There is a contradiction at the heart of our current understanding of individual and collective mobility patterns. On the one hand, a highly influential body of literature on human mobility driven by analyses of massive empirical datasets finds that human movements show no evidence of characteristic spatial scales. There, human mobility is described as scale free1,2,3. On the other hand, geographically, the concept of scale—referring to meaningful levels of description from individual buildings to neighbourhoods, cities, regions and countries—is central for the description of various aspects of human behaviour, such as socioeconomic interactions, or political and cultural dynamics4,5. Here we resolve this apparent paradox by showing that day-to-day human mobility does indeed contain meaningful scales, corresponding to spatial ‘containers’ that restrict mobility behaviour. The scale-free results arise from aggregating displacements across containers. We present a simple model—which given a person’s trajectory—infers their neighbourhood, city and so on, as well as the sizes of these geographical containers. We find that the containers—characterizing the trajectories of more than 700,000 individuals—do indeed have typical sizes. We show that our model is also able to generate highly realistic trajectories and provides a way to understand the differences in mobility behaviour across countries, gender groups and urban–rural areas.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Derived data that support the findings of this study are available in DTU Data with the identifier https://doi.org/10.11583/DTU.12941993.v1. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors. Raw data for dataset D1 are not publicly available to preserve individuals’ privacy under the European General Data Protection Regulation. Raw data for dataset D2 are not publicly available due to privacy considerations, but are available to researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data, sign a confidentiality agreement and agree to work under supervision in Copenhagen. Please direct your queries to the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code is available at https://github.com/lalessan/scales_human_mobility/.
Brockmann, D., Hufnagel, L. & Geisel, T. The scaling laws of human travel. Nature 439, 462–465 (2006).
González, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A. & Barabási, A.-L. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 779–782 (2008).
Song, C., Koren, T., Wang, P. & Barabási, A.-L. Modelling the scaling properties of human mobility. Nat. Phys. 6, 818–823 (2010).
Paasi, A. Place and region: looking through the prism of scale. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 28, 536–546 (2004).
Marston, S. A. The social construction of scale. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 24, 219–242 (2000).
Cresswell, T. On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World (Taylor & Francis, 2006).
Kaluza, P., Kölzsch, A., Gastner, M. T. & Blasius, B. The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 1093–1103 (2010).
Kraemer, M. U. et al. The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China. Science 368, 493–497 (2020).
Song, X., Zhang, Q., Sekimoto, Y. & Shibasaki, R. Prediction of human emergency behavior and their mobility following large-scale disaster. In Proc. 20th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 5–14 (ACM, 2014).
Becker, F. & Axhausen, K. W. Literature review on surveys investigating the acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation 44, 1293–1306 (2017).
Barbosa, H. et al. Human mobility: models and applications. Phys. Rep. 734, 1–74 (2018).
Larsen, J. & Urry, J. Mobilities, Networks, Geographies (Routledge, 2016).
Hirtle, S. C. & Jonides, J. Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Mem. Cognit. 13, 208–217 (1985).
Von Thünen, J. H. Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie Vol. 13 (G Fischer, 1910).
Christaller, W. Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland: eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmässigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischen Funktionen (Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1980).
Berry, B. J. L. Geography of Market Centers and Retail Distribution (Prentice Hall, 1967).
Alonso, W. et al. Location and Land Use. Toward a General Theory of Land Rent (Harvard Univ. Press, 1964).
Cadwallader, M. Migration and Residential Mobility: Macro and Micro Approaches (Univ. Wisconsin Press, 1992).
Thiemann, C., Theis, F., Grady, D., Brune, R. & Brockmann, D. The structure of borders in a small world. PLoS ONE 5, e15422 (2010).
Marchetti, C. Anthropological invariants in travel behavior. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 47, 75–88 (1994).
Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Lambiotte, R., Pontil, M. & Mascolo, C. A tale of many cities: universal patterns in human urban mobility. PLoS ONE 7, e37027 (2012); correction 7, https://doi.org/10.1371/annotation/ca85bf7a-7922-47d5-8bfb-bcdf25af8c72 (2020).
Alessandretti, L., Sapiezynski, P., Lehmann, S. & Baronchelli, A. Multi-scale spatio-temporal analysis of human mobility. PLoS ONE 12, e0171686 (2017).
Newman, M. E. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemp. Phys. 46, 323–351 (2005).
Liang, X., Zhao, J., Dong, L. & Xu, K. Unraveling the origin of exponential law in intra-urban human mobility. Sci. Rep. 3, 2983 (2013).
Alessandretti, L., Sapiezynski, P., Sekara, V., Lehmann, S. & Baronchelli, A. Evidence for a conserved quantity in human mobility. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 485–491 (2018).
Gallotti, R., Bazzani, A., Rambaldi, S. & Barthelemy, M. A stochastic model of randomly accelerated walkers for human mobility. Nat. Commun. 7, 12600 (2016).
Gheorghiu, S. & Coppens, M.-O. Heterogeneity explains features of “anomalous” thermodynamics and statistics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15852–15856 (2004).
Amini, A., Kung, K., Kang, C., Sobolevsky, S. & Ratti, C. The impact of social segregation on human mobility in developing and industrialized regions. EPJ Data Sci. 3, 6 (2014).
Fotheringham, A. S. A new set of spatial-interaction models: the theory of competing destinations. Environ. Plan. A 15, 15–36 (1983).
Saraçli, S., Doğan, N. & Doğan, İ. Comparison of hierarchical cluster analysis methods by cophenetic correlation. J. Inequal. Appl. 2013, 203 (2013).
Barbosa, H., de Lima-Neto, F. B., Evsukoff, A. & Menezes, R. The effect of recency to human mobility. EPJ Data Sci. 4, 21 (2015).
Gaddum, J. H. Lognormal distributions. Nature 156, 463–466 (1945).
Romeo, M., Da Costa, V. & Bardou, F. Broad distribution effects in sums of lognormal random variables. Eur. Phys. J. B 32, 513–525 (2003).
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R. & Newman, M. E. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 51, 661–703 (2009).
Song, C., Qu, Z., Blumm, N. & Barabási, A.-L. Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327, 1018–1021 (2010).
Gauvin, L. et al. Gender gaps in urban mobility. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 7, 11 (2020).
Breheny, M. The compact city and transport energy consumption. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 20, 81–101 (1995).
Carr, L. J., Dunsiger, S. I. & Marcus, B. H. Walk Score™ as a global estimate of neighborhood walkability. Am. J. Prev. Med. 39, 460–463 (2010).
Gaye, A. et al. Measuring Key Disparities in Human Development: The Gender Inequality Index Human Development Research Paper 46 (UNDP, 2010).
Velaga, N. R., Beecroft, M., Nelson, J. D., Corsar, D. & Edwards, P. Transport poverty meets the digital divide: accessibility and connectivity in rural communities. J. Transp. Geogr. 21, 102–112 (2012).
Litman, T. A. Economic value of walkability. Transp. Res. Rec. 1828, 3–11 (2003).
Baronchelli, A. & Radicchi, F. Lévy flights in human behavior and cognition. Chaos Solitons Fractals 56, 101–105 (2013).
Han, X.-P., Hao, Q., Wang, B.-H. & Zhou, T. Origin of the scaling law in human mobility: hierarchy of traffic systems. Phys. Rev. E 83, 036117 (2011).
Zhao, K., Musolesi, M., Hui, P., Rao, W. & Tarkoma, S. Explaining the power-law distribution of human mobility through transportation modality decomposition. Sci. Rep. 5, 9136 (2015).
Pappalardo, L. et al. Returners and explorers dichotomy in human mobility. Nat. Commun. 6, 8166 (2015).
Szell, M., Sinatra, R., Petri, G., Thurner, S. & Latora, V. Understanding mobility in a social petri dish. Sci. Rep. 2, 457 (2012).
Jiang, S. et al. The TimeGeo modeling framework for urban mobility without travel surveys. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E5370–E5378 (2016); correction 113, E7137 (2016).
Pumain, D. in Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences (ed. Pumain, D.) 169–222 (Springer, 2006).
Batty, M. in Hierarchy in Natural and Social Sciences (ed. Pumain, D.) 143–168 (Springer, 2006).
Arcaute, E. et al. Cities and regions in Britain through hierarchical percolation. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 150691 (2016).
Stopczynski, A. et al. Measuring large-scale social networks with high resolution. PLoS ONE 9, e95978 (2014).
Aslak, U. & Alessandretti, L. Infostop: scalable stop-location detection in multi-user mobility data. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.14370 (2020).
Pesaresi, M. et al. Operating Procedure for the Production of the Global Human Settlement Layer from Landsat Data of the Epochs 1975, 1990, 2000, and 2014 (Publications Office of the European Union, 2016).
Train, K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
Zahavi, Y. & Ryan, J. The stability of travel components over time. Traffic Eng. Control 750, 19–26 (1978).
Miller, H. J. Tobler’s first law and spatial analysis. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 94, 284–289 (2004).
Kraemer, M. U. G. et al. Mapping global variation in human mobility. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 800–810 (2020).
Steele, J. E. et al. Mapping poverty using mobile phone and satellite data. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20160690 (2017).
Lu, X. et al. Detecting climate adaptation with mobile network data in Bangladesh: anomalies in communication, mobility and consumption patterns during cyclone Mahasen. Climatic Change 138, 505–519 (2016).
Lu, X., Bengtsson, L. & Holme, P. Predictability of population displacement after the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11576–11581 (2012).
Weiss, D. J. et al. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature 553, 333–336 (2018).
Althoff, T. et al. Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature 547, 336–339 (2017).
Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Leese, M. & Stahl, D. Hierarchical clustering. Cluster Anal. 5, 71–110 (2011).
Sekara, V., Stopczynski, A. & Lehmann, S. Fundamental structures of dynamic social networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9977–9982 (2016).
We thank J. Sellergren for being the best; F. Simini and L. K. Hansen for providing insightful comments; and M. C. Gonzalez for help with auxiliary datasets. The work was supported in part by the Villum Foundation and the Danish Council for Independent Research.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature thanks Elsa Arcaute, Denise Pumain and José Ramasco for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
a, Number of individuals for each gender. b, Number of individuals per age group. c, Number of individuals per country (see colour scale). We considered the 600,817 individuals in our dataset with at least one year of data, and whose time coverage (the fraction of time an individual position is known) was higher than 50% at any given day. For these individuals, we considered one year of data with highest median time coverage. Map data from the GADM Database of Global Administrative Areas, version 3.6, available at http://www.gadm.org.
a–h, Distribution of individual container sizes at hierarchical levels 2 (a, e), 3 (b, f), 4 (c, g) and 5 (d, h) (black line) and the corresponding lognormal (blue line) and truncated power-law (orange line) fits. Results are shown for the D1 (a–d) and D2 (e–h) datasets.
We find the hierarchical partitioning corresponding to a sequence of locations as follows. a, Individual locations are iteratively merged to form clusters via the complete linkage algorithm. Here the output of the algorithm is visualized as a dendogram. b, We add levels to the hierarchical partition by maximizing the likelihood of the container model one level at a time: at the first iteration (top), we find the container size (x axis) corresponding to the dendogram cut (dashed line) that minimizes the negative likelihood (y axis), if any. We proceed by adding more dendogram cuts (middle and bottom), and thus hierarchical levels, until the likelihood can not be further improved. c, The dendogram cuts correspond to a hierarchical partitioning of individual locations. We evaluate the ability of the algorithm to recover the original parameters using 5,000 synthetic traces of 3,000 locations. d, Distribution of the difference between the number of recovered and original levels. The difference is 0 in 70% of the cases. e, Probability density associated with the cophenetic similarity between the original and recovered hierarchical structure. The dashed line corresponds to the median value. f, Probability density associated to the relative difference |popr|/pr between original (po) and recovered (pr) entries of the matrix p.
a, e, The distribution of displacements for the entire population. b, f, The median individual radius of gyration versus the number of displacements. c, g, The average visitation frequency versus the rank of individuals’ locations. d, h, The distribution of the difference between the real entropy Stemp and the uncorrelated entropy Sunc across individuals. Results are shown for real traces (black line, dots), and traces generated by various models (see legend), for dataset D1 (a–d) and D2 (e–h). In a, c, d, e, g and h, the filled areas for the synthetic traces include two standard deviations around the mean computed across 1,000 simulations for each user. In b and f, the filled areas include the interquartile range. For each individual, we fitted the models considering a training period of one year. The data used here for validation corresponds to the 50 individual displacements following the training period.
Distribution of the number of hierarchical levels found by the container model for trajectories in the D1 dataset (plain black line), the D2 dataset (dashed black line), and 1,000 synthetic traces generated by the EPR model9 (blue line) and the memory EPR (m-EPR) model (green line).
About this article
Cite this article
Alessandretti, L., Aslak, U. & Lehmann, S. The scales of human mobility. Nature 587, 402–407 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2909-1