Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The impact of nuclear shape on the emergence of the neutron dripline

Nature volume 587, pages 66–71 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Atomic nuclei are composed of a certain number of protons Z and neutrons N. A natural question is how large Z and N can be. The study of superheavy elements explores the large Z limit1,2, and we are still looking for a comprehensive theoretical explanation of the largest possible N for a given Z—the existence limit for the neutron-rich isotopes of a given atomic species, known as the neutron dripline3. The neutron dripline of oxygen (Z = 8) can be understood theoretically as the result of single nucleons filling single-particle orbits confined by a mean potential, and experiments confirm this interpretation. However, recent experiments on heavier elements are at odds with this description. Here we show that the neutron dripline from fluorine (Z = 9) to magnesium (Z = 12) can be predicted using a mechanism that goes beyond the single-particle picture: as the number of neutrons increases, the nuclear shape assumes an increasingly ellipsoidal deformation, leading to a higher binding energy. The saturation of this effect (when the nucleus cannot be further deformed) yields the neutron dripline: beyond this maximum N, the isotope is unbound and further neutrons ‘drip’ out when added. Our calculations are based on a recently developed effective nucleon–nucleon interaction4, for which large-scale eigenvalue problems are solved using configuration-interaction simulations. The results obtained show good agreement with experiments, even for excitation energies of low-lying states, up to the nucleus of magnesium-40 (which has 28 neutrons). The proposed mechanism for the formation of the neutron dripline has the potential to stimulate further thinking in the field towards explaining nucleosynthesis with neutron-rich nuclei.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic illustrations of shell structure and nuclear shape.
Fig. 2: The Segrè (nuclear) chart (from hydrogen up to sulfur) and schematic pictures for the dripline mechanisms.
Fig. 3: Systematic variations of the \({{\bf{2}}}_{{\bf{1}}}^{{\boldsymbol{+}}}\) and \({{\bf{4}}}_{{\bf{1}}}^{{\boldsymbol{+}}}\) energy levels of Ne and Mg isotopes, as functions of N.
Fig. 4: Ground-state energies of even-N isotopes of F, Ne, Na and Mg, relative to the 16O value.
Fig. 5: Contribution of the rest (such as quadrupole) component of the effective nucleon–nucleon interaction and the energy level scheme of 40Mg.

Data availability

All data relevant to this study are shown in the paper, but if more details are needed, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Several codes for the conventional shell-model (configuration-interaction) calculation are available, of which we used KSHELL33 in the present work. Reasonable inquiries about the MCSM code will be responded to by the corresponding author.

References

  1. Indelicato, P. & Karpov, A. Sizing up atoms. Nature 498, 40–41 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nazarewicz, W. The limits of nuclear mass and charge. Nat. Phys. 14, 537–541 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Erler, J. et al. The limits of the nuclear landscape. Nature 486, 509–512 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tsunoda, N. et al. Exotic neutron-rich medium-mass nuclei with realistic nuclear forces. Phys. Rev. C 95, 021304(R) (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Goeppert Mayer, M. On closed shells in nuclei. II. Phys. Rev. 75, 1969 (1949).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haxel, O., Jensen, J. H. D. & Suess, H. E. On the “magic numbers” in nuclear structure. Phys. Rev. 75, 1766 (1949).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rainwater, J. Nuclear energy level argument for a spheroidal nuclear model. Phys. Rev. 79, 432 (1950).

    ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bohr, A. & Mottelson, B. R. Nuclear Structure Vol. II (Benjamin, 1975).

  9. Casten, R. F. Nuclear Structure From A Simple Perspective (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).

  10. Thibault, C. et al. Direct measurement of the masses of 11Li and 26–32Na with an on-line mass spectrometer. Phys. Rev. C 12, 644–657 (1975).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Guillemaud-Mueller, D. et al. β-Decay schemes of very neutron-rich sodium isotopes and their descendants. Nucl. Phys. A 426, 37–76 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Warburton, E. K., Becker, J. A. & Brown, B. A. Mass systematics for A = 29–44 nuclei: the deformed A ~ 32 region. Phys. Rev. C 41, 1147 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Caurier, E., Martínez-Pinedo, G., Nowacki, F., Poves, A. & Zuker, A. P. The shell model as a unified view of nuclear structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 427–488 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heyde, K. & Wood, J. L. Shape coexistence in atomic nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1467 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanihata, I. et al. Measurements of interaction cross sections and nuclear radii in the light p-shell region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2676–2679 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen, P. G. & Jonson, B. The neutron halo of extremely neutron-rich nuclei. Europhys. Lett. 4, 409 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gade, A. & Glasmacher, T. In-beam nuclear spectroscopy of bound states with fast exotic ion beams. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 60, 161–224 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura, T., Sakurai, T. & Watanabe, H. Exotic nuclei explored at in-flight separators. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 53–122 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Takayanagi, K. Effective interaction in non-degenerate model space. Nucl. Phys. A 852, 61–81 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takayanagi, K. Effective Hamiltonian in the extended Krenciglowa-Kuo method. Nucl. Phys. A 864, 91–112 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsunoda, N., Takayanagi, K., Hjorth-Jensen, M. & Otsuka, T. Multi-shell effective interactions. Phys. Rev. C 89, 024313 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Machleidt, R. & Entem, D. R. Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces. Phys. Rep. 503, 1 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Otsuka, T., Suzuki, T., Holt, J. A., Schwenk, A. & Akaishi, Y. Three-body forces and the limit of oxygen isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 032501 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fujita, J. & Miyazawa, H. Pion theory of three-body forces. Prog. Theor. Phys. 17, 360 (1957).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Stroberg, S. R. et al. Nucleus-dependent valence-space approach to nuclear structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 032502 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Simonis, J., Stroberg, S. R., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D. & Schwenk, A. Saturation with chiral interactions and consequences for finite nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 96, 014303 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Otsuka, T., Gade, A., Sorlin, O., Suzuki, T. & Utsuno, Y. Evolution of shell structure in exotic nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015002 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Loelius, C. et al. Enhanced electric dipole strength for the weakly bound states in 27Ne. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 262501 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernández-Domínguez, B. et al. Re-examining the transition into the N = 20 island of inversion: structure of 30Mg. Phys. Lett. B 779, 124 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu, Z. Y. et al. Nuclear moments of the low-lying isomeric 1+ state of 34Al: Investigation on the neutron 1p1h excitation across N = 20 in the island of inversion. Phys. Lett. B 782, 619 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Murray, I. et al. Spectroscopy of strongly deformed 32Ne by proton knockout reactions. Phys. Rev. C 99, 011302(R) (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nishibata, H. et al. Structure of 31Mg: shape coexistence revealed by β-γ spectroscopy with spin-polarized 31Na. Phys. Rev. C 99, 024322 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shimizu, N., Mizusaki, T., Utsuno, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. Thick-restart block Lanczos method for large-scale shell-model calculations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 372–384 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Otsuka, T., Honma, M., Mizusaki, T., Shimizu, N. & Utsuno, Y. Monte Carlo shell model for atomic nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 47, 319–400 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Shimizu, N. et al. New-generation Monte Carlo shell model for the K computer era. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 01A205 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Marsh, B. A. et al. Characterization of the shape-starggering effect in mercury nuclei. Nat. Phys. 14, 1163–1167 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ichikawa, Y. et al. Interplay between nuclear shell evolution and shape deformation revealed by the magnetic moment of 75Cu. Nat. Phys. 15, 321–325 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Taniuchi, R. et al. 78Ni revealed as a doubly magic stronghold against nuclear deformation. Nature 569, 53–58 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ahn, D. S. et al. Location of the neutron dripline at fluorine and neon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 212501 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Koura, H. et al. Nuclidic mass formula on a spherical basis with an improved even-odd term. Prog. Theor. Phys. 113, 305–325 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Otsuka, T., Suzuki, T., Fujimoto, R., Grawe, H. & Akaishi, Y. Evolution of the nuclear shells due to the tensor force. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 232502 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Fauerbach, M. et al. New search for 26O. Phys. Rev. C 53, 647–651 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sakurai, H. et al. Evidence for particle stability of 31F and particle instability of 25N and 28O. Phys. Lett. B 448, 180–184 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dobaczewski, J., Michel, N., Nazarewicz, W., Płoszajczak, M. & Rotureau, J. Shell structure of exotic nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 432–445 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Caurier, E., Nowacki, F. & Poves, A. Merging of the islands of inversion at N = 20 and N = 28. Phys. Rev. C 90, 014302 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jahn, H. A. & Teller, E. Stability of polyatomic molecules in degenerate electronic states. I—Orbital degeneracy. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 161, 220 (1937).

    ADS  CAS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Crawford, H. L. et al. First spectroscopy of the near drip-line nucleus 40Mg. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 052501 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nakamura, T. et al. Deformation-driven p-wave halos at the drip line: 31Ne. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 142501 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bohr, A. & Mottelson, B. R. Nuclear Structure Vol. I (Benjamin, 1969).

  50. Otsuka, T., Tsunoda, Y., Abe, T., Shimizu, N. & Van Duppen, P. Underlying structure of collective bands and self-organization in quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 222502 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hjorth-Jensen, M., Kuo, T. T. S. & Osnes, E. Realistic effective interactions for nuclear systems. Phys. Rep. 261, 125–270 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Krenciglowa, E. M. & Kuo, T. T. S. Convergence of effective Hamiltonian expansion and partial summations of folded diagrams. Nucl. Phys. A 235, 171–189 (1974).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Entem, D. R. & Machleidt, R. Accurate charge-dependent nucleon-nucleon potential at fourth order of chiral perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. C 68, 041001 (2003).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bogner, S., Kuo, T. T. S., Coraggio, L., Covello, A. & Itaco, N. Low momentum nucleon-nucleon potential and shell model effective interactions. Phys. Rev. C 65, 051301 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Nogga, A., Bogner, S. K. & Schwenk, A. Low-momentum interaction in few-nucleon systems. Phys. Rev. C 70, 061002 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Carlson, J. et al. Quantum Monte Carlo methods for nuclear physics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1067 (2015).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Pastore, S. et al. Quantum Monte Carlo calculations of weak transitions in A = 6–10 nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 97, 022501 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ekström, A., Hagen, G., Morris, T. D., Papenbrock, T. & Schwartz, P. D. Δ isobars and nuclear saturation. Phys. Rev. C 97, 024332 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. Honma, M., Otsuka, T., Brown, B. A. & Mizusaki, T. Effective interaction for pf-shell nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 65, 061301 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. Notani, M. et al. New neutron-rich isotopes, 34Ne, 37Na and 43Si, produced by fragmentation of a 64 A MeV 48Ca beam. Phys. Lett. B 542, 49–54 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Baumann, T. et al. Discovery of 40Mg and 42Al suggests neutron drip-line slant towards heavier isotopes. Nature 449, 1022–1024 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hagen, G. et al. Neutron and weak-charge distributions of the 48Ca nucleus, estimated uncertainties from truncations of employed method and model space. Nat. Phys. 12, 186–190 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hergert, H., Binder, S., Calci, A., Langhammer, J. & Roth, R. Ab initio calculations of even oxygen isotopes with chiral two-plus-three-nucleon interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 242501 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Hergert, H. et al. Ab initio multireference in-medium similarity renormalization group calculations of even calcium and nickel isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 90, 041302 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. Stroberg, S. R., Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K. & Holt, J. D. Nonempirical interactions for the nuclear shell model: an update. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 307–362 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Simonis, J., Hebeler, K., Holt, J. D., Menendez, J. & Schwenk, A. Exploring sd-shell nuclei from two- and three-nucleon interactions with realistic saturation properties. Phys. Rev. C 93, 011302 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. Morris, T. D. et al. Structure of the lightest tin isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 152503 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Holt, J. D., Menendez, J., Simonis, J. & Schwenk, A. Three-nucleon forces and spectroscopy of neutron-rich calcium isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 90, 024312 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Smirnova, N. A. et al. Effective interactions in the sd shell. Phys. Rev. C 100, 054329 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Dikmen, E. et al. Ab initio effective interactions for sd-shell valence nucleons. Phys. Rev. C 91, 064301 (2015).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K., Morris, T. D., Schwenk, A. & Tsukiyama, K. The in-medium similarity renormalization group: a novel ab initio method for nuclei. Phys. Rep. 621, 165–222 (2016).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W. & Meißner, Ulf-G. Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1773 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Bogner, S. K. et al. Nonperturbative shell-model interactions from the in-medium similarity renormalization group. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 142501 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Jansen, G. R., Engel, J., Hagen, G., Navratil, P. & Signoracci, A. Ab initio coupled-cluster effective interactions for the shell model: application to neutron-rich oxygen and carbon isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 142502 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Stroberg, S. R., Hergert, H., Holt, J. D., Bogner, S. K. & Schwenk. A. Ground and excited states of doubly open-shell nuclei from ab initio valence-space Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. C 93, 051301(R) (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. Coraggio, L., Gargano, A. & Itaco, N. Double-step truncation procedure for large-scale shell-model calculations. Phys. Rev. C 93, 064328 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. Hebeler, K., Bogner, S. K., Furnstahl, R. J., Nogga, A. & Schwenk, A. Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low-momentum interactions. Phys. Rev. C 83, 031301 (2011).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. van Kolck, U. Few-nucleon forces from chiral Lagrangians. Phys. Rev. C 49, 2932 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. Epelbaum, E. et al. Three-nucleon forces from chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. C 66, 064001 (2002).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. Gazit, D., Quaglioni, S. & Navrátil, P. Three-nucleon low-energy constants from the consistency of interactions and currents in chiral effective field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 102502 (2009); erratum 122, 029901 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. Kohno, M. Nuclear and neutron matter G-matrix calculations with a chiral effective field theory potential including effects of three-nucleon interactions. Phys. Rev. C 88, 064005 (2013); erratum 96, 059903 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. Bogner, S. K., Furnstahl, R. J. & Perry, R. J. Similarity renormalization group for nucleon-nucleon interactions. Phys. Rev. C 75, 061001(R) (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  83. Bogner, S. K., Furnstahl, R. J., Ramanan, S. & Schwenk, A. Low-momentum interactions with smooth cutoffs. Nucl. Phys. A 784, 79–103 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. Wildenthal, B. H. & Chung, W. Collapse of the conventional shell-model ordering in the very-neutron-rich isotopes of Na and Mg. Phys. Rev. C 22, 2260 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Watt, A., Singhal, R. P., Storm, M. H. & Whitehead, R. R. A shell-model investigation of the binding energies of some exotic isotopes of sodium and magnesium. J. Phys. G 7, L145–L148 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Utsuno, Y., Otsuka, T., Mizusaki, T. & Honma, M. Varying shell gap and deformation in N ~ 20 unstable nuclei studied by the Monte Carlo shell model. Phys. Rev. C 60, 054315 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. Motobayashi, T. et al. Large deformation of the very neutron-rich nucleus 32Mg from intermediate-energy Coulomb excitation. Phys. Lett. B 346, 9–14 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Gade, A. et al. Spectroscopy of 36Mg: interplay of normal and intruder configurations at the neutron-rich boundary of the “island of inversion”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 072502 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Doornenbal, P. et al. Spectroscopy of 32Ne and the “island of inversion”. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 032501 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Nakamura, T. et al. Halo structure of the island of inversion nucleus 31Ne. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 262501 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Doornenbal, P. et al. In-beam γ-ray spectroscopy of 34,36,38Mg: merging the N = 20 and N = 28 shell quenching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 212502 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Kobayashi, N. et al. Observation of a p-wave one-neutron halo configuration in 37Mg. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 242501 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Crawford, H. L. et al. Rotational band structure in 32Mg. Phys. Rev. C 93, 031303(R) (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  94. Doornenbal, P. et al. Low-Z shore of the “island of inversion” and the reduced neutron magicity toward 28O. Phys. Rev. C 95, 041301(R) (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.T., T.O. and N.S. acknowledge partial support from MEXT via the “Priority Issue on post-K computer” (Elucidation of the Fundamental Laws and Evolution of the Universe) grants (hp160211, hp170230, hp180179, hp190160), partial support from MEXT via the “Program for Promoting Researches on the Supercomputer Fugaku” (Simulation for basic science: from fundamental laws of particles to creation of nuclei) grant (hp200130) and from Joint Institute for Computational Fundamental Science (JICFuS). This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI grant JP19H05145. N.S. and T.S. acknowledge JSPS KAKENHI grants JP17K05433 and JP19K03855, respectively. T.O. thanks P. Van Duppen for valuable comments and Y. Aritomo and H. Koura for information. We thank T. Abe and Y. Tsunoda for help. N.T., T.O. and K.T. are grateful to M. H.-Jensen for collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Nuclear Study, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Naofumi Tsunoda, Noritaka Shimizu & Yutaka Utsuno

  2. Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Takaharu Otsuka

  3. RIKEN Nishina Center, Saitama, Japan

    Takaharu Otsuka & Hideki Ueno

  4. KU Leuven, Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, Leuven, Belgium

    Takaharu Otsuka

  5. Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan

    Takaharu Otsuka & Yutaka Utsuno

  6. Department of Physics, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan

    Kazuo Takayanagi

  7. Department of Physics, College of Humanities and Sciences, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan

    Toshio Suzuki

  8. National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Tokyo, Japan

    Toshio Suzuki

  9. Liberal and General Education Center, Institute for Promotion of Higher Academic Education, Utsunomiya University, Tochigi, Japan

    Sota Yoshida

Authors
  1. Naofumi Tsunoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takaharu Otsuka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuo Takayanagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noritaka Shimizu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Toshio Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yutaka Utsuno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sota Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hideki Ueno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.T. derived the EEdf1 interaction and performed many of the configuration-interaction calculations; T.O. supervised the whole study; K.T. derived the EKK method and contributed to in-depth discussions; N.S. wrote most of the computer codes and performed some calculations; T.S. calculated the Fujita–Miyazawa three-nucleon interaction; Y.U. contributed to detailed discussions; S.Y. calculated the χEFT three-nucleon interactions, H.U. suggested this project at the initial stage; and T.O. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaharu Otsuka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Calvin Johnson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Dripline nucleus in each chain of isotopes as a function of Δε.

The single-particle energies are shifted from their original values by the same amount, Δε, which is the vertical axis. The dark pink belt indicates the range of Δε suggested by the recent experiment39 identifying 31F, 34Ne and 39Na as dripline nuclei, while the light pink belt is obtained similarly but by assuming 37Na is the dripline nucleus of Na isotopes.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Dependences of the ground-state energy on the cutoff parameter of the Vlowk approach.

The ground-state expectation value of the effective NN interaction originating in the χEFT NN forces by Entem and Machleidt22,53 (Methods) are shown for the Ne and Mg isotopes. a, Ne; b, Mg. For each isotope, the second (orange), third (red) and fourth (grey) columns depict, respectively, this quantity obtained with the cutoff parameter ΛVlowk = 1.8 fm−1, 2.0 fm−1 and 2.2 fm−1 by the second-order \(\hat{Q}\)-box calculation in the EKK process. For comparison, the third-order \(\hat{Q}\)-box result with ΛVlowk = 2.0 fm−1 is shown by the first (green) column. All values are shown relative to their corresponding N = 16 values.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Dependences of the rest interaction contribution on the cutoff parameter of the Vlowk approach.

Cutoff dependences of the ground-state expectation value of the rest (such as quadrupole) term of the effective NN interaction originating in the χEFT NN forces by Entem and Machleidt22,53 (Methods) are shown for the Ne and Mg isotopes. a, Ne; b, Mg. For each isotope, the orange, red and grey lines depict, respectively, this quantity obtained with the cutoff parameter ΛVlowk = 1.8 fm−1, 2.0 fm−1 and 2.2 fm−1 by the second-order \(\hat{Q}\)-box calculation in the EKK process. For comparison, the third-order \(\hat{Q}\)-box result with ΛVlowk = 2.0 fm−1 is shown by the green line. All values are shown relative to their corresponding N = 16 values. The dripline isotopes suggested by the present work are indicated by star symbols.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Ground-state expectation value of the 3NF for the Ne and Mg isotopes.

a, Ne; b, Mg. For each isotope, the second (orange), third (green) and fourth (red) columns depict, respectively, this quantity obtained with the 3NF of Gazit et al.80, that of Hebeler et al.77 and that of Hebeler et al. with single-particle energy shift (labelled ‘Hebeler et al.−0.5N’) (Methods). For comparison, the same quantity by the Fujita–Miyazawa 3NF is shown by the first (blue) column.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tsunoda, N., Otsuka, T., Takayanagi, K. et al. The impact of nuclear shape on the emergence of the neutron dripline. Nature 587, 66–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2848-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2848-x

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing