Correction to: Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2885-5 Published online 21 October 2020
In Fig. 2 of this Article, the Ct values for the orf1ab gene (shown in Fig. 2b) in samples B16121 and B16122 at 20×, 50× and 100× dilution were accidental duplications of those of the N gene (shown in Fig. 2a). The Ct values for orf1ab have been corrected in Fig. 2 of the original Article, and Fig. 1 of this Amendment shows the original and corrected Fig. 2b, for transparency. As B16121 and B16122 are both low-Ct samples, this change has no effect on our conclusion that typical samples are easily detected after 100-fold dilution.
In Extended Data Table 2 of this Article, which presents the source data for Fig. 2, the orf1ab Ct values for sample B16121 were incorrectly given as 29, 29.74 and 30.54 for 20×, 50× and 100× dilution, respectively, instead of 31, 30.51 and 30.95, respectively. In addition, the orf1ab Ct values for sample B16122 were incorrectly given as 26.81, 27.75 and 29.07 for 20×, 50× and 100× dilution, respectively, instead of 28.5, 29.4 and 30.2, respectively. Extended Data Table 2 of the original Article has been corrected online. We thank T. Carey for drawing this error to our attention. The original Article has been corrected online.
About this article
Cite this article
Mutesa, L., Ndishimye, P., Butera, Y. et al. Author Correction: A pooled testing strategy for identifying SARS-CoV-2 at low prevalence. Nature 595, E3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03630-z