Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

Reply to: Transformation of naked mole-rat cells

The Original Article was published on 01 July 2020

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Differential response of NMR cells to HRAS(G12V) expression.
Fig. 2: HRAS(G12V) expression levels determine oncogenic transformation in NMR cells.

Data availability

The RNA-seq data have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (SRP133455). Uncropped western blots are provided as Supplementary Fig. 1. All other data that support the findings of this study can be found as in bioRxiv preprint11 or are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Source code are available upon request.

References

  1. Tian, X. et al. High-molecular-mass hyaluronan mediates the cancer resistance of the naked mole rat. Nature 499, 346–349 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang, S., Mele, J., Wu, Y., Buffenstein, R. & Hornsby, P. J. Resistance to experimental tumorigenesis in cells of a long-lived mammal, the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Aging Cell 9, 626–635 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hadi, F. et al. Transformation of naked mole-rat cells. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2410-x (2020).

  4. Hahn, W. C. et al. Enumeration of the simian virus 40 early region elements necessary for human cell transformation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2111–2123 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rangarajan, A., Hong, S. J., Gifford, A. & Weinberg, R. A. Species- and cell type-specific requirements for cellular transformation. Cancer Cell 6, 171–183 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao, J. J. et al. Human mammary epithelial cell transformation through the activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Cancer Cell 3, 483–495 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Serrano, M., Lin, A. W., McCurrach, M. E., Beach, D. & Lowe, S. W. Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a. Cell 88, 593–602 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tian, X. et al. Evolution of telomere maintenance and tumour suppressor mechanisms across mammals. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 373, 20160443 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elenbaas, B. et al. Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells. Genes Dev. 15, 50–65 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hahn, W. C. et al. Creation of human tumour cells with defined genetic elements. Nature 400, 464–468 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao, J. et al. Dampened PI3K/AKT signaling contributes to cancer resistance of the naked mole rat. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.27.967729 (2020).

  12. Ayyadevara, S., Alla, R., Thaden, J. J. & Shmookler Reis, R. J. Remarkable longevity and stress resistance of nematode PI3K-null mutants. Aging Cell 7, 13–22 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moskalev, A. A. & Shaposhnikov, M. V. Pharmacological inhibition of phosphoinositide 3 and TOR kinases improves survival of Drosophila melanogaster. Rejuvenation Res. 13, 246–247 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nojima, A. et al. Haploinsufficiency of Akt1 prolongs the lifespan of mice. PLoS One 8, e69178 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Foukas, L. C. et al. Long-term p110α PI3K inactivation exerts a beneficial effect on metabolism. EMBO Mol. Med. 5, 563–571 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by US National Institutes of Health grant AG047200 to V.G. and A.S., and Natural Science Foundation of China grant 81672818, Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality grant JCYJ20160331190123578 and Guangzhou Science and Technology Program key project 201604020005 to X.F.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The list of authors is different from the original study, because new data were included in this Reply. J.Z., X.T., Y.Z., X.F. and V.G. designed research. X.T., Z.Z. and E.R. generated the stable cell lines and performed western blot and xenograft experiments. H.Z. constructed libraries and sequenced the samples. J.Z., Y.Z., Y.Y., B.R., A.C., X.S. and R.H. performed data control and bioinformatics analysis. E.N. provided samples. K.K. contributed to the result interpretation and paper writing. A.S., X.F., and V.G. supervised the study. J.Z., X.T., Y.Z., A.S., X.F. and V.G. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrei Seluanov, Xiaodong Fang or Vera Gorbunova.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Tumorigenicity of the cell lines and PCA of the RNA-seq datasets.

a, Tumorigenicity of the cell lines. Cells not analysed in this study are indicated with a ‘-’. All transforming genes were driven by a retroviral LTR promoter. be, PCA of the RNA-seq datasets. PCA was done using the expression of 13,276 orthologous genes across all four species (mouse (b), blind mole rat (c), NMR (d) and human (e)). The first two principal components of each analysis were extracted. Values in parentheses indicate the variance explained by each of the principal components. L, SV40LT; R, HRAS(G12V); T, human TERT. All transgenes are driven by LTR promoters.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Enrichment analysis of DEGs in the transformed cells across species.

a, GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs derived from Fig. 1a. b, GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs derived from Fig. 1b. c, GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs derived from Fig. 1c. Biological process and molecular function terms are shown. All GO terms in ac are arranged in the order of decreasing significance in the mouse cells. The top 20 significantly upregulated (red) and downregulated (green) terms are shown. LT, SV40LT; RAS, HRAS(G12V). All transgenes are driven by LTR promoters.

Extended Data Table 1 Statistics for RNA-seq data and expressed genes for all samples

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figure 1 showing uncropped Western blot images.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Tian, X., Zhu, Y. et al. Reply to: Transformation of naked mole-rat cells. Nature 583, E8–E13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2411-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2411-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer