Abstract
The mechanical properties of olivine-rich rocks are key to determining the mechanical coupling between Earth’s lithosphere and asthenosphere. In crystalline materials, the motion of crystal defects is fundamental to plastic flow1,2,3,4. However, because the main constituent of olivine-rich rocks does not have enough slip systems, additional deformation mechanisms are needed to satisfy strain conditions. Experimental studies have suggested a non-Newtonian, grain-size-sensitive mechanism in olivine involving grain-boundary sliding5,6. However, very few microstructural investigations have been conducted on grain-boundary sliding, and there is no consensus on whether a single or multiple physical mechanisms are at play. Most importantly, there are no theoretical frameworks for incorporating the mechanics of grain boundaries in polycrystalline plasticity models. Here we identify a mechanism for deformation at grain boundaries in olivine-rich rocks. We show that, in forsterite, amorphization takes place at grain boundaries under stress and that the onset of ductility of olivine-rich rocks is due to the activation of grain-boundary mobility in these amorphous layers. This mechanism could trigger plastic processes in the deep Earth, where high-stress conditions are encountered (for example, at the brittle–plastic transition). Our proposed mechanism is especially relevant at the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary, where olivine reaches the glass transition temperature, triggering a decrease in its viscosity and thus promoting grain-boundary sliding.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data (micrographs) are provided in the figures. Original files are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3893661. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Carter, N. L. & Ave’Lallemant, H. G. High temperature flow of dunite and peridotite. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 81, 2181–2202 (1970).
Kocks, U. F., Argon, A. S. & Ashby, M. F. in Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Slip (eds Kocks, U. F. et al.) 110–271 (Pergamon Press, 1975).
Ashby, M. F. & Verrall, R. A. Micromechanisms of flow and fracture, and their relevance to the rheology of the upper mantle. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 288, 59–95 (1978).
Marquardt, K. & Faul, U. K. The structure and composition of olivine grain boundaries: 40 years of studies, status and current developments. Phys. Chem. Miner. 45, 139–172 (2018).
Hirth, G. & Kohlstedt, D. L. Experimental constraints on the dynamics of the partially molten upper mantle: 2. Deformation in the dislocation creep regime. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 15441–15449 (1995).
Warren, J. M. & Hirth, G. Grain size sensitive deformation mechanisms in naturally deformed peridotites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 248, 438–450 (2006).
Maruyama, G. & Hiraga, T. Grain- to multiple-grain-scale deformation processes during diffusion creep of forsterite + diopside aggregate: 1. Direct observations. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122, 5890–5915 (2017).
Bollinger, C., Marquardt, K. & Ferreira, F. Intragranular plasticity vs. grain boundary sliding (GBS) in forsterite: microstructural evidence at high pressures (3.5–5.0 GPa). Am. Mineral. 104, 220–231 (2019).
Ohuchi, T. et al. Dislocation-accommodated grain boundary sliding as the major deformation mechanism of olivine in the Earth’s upper mantle. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500360 (2015).
Burnley, P. C. & Kaboli, S. Elastic plastic self-consistent (EPSC) modeling of San Carlos olivine deformed in a D-DIA apparatus. Am. Mineral. 104, 276–281 (2019).
Ashby, M. F. Boundary defects and atomistic aspects of boundary sliding and diffusional creep. Surf. Sci. 31, 498–542 (1972).
Raj, R. & Ashby, M. F. On grain boundary sliding and diffusional creep. Metall. Trans. 2, 1113–1127 (1971).
Cooper, R. F. Seismic wave attenuation: energy dissipation in viscoelastic crystalline solids. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 51, 253–290 (2002)
Jackson, I., Faul, U. & Skelton, R. Elastically accommodated grain-boundary sliding: new insights from experiment and modeling. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 228, 203–210 (2014).
Bollmann, W. Crystal defects and Crystalline Interfaces (Springer, 1970)
Hirth, J. P., Hirth, G. & Wang, J. Disclinations and disconnections in minerals and metals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 196–204 (2020).
Volterra, V. Sur l’équilibre des corps élastiques multiplement connexes. Ann. Sci. Ecol. Norm. Sup. III 24, 401–517 (1907).
Taupin, V., Capolungo, L., Fressengeas, C., Das, A. & Upadhyay, M. Grain boundary modeling using an elasto-plastic theory of dislocation and disclination fields. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 61, 370–384 (2013).
Cordier, P. et al. Disclinations provide the missing mechanism for deforming olivine-rich rocks in the mantle. Nature 507, 51–56 (2014).
Gasc, J., Demouchy, S., Barou, F., Koizumi, S. & Cordier, P. Creep mechanisms in the lithospheric mantle Inferred from deformation of iron-free forsterite aggregates at 900–1200 °C. Tectonophysics 761, 16–30 (2019).
Watanabe, T., Obata, M. & Karashima, S. High temperature intergranular fracture enhanced by grain boundary migration in alpha iron-tin alloy. In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Strength of Metals and Alloys (ICSMA 6) (ed. Gifkins, R. C.) 671–676 (Pergamon, 1982)
Schneibel, J. H., White, C. L. & Padgett, R. A. The influence of traces of Sb and Zr on creep and creep fracture of Ni-20% Cr. In Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Strength of Metals and Alloys (ICSMA 6) (ed. Gifkins, R. C.) 649–654 (Pergamon, 1982)
Masuda, H., Tobe, H., Sato, E., Sugino, Y. & Ukai, S. Two-dimensional grain boundary sliding and mantle dislocation accommodation in ODS ferritic steel. Acta Mater. 120, 205–215 (2016).
Dupas-Bruzek, C., Tingle, T., Green, I. I. H., Doukhan, N. & Doukhan, J. C. The rheology of olivine and spinel magnesium germanate (Mg2GeO4): TEM study of the defect microstructures. Phys. Chem. Miner. 25, 501–514 (1998).
Rösner, H., Peterlechner, M., Kübel, C., Schmidt, V. & Wilde, G. Density changes in shear bands of a metallic glass determined by correlative analytical transmission electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 142, 1–9 (2014).
Koizumi, S. et al. Synthesis of highly dense and fine-grained aggregates of mantle composites by vacuum sintering of nano-sized mineral powders. Phys. Chem. Miner. 37, 505–518 (2010).
Rosenhain, W. & Ewen, D. Intercrystalline cohesion in metals. J. Inst. Met. 8, 149–173 (1912).
Kê, T.-S. Experimental evidence of the viscous behavior of grain boundaries in metals. Phys. Rev. 71, 533–546 (1947).
Read, W. T. & Shockley, W. Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries. Phys. Rev. 78, 275–289 (1950).
Keblinski, P., Phillpot, S. R., Wolf, D. & Gleiter, H. Thermodynamic criterion for the stability of amorphous intergranular films in covalent materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2965–2968 (1996).
Richet, P., Leclerc, F. & Benoist, L. Melting of forsterite and spinel, with implications for the glass transition of Mg2SiO4 liquid. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 1675–1678 (1993).
Jeanloz, R. et al. Shock-produced olivine glass: first observation. Science 197, 457–459 (1977).
Lacam, A., Madon, M. & Poirier, J. P. Olivine glass and spinel formed in a diamond anvil high-pressure cell. Nature 288, 155–157 (1980).
Andrault, D., Bouhifd, M. A., Itie, J. P. & Richet, P. Compression and amorphization of (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 olivines: an X-ray diffraction study up to 70 GPa. Phys. Chem. Miner. 22, 99–107 (1995).
Gouriet, K., Carrez, P. & Cordier, P. Ultimate mechanical properties of forsterite. Minerals 9, 787 (2019).
Kranjc, K. et al. Amorphisation and plasticity of olivine during low temperature micropillar deformation experiments. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 125, B019242 (2019).
Nakamura, K. et al. First-principles study of grain boundary sliding in α-Al2O3. Phys. Rev. B 75, 184109 (2007); erratum 84, 059903 (2011).
Zhang, Z., Fu, Z., Zhang, R., Legut, D. & Guo, H. Anomalous mechanical strengths and shear deformation paths of Al2O3 polymorphs with high iconicity. RSC Advances 6, 12885–12892 (2016).
Guo, D. et al. Grain boundary sliding and amorphization are responsible for the reverse Hall–Petch relation in superhard nanocrystalline boron carbide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 145504 (2018).
Schuh, C. A., Hufnagel, T. C. & Ramamurty, U. Mechanical behavior of amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 55, 4067–4109 (2007).
Zoback, M. L. & Zoback, M. in Treatise on Geophysics Vol. 6 (ed. Schubert, G.) 253–273 (2007).
Boioli, F., Tommasi, A., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S. & Mussi, A. Low steady-state stresses in the cold lithospheric mantle inferred from dislocation dynamics models of dislocation creep in olivine. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 432, 232–242 (2015).
Wallis, D., Hansen, L. N., Britton, T. B. & Wilkinson, A. J. High‐angular resolution electron backscatter diffraction as a new tool for mapping lattice distortion in geological minerals. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 124, 6337–6358 (2019).
McKenzie, D., Jackson, J. & Priestley, K. Thermal structure of oceanic and continental lithosphere. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 233, 337–349 (2005).
Watts, A. B. & Zhong, S. Observations of flexure and the rheology of oceanic lithosphere. Geophys. J. Int. 142, 855–875 (2000).
Kneller, E. A., van Keken, P. E., Karato, S.-I. & Park, J. B-type olivine fabric in the mantle wedge: insights from high-resolution non-Newtonian subduction zone models. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 237, 781–797 (2005).
Pollitz, F. F. Lithosphere and shallow asthenosphere rheology from observations of post-earthquake relaxation. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 293, 106271 (2019).
Barrell, J. The strength of the Earth’s crust. J. Geol. 22, 28–48 (1914).
O’Reilly, S. Y. & Griffin, W. L. The continental lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary: can we sample it? Lithos 120, 1–13 (2010).
Wang, Q. Homologous temperature of olivine: implications for creep of the upper mantle and fabric transitions in olivine. Sci. China Earth Sci. 59, 1138–1156 (2016).
Sakamaki, T. Ponded melt at the boundary between the lithosphere and asthenosphere. Nat. Geosci. 6, 1041–1044 (2013).
Kawakatsu, H. et al. Seismic evidence for sharp lithosphere-asthenosphere boundaries of oceanic plates. Science 324, 499–502 (2009).
Naif, S., Key, K., Constable, S. & Evans, R. L. Melt-rich channel observed at the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary. Nature 495, 356–359 (2013).
Gaillard, F., Malki, M., Iacono-Marziano, G., Pichavant, M. & Scaillet, B. Carbonatite melts and electrical conductivity in the asthenosphere. Science 322, 1363–1365 (2008).
Green, D. H., Hibberson, W. O., Kovács, I. & Rosenthal, A. Water and its influence on the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary. Nature 467, 448–451 (2010); addendum 472, 504 (2011).
Raleigh, C. B. Mechanism of plastic deformation of olivine. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 5391–5406 (1968).
Couvy, H. et al. Shear deformation experiments of forsterite at 11 GPa - 1400 °C in the multianvil apparatus. Eur. J. Mineral. 16, 877–889 (2004).
Mainprice, D., Tommasi, A., Couvy, H., Cordier, P. & Frost, D. J. Pressure sensitivity of olivine slip systems and seismic anisotropy of Earth’s upper mantle. Nature 433, 731–733 (2005).
Ismaïl, W. B. & Mainprice, D. An olivine fabric database: an overview of upper mantle fabrics and seismic anisotropy. Tectonophysics 296, 145–157 (1998).
Pollack, H. N. & Chapman, D. S. On the regional variation of heat flow, geotherms, and lithospheric thickness. Tectonophysics 38, 279–296 (1977).
Eaton, D. W. et al. The elusive lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons. Lithos 109, 1–22 (2009).
Fischer, K. M., Ford, H. A., Abt, D. L. & Rychert, C. A. The lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 38, 551–575 (2010).
Hiraga, T., Miyazaki, T., Tasaka, M. & Yoshida, H. Mantle superplasticity and its self-made demise. Nature 468, 1091–1094 (2010).
Tasaka, M., Hiraga, T. & Zimmerman, M. E. Influence of mineral fraction on the rheological properties of forsterite plus enstatite during grain-size-sensitive creep: 2. Deformation experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 3991–4012 (2013).
Gasparik, T. Phase Diagrams for Geologists, An Atlas of Earth Interior 462 (Springer, 2003).
Chen C.-H, Presnall, D. The system Mg2SiO4-SiO2 at pressure up to 25 kilobars. Am. Mineral. 60, 398–406 (1975).
Paterson, M. S. in The Brittle-Ductile Transition in Rocks: the Heard Volume (eds Duba, A. et al.) 187–194 (AGU, 1990).
Thieme, M., Demouchy, S., Mainprice, D., Barou, F. & Cordier, P. Stress evolution and associated microstructure during transient creep of olivine at 1000–1200 °C. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 278, 34–46 (2018).
Mei, S. & Kohlstedt, D.L. Influence of water on the plastic deformation of olivine aggregates: 1. Diffusion creep regime. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 21457–21469 (2000).
Fei, H. et al. High silicon self-diffusion coefficient in anhydrous forsterite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 345–348, 95–103 (2012).
Guignard, J., Bystricky, M. & Béjina, F. Dense fine-grained aggregates prepared by spark plasma sintering (SPS), an original technique in experimental petrology. Eur. J. Mineral. 23, 323–331 (2011).
Manthilake, M. A.G.M., Walter, N., & Frost, D.J. A new multi-anvil press employing six independently acting 8 MN hydraulic rams. High Press. Res. 32, 195–207 (2012).
Vastava, R. B. & Langdon, T. G. An investigation of intercrystalline and interphase boundary sliding in the superplastic Pb-62% Sn eutectic. Acta Metall. 27, 251–257 (1979).
Langdon, T. G. The effect of surface configuration on grain boundary sliding. Metall. Trans. 3, 797–801 (1972).
Fryer, D. S., Nealey, P. F. & de Pablo, J. J. Thermal probe measurements of the glass transition temperature for ultrathin polymer films as a function of thickness. Macromolecules 33, 6439–6447 (2000).
Van Cappellen, E. & Doukhan, J. C. Quantitative transmission X-ray microanalysis of ionic compounds. Ultramicroscopy 53, 343–349 (1994).
Cliff, G. & Lorimer, G. Quantitative analysis of thin specimens. J. Micros. 102, 203–207 (1975).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 787198 – TimeMan. The TEM facility in Lille is supported by the Conseil Régional du Nord-Pas de Calais and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). H.I. is mandated by the Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FSR-FNRS). This study was partially supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche through the ANR INDIGO grant (ANR-14-CE33-0011) for the low-pressure experiments, by the German Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Free State of Bavaria for the high-pressure experiments, and by the JSPS KAKENHI grant (number JP18K03799) to S.K. and cooperative research program of the Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.C. designed the study, and P.C. and H.I. co-supervised it. S.K. prepared the starting material nanoforsterite. C.B. prepared the coarse-grained forsterite. J.G., S.D. and C.B. performed the deformation experiments. V.S., H.I., A.M., D.S. and P.C. performed and analysed the TEM. All authors discussed and analysed the data. P.C., H.I. and S.D. wrote the paper, with contributions from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature thanks Pamela Burnley and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Orientation map obtained from TEM using the ACOM-TEM method.
The spatial resolution is 6 nm. The three crystalline grains (red, blue and green) are indexed against forsterite (Pbnm space group, two diffraction patterns are provided as insets). The figure is the combination of the reliability map (darker areas being less well indexed) and the inverse pole figure along the vertical direction (using the colour code shown in the inset). In between the grains is an amorphous phase (orange, no relation to the colour code for the forsterite orientation), with a diffraction presented in the inset.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Chemical analysis (STEM-EDX) of the intergranular amorphous phase in specimen NF1050-1.
a, e, i, STEM bright-field images of the three areas investigated. b, f, j, Combined STEM and chemical Si maps, showing the presence of Si in the amorphous phase. c, g, k, Combined Si and Mg maps showing continuity of composition (Mg, Si) between the forsterite grains and the amorphous phase. Mg enrichment of the pyroxene grain is evident. d, h, i, Combined Si and Mg maps after quantification, performed using an existing method76 on the basis of the stoichiometric oxides, with standard specimens used to obtain the k factors77 of Mg and Si. In d, where the amorphous layer is larger, the thickness correction can be done accurately, showing that the amorphous phase has exactly the composition of forsterite. In h and i, the amorphous layers are smaller and thinner, with non-homogeneous thicknesses rendering quantification less reliable, so the local deviations observed in the thinnest regions should be taken with care.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Specimen NF1050-1.
Despite extensive serration of the vertical grain boundary, the forsterite grain in the middle (in Bragg conditions) shows no dislocation activity (no defects). The grain on the left shows indications of strain due to defects only where indicated by the arrow.
Extended Data Fig. 4 HRTEM image of an amorphous layer in a grain boundary.
Experiment M639 was deformed in the multi-anvil press at 1,200 °C and 5 GPa. Fast Fourier transforms of the crystals are shown in the insets.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Grain boundaries of undeformed samples.
a–d, HRTEM of four grain boundaries in the starting material used in ref. 20 before deformation experiments in the Paterson press.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Specimen M576.
HRTEM of a grain boundary shows an amorphous layer; insets show the fast Fourier transforms from different regions.
Extended Data Fig. 7 CTEM of grain boundaries in specimen NF950-1.
a, Evidence for cleavage-like intergranular fracturing (boundaries indicted by arrows). b, Some grain boundaries display evidence for a internal flow-like structure. c, Inclined view of such a boundary, showing the cellular structures inside the boundary. At this temperature, the displacements are very small.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Evidence (CTEM images) of grain-boundary sliding in specimen NF1050-1.
a, Arrows indicate where grain-boundary opening occurs in response to tensile stress components. These displacements must be accompanied by some shear along the neighbouring boundaries. Without markers, these shear displacements cannot be quantified. b, Assemblage of two micrographs. This region, which was probably under horizontal tensile loading, shows large displacements along vertical boundaries. Owing to differential ion-thinning rates between crystalline and amorphous materials, the region with the black star shows no remaining amorphous material (as in a). In the boundary on the left, located in a thicker region, some amorphous olivine (‘am’) is preserved. The extensional displacement at this boundary (about 190 nm) is used to evaluate the local strain (Methods). The boundaries indicated by the white asterisks show strong morphological evidence of ductile flow. The one on the right is still filled with amorphous olivine. c, The grain at the centre was probably subjected to complex triaxial loading, which has been accommodated by amorphization (some is remaining, ‘am’) and flow involving rotational, tensile and shear components (arrows). On the bottom right is a grain boundary still filled with amorphous material under tensile loading. The neighbouring grain boundary (white diamond) must also have experienced some shear. This is also probably the case for the boundary (white triangle) that is close to an opening boundary.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Evidence (Fresnel micrograph, Δf ≈ −20 μm) of grain-boundary sliding in specimen M640 (5 GPa, 1,000 °C).
The symbols represent markers, which help to visualize the shear (represented by the white arrow). Some shear bands evidenced by the Fresnel contrast are shown by black arrows. Owing to the shape of the grain, the pure shear sliding displacement in the upper part of the grain boundary transforms into opening in the central part.
Source data
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samae, V., Cordier, P., Demouchy, S. et al. Stress-induced amorphization triggers deformation in the lithospheric mantle. Nature 591, 82–86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03238-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03238-3
This article is cited by
-
The Pannon LitH2Oscope magnetotelluric array in the Pannonian Basin
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica (2024)
-
Amorphization-mediated plasticity
Nature Materials (2023)
-
Amorphous shear bands in crystalline materials as drivers of plasticity
Nature Materials (2023)
-
Intracrystalline deformation microstructures in natural olivine with implications for stress estimation
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Resolving puzzles of the phase-transformation-based mechanism of the strong deep-focus earthquake
Nature Communications (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.