In only a few decades, lithium-ion batteries have revolutionized technologies, enabling the proliferation of portable devices and electric vehicles1, with substantial benefits for society. However, the rapid growth in technology has highlighted the ethical and environmental challenges of mining lithium, cobalt and other mineral ore resources, and the issues associated with the safe usage and non-hazardous disposal of batteries2. Only a small fraction of lithium-ion batteries are recycled, further exacerbating global material supply of strategic elements3,4,5. A potential alternative is to use organic-based redox-active materials6,7,8 to develop rechargeable batteries that originate from ethically sourced, sustainable materials and enable on-demand deconstruction and reconstruction. Making such batteries is challenging because the active materials must be stable during operation but degradable at end of life. Further, the degradation products should be either environmentally benign or recyclable for reconstruction into a new battery. Here we demonstrate a metal-free, polypeptide-based battery, in which viologens and nitroxide radicals are incorporated as redox-active groups along polypeptide backbones to function as anode and cathode materials, respectively. These redox-active polypeptides perform as active materials that are stable during battery operation and subsequently degrade on demand in acidic conditions to generate amino acids, other building blocks and degradation products. Such a polypeptide-based battery is a first step to addressing the need for alternative chemistries for green and sustainable batteries in a future circular economy.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Lopez, J., Mackanic, D. G., Cui, Y. & Bao, Z. Designing polymers for advanced battery chemistries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 312–330 (2019).
Turcheniuk, K., Bondarev, D., Singhal, V. & Yushin, G. Ten years left to redesign lithium-ion batteries. Nature 559, 467–470 (2018).
Zeng, X., Li, J. & Singh, N. Recycling of spent lithium-ion battery: a critical review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1129–1165 (2014).
Olivetti, E. A., Ceder, G., Gaustad, G. G. & Fu, X. Lithium-ion battery supply chain considerations: analysis of potential bottlenecks in critical metals. Joule 1, 229–243 (2017).
Wild, A., Strumpf, M., Häupler, B., Hager, M. D. & Schubert, U. S. All-organic battery composed of thianthrene- and TCAQ-based polymers. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1601415 (2017).
Banza Lubaba Nkulu, C. et al. Sustainability of artisanal mining of cobalt in DR Congo. Nat. Sustain. 1, 495–504 (2018).
Koshika, K., Chikushi, N., Sano, N., Oyaizu, K. & Nishide, H. A TEMPO-substituted polyacrylamide as a new cathode material: an organic rechargeable device composed of polymer electrodes and aqueous electrolyte. Green Chem. 12, 1573–1575 (2010).
Esquivel, J. P. et al. A metal-free and biotically degradable battery for portable single-use applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700275 (2017).
Friebe, C., Lex-Balducci, A. & Schubert, U. S. Sustainable energy storage: recent trends and developments toward fully organic batteries. ChemSusChem 12, 4093 (2019).
Janoschka, T., Hager, M. D. & Schubert, U. S. Powering up the future: radical polymers for battery applications. Adv. Mater. 24, 6397–6409 (2012).
Kim, J., Kim, J. H. & Ariga, K. Redox-active polymers for energy storage nanoarchitectonics. Joule 1, 739–768 (2017).
Tomlinson, E. P., Hay, M. E. & Boudouris, B. W. Radical polymers and their application to organic electronic devices. Macromolecules 47, 6145–6158 (2014).
Lutkenhaus, J. A radical advance for conducting polymers. Science 359, 1334–1335 (2018).
Joo, Y., Agarkar, V., Sung, S. H., Savoie, B. M. & Boudouris, B. W. A nonconjugated radical polymer glass with high electrical conductivity. Science 359, 1391–1395 (2018).
Coates, G. W. & Getzler, Y. D. Y. L. Chemical recycling to monomer for an ideal, circular polymer economy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 501–516 (2020).
Muench, S. et al. Polymer-based organic batteries. Chem. Rev. 116, 9438–9484 (2016).
Zhang, K., Monteiro, M. J. & Jia, Z. Stable organic radical polymers: synthesis and applications. Polym. Chem. 7, 5589–5614 (2016).
Janoschka, T. et al. An aqueous, polymer-based redox-flow battery using non-corrosive, safe, and low-cost materials. Nature 527, 78–81 (2015).
Koshika, K., Sano, N., Oyaizu, K. & Nishide, H. An aqueous, electrolyte-type, rechargeable device utilizing a hydrophilic radical polymer-cathode. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 210, 1989–1995 (2009).
Sano, N. et al. Polyviologen hydrogel with high-rate capability for anodes toward an aqueous electrolyte-type and organic-based rechargeable device. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 1355–1361 (2013).
Suga, T., Ohshiro, H., Sugita, S., Oyaizu, K. & Nishide, H. Emerging n-type redox-active radical polymer for a totally organic polymer-based rechargeable Battery. Adv. Mater. 21, 1627–1630 (2009).
Suga, T., Sugita, S., Ohshiro, H., Oyaizu, K. & Nishide, H. p- and n-type bipolar redox-active radical polymer: toward totally organic polymer-based rechargeable devices with variable configuration. Adv. Mater. 23, 751–754 (2011).
Oka, K., Kato, R., Oyaizu, K. & Nishide, H. Poly(vinyldibenzothiophenesulfone): its redox capability at very negative potential toward an all-organic rechargeable device with high-energy density. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1805858 (2018).
Qu, J. et al. Synthesis and properties of DNA complexes containing 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinoxy (TEMPO) moieties as organic radical battery materials. Chemistry 14, 3250–3259 (2008).
Ibe, T., Frings, R. B., Lachowicz, A., Kyo, S. & Nishide, H. Nitroxide polymer networks formed by Michael addition: on site-cured electrode-active organic coating. Chem. Commun. 46, 3475–3477 (2010).
Qu, J. et al. Helical polyacetylenes carrying 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy and 2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-1-pyrrolidinyloxy moieties: their synthesis, properties, and function. J. Polym. Sci. A 45, 5431–5445 (2007).
Otaki, M. & Goto, H. Helical spin polymer with magneto-electro-optical activity. Macromolecules 52, 3199–3209 (2019).
Hatakeyama-Sato, K., Wakamatsu, H., Katagiri, R., Oyaizu, K. & Nishide, H. An ultrahigh output rechargeable electrode of a hydrophilic radical polymer/nanocarbon hybrid with an exceptionally large current density beyond 1 A cm−2. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800900 (2018).
Hiejima, T. & Kaneko, J. Spiral configuration of nitroxide radicals along the polypeptide helix and their magnetic properties. Macromolecules 46, 1713–1722 (2013).
Belshaw, P. J., Mzengeza, S. & Lajoie, G. A. Chlorotrimethylsilane mediated formation of ω-allyl esters of aspartic and glutamic acids. Synth. Commun. 20, 3157–3160 (1990).
Deming, T. J. Synthesis of side-chain modified polypeptides. Chem. Rev. 116, 786–808 (2016).
Fan, J. et al. Construction of a versatile and functional nanoparticle platform derived from a helical diblock copolypeptide-based biomimetic polymer. Polym. Chem. 5, 3977–3981 (2014).
Engler, A. C., Lee, H.-i. & Hammond, P. T. Highly efficient “grafting onto” a polypeptide backbone using click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9334–9338 (2009).
Hoyle, C. E. & Bowman, C. N. Thiol–ene click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 1540–1573 (2010).
Hansen, K.-A. et al. A methoxyamine-protecting group for organic radical battery materials—an alternative approach. ChemSusChem 13, 2386 (2020).
Galbo, J. P. Process for preparing N-methoxy derivatives of 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidone. US patent 5374729A (1994).
Deming, T. J. Noodle gels for cells. Nat. Mater. 9, 535–536 (2010).
Lalatsa, A., Schätzlein, A. G., Mazza, M., Le, T. B. H. & Uchegbu, I. F. Amphiphilic poly(l-amino acids) — new materials for drug delivery. J. Control. Release 161, 523–536 (2012).
Matson, J. B. & Stupp, S. I. Self-assembling peptide scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Chem. Commun. 48, 26–33 (2012).
Shpilevaya, I. & Foord, J. S. Electrochemistry of methyl viologen and anthraquinonedisulfonate at diamond and diamond powder electrodes: the influence of surface chemistry. Electroanalysis 26, 2088–2099 (2014).
Bard, A. J. & Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications 2nd edn, Ch. 6 (Wiley, 2000).
Bugnon, L., Morton, C. J. H., Novak, P., Vetter, J. & Nesvadba, P. Synthesis of poly(4-methacryloyloxy-TEMPO) via group-transfer polymerization and its evaluation in organic radical battery. Chem. Mater. 19, 2910–2914 (2007).
Janoschka, T. et al. Reactive inkjet printing of cathodes for organic radical batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 1025–1028 (2013).
Vlad, A., Rolland, J., Hauffman, G., Ernould, B. & Gohy, J.-F. Melt-polymerization of TEMPO methacrylates with nano carbons enables superior battery materials. ChemSusChem 8, 1692–1696 (2015).
Lutkenhaus, J. et al. Solution-processable thermally crosslinked organic radical polymer battery cathodes. ChemSusChem 13, 2371 (2020).
Elsabahy, M., Samarajeewa, S., Raymond, J. E., Clark, C. & Wooley, K. L. Shell-crosslinked knedel-like nanoparticles induce lower immunotoxicity than their non-crosslinked analogs. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 5241–5255 (2013).
This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation (DMR-1507429, DMR-1905818, CHE-2003771 and DMREF-1629094; K.L.W. and T.P.N.; synthesis and structural characterization), the Welch Foundation (A-0001, K.L.W.; A-1717, C.-H.Y.) and the US Department of Energy Office of Science (DE-SC0014006; J.L.L. and A.D.E.; electrochemical measurements). A.D.E. acknowledges support by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature thanks Jung Ho Kim, David Mercerreyes and Ulrich Schubert for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
a, The half sandwich cell: viol-Cl or biTEMPO polypeptide composite working electrode and lithium metal reference electrode, with a filter-paper separator. b, The full sandwich cell: viol-Cl polypeptide composite working electrode and biTEMPO polypeptide composite reference electrode, with a filter-paper separator.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Electrochemical performance of full cell without polypeptide active material as a control.
Electrochemical characterization of a PVDF + CB symmetric full cell is shown, including cyclic voltammograms (i), charge–discharge curves (ii) and cycling response at 1C (iii) (PVDF + CB composite electrode, 0.5 M TBACF3SO3 in PC and filter paper, PVDF + CB composite electrode). The composite electrodes were cast in an identical manner to the polypeptide composite electrodes, with a composition of 86 wt% CB and 14 wt% PVDF on ITO-coated glass substrates. After 250 cycles, the capacity was 1.7 mA h g−1, whereas the capacity of the polypeptide-based full cell was 7.5 mA h g−1 (Fig. 4g–i).
a, b, Scanning electron micrographs of the viol-Cl polypeptide composite electrode (a) and the biTEMPO polypeptide composite electrode (b), before (i) and after (ii) 50 charge–discharge cycles in the full sandwich cell configuration (viol-Cl polypeptide composite electrode, 0.5 M TBACF3SO3 in PC and filter paper, biTEMPO polypeptide composite electrode).
Dose–response curves for redox-active polypeptides. Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. of three determinations. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism, with the black lines representing four-parameter fits.
Dose–response curves for redox-active polypeptides after acid degradation. Data are expressed as mean ± s.d. of three determinations. The statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism, with the black lines representing four-parameter fits.
Comparison of IC50 values of viologen polypeptide, biTEMPO polypeptide, viologen analogue, biTEMPO analogue and their degraded products.
This file contains supplementary experimental procedures for additional electrochemistry characterizations and the synthetic details for the viologen and BiTEMPO polypeptides and their analogs. Spectral data (NMR and FTIR) is provided for all the synthesized species. Supplementary Figures are provided for electrochemical, degradation, and cell viability studies.
About this article
Cite this article
Nguyen, T.P., Easley, A.D., Kang, N. et al. Polypeptide organic radical batteries. Nature 593, 61–66 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03399-1
Nature Reviews Materials (2021)