The increasing demand for next-generation energy storage systems necessitates the development of high-performance lithium batteries1,2,3. Unfortunately, current Li anodes exhibit rapid capacity decay and a short cycle life4,5,6, owing to the continuous generation of solid electrolyte interface7,8 and isolated Li (i-Li)9,10,11. The formation of i-Li during the nonuniform dissolution of Li dendrites12 leads to a substantial capacity loss in lithium batteries under most testing conditions13. Because i-Li loses electrical connection with the current collector, it has been considered electrochemically inactive or ‘dead’ in batteries14,15. Contradicting this commonly accepted presumption, here we show that i-Li is highly responsive to battery operations, owing to its dynamic polarization to the electric field in the electrolyte. Simultaneous Li deposition and dissolution occurs on two ends of the i-Li, leading to its spatial progression toward the cathode (anode) during charge (discharge). Revealed by our simulation results, the progression rate of i-Li is mainly affected by its length, orientation and the applied current density. Moreover, we successfully demonstrate the recovery of i-Li in Cu–Li cells with >100% Coulombic efficiency and realize LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 (NMC)–Li full cells with extended cycle life.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
All the data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J. & Tarascon, J.-M. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 11, 19–29 (2012); erratum Nat. Mater. 11, 172 (2012).
Lin, D., Liu, Y. & Cui, Y. Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 194–206 (2017).
Albertus, P., Babinec, S., Litzelman, S. & Newman, A. Status and challenges in enabling the lithium metal electrode for high-energy and low-cost rechargeable batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 16–21 (2018).
Liu, J. et al. Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries. Nat. Energy 4, 180–186 (2019).
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z. & Zhang, Q. Toward safe lithium metal anode in rechargeable batteries: a review. Chem. Rev. 117, 10403–10473 (2017).
Xu, W. et al. Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 513–537 (2014).
Lu, D. et al. Failure mechanism for fast-charged lithium metal batteries with liquid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1400993 (2015).
Niu, C. et al. High-energy lithium metal pouch cells with limited anode swelling and long stable cycles. Nat. Energy 4, 551–559 (2019)
Yoshimatsu, I., Hirai, T. & Yamaki, J.-i. Lithium electrode morphology during cycling in lithium cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 135, 2422–2427 (1988).
Sanchez, A. J. et al. Plan-view operando video microscopy of Li metal anodes: identifying the coupled relationships among nucleation, morphology, and reversibility. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 994–1004 (2020).
Gunnarsdóttir, A. B., Amanchukwu, C. V., Menkin, S. & Grey, C. P. Noninvasive in situ NMR study of “dead lithium” formation and lithium corrosion in full-cell lithium metal batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 20814–20827 (2020).
Li, Y. et al. Correlating structure and function of battery interphases at atomic resolution using cryoelectron microscopy. Joule 2, 2167–2177 (2018).
Fang, C. et al. Quantifying inactive lithium in lithium metal batteries. Nature 572, 511–515 (2019).
Chen, K.-H. et al. Dead lithium: mass transport effects on voltage, capacity, and failure of lithium metal anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11671–11681 (2017).
Xu, S., Chen, K.-H., Dasgupta, N. P., Siegel, J. B. & Stefanopoulou, A. G. Evolution of dead lithium growth in lithium metal batteries: experimentally validated model of the apparent capacity loss. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A3456–A3463 (2019).
Jin, C. et al. Rejuvenating dead lithium supply in lithium metal anodes by iodine redox. Nat. Energy 6, 378–387 (2021).
Yu, Z. et al. Molecular design for electrolyte solvents enabling energy-dense and long-cycling lithium metal batteries. Nat. Energy 5, 526–533 (2020).
Zeng, Z. et al. Non-flammable electrolytes with high salt-to-solvent ratios for Li-ion and Li-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 674–681 (2018).
Gao, Y. et al. Polymer–inorganic solid–electrolyte interphase for stable lithium metal batteries under lean electrolyte conditions. Nat. Mater. 18, 384–389 (2019).
Weng, Y.-T. et al. An ultrathin ionomer interphase for high-efficiency lithium anode in carbonate-based electrolyte. Nat. Commun. 10, 5824 (2019).
Lin, D. et al. Conformal lithium fluoride protection layer on three-dimensional lithium by nonhazardous gaseous reagent freon. Nano Lett. 17, 3731–3737 (2017).
Lin, D. et al. Layered reduced graphene oxide with nanoscale interlayer gaps as a stable host for lithium metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 626–632 (2016).
Lin, D. et al. Three-dimensional stable lithium metal anode with nanoscale lithium islands embedded in ionically conductive solid matrix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4613–4618 (2017).
Chen, H. et al. Tortuosity effects in lithium-metal host anodes. Joule 4, 938–952 (2020).
Mao, C., Ruther, R. E., Li, J., Du, Z. & Belharouak, I. Identifying the limiting electrode in lithium ion batteries for extreme fast charging. Electrochem. Commun. 97, 37–41 (2018).
Belov, D. & Yang, M.-H. Investigation of the kinetic mechanism in overcharge process for Li-ion battery. Solid State Ionics 179, 1816–1821 (2008).
Doyle, M., Fuller, T. F. & Newman, J. Modeling of galvanostatic charge and discharge of the lithium/polymer/insertion cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 140, 1526–1533 (1993).
Fuller, T. F., Doyle, M. & Newman, J. Simulation and optimization of the dual lithium ion insertion cell. J. Electrochem. Soc. 141, 1–10 (1994).
Zheng, J. et al. Highly stable operation of lithium metal batteries enabled by the formation of a transient high-concentration electrolyte layer. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502151 (2016).
Y.C. acknowledges support from the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy, under the Battery Materials Research (BMR), Battery 500 Consortium, and the eXtreme Fast Charge Cell Evaluation of Li-ion batteries (XCEL) programmes.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature thanks Peng Bai and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
a, Experimental setup. b, Optical image of the deposited lithium on the Cu island. The scale bar is 100 µm.
a, b, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis of the ends of i-Li island near Li anode (a) and NMC cathode (b) after 3 h charging.
Optical images showing the evolution process of micrometre-sized, electrochemically generated ‘dead Li’ filaments under a charging current of 20 µA. The scale bar is 20 µm.
a, b, The potential distribution in the electrolyte during charge (a) and discharge (b). The direction of Li+ flux is shown in black arrows. The initial and end states are at t = 100 s and 2 h, respectively.
Extended Data Fig. 5 The dynamic response and spatial progression of i-Li during battery operations.
a, b, The absolute overpotentials at two ends of i-Li with different width (a) and length (b) during charge. c, The maximum current densities at the ends of i-Li filaments and Li electrode under various current densities during discharge. d, The migration distance of i-Li with different orientations at the end of 1C discharge (1C = 3 mA cm−2). The orientation of i-Li is defined as the angle between i-Li and the electric field. 0° and 90° represent the directions along and perpendicular to the electric field, respectively.
a, Voltage–capacity profiles of NMC–G cells with different cell configurations. NMC–polyimide (PI)–G cells with/without Cu present identical voltage profiles, indicating that the addition of Cu does not influence the electrochemical performance of NMC–G cell. Red arrow marks the voltage fluctuation observed in NMC–PI–G cell with Cu/Li due to i-Li’s progression. Meanwhile, the NMC–polypropylene–G cell with i-Li (Cu/Li) exhibits a smooth voltage profile, suggesting that i-Li could not penetrate through the nano-sized pores of commercial polypropylene (PP) separators. b, c, SEM images of Cu/Li (bottom) and polyimide membrane (top) after 5-min (b) and 1-h charge (c), showing that i-Li penetrates through the polyimide membrane. Arrows point out the Li dendrites on the edge of polyimide membrane. The scale bars are 10 µm.
a, A representative voltage profile of Cu–Li cell during i-Li formation cycle. b, Capacity of ‘dead Li’ on average. Each coloured sphere represents the CE of one Cu–Li cell, the box shows the average CE of ten cells, and the error bar illustrates 1 standard deviation. c, The recovery percentage of ‘dead Li’ under different stripping currents.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Coulombic efficiency measurements of Cu–Li half-cells with/without activation in the presence of ‘dead Li’.
a–d, The stripping conditions are 0.5 mA cm−2 with an activation step of a, none, b, 3 mA cm−2 for 1 min, c, 3 mA cm−2 for 2 mins, and d, 6 mA cm−2 for 1 min. For the average CE measurement, a standard protocol is followed: (1) 5 mAh cm−2 of Li is deposited onto Cu under 0.5 mA cm−2 as a Li reservoir, (2) repeatedly deposit 1 mAh cm−2 of Li (0.5 mA cm−2) and strip under different conditions for ten cycles, (3) strip all active Li (0.5 mA cm−2) until 1 V. Accumulated ‘dead Li’ are formed by 5 cycles of Li deposition (3 mA cm−2, 1 h) and stripping (0.5 mA cm−2 until 1 V).
a, Coulombic efficiency and b, cycle life of NMC–Li cells (150%-excessed Li) with/without activation. c, Specific capacity and d, cycle life of NMC–Li cells (300%-excessed Li) under a fast-charging condition. Each coloured sphere represents the cycle life of one NMC–Li cell, the box shows the average cycle life of three cells, and the error bar illustrates 1 standard deviation. Cycle life is defined as the cycle number when the cell capacity falls below 80% of its initial capacity. TF stands for temperature fluctuation.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, F., Xu, R., Wu, Y. et al. Dynamic spatial progression of isolated lithium during battery operations. Nature 600, 659–663 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04168-w