Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Imaging single glycans

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 15 July 2020

This article has been updated


Imaging of biomolecules guides our understanding of their diverse structures and functions1,2. Real-space imaging at sub-nanometre resolution using cryo-electron microscopy has provided key insights into proteins and their assemblies3,4. Direct molecular imaging of glycans—the predominant biopolymers on Earth, with a plethora of structural and biological functions5—has not been possible so far6. The inherent glycan complexity and backbone flexibility require single-molecule approaches for real-space imaging. At present, glycan characterization often relies on a combination of mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging to provide insights into size, sequence, branching and connectivity, and therefore requires structure reconstruction from indirect information7,8,9. Here we show direct imaging of single glycan molecules that are isolated by mass-selective, soft-landing electrospray ion beam deposition and imaged by low-temperature scanning tunnelling microscopy10. The sub-nanometre resolution of the technique enables the visualization of glycan connectivity and discrimination between regioisomers. Direct glycan imaging is an important step towards a better understanding of the structure of carbohydrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: STM topography imaging of linear glycans prepared by ES-IBD.
Fig. 2: STM topographic image of branched hexamanosides 4 and 5.
Fig. 3: STM topography image of undecasaccharide 6.
Fig. 4: Analysis of glycans from mixtures by chemically selective deposition followed by STM imaging.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors on reasonable request; see Author contributions for specific datasets.

Change history


  1. Unwin, P. N. T. & Henderson, R. Molecular structure determination by electron microscopy of unstained crystalline specimens. J. Mol. Biol. 94, 425–440 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blundell T. L. et al. (eds) Celebrating structural biology. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1304–1316 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bai, X.-c., McMullan, G. & Scheres, S. H. W. How cryo-EM is revolutionizing structural biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 49–57 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Callaway, E. The revolution will not be crystallized: a new method sweeps through structural biology. Nature 525, 172–174 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Varki, A. et al. Essentials of Glycobiology 3rd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2017).

  6. Gray, C. J. et al. Advancing solutions to the carbohydrate sequencing challenge. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 14463–14479 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mariño, K., Bones, J., Kattla, J. J. & Rudd, P. M. A systematic approach to protein glycosylation analysis: a path through the maze. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 713–723 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dell, A. & Morris, H. R. Glycoprotein structure determination by mass spectrometry. Science 291, 2351 (2001).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lundborg, M., Fontana, C. & Widmalm, G. Automatic structure determination of regular polysaccharides based solely on NMR spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 12, 3851–3855 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rauschenbach, S., Ternes, M., Harnau, L. & Kern, K. Mass spectrometry as a preparative tool for the surface science of large molecules. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 9, 473–498 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hofmann, J., Hahm, H., Seeberger, P. & Pagel, K. Identification of carbohydrate anomers using ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Nature 526, 241–244 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Faleh, A. B., Warnke, S. & Rizzo, T. R. Combining ultrahigh-resolution ion-mobility spectrometry with cryogenic infrared spectroscopy for the analysis of glycan mixtures. Anal. Chem. 91, 4876–4882 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kley, C. S. et al. Atomic-scale observation of multiconformational binding and energy level alignment of ruthenium-based photosensitizers on TiO2 anatase. Nano Lett. 14, 563–569 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Deng, Z. et al. A close look at proteins: submolecular resolution of two- and three-dimensionally folded cytochrome c at surfaces. Nano Lett. 12, 2452–2458 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Longchamp, J.-N. et al. Imaging proteins at the single-molecule level. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1474 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Abb, S., Harnau, L., Gutzler, R., Rauschenbach, S. & Kern, K. Two-dimensional honeycomb network through sequence-controlled self-assembly of oligopeptides. Nat. Commun. 7, 10335 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rauschenbach, S. et al. Two-dimensional folding of polypeptides into molecular nanostructures at surfaces. ACS Nano 11, 2420–2427 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, L. et al. Chaperon-mediated single molecular approach toward modulating Aβ peptide aggregation. Nano Lett. 9, 4066–4072 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abb, S. et al. Carbohydrate self-assembly at surfaces: STM imaging of sucrose conformation and ordering on Cu(100). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 131, 8424–8428 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abb, S. et al. Polymorphism in carbohydrate self-assembly at surfaces: STM imaging and theoretical modelling of trehalose on Cu(100). RSC Adv. 9, 35813–35819 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rauschenbach, S. et al. Electrospray ion beam deposition of clusters and biomolecules. Small 2, 540–547 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guberman, M. & Seeberger, P. H. Automated glycan assembly: a perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 5581–5592 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Panza, M., Pistorio, S. G., Stine, K. J. & Demchenko, A. V. Automated chemical oligosaccharide synthesis: novel approach to traditional challenges. Chem. Rev. 118, 8105–8150 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Brazil, R. Can chemists crack the sugar code? Chemistry World (2020).

  25. Delbianco, M. et al. Well-defined oligo- and polysaccharides as ideal probes for structural studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5421–5426 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Max Planck Society and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for financial support. M.D. thanks the Minerva Fast Track Program and the MPG-FhG Cooperation Project Glyco3Dysplay. The authors acknowledge the Emmy-Noether-Program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.R., S.A., P.H.S. and K.K. conceived this project. X.W., K.A., S.R., S.A., U.S., K.K., P.H.S. and M.D. designed the experiments. X.W., K.A., T.M., S.S., M.P., U.S. and S.A. carried out the sample preparation and measurements. X.W., S.A. and T.M. analysed the data. M.D., A.P.V. and P.B. carried out the molecule synthesis. All authors contributed to and discussed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to S. Rauschenbach, P. H. Seeberger or K. Kern.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Steven De Feyter and Sabine Flitsch for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Mass spectra of all deposited glycans.

af, The mass spectra show absence of major contaminants in the ion beam after mass filtering. For glycans 15, the charge state of the molecule is −1, whereas undecasaccharide 6 has a charge state of −2.

Extended Data Fig. 2 STM overview image of a sample of hexamannoside 4.

Single molecules (marked with yellow circles) are observed as the major species on the terrace. The dark spots are due to impurities on the surface, which is typical for depositions at low temperature. Scale bar, 10 nm.

Extended Data Fig. 3 STM topography image of linear glycans.

af, STM images of pentamannoside 1 (a, b), hexamannoside 2 (c, d) and hexaglucoside 3 (e, f) showing different conformations on the surface. Scale bars, 1 nm.

Extended Data Fig. 4 STM topography image of branched hexamannosides.

a, b, STM images of adsorbed hexamannoside 4 showing different conformations. Two branches are clearly visible. c, d, STM images of hexamannoside 5 of different conformations on the surface, with branching clearly visible. The assignment of the linkage is based on the position of the linker (low-height feature) and on the interunit distance, as shown in the inset (1-2 linkage in pink). Scale bars, 1 nm.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Statistical analysis of the feature distance of 1-6 linkages in linear glycans.

a, Pentamannoside 1. b, Hexamannoside 2. c, Hexaglucoside 3. d, Combined histogram for all linear glycans. Values for the mean feature distance of the 1-6 linkages were calculated by fitting with Gaussian peaks, resulting in centre and width values of 0.48 ± 0.09 nm, 0.51 ± 0.08 nm and 0.53 ± 0.04 nm, respectively. The total averaging of the 1-6 linkages (including α1-6 and β1-6) yields a measured 1-6 feature distance of 0.52 ± 0.07 nm. Histogram bin size, 0.05 nm.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Statistical analysis of the feature distance of α1-6 and α1-2 linkages in hexamannoside 4.

The distance between the monosaccharide units connected with α1-6 and α1-2 linkages in hexamannoside 4 was identified on the basis of the linker position and the branching points. The histogram (bin size, 0.02 nm) of the α1-6 (grey) and α1-2 (purple) linkages was fitted with Gaussian peaks at 0.53 ± 0.05 nm and 0.61 ± 0.03 nm, respectively. The distributions show little overlap and thus the feature distance is identified as a reliable parameter for distinguishing between α1-6 and α1-2 linkages. The wide distribution of α1-6 (black) linkages compared to the narrow shape of α1-2 linkages (purple) indicates larger conformational variability, probably due to the greater flexibility of the α1-6 links.

Extended Data Fig. 7 STM topography image of branched undecasaccharide 6.

a, STM images of undecasaccharide 6, clearly showing branching points and individually resolved monosaccharide units. The assignment of the branches is made by the number of units in the branch and by the feature distance between the monosaccharide units. Scale bar, 1 nm. b, Line profiles as indicated in a.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains: (1) General Materials and Methods, (2) Automated Glycan Assembly, and (3) additional References.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Delbianco, M., Anggara, K. et al. Imaging single glycans. Nature 582, 375–378 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing