Abstract
The coevolution of mammalian hosts and their beneficial commensal microbes has led to development of symbiotic host–microbiota relationships1. Epigenetic machinery permits mammalian cells to integrate environmental signals2; however, how these pathways are fine-tuned by diverse cues from commensal bacteria is not well understood. Here we reveal a highly selective pathway through which microbiota-derived inositol phosphate regulates histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) activity in the intestine. Despite the abundant presence of HDAC inhibitors such as butyrate in the intestine, we found that HDAC3 activity was sharply increased in intestinal epithelial cells of microbiota-replete mice compared with germ-free mice. This divergence was reconciled by the finding that commensal bacteria, including Escherichia coli, stimulated HDAC activity through metabolism of phytate and production of inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3). Both intestinal exposure to InsP3 and phytate ingestion promoted recovery following intestinal damage. Of note, InsP3 also induced growth of intestinal organoids derived from human tissue, stimulated HDAC3-dependent proliferation and countered butyrate inhibition of colonic growth. Collectively, these results show that InsP3 is a microbiota-derived metabolite that activates a mammalian histone deacetylase to promote epithelial repair. Thus, HDAC3 represents a convergent epigenetic sensor of distinct metabolites that calibrates host responses to diverse microbial signals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Global datasets are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository under accession numbers GSE50190 and GSE148743. Raw uncropped gel scans with size markers indicated can be found in Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
Description of scripts used to analyse metagenomic data are provided in the Methods and the scripts are available upon request.
References
Honda, K. & Littman, D. R. The microbiome in infectious disease and inflammation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30, 759–795 (2012).
Feil, R. & Fraga, M. F. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 97–109 (2012).
Peterson, L. W. & Artis, D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14, 141–153 (2014).
Kim, T. H. et al. Broadly permissive intestinal chromatin underlies lateral inhibition and cell plasticity. Nature 506, 511–515 (2014).
Elliott, E. N., Sheaffer, K. L., Schug, J., Stappenbeck, T. S. & Kaestner, K. H. Dnmt1 is essential to maintain progenitors in the perinatal intestinal epithelium. Development 142, 2163–2172 (2015).
Wilson, A. J. et al. Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) and other class I HDACs regulate colon cell maturation and p21 expression and are deregulated in human colon cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 13548–13558 (2006).
Alenghat, T. et al. Histone deacetylase 3 coordinates commensal-bacteria-dependent intestinal homeostasis. Nature 504, 153–157 (2013).
Turgeon, N. et al. HDAC1 and HDAC2 restrain the intestinal inflammatory response by regulating intestinal epithelial cell differentiation. PLoS ONE 8, e73785–e73785 (2013).
Navabi, N. et al. Epithelial histone deacetylase 3 instructs intestinal immunity by coordinating local lymphocyte activation. Cell Rep. 19, 1165–1175 (2017).
Schell, M. J. Inositol trisphosphate 3-kinases: focus on immune and neuronal signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 1755–1778 (2010).
Kim, E., Beon, J., Lee, S., Park, J. & Kim, S. IPMK: A versatile regulator of nuclear signaling events. Adv. Biol. Regul. 61, 25–32 (2016).
Zhang, J., Kalkum, M., Chait, B. T. & Roeder, R. G. The N-CoR–HDAC3 nuclear receptor corepressor complex inhibits the JNK pathway through the integral subunit GPS2. Mol. Cell 9, 611–623 (2002).
Guenther, M. G., Barak, O. & Lazar, M. A. The SMRT and N-CoR corepressors are activating cofactors for histone deacetylase 3. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 6091–6101 (2001).
Alenghat, T. et al. Nuclear receptor corepressor and histone deacetylase 3 govern circadian metabolic physiology. Nature 456, 997–1000 (2008).
Watson, P. J., Fairall, L., Santos, G. M. & Schwabe, J. W. Structure of HDAC3 bound to co-repressor and inositol tetraphosphate. Nature 481, 335–340 (2012).
Feng, D. et al. A circadian rhythm orchestrated by histone deacetylase 3 controls hepatic lipid metabolism. Science 331, 1315–1319 (2011).
Mullican, S. E. et al. Histone deacetylase 3 is an epigenomic brake in macrophage alternative activation. Genes Dev. 25, 2480–2488 (2011).
Kuang, Z. et al. The intestinal microbiota programs diurnal rhythms in host metabolism through histone deacetylase 3. Science 365, 1428–1434 (2019).
Krautkramer, K. A. et al. Diet–microbiota interactions mediate global epigenetic programming in multiple host tissues. Mol. Cell 64, 982–992 (2016).
Schlemmer, U., Frølich, W., Prieto, R. M. & Grases, F. Phytate in foods and significance for humans: food sources, intake, processing, bioavailability, protective role and analysis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 53 (Suppl 2), S330–S375 (2009).
Wise, A. & Gilburt, D. J. Phytate hydrolysis by germfree and conventional rats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 753–756 (1982).
Lim, D., Golovan, S., Forsberg, C. W. & Jia, Z. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli phytase and its complex with phytate. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 108–113 (2000).
Woo, V. et al. Microbiota inhibit epithelial pathogen adherence by epigenetically regulating C-type lectin expression. Front. Immunol. 10, 928 (2019).
Gossman, D. G. & Zhao, H.-B. Hemichannel-mediated inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) release in the cochlea: a novel mechanism of IP3 intercellular signaling. Cell Commun. Adhes. 15, 305–315 (2008).
Hernández-Chirlaque, C. et al. Germ-free and antibiotic-treated mice are highly susceptible to epithelial injury in DSS colitis. J. Crohn’s Colitis 10, 1324–1335 (2016).
Rakoff-Nahoum, S., Paglino, J., Eslami-Varzaneh, F., Edberg, S. & Medzhitov, R. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118, 229–241 (2004).
Lloyd-Price, J. et al. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature 569, 655–662 (2019).
Gevers, D. et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn’s disease. Cell Host Microbe 15, 382–392 (2014).
Franzosa, E. A. et al. Gut microbiome structure and metabolic activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 293–305 (2019).
Kaiko, G. E. et al. The colonic crypt protects stem cells from microbiota-derived metabolites. Cell 165, 1708–1720 (2016).
Whitt, J. et al. Disruption of epithelial HDAC3 in intestine prevents diet-induced obesity in mice. Gastroenterology 155, 501–513 (2018).
Madison, B. B. et al. Cis elements of the villin gene control expression in restricted domains of the vertical (crypt) and horizontal (duodenum, cecum) axes of the intestine. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33275–33283 (2002).
McAlees, J. W. et al. Distinct Tlr4-expressing cell compartments control neutrophilic and eosinophilic airway inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 8, 863–873 (2015).
Schnare, M. et al. Toll-like receptors control activation of adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 2, 947–950 (2001).
Vétizou, M. et al. Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota. Science 350, 1079–1084 (2015).
Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP–seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Kartashov, A. V. & Barski, A. BioWardrobe: an integrated platform for analysis of epigenomics and transcriptomics data. Genome Biol. 16, 158 (2015).
Shao, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, G.-C., Orkin, S. H. & Waxman, D. J. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP–seq data sets. Genome Biol. 13, R16 (2012).
Sagar, G. D. & Larson, D. M. Carbenoxolone inhibits junctional transfer and upregulates Connexin43 expression by a protein kinase A-dependent pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 98, 1543–1551 (2006).
Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2018).
Franzosa, E. A. et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat. Methods 15, 962–968 (2018).
Acknowledgements
We thank the Way, Qualls and Deshmukh laboratories for useful discussions; CCHMC Veterinary Services, Pathology Research Core, Research Flow Cytometry Core, NMR-based Metabolomics Core, and Confocal Imaging Core for services and technical assistance. This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health (DK114123 and DK116868 to T.A.; DK098231 to L.A.D.; and F32AI147591 to. E.M.E.), Pew Charitable Trust, and a Kenneth Rainin Foundation award to T.A. T.A. holds an Investigator in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease Award from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund. This project is supported in part by NIH P30 DK078392 and the CCHMC Trustee Award and Procter Scholar’s Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.-e.W., S.H.-H., V.W., E.M.E., J.W. and T.A. designed the studies and analysed the data. S.-e.W. conducted HDAC assays, immunoprecipitations, western blotting, bacterial cultures and colonoid studies. S.H.-H. and V.W. performed ChIP experiments, S.H.-H. conducted qPCR, E.M.E. performed flow cytometry and ELISA analyses, J.W. and S.-e.W. conducted DSS studies, J.W. and L.E. maintained gnotobiotic mice, V.W. analysed recombinant proteins. V.W. and R.K. performed bioinformatic analyses, D.B.H. performed microbiome analyses, and L.A.D. provided patient samples and clinical expertise. T.A., S.H.-H. and S.-e.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature thanks Matthew Hirschey, Philip Rosenstiel and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Butyrate inhibits epithelial HDAC activity in the intestine.
a, IEC HDAC activity of large intestine explant treated with vehicle (n = 3), 10 mM butyrate (n = 3), or 10 mM trichostatin A (TSA; n = 3) for 3 h. ***P = 4.16 × 10–7 (Vehicle vs TSA), ***P = 0.0006 (Vehicle vs Butyrate), **P = 0.0015 (Butyrate vs TSA). b, IEC HDAC activity of GF mice (n = 7) and mice mono-associated with F. prausnitzii (butyrate-producing bacteria) (n = 7). *P = 0.028. c, Bacterial-specific qPCR of faeces for F. prausnitzii, Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacteroides (n = 3/group). d, Western blot of immunoprecipitated HDAC3 from IECs. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. e, HDAC activity of immunoprecipitated (IP) HDAC3 from HDAC3FF (n = 3) and HDAC3ΔIEC (n = 3) intestinal epithelium. **P = 0.001. f, HDAC activity of IECs from GF (n = 4), CNV (Vehicle n = 9, TSA n = 6), and HDAC3∆IEC mice (n = 6) −/+ 10 μM TSA. ***P = 5.77 × 10–5 (GF Vehicle vs TSA), ***P = 1.12 × 10–7 (CNV Vehicle vs TSA), ***P = 3.49 × 10–5 (HDAC3∆IEC Vehicle vs TSA), **P = 0.008 (Vehicle GF vs CNV), **P = 0.004 (Vehicle CNV vs HDAC3∆IEC). All graphs are mean of biological replicates ± s.e.m.; unpaired two-tailed t test. Data were independently repeated three (a–c) or two (d–f) times with similar results. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.
Extended Data Fig. 2 HDAC activity and expression in IECs lack sensitivity to multiple bacterial stimuli.
a, HDAC activity of mouse colonoid lysate treated with 1 μg/ml vehicle, butyrate, flagellin, LPS, or Pam3csk4. n = 6/treatment. **P = 0.0008. b–e, Western blot (b) and qPCR (c–e) analyses of HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3 in colonoids following treatment with vehicle (n = 9), butyrate (n = 6), flagellin (n = 6), LPS (n = 6), or Pam3csk4 (n = 6); all at 1 μg/ml for 5 h. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. f, g, HDAC activity in IECs harvested from floxed TLR4FF and IEC-specific toll-like receptor 4 knockout (TLR4ΔIEC) mice (f) (n = 3/genotype) or wildtype and Myd88 knockout (Myd88−/−) mice (g) (n = 4/genotype). All graphs are mean of biological replicates ± s.e.m.; unpaired two-tailed t test. Data were independently repeated four (a) or two (b–g) times with similar results. **P ≤ 0.01.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Inositol phosphate-sensitive pathways are upregulated in microbiota-replete mice and InsP3 induces enhanced HDAC3 activity.
a, Principal component analysis of gene expression of inositol phosphate-sensitive pathways in IECs from GF (n = 3) and CNV (n = 3) mice. **P = 0.0046. b, Pathway analysis showing upregulated signalling pathways in IECs from a. c, Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) comparing IECs from a to published data enrichment sets obtained from KEGG. *P = 0.05. d, Basal activity (fluorescence units) of 10 nM recombinant HDAC1, HDAC2, and HDAC3/NCoR-deacetylase activation domain (n = 3/group). ***P = 2.19 × 10−5 (vs HDAC1), ***P = 5.48 × 10−7 (vs HDAC2). e, HDAC activity normalized to recombinant basal levels following incubation with vehicle or 1 μM InsP3 (IP3). n = 5/treatment. ***P = 6.61 × 10–5. f, HDAC activity of immunoprecipitated HDAC3 from primary IECs incubated with increasing InsP3 doses. n = 4 (Vehicle, 10 nM, 100 nM), n = 3 (1 μM, 10 μM), *P = 0.040, **P = 0.003. Data in all graphs are mean ± s.e.m.; unpaired two-tailed t test. Data in d–f were independently repeated three times with similar results. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Inositol phosphate induces HDAC enzymatic activity without altering expression in IECs.
a, HDAC activity in mouse colonoids following incubation with increasing doses of InsP3 (IP3) for 5 h (Vehicle: n = 8; 100 nM InsP3: n = 5, *P = 0.0062; 100 μM InsP3: n = 6, *P = 0.0147). b, mRNA expression of Hdac1, Hdac2 and Hdac3 in mouse colonoids following incubation with InsP3 for 5 h at indicated dose (Vehicle: n = 5; InsP3: n = 6/dose). c, Western blot of HDAC1, HDAC2 and HDAC3 in colonoids from a. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. All graphs are mean of biological replicates ± s.e.m.; unpaired two-tailed t test. Data were independently repeated three times with similar results. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Phytate digestion promotes HDAC activity in IECs.
a, Number of peaks identified by ChIP–sequencing with significantly increased or decreased H3K9Ac enrichment in IECs, relative to IECs harvested from GF mice. n = 2/group; Min to max plots for each comparison (4 per bar); line at median. b, ChIP-seq for H3K9Ac at HDAC3 target genes in primary IECs isolated from GF and E. coli mono-associated mice. Peaks are normalized to reads per million mapped reads. c, InsP3 (IP3) levels in 1010 colony forming units (CFU)/ml cultures of phytaseΔ E. coli (n = 4) versus wildtype E. coli (n = 4) *P = 0.0314. d, HDAC activity of mouse colonoids treated with PBS (n = 8) or phytase-digested phytate (1 mg/ml) (n = 9) for 5 h.**P = 0.0016. e, western blot detection of HDACs in mouse colonoid lysate. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. f, HDAC activity with inositol-1,4,5,6-tetrakisphosphate (IP4) doses as indicated. n = 3/group. **P = 0.0052 (1 μM), **P = 0.0018 (100 μM). g, Relative intracellular InsP3 levels of colonoids treated with phytase-digested phytate (1 mg/ml) -/+ 40 μM carbenoxolone. n = 3/treatment. *P = 0.0189. h, CFU measured in stool collected from mice mono-associated with E. coli or phytaseΔ E. coli. n = 3/group. i, Bacterial-specific qPCR of faeces for Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroides, and Firmicutes. n = 3/group. j, PCR of E. coli phytase gene (appA) in stool from mono-associated mice in (h, i). All graphs, except a, are mean of biological replicates ± s.e.m.; unpaired two-tailed t test. Data were independently repeated two (e, f) or three (c, d, g–j) times with similar results. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01.
Extended Data Fig. 6 Microbiota-dependent breakdown of dietary phytate improves recovery from intestinal damage.
a, Percentage survival of antibiotic-treated mice exposed to 2.5% DSS while receiving vehicle (n = 8) or 10 μM InsP3 (IP3) (n = 8) via rectal enema as depicted in diagram. *P = 0.0423 Mantel-Cox test; independently repeated two times. b, Abundance of bacterial phytase (E.C.3.1.3.26) DNA sequence in last stool sample collected from non-IBD (n = 27) and ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 38) patients in Human Microbiome Project27. *P = 0.036; unpaired two-tailed t test. *P ≤ 0.05.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Microbiota and SCFA composition are not altered in phytate-sensitive DSS protection.
a, b, Shannon diversity index (a) (n = 4/group) and comparison of bacterial communities (b) in stool collected from DSS-treated mice -/+ 2% phytate (n = 4/group). c, Nuclear magnetic resonance identification of short chain fatty acids in intestinal contents from vehicle- and 2% phytate-treated DSS mice, n = 4/group. Graphs (a, c) are mean ± s.e.m.; ns, not significant.
Extended Data Fig. 8 Phytate decreases pathology caused by intestinal epithelial damage.
a, Frequency of CD45+ intraepithelial leukocytes assessed by flow cytometry (gated on live cells). n = 4/group. *P = 0.0107. b, c, Frequency of TNFα (b) and IFNγ (c) producing CD4+ lamina propria leukocytes from vehicle- and 2% phytate-treated mice during DSS-induced colitis (gated on live, CD45+ CD4+). n = 4/group. **P = 0.0048 (b), *P = 0.0277 (c). d, Relative faecal lipocalin levels measured by ELISA in vehicle (n = 6) or phytate treated (n = 7) mice *P = 0.0484. e, Histological scoring parameters for Fig. 4d. Scores reflect severity of the DSS-induced histological parameters: inflammatory infiltration (1–5), oedema (1–5), and ulceration on a scale ranging from 1 to 5 with 5 being most severe. n = 6/group (inflammatory infiltration: *P = 0.0314; oedema: **P = 0.0075; ulceration: **P = 0.0057). Graphs are mean of biological replicates ± s.e.m.; unpaired two-tailed t test. Data were independently repeated three times with similar results. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Inositol trisphosphate counters butyrate-induced inhibition of colonoid growth.
a, b, Growth of colonoids generated from GF mice and treated with vehicle or InsP3 (IP3) (a) (10nM; n = 60 colonoids/treatment; *P = 0.029) or phytate vs phytase-digested phytate (b) (0.2 mg/ml; n = 40 colonoids/treatment; **P = 0.0012). c, Representative images of GF colonoids treated with vehicle or 1mM butyrate, scale bars, 100 μm. d, e, Representative images (d) (red: phalloidin, blue: DAPI), scale bars, 100 μm and growth (e) of colonoids from GF mice treated with vehicle, 5 mM butyrate, or 5 mM butyrate + 50 nM InsP3; n = 30 colonoids/treatment; *P = 0.0409, ***P = 0.0001). All graphs are mean of biological replicates ± s.e.m.; unpaired two-tailed t test. Data were independently repeated two (b) or four (a, c–e) times with similar results. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.
Extended Data Fig. 10 Epithelial HDAC3 functions as an intestinal sensor of distinct microbiota-derived metabolites.
Microbiota can generate inhibitory (SCFA) and activating (InsP3) signals through metabolism of dietary fibres and phytate, respectively. Epithelial HDAC3 functions as a central hub for these opposing signals, and likely additional factors, to modulate enzymatic activity and intestinal epithelial homeostasis/repair. Therefore, HDAC3 represents an epigenetic-modifying enzyme that can calibrate intestinal dynamics in response to alterations in diet and/or microbiota.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Figures
This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-2. Supplementary Fig. 1 contains the uncropped data for western blots, and Supplementary Fig. 2 the flow cytometry gating strategy.
Source data
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Se., Hashimoto-Hill, S., Woo, V. et al. Microbiota-derived metabolite promotes HDAC3 activity in the gut. Nature 586, 108–112 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2604-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2604-2
This article is cited by
-
Histone butyrylation in the mouse intestine is mediated by the microbiota and associated with regulation of gene expression
Nature Metabolism (2024)
-
Faecalibacterium prausnitzii alleviates inflammatory arthritis and regulates IL-17 production, short chain fatty acids, and the intestinal microbial flora in experimental mouse model for rheumatoid arthritis
Arthritis Research & Therapy (2023)
-
Unlocking the potential of targeting histone-modifying enzymes for treating IBD and CRC
Clinical Epigenetics (2023)
-
Core-predominant gut fungus Kazachstania slooffiae promotes intestinal epithelial glycolysis via lysine desuccinylation in pigs
Microbiome (2023)
-
Deficiency of histone variant macroH2A1.1 is associated with sexually dimorphic obesity in mice
Scientific Reports (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
