environmental changes to be compared in archaeological stratigraphies worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Radiocarbon dating results of annual tree rings, compared to the international calibration curve IntCal13.
Fig. 2: Viking Age artefacts and trade connections through time.
Fig. 3: Radiocarbon dates, artefact distributions and climate during phase 9 in Ribe.

Data availability

All data are available in the Article or the Supplementary Information. Additional information about the site and excavation can be found at https://projects.au.dk/northernemporium/, and additional artefact photographs can be found at http://sol.sydvestjyskemuseer.dk/ using the search term ‘SJM 3’.

Code availability

All code is available in the Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Reimer, P. J. et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 kcal BP). Radiocarbon 62, 725–757 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Büntgen, U. et al. Tree rings reveal globally coherent signature of cosmogenic radiocarbon events in 774 and 993 CE. Nat. Commun. 9, 3605 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dee, M. et al. Supernovae and single-year anomalies in the atmospheric radiocarbon record. Radiocarbon 59, 293–302 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fogtmann-Schulz, A. Cosmic ray event in 994 C.E. recorded in radiocarbon from Danish oak. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 8621–8628 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jull, A. J. T. et al. More rapid 14C excursions in the tree-ring record: a record of different kind of solar activity at about 800 BC? Radiocarbon 60, 1237–1248 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, F. Y. et al. A rapid cosmic-ray increase in BC 3372–3371 from ancient buried tree rings in China. Nat. Commun. 8, 1487 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mekhaldi, F. et al. Multiradionuclide evidence for the solar origin of the cosmic-ray events of AD 774/5 and 993/4. Nat. Commun. 6, 8611 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Park, J. et al. Relationship between solar activity and 14C peaks in AD 775, AD 994, and 660 BC. Radiocarbon 59, 1147–1156 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyake, F. et al. Large 14C excursion in 5480 BC indicates an abnormal sun in the mid-Holocene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 881–884 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dee, M. W. & Pope, B. J. S. Anchoring historical sequences using a new source of astro-chronological tie-points. Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20160263 (2016).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wacker, L. et al. Radiocarbon dating to a single year by means of rapid atmospheric 14C changes. Radiocarbon 56, 573–579 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuitems, M. et al. Radiocarbon-based approach capable of subannual precision resolves the origins of the site of Por-Bajin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 14038–14041 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyake, F. et al. A signature of cosmic-ray increase in AD 774–775 from tree rings in Japan. Nature 486, 240–242 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Büntgen, U. et al. 2500 years of European climate variability and human susceptibility. Science 331, 578–582 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook, E. R. et al. Old World megadroughts and pluvials during the Common Era. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500561 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Misra, P., Tandon, S. K. & Sinha, R. Holocene climate records from lake sediments in India: assessment of coherence across climate zones. Earth Sci. Rev. 190, 370–397 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Denniston, R. F. & Luetscher, M. Speleothems as high-resolution paleoflood archives. Quat. Sci. Rev. 170, 1–13 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahl-Jensen, D. et al. Eemian interglacial reconstructed from a Greenland folded ice core. Nature 493, 489–494 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Margaryan, A. et al. Population genomics of the Viking world. Nature 585, 390–396 (2020).

  20. Hansen, V. The Year 1000. When Explorers Connected the World – And Globalization Began (Scribner, 2020).

  21. Hodges, R. & Whitehouse, D. Mohammed, Charlemagne and the Origins of Europe. The Pirenne Thesis in the Light of Archaeology (Duckworth, 1983).

  22. Noonan, T. S. The Islamic World, Russia and the Vikings, 750–900. The Numismatic Evidence (Routledge, 1998).

  23. McCormick, M. Origins of the European Economy: Communications and Commerce AD 300–900 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).

  24. Jankowiak, M. in Viking-Age Trade: Silver, Slaves and Gotland (eds Gruszczyński, J. et al.) (Routledge, 2020).

  25. Barrett, J. H. What caused the Viking Age? Antiquity 82, 671–685 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hodges, R. Dark Age Economics: A New Audit (Bloomsbury Academic, 2012).

  27. Wickham, C. Framing the Early Middle Ages: Europe and the Mediterranean, 400–800 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2005).

  28. Baug, I. et al. The beginning of the Viking Age in the West. J. Marit. Archaeol. 14, 43–80 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schrijver, C. J. et al. Estimating the frequency of extremely energetic solar events, based on solar, stellar, lunar, and terrestrial records. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 117 (2012).

  30. Baroni, M. et al. Volcanic and solar activity, and atmospheric circulation influences on cosmogenic 10Be fallout at Vostok and Concordia (Antarctica) over the last 60 years. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 7132–7145 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stuiver, M. & Braziunas, T. F. Sun, ocean, climate and atmospheric 14CO2: an evaluation of causal and spectral relationships. The Holocene 3, 289–305 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuitems, M. et al. Evidence for European presence in the Americas in AD 1021. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03972-8 (2021).

  33. Croix, S. et al. Single context, metacontext, and high definition archaeology: Integrating new standards of stratigraphic excavation and recording. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 26, 1591–1631 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yang, J. & Ren, P. BFDA: a MATLAB toolbox for Bayesian functional data analysis. J. Stat. Softw. 89, 21 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Buck, C. E. et al. Combining archaeological and radiocarbon information: a Bayesian approach to calibration. Antiquity 65, 808–821 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bronk Ramsey, C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51, 337–360 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Callmer, J. in Glass beads – Cultural History, Technology, Experiment and Analogy. Proceedings of the Nordic Glass Bead Seminar 16th–18th October 1992 Studies in Technology and Culture 2. Lejre (eds Rasmussen, M. et al.) 49–54 (1995).

  38. Sindbæk, S. M. in Urban Network Evolutions: Towards a high-definition archaeology (eds Raja, R. and Sindbæk, S.) 161–166 (Aarhus Univ. Press, 2018).

  39. Ashby, S., Coutu, A. & Sindbæk, S. Urban networks and arctic outlands: craft specialists and reindeer antler in Viking towns. Eur. J. Archaeol. 18, 679–704 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Luterbacher, J. et al. European summer temperatures since Roman times. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 024001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kerr, T. R., Swindles, G. T. & Plunkett, G. Making hay while the sun shines? Socio-economic change, cereal production and climatic deterioration in Early Medieval Ireland. J. Archaeolog. Sci. 36, 2868–2874 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sukhodolov, T. et al. Atmospheric impacts of the strongest known solar particle storm of 775 AD. Sci. Rep. 7, 45257 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Reimer, P. J. et al. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hall, R. Exploring the World of the Vikings (Thames and Hudson, 2007).

  45. Croix, S. et al. Single context, metacontext, and high definition archaeology: integrating new standards of stratigraphic excavation and recording. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 26, 1591–1631 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tyers, I. DENDRO for Windows Program Guide ARCUS Report Vol. 500 (Univ. of Sheffield, 1999).

  47. Baillie, M. & Pilcher, J. A simple cross-dating program for tree-ring research. Tree-Ring Bull. 33, 7–14 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kudsk, S. G. K., et al. What is the carbon origin of early-wood? Radiocarbon 60, 1457–1464 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. McDonald, L., D. Chivall, Miles, D. & Bronk Ramsey, C. Seasonal variations in the 14C content of tree rings: influences on radiocarbon calibration and single-year curve construction. Radiocarbon 61, 185–194 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Loer, N. J., Robertson, I., Barker, A. C., Switsur, V. R. & Waterhouse, J. S. An improved technique for the batch processing of small wholewood samples to α-cellulose. Chem. Geol. 136, 313–317 (1997).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Southon, J. R. & Magana, A. L., A comparison of cellulose extraction and ABA pretreatment methods for AMS C-14 dating of ancient wood. Radiocarbon 52, 1371–1379 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kudsk, S. G. K. et al. New single-year radiocarbon measurements based on Danish oak covering the periods AD 692–790 and 966–1057. Radiocarbon 62, 969–987 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Vogel, J. S., Southon, J. R., Nelson, D. E. & Brown, T. A., Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 5, 289–293 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Olsen, J., Tikhomirov, D., Grosen, C., Heinemeier, J. & Klein, M., Radiocarbon analysis on the new AARAMS 1MV Tandetron. Radiocarbon 59, 905–913 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Stuiver, M. & Polach, H. A. Discussion. Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19, 355–363 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Longin, R. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230, 241–242 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Brown, T. A., Nelson, D. E., Vogel, J. C. & Southon, J. R. Improved collagen extraction by improved Longin method. Radiocarbon 30, 171–177 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jørkov, M. L. S., Heinemeier, J. & Lynnerup, N. Evaluating bone collagen extraction methods for stable isotope analysis in dietary studies. J. Archaeolog. Sci. 34, 1824–1829 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the excavators of the site, whose work formed the basis for this study: H. Brinch Christiansen, M. Knudsen, S. Qvistgaard and M. Søvsø from the Museum of Southwest Jutland, and S. Croix and P. Deckers from Aarhus University. The large numbers of radiocarbon dates would not have been possible without the support of the staff and PhD students of the Aarhus AMS Centre: A. Fogtmann-Schulz, C. Grosen, H. Jakobsen, M. Kanstrup, S. Kudsk, M. Sand Kalaee and A. B. Valbøl Jensen. This study was funded by the Carlsberg Foundation Semper Ardens grant no. CF16-0008 (Northern Emporium project) and the Danish National Research Foundation grant no. DNRF119 – Centre of Excellence for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet). Brødrene Hartmanns Fond (grant no. application A34514) and Grosserer P.L. Jørgensens Mindefond supported the tree-ring measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aarhus AMS Centre (AARAMS), Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Bente Philippsen & Jesper Olsen

  2. Centre for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet), Aarhus University, Højbjerg, Denmark

    Bente Philippsen, Jesper Olsen & Søren M. Sindbæk

  3. Museum of Southwest Jutland, Ribe, Denmark

    Claus Feveile

Authors
  1. Bente Philippsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Claus Feveile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jesper Olsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Søren M. Sindbæk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.O. and S.M.S. conceptualized the study. B.P., C.F., J.O. and S.M.S. were responsible for data curation. B.P. and J.O. carried out the formal analysis. S.M.S., J.O. and B.P. were responsible for funding acquisition. B.P., C.F., J.O. and S.M.S. carried out the investigations. B.P., C.F., J.O. and S.M.S. were responsible for the methodology. S.M.S. and C.F. administered the project. B.P. and J.O. were responsible for visualization. B.P., S.M.S. and J.O. wrote the original draft. B.P. and C.F. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bente Philippsen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information

Nature thanks James Barrett, Paula Reimer and Dagfinn Skre for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Finds relating to the manufacture of wound glass beads.

a) glass vessel cullet; b) mosaic tesserae; c) splints from batches of re-melted, coloured glass; d) production debris, including droplets; e) cane ends with plier marks; f) canes for applied trail ornaments; g) ‘Ribe type’ beads; h) ‘wasp type’ beads. Photos: Museum of Southwest Jutland. High-resolution images of all finds are available at http://sol.sydvestjyskemuseer.dk/ using the search term “SJM 3”.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Finds relating to non-ferrous metalworking.

a) crucible sherds; b) fragments of clay casting moulds; c) mould fragment with impressions of a cast brooch; d) mould fragment for Berdal-type brooches. Photos: Museum of Southwest Jutland. High-resolution images of all finds are available at http://sol.sydvestjyskemuseer.dk/ using the search term “SJM 3”.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Common types of imported beads found in Ribe.

a) small segmented ‘gold-foil’ bead; b) segmented ‘gold -foil’ bead; c) segmented colourless ‘silver-foil’ bead; d) segmented blue bead; e) segmented blue metal-foil bead; f) green faceted bead; g) mosaic eye beads; h) cut tubular beads; i) blown metal-foil beads. Photos: Museum of Southwest Jutland. High-resolution images of all finds are available at http://sol.sydvestjyskemuseer.dk/ using the search term “SJM 3”.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Common types of imports from the Rhine area.

a) fragments of Mayen basalt quern stones; b) fragment of Badorf ware pottery; c) fragment of Reliefband amphora; d) fragment of Tating ware pitcher. Photos: Museum of Southwest Jutland. High-resolution images of all finds are available at http://sol.sydvestjyskemuseer.dk/ using the search term “SJM 3”.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Common types of imports from the Scandinavian Peninsula.

a) fragments of (or blanks for) whetstones made from dark and light schist; b) casting mould made of soap stone; c) sherds of soap stone vessels. Photos: Museum of Southwest Jutland. High-resolution images of all finds are available at http://sol.sydvestjyskemuseer.dk/ using the search term “SJM 3”.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Examples of sceatta coins types.

a) Wodan/Monster (W/M) – obverse and reverse; b) Continental Runic – obverse and reverse; c) Porcupine – obverse and reverse. Photos: Museum of Southwest Jutland. High-resolution images of all finds are available at http://sol.sydvestjyskemuseer.dk/ using the search term “SJM 3”.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Methods and Results descriptions (excavation and artefact chronology; radiocarbon dating); thirteen tables detailing artefact distribution per phases on this project’s excavation (SJM 3) and on the neighbouring excavation ASR 9 Posthuset from 1990 to 1991; one table with 14C ages for all tree-ring samples; two tables with detailed information about samples for radiocarbon dating and dendrochronology, as well as 14C ages and unmodelled and modelled radiocarbon dating results of these samples, calibrated with IntCal20 and the Aarhus curve; thirteen supplementary figures, of which Figs. 1 to 6 show typical artefacts from the excavations, as can be found in the Extended Data, Fig. 7 displays a map of the study area and the neighbouring excavation ASR 9 Posthuset from 1990 to 1991, and Figs. 8–13 are related to radiocarbon analyses, calibration curves and age models.

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary Data

The MATLAB code used in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Philippsen, B., Feveile, C., Olsen, J. et al. Single-year radiocarbon dating anchors Viking Age trade cycles in time. Nature 601, 392–396 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04240-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04240-5

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing