Night-time measurements of astronomical seeing at Dome A in Antarctica


Seeing—the angular size of stellar images blurred by atmospheric turbulence—is a critical parameter used to assess the quality of astronomical sites at optical/infrared wavelengths. Median values at the best mid-latitude sites are generally in the range of 0.6–0.8 arcseconds1,2,3. Sites on the Antarctic plateau are characterized by comparatively weak turbulence in the free atmosphere above a strong but thin boundary layer4,5,6. The median seeing at Dome C is estimated to be 0.23–0.36 arcseconds7,8,9,10 above a boundary layer that has a typical height of 30 metres10,11,12. At Domes A and F, the only previous seeing measurements have been made during daytime13,14. Here we report measurements of night-time seeing at Dome A, using a differential image motion monitor15. Located at a height of just 8 metres, it recorded seeing as low as 0.13 arcseconds, and provided seeing statistics that are comparable to those at a height of 20 metres at Dome C. This indicates that the boundary layer was below 8 metres for 31 per cent of the time, with median seeing of 0.31 arcseconds, consistent with free-atmosphere seeing. The seeing and boundary-layer thickness are found to be strongly correlated with the near-surface temperature gradient. The correlation confirms a median thickness of approximately 14 metres for the boundary layer at Dome A, as found from a sonic radar16. The thinner boundary layer makes it less challenging to locate a telescope above it, thereby giving greater access to the free atmosphere.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The night-time seeing at Dome A in 2019.
Fig. 2: The correlations between seeing and meteorological parameters.
Fig. 3: The statistics of polar-night weather data in 2015.

Data availability

The seeing and weather data at Dome A in 2019 that support the findings of this study are available in the China-VO Paper Data Repository, The weather data in 2015 have been published18 and are available in The data are also displayed on a public website,


  1. 1.

    Skidmore, W. et al. Thirty meter telescope site testing. V. Seeing and isoplanatic angle. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 121, 1151–1161 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vázquez Ramió, H. et al. European Extremely Large Telescope site characterization. II. High angular resolution parameters. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 124, 868–884 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thomas-Osip, J. E., McCarthy, P., Prieto, G., Phillips, M. M. & Johns, M. Giant Magellan Telescope site testing summary. Preprint at (2011).

  4. 4.

    Marks, R. D., Vernin, J., Azouit, M., Manigault, J. F. & Clevelin, C. Measurement of optical seeing on the high Antarctic plateau. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 134, 161–172 (1999).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Swain, M. R. & Gallée, H. Antarctic boundary layer seeing. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 118, 1190–1197 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Saunders, W. et al. Where is the best site on Earth? Domes A, B, C, and F, and Ridges A and B. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 121, 976–992 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lawrence, J. S., Ashley, M. C. B., Tokovinin, A. & Travouillon, T. Exceptional astronomical seeing conditions above Dome C in Antarctica. Nature 431, 278–281 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Agabi, A. et al. First whole atmosphere night-time seeing measurements at Dome C, Antarctica. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 118, 344–348 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Trinquet, H. et al. Nighttime optical turbulence vertical structure above Dome C in Antarctica. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 120, 203–211 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Aristidi, E. et al. Dome C site testing: surface layer, free atmosphere seeing, and isoplanatic angle statistics. Astron. Astrophys. 499, 955–965 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Petenko, I. et al. Observations of optically active turbulence in the planetary boundary layer by sodar at the Concordia astronomical observatory, Dome C, Antarctica. Astron. Astrophys. 568, A44 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Aristidi, E. et al. Monitoring the optical turbulence in the surface layer at Dome C, Antarctica, with sonic anemometers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 454, 4304–4315 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pei, C., Li, Z., Chen, H. & Yuan, X. Preliminary daytime seeing monitoring at Dome A, Antarctica. Astrophys. Antarctica 288, 296–297 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Okita, H., Ichikawa, T., Ashley, M. C. B., Takato, N. & Motoyama, H. Excellent daytime seeing at Dome Fuji on the Antarctic plateau. Astron. Astrophys. 554, L5 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sarazin, M. & Roddier, F. The ESO differential image motion monitor. Astron. Astrophys. 227, 294–300 (1990).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bonner, C. S. et al. Thickness of the atmospheric boundary layer above Dome A, Antarctica, during 2009. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 122, 1122–1131 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ma, B. et al. An automatic DIMM for Dome A, Antarctica. Proc. SPIE 10700, 1070052 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hu, Y. et al. Meteorological data from KLAWS-2G for an astronomical site survey of Dome A, Antarctica. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 131, 015001 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Vernin, J. Mechanism of formation of optical turbulence. In IAU Tech. Works. Astronomical Site Evaluation in the Visible and Radio Range 266, 2–17  (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2002);

  20. 20.

    Petenko, I., Argentini, S., Casasanta, G., Genthon, C. & Kallistratova, M. Stable surface-based turbulent layer during the polar winter at Dome C, Antarctica: sodar and in situ observations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 171, 101–128 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vignon, E. et al. Stable boundary-layer regimes at Dome C, Antarctica: observation and analysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 143, 1241–1253 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zou, H. et al. Sky brightness and transparency in the i-band at Dome A, Antarctica. Astron. J. 140, 602–611 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yang, Y. et al. Optical sky brightness and transparency during the winter season at Dome A Antarctica from the Gattini-All-Sky Camera. Astron. J. 154, 6 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ashley, M. C. B. et al. South Pole observations of the near-infrared sky brightness. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 108, 721–723 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hu, Y. et al. Meteorological data for the astronomical site at Dome A, Antarctica. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 126, 868–881 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yuan, X. et al. Preliminary design of the Kunlun Dark Universe Survey Telescope (KDUST). Astrophys. Antarctica 288, 271–274 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hickson, P., Ma, B., Shang, Z. & Xue, S. Multistar turbulence monitor: a new technique to measure optical turbulence profiles. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 2532–2545 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gallée, H. et al. Characterization of the boundary layer at Dome C (East Antarctica) during the OPALE summer campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 6225–6236 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vignon, E. et al. Antarctic boundary layer parametrization in a general circulation model: 1-D simulations facing summer observations at Dome C. J. Geophys. Res. D 122, 6818–6843 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Baas, P. et al. Transitions in the wintertime near-surface temperature inversion at Dome C, Antarctica. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 145, 930–946 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Xu, J. et al. Site-testing at Muztagh-ata site. II. Seeing statistics. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 20, 87 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ashley, M. C. B. et al. Future development of the PLATO Observatory for Antarctic science. Proc. SPIE 7735, 773540 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shang, Z. et al. Kunlun cloud and aurora monitor. Proc. SPIE 10700, 1070057 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tokovinin, A. From differential image motion to seeing. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 114, 1156–1166 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to the 35th Chinese National Antarctic Research Expedition team supported by the Polar Research Institute of China and the Chinese Arctic and Antarctic Administration. We also thank Z. Li, F. Du, Z. Hu, T. Song, E. Aristidi and K. Agabi for their help in the development of the KL-DIMMs. We thank the Chinese Antarctic Center of Surveying and Mapping for providing the map of Antarctica in Extended Data Fig. 1. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grant numbers 11733007, 11673037 and 11873010, and is partly supported by the Operation, Maintenance and Upgrading Fund for Astronomical Telescopes and Facility Instruments, budgeted from the Ministry of Finance of China (MOF) and administrated by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The tower for KL-DIMMs was funded by Tianjin Normal University, and implemented by Tianjin University. P.H. acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, RGPIN-2019-04369, the Canada Foundation for Innovation, and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), President’s International Fellowship Initiative, 2017VMA0013. M.C.B.A. acknowledges support from the Australian Antarctic Division and NCRIS funding through Astronomy Australia Limited.

Author information




B.M., Z.S., Y.H., K.H., Y.W. and X.Y. contributed to the development and testing of the KL-DIMM. K.H., Z.S. and P.J. installed KL-DIMM at Dome A, Antarctica, while B.M.,Y.H., Y.W. and X.Y. contributed to its remote operation. M.C.B.A. contributed to the PLATO-A platform supplying power and internet access. B.M. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript together with P.H., Z.S. and M.C.B.A. All authors reviewed and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bin Ma or Zhaohui Shang or Yi Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Marc Sarazin and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Map of Antarctica.

The red dots indicate locations of Dome A (Chinese Kunlun Station), Dome C (French–Italian Concordia Station), Dome F (Japanese Dome Fuji Station) and the South Pole (United States Amundsen–Scott Station), respectively. Map drawn using CorelDRAW and used with permission from Xiaoping Pang and Shiyun Wang (2020).

Extended Data Fig. 2 An example of seeing and meteorological data from 4 and 5 March 2019.

a, Seeing (black) and Sun elevation (red). b, Air temperature T at heights of 12 m, 8 m and 0 m. c, Wind speed U at heights of 12 m, 8 m and 2 m. d, Wind direction at a height of 8 m. Dotted vertical lines mark times when seeing either increased or decreased rapidly.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, B., Shang, Z., Hu, Y. et al. Night-time measurements of astronomical seeing at Dome A in Antarctica. Nature 583, 771–774 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.