Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A bimodal burst energy distribution of a repeating fast radio burst source


The event rate, energy distribution and time-domain behaviour of repeating fast radio bursts (FRBs) contain essential information regarding their physical nature and central engine, which are as yet unknown1,2. As the first precisely localized source, FRB 121102 (refs. 3,4,5) has been extensively observed and shows non-Poisson clustering of bursts over time and a power-law energy distribution6,7,8. However, the extent of the energy distribution towards the fainter end was not known. Here we report the detection of 1,652 independent bursts with a peak burst rate of 122 h−1, in 59.5 hours spanning 47 days. A peak in the isotropic equivalent energy distribution is found to be approximately 4.8 × 1037 erg at 1.25 GHz, below which the detection of bursts is suppressed. The burst energy distribution is bimodal, and well characterized by a combination of a log-normal function and a generalized Cauchy function. The large number of bursts in hour-long spans allows sensitive periodicity searches between 1 ms and 1,000 s. The non-detection of any periodicity or quasi-periodicity poses challenges for models involving a single rotating compact object. The high burst rate also implies that FRBs must be generated with a high radiative efficiency, disfavouring emission mechanisms with large energy requirements or contrived triggering conditions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Detected bursts and temporal energy distribution during the observation campaign.
Fig. 2: Burst rate distribution of the isotropic equivalent energy at 1.25 GHz for FRB 121102 bursts.
Fig. 3: Waiting time distribution of the bursts.
Fig. 4: DM evolution of FRB 121102.

Data availability

All relevant data for the 1,652 detected burst events are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Observational data are available from the FAST archive ( 1 year after data collection, following FAST data policy. Owing to the large data volume for these observations, interested users are encouraged to contact the corresponding author to arrange the data transfer. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Science Data Bank at or

Code availability

Computational programs for the FRB121102 burst analysis and observations reported here are available at Other standard data reduction packages are available at their respective websites: PRESTO (, HEIMDALL (, DSPSR (, PSRCHIVE (


  1. 1.

    Petroff, E., Hessels, J. W. T. & Lorimer, D. R. Fast radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27, 4 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cordes, J. M. & Chatterjee, S. Fast radio bursts: an extragalactic enigma. Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 57, 417–465 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Spitler, L. G. et al. A repeating fast radio burst. Nature 531, 202–205 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chatterjee, S. et al. A direct localization of a fast radio burst and its host. Nature 541, 58–61 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tendulkar, S. P. et al. The host galaxy and redshift of the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. Lett. 834, L7 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Michilli, D. et al. An extrememagneto-ionic environment associated with the fast radio burst source FRB 121102. Nature 553, 182 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zhang, Y. G. et al. Fast radio burst 121102 pulse detection and periodicity: a machine learning approach. Astrophys. J. 866, 149 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gourdji, K. et al. A sample of low-energy bursts from FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. Lett. 877, L19 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Li, Di. et al. FAST in space: considerations for a multibeam, multipurpose survey using China’s 500-m aperture spherical radio telescope (FAST). IEEE 19, 112–119 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Planck Collaboration et al. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shannon, R. M. et al. The dispersion-brightness relation for fast radio bursts from a wide-field survey. Nature 562, 386–390 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Katz, J. I. Fast radio bursts. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 103, 1–18 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Palaniswamy, D., Li, Y. & Zhang, B. Are there multiple populations of fast radio bursts? Astrophys. J. Lett. 854, L12 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Scholz, P. et al. The repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102: multi-wavelength observations and additional bursts. Astrophys. J. 833, 177 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Petroff, E. et al. FRBCAT: rhe fast radio burst catalogue. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 33, e045 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Oostrum, L. C. et al. Repeating fast radio bursts with WSRT/Apertif. Astron. Astrophys. 635, A61 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hessels, J. W. T. et al. FRB 121102 bursts show complex time-frequency structure. Astrophys. J. 876, L23 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Metzger, B. D., Berger, E. & Margalit, B. Millisecond magnetar birth connects FRB 121102 to superluminous supernovae and long-duration gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 841, 14 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yang, Y.-P. & Zhang, B. Dispersion measure variation of repeating fast radio burst sources. Astrophys. J. 847, 22 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lu, W. B., Kumar, P. & Zhang, B. A unified picture of Galactic and cosmological fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 498, 1397 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wadiasingh, Z. et al. The fast radio burst luminosity function and death line in the low twist magnetar model. Astrophys. J. 891, 82 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Göğüs, E. et al. Statistical properties of SGR 1806-20 bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 532, L121–L124 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang, F. Y. & Yu, H. SGR-like behaviour of the repeating FRB 121102. JCAP 03, 023 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bagchi, M. A unified model for repeating and non-repeating fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 838, L16 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Smallwood, J. L., Martin, R. G. & Zhang, B. Investigation of the asteroid-neutron star collision model for the repeating fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 1367–1376 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Cordes, J. M. & Wasserman, I. Supergiant pulses from extragalactic neutron stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 457, 232–257 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhang, B. Fast radio bursts from interacting binary neutron star systems. Astrophys. J. Lett. 890, L24 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Metzger, B. D., Margalit, B. & Sironi, L. Fast radio bursts as synchrotron maser emission from decelerating relativistic blast waves. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 4091–4106 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Beloborodov, A. M. Blast waves from magnetar flares and fast radio bursts. Preprint at (2019).

  30. 30.

    Kumar, P., Lu, W. & Bhattacharya, M. Fast radio burst source properties and curvature radiation model. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 468, 2726–2739 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Petroff, E. et al. A real-time fast radio burst: polarization detection and multiwavelength follow-up. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 246 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ransom, S. M. New Search Techniques for Binary Pulsars. PhD thesis, Harvard Univ. (2001).

  33. 33.

    Zhang, B. Fast radio burst energetics and detectability from high redshifts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 867, L21 (2018).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Gupta, V. et al. Estimating fast transient detection pipeline efficiencies at UTMOST via real-time injection of mock FRBs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 2316–2326 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Luo, R., Lee, K., Lorimer, D. R. & Zhang, B. On the normalized FRB luminosity function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 2320–2337 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wang, F. Y. & Zhang, G. Q. A. Universal energy distribution for FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. 882, 108 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lu,W. & Piro Anthony, L., Implications from ASKAP fast radio burst statistics. Astrophys. J. 883, 3796–3847 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Luo, R. et al. On the FRB luminosity function–II. Event rate density. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 494, 665–679 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cordes, J. M., Bhat, N. D. E., Hankins, T. H., McLaughlin, M. A. & Kern, J. The brightest pulses in the universe: multifrequency observations of the Crab pulsar’s giant pulses. Astrophys. J. 612, 375–388 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    The CHIME/FRB Collaboration et al. CHIME/FRB detection of eight new repeating fast radio burst sources. Preprint at (2019).

  41. 41.

    Oppermann, N., Yu, H. R. & Pen, U. L. On the non-Poissonian repetition pattern of FRB121102. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 5109–5115 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lomb, N. R. Least-squares frequency analysis of unequally spaced data. Astrophys. Space Sci. 39, 447–462 (1976).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Scargle, J. D. Studies in astronomical time series analysis. II. Statistical aspects of spectral analysis of unevenly spaced data. Astrophys. J. 263, 835–853 (1982).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rajwade, K. M. et al. Possible periodic activity in the repeating FRB 121102. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 495, 3551–3558 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cruces, M. et al. Repeating behaviour of FRB 121102: periodicity, waiting times and energy distribution. Preprint at (2020).

  46. 46.

    Feng, Y. I. et al. Study of PSR J1022+1001 using the FAST radio telescope. Astrophys. J. 908, 105–111 (2021).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Luo, R. et al. Diverse polarization angle swings from a repeating fast radio burst source. Nature 586, 693–696 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, C. F. et al. A highly polarised radio burst detected from SGR 1935+2154 by FAST The Astronomer’s Telegram 13699, 1–1 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Hilmarsson, G. H., et al, Rotation measure evolution of the repeating fast radio burst source FRB 121102 Astrophys. J. Lett. 908, 10–23 (2021).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Plotnikov, I. & Sironi, L. The synchrotron maser emission from relativistic shocks in fast radio bursts: 1D PIC simulations of cold pair plasmas. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 3816–3833 (2019).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wu, Q., Zhang, G. Q., Wang, F. Y. & Dai, Z. G. Understanding FRB 200428 in the synchrotron maser shock model: consistency and possible challenge. Astrophys. J. Lett. 900, L26 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) programme nos. 11988101, 11725313, 11690024, 12041303, U1731238, U2031117, U1831131 and U1831207; by CAS International Partnership programme no. 114-A11KYSB20160008; by CAS Strategic Priority Research programme no. XDB23000000; the National Key R&D Program of China (no. 2017YFA0402600); and the National SKA Program of China no. 2020SKA0120200; and the Cultivation Project for FAST Scientific Payoff and Research Achievement of CAMS-CAS. S.C. and J.M.C. acknowledge support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (AAG 1815242). D.R.L. acknowledges support from the U.S. National Science Foundation awards AAG-1616042, OIA-1458952 and PHY-1430284. P.W. acknowledges support from the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (ID 2021055) and CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Reasearch (grant YSBR-006); P.W. and C.H.N. acknowledge support from cultivation project for FAST scientific payoff and research achievement of CAMS-CAS. Q.J.Z. is supported by the Technology Fund of Guizhou Province ((2016)-4008). L.Q. is supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (ID 2018075). This work made use of data from FAST, a Chinese national mega-science facility built and operated by the National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author information




D.L., R.D. and W.W.Z. launched the FAST campaign; P.W., C.H.N., Y.K.Z., Y.F., N.Y.T., J.R.N., C.C.M. and L.Z. processed the data; D.L., B.Z. and P.W. drafted the paper; R.D., X.X.Z., V.G., C.J., Y.Z., D.W. and Y.L.Y. built the FAST FRB backend; L.Q., G.H., X.Y.X., Q.J.Z. and S.D. made key contributions to the overall FAST data processing pipelines; L.S., M.C. and M.K. provided salient information on FRB 121102 from other observatories, particularly Effelsberg, and contributed to the scientific analysis; S.C., J.M.C., D.R.L. and F.Y.W. contribued to the writing and analysis, including simulations of the waiting time distribution (J.M.C.). F.Y.W. and G.Q.Z. contributed to work on the time-dependence of bimodal energy distribution.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. Li or B. Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Victoria Kaspi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 The distribution of the instrumental gain and off-pulse brightness RMS at 1.25 GHz for observations.

The upper panel indicates the gain applied for each pulses. The red dots denote the averaged gain in each day. The bottom panel shows the off-pulse brightness RMS (mK s) of the first pulse detected each day.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Example of a dynamic spectrum of burst with RFI.


Extended Data Fig. 3 Left panel: Example of FRB simulations.

Upper panels (a and b) are injected and de-dispersed dynamic spectra respectively. The time series is shown in panel (c) with the red arrows pointing to simulated pulses that were detected, while the blue arrow indicates an undetected pulse. Right panel: Comparison of SNRp recovered by FRB search versus the corresponding injected values. The SNRp histograms separately indicate the injected FRB pulses (grey lines) and the mock FRBs detected (red lines).

Extended Data Fig. 4 The completeness fraction of the FAST survey to FRBs as a function of the observed fluence and detected width.

All FRBs lying in the integrated SNRf < 6 region are below PRESTO’s search threshold. The region above the integrated SNRf of 6 shows the incompleteness of our FAST detection to broad FRBs as revealed by the injections. The map was smoothed (rebin) the map with a box of 0.05 ms × 0.002 Jy ms, which ensured the presence of at least one injected pulse in most map areas. Then for a few grid points without pulses, a simple linear interpolation was used to improve the visual appearance. The colour bar on the right side indicates the detection recovery fraction.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Upper panel (a): The burst rate distribution of the isotropic equivalent energy.

Details as per Extended Data Fig. 2. The red line represents the recovered distribution by adding back the missing fraction based on the simulation. The grey shaded region is the uncertainty for a 95% confidence based on the Poisson statistical assumption in the “reconstructed” fitting. Bottom panel (b): The fluence-width distribution at 1.25 GHz for FRB 121102 bursts. The black dots indicate the 1,652 detected bursts, the colorbar is consistent with Extended Data Fig. 4. In the upper panel, the two-component lognormal (LN) distribution is separately fitted in blue dashed line and grey dot line, an overall fit for bursts is shown in green. The red line and the shaded region indicates reconstructed missing fraction of bursts detection and uncertainty.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Flux intensity and pulse width distribution of FRB 121102.

Left: Flux intensity against pulse width for the FRB 121102 bursts with peak SNRp >10 in our sample. Right: The equivalent pulse width histogram.

Extended Data Fig. 7 MC simulations of the waiting time distribution.

The three figures correspond to three different simulations, and the number of randomly generated pulses in each simulation are 100 × 1652 ~ 1.6e5, 1 × 1652 = 1652, and 0.2 × 1652 ~ 330. The peak times of the three log-normal distributions are 0.62 s, 61.89 s, and 272.04 s, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Lomb-Scargle periodograms of FRB 121102 burst arrival times (top row) along with phase histograms for two trial periods (bottom row).

Left: Periods from 10−3 to 102 d. The four leftmost peaks in the periodogram are caused by daily sampling and its harmonics. The peak at ~24 d is related to the sampling window function (i.e. non-uniform sampling) over the 47 d data set, as is consistent with the broad distribution in burst phase (bottom left). Right: Periods from 1 ms to 103 s. The peak at 10 ms is a large multiple of the original sampling time and also yields no distinct concentration in burst phase.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Example of the DM optimization method for FRB 121102.

The complex time–frequency structures for the burst of MJD 58729.01858 was revealed with an optimal DM of 563.5 pc cm−3.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Left panel: Histogram and cumulative distribution of dispersion measure for FRB 121102.

Right panel: Slope distribution of null hypothesis test.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Table 1.

Peer Review File

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Data for 1,652 burst list in Supplementary Table 1 (Supplementary Information).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Wang, P., Zhu, W.W. et al. A bimodal burst energy distribution of a repeating fast radio burst source. Nature 598, 267–271 (2021).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing