Hydrothermal 15N15N abundances constrain the origins of mantle nitrogen


Nitrogen is the main constituent of the Earth’s atmosphere, but its provenance in the Earth’s mantle remains uncertain. The relative contribution of primordial nitrogen inherited during the Earth’s accretion versus that subducted from the Earth’s surface is unclear1,2,3,4,5,6. Here we show that the mantle may have retained remnants of such primordial nitrogen. We use the rare 15N15N isotopologue of N2 as a new tracer of air contamination in volcanic gas effusions. By constraining air contamination in gases from Iceland, Eifel (Germany) and Yellowstone (USA), we derive estimates of mantle δ15N (the fractional difference in 15N/14N from air), N2/36Ar and N2/3He. Our results show that negative δ15N values observed in gases, previously regarded as indicating a mantle origin for nitrogen7,8,9,10, in fact represent dominantly air-derived N2 that experienced 15N/14N fractionation in hydrothermal systems. Using two-component mixing models to correct for this effect, the 15N15N data allow extrapolations that characterize mantle endmember δ15N, N2/36Ar and N2/3He values. We show that the Eifel region has slightly increased δ15N and N2/36Ar values relative to estimates for the convective mantle provided by mid-ocean-ridge basalts11, consistent with subducted nitrogen being added to the mantle source. In contrast, we find that whereas the Yellowstone plume has δ15N values substantially greater than that of the convective mantle, resembling surface components12,13,14,15, its N2/36Ar and N2/3He ratios are indistinguishable from those of the convective mantle. This observation raises the possibility that the plume hosts a primordial component. We provide a test of the subduction hypothesis with a two-box model, describing the evolution of mantle and surface nitrogen through geological time. We show that the effect of subduction on the deep nitrogen cycle may be less important than has been suggested by previous investigations. We propose instead that high mid-ocean-ridge basalt and plume δ15N values may both be dominantly primordial features.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: The nitrogen isotopic composition of volcanic gases and volatile-rich MORBs.
Fig. 2: The relationship between Δ30 and N2/3He ratios in volcanic gases.
Fig. 3: The relationship between Δ30 and argon isotopes in volcanic gases.
Fig. 4: The evolution of δ15N and nitrogen abundances in the convective mantle and at the Earth’s surface as a function of time.

Data availability

Nitrogen isotopologue and noble gas data are archived on EarthChem at https://doi.org/10.1594/IEDA/111481. Source data for Figs. 1–3 are provided with the paper.


  1. 1.

    Javoy, M. The birth of the Earth’s atmosphere: the behaviour and fate of its major elements. Chem. Geol. 147, 11–25 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dauphas, N. & Marty, B. Heavy nitrogen in carbonatites of the Kola Peninsula: a possible signature of the deep mantle. Science 286, 2488–2490 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Marty, B. & Zimmermann, L. Volatiles (He, C, N, Ar) in mid-ocean ridge basalts: assesment of shallow-level fractionation and characterization of source composition. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63, 3619–3633 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Marty, B. & Dauphas, N. The nitrogen record of crust–mantle interaction and mantle convection from Archean to Present. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 206, 397–410 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Palot, M., Cartigny, P., Harris, J. W., Kaminsky, F. V. & Stachel, T. Evidence for deep mantle convection and primordial heterogeneity from nitrogen and carbon stable isotopes in diamond. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 357–358, 179–193 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Barry, P. H. & Hilton, D. R. Release of subducted sedimentary nitrogen throughout Earth’s mantle. Geochem. Perspect. Lett. 2, 148–159 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Marty, B. et al. Gas geochemistry of geothermal fluids, the Hengill area, southwest rift zone of Iceland. Chem. Geol. 91, 207–225 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fischer, T. P. et al. Subduction and recycling of nitrogen along the Central American margin. Science 297, 1154–1157 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fischer, T. et al. Upper-mantle volatile chemistry at Oldoinyo Lengai volcano and the origin of carbonatites. Nature 459, 77–80 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bräuer, K., Kämpf, H., Niedermann, S. & Strauch, G. Indications for the existence of different magmatic reservoirs beneath the Eifel area (Germany): a multi-isotope (C, N, He, Ne, Ar) approach. Chem. Geol. 356, 193–208 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Javoy, M. & Pineau, F. The volatiles record of a “popping” rock from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at 14°N: chemical and isotopic composition of gas trapped in the vesicles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 107, 598–611 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bebout, G. E. & Fogel, M. L. Nitrogen-isotope compositions of metasedimentary rocks in the Catalina Schist, California: implications for metamorphic devolatilization history. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 2839–2849 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Busigny, V., Cartigny, P. & Philippot, P. Nitrogen isotopes in ophiolitic metagabbros: a re-evaluation of modern nitrogen fluxes in subduction zones and implication for the early Earth atmosphere. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 7502–7521 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Busigny, V., Cartigny, P., Philippot, P., Ader, M. & Javoy, M. Massive recycling of nitrogen and other fluid-mobile elements (K, Rb, Cs, H) in a cold slab environment: evidence from HP to UHP oceanic metasediments of the Schistes Lustrés nappe (western Alps, Europe). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 215, 27–42 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bebout, G. E., Agard, P., Kobayashi, K., Moriguti, T. & Nakamura, E. Devolatilization history and trace element mobility in deeply subducted sedimentary rocks: evidence from Western Alps HP/UHP suites. Chem. Geol. 342, 1–20 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Grady, M. & Wright, I. Elemental and isotopic abundances of carbon and nitrogen in meteorites. Space Sci. Rev. 106, 231–248 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Abernethy, F. A. J. et al. Stable isotope analysis of carbon and nitrogen in angrites. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 48, 1590–1606 (2013).We include issue numbers in journal references only when each issue begins at page 1; the issue number has therefore been removed from ref. 17

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cartigny, P., Palot, M., Thomassot, E. & Harris, J. W. Diamond formation: a stable isotope perspective. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42, 699–732 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pearson, V. K., Sephton, M. A., Franchi, I. A., Gibson, J. M. & Gilmour, I. Carbon and nitrogen in carbonaceous chondrites: elemental abundances and stable isotopic compositions. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 41, 1899–1918 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Young, E. D. et al. Near-equilibrium isotope fractionation during planetesimal evaporation. Icarus 323, 1–15 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li, Y., Marty, B., Shcheka, S., Zimmermann, L. & Keppler, H. Nitrogen isotope fractionation during terrestrial core-mantle separation. Geochem. Perspect. Lett. 2, 138–147 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dalou, C. et al. Redox control on nitrogen isotope fractionation during planetary core formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 14485–14494 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Allègre, C. J. & Turcotte, D. L. Implications of a two-component marble-cake mantle. Nature 323, 123–127 (1986).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Thomazo, C. & Papineau, D. Biogeochemical cycling of nitrogen on the early Earth. Elements 9, 345–351 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yeung, L. Y. et al. Extreme enrichment in atmospheric 15N15N. Sci. Adv. 3, eaao6741 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Halldórsson, S. A., Hilton, D. R., Barry, P. H., Füri, E. & Grönvold, K. Recycling of crustal material by the Iceland mantle plume: new evidence from nitrogen elemental and isotope systematics of subglacial basalts. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 176, 206–226 (2016); corrigendum 186, 360–364 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lee, H., Sharp, Z. D. & Fischer, T. P. Kinetic nitrogen isotope fractionation between air and dissolved N2 in water: implications for hydrothermal systems. Geochem. J. 49, 571–573 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ballentine, C. J., Burgess, R. & Marty, B. Tracing fluid origin, transport and interaction in the crust. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 47, 539–614 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Warr, O., Rochelle, C. A., Masters, A. & Ballentine, C. J. Determining noble gas partitioning within a CO2–H2O system at elevated temperatures and pressures. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 159, 112–125 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chiodini, G. et al. Insights from fumarole gas geochemistry on the origin of hydrothermal fluids on the Yellowstone Plateau. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 89, 265–278 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bekaert, D. V. B., Broadley, M. W., Caracausi, A. & Marty, B. Novel insights into the degassing history of the Earth’s mantle from high precision noble gas analysis of magmatic gas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 525, 115766–115778 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sano, Y., Takahata, N., Nishio, Y., Fischer, T. P. & Williams, S. N. Volcanic flux of nitrogen from the Earth. Chem. Geol. 171, 263–271 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Avice, G. et al. Evolution of atmospheric xenon and other noble gases inferred from Archean to Paleoproterozoic rocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 232, 82–100 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Giggenbach, W. & Goguel, R. Collection and Analysis of Geothermal and Volcanic Water and Gas Discharges Report No. CD 2401 (Chemistry Division, DSIR, 1989).

  35. 35.

    Sherwood Lollar, B., Westgate, T., Ward, J., Slater, G. & Lacrampe-Couloume, G. Abiogenic formation of alkanes in the Earth’s crust as a minor source for global hydrocarbon reservoirs. Nature 416, 522–524 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Young, E. D., Rumble, D., III, Freedman, P. & Mills, M. A large-radius high-mass-resolution multiple-collector isotope ratio mass spectrometer for analysis of rare isotopologues of O2, N2, CH4 and other gases. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 401, 1–10 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Barry, P. et al. Noble gases solubility models of hydrocarbon charge mechanism in the Sleipner Vest gas field. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 194, 291–309 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fischer, T. P. et al. Temporal variations in fumarole gas chemistry at Poás volcano, Costa Rica. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 294, 56–70 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rizzo, A. L. et al. Kolumbo submarine volcano (Greece): an active window into the Aegean subduction system. Sci. Rep. 6, 28013 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ward, J. A. et al. Microbial hydrocarbon gases in the Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa: implications for the deep biosphere. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 3239–3250 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sherwood Lollar, B. et al. Unravelling abiogenic and biogenic sources of methane in the Earth’s deep subsurface. Chem. Geol. 226, 328–339 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sano, Y. et al. Origin of methane-rich natural gas at the West Pacific convergent plate boundary. Sci. Rep. 7, 15646 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sarda, P. & Graham, D. Mid-ocean ridge popping rocks: implications for degassing at ridge crests. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 97, 268–289 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Moreira, M., Kunz, J. & Allegre, C. Rare gas systematics in popping rock: isotopic and elemental compositions in the upper mantle. Science 279, 1178–1181 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Middleton, J. L., Langmuir, C. H., Mukhopadhyay, S., McManus, J. F. & Mitrovica, J. X. Hydrothermal iron flux variability following rapid sea level changes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3848–3856 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jones, M. et al. New constraints on mantle carbon from Mid-Atlantic Ridge popping rocks. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 511, 67–75 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Péron, S. et al. Noble gas systematics in new popping rocks from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (14° N): evidence for small-scale upper mantle heterogeneities. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 519, 70–82 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Cartigny, P., Pineau, F., Aubaud, C. & Javoy, M. Towards a consistent mantle carbon flux estimate: Insights from volatile systematics (H2O/Ce, δD, CO2/Nb) in the North Atlantic mantle (14°N and 34°N). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 265, 672–685 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Cartigny, P., Jendrzejewski, N., Pineau, F., Petit, E. & Javoy, M. Volatile (C, N, Ar) variability in MORB and the respective roles of mantle source heterogeneity and degassing: the case of the Southwest Indian Ridge. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 194, 241–257 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Füri, E. et al. Apparent decoupling of the He and Ne isotope systematics of the Icelandic mantle: the role of He depletion, melt mixing, degassing fractionation and air interaction. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 3307–3332 (2010).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Mukhopadhyay, S. Early differentiation and volatile accretion recorded in deep-mantle neon and xenon. Nature 486, 101–104 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bräuer, K., Kämpf, H., Niedermann, S., Strauch, G. & Weise, S. M. Evidence for a nitrogen flux directly derived from the European subcontinental mantle in the Western Eger Rift, central Europe. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 4935–4947 (2004).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Libourel, G., Marty, B. & Humbert, F. Nitrogen solubility in basaltic melt. Part I. effect of oxygen fugacity. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 4123–4135 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Broadley, M. W., Ballentine, C. J., Chavrit, D., Dallai, L. & Burgess, R. Sedimentary halogens and noble gases within Western Antarctic xenoliths: implications of extensive volatile recycling to the sub continental lithospheric mantle. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 176, 139–156 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Matsumoto, T., Chen, Y. & Matsuda, J.-i. Concomitant occurrence of primordial and recycled noble gases in the Earth’s mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 185, 35–47 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Buikin, A. et al. Noble gas isotopes suggest deep mantle plume source of late Cenozoic mafic alkaline volcanism in Europe. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 230, 143–162 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gautheron, C., Moreira, M. & Allègre, C. He, Ne and Ar composition of the European lithospheric mantle. Chem. Geol. 217, 97–112 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Caracausi, A., Avice, G., Burnard, P. G., Füri, E. & Marty, B. Chondritic xenon in the Earth’s mantle. Nature 533, 82–85 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Moreira, M., Rouchon, V., Muller, E. & Noirez, S. The xenon isotopic signature of the mantle beneath Massif Central. Geochem. Perspect. Lett. 6, 28–32 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sobolev, A. V. et al. The amount of recycled crust in sources of mantle-derived melts. Science 316, 412–417 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Moreira, M. A., Dosso, L. & Ondréas, H. Helium isotopes on the Pacific-Antarctic ridge (52.5°–41.5° S). Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L10306 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Day, J. M. & Hilton, D. R. Origin of 3He/4He ratios in HIMU-type basalts constrained from Canary Island lavas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 305, 226–234 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lowenstern, J. B., Evans, W. C., Bergfeld, D. & Hunt, A. G. Prodigious degassing of a billion years of accumulated radiogenic helium at Yellowstone. Nature 506, 355–358 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Warr, O. et al. Tracing ancient hydrogeological fracture network age and compartmentalisation using noble gases. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 222, 340–362 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Holland, G. et al. Deep fracture fluids isolated in the crust since the Precambrian era. Nature 497, 357–360 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Li, L., Cartigny, P. & Ader, M. Kinetic nitrogen isotope fractionation associated with thermal decomposition of NH3: experimental results and potential applications to trace the origin of N2 in natural gas and hydrothermal systems. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 6282–6297 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sherwood Lollar, B. et al. Evidence for bacterially generated hydrocarbon gas in Canadian Shield and Fennoscandian Shield rocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 5073–5085 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Sherwood Lollar, B. et al. Abiogenic methanogenesis in crystalline rocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 5087–5097 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Jean, M. M., Hanan, B. B. & Shervais, J. W. Yellowstone hotspot–continental lithosphere interaction. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 389, 119–131 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Plank, T. & Langmuir, C. H. The chemical composition of subducting sediment and its consequences for the crust and mantle. Chem. Geol. 145, 325–394 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Class, C. & le Roex, A. P. Ce anomalies in Gough Island lavas—trace element characteristics of a recycled sediment component. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 265, 475–486 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Eisele, J. et al. The role of sediment recycling in EM-1 inferred from Os, Pb, Hf, Nd, Sr isotope and trace element systematics of the Pitcairn hotspot. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 196, 197–212 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Jackson, M. G. et al. The return of subducted continental crust in Samoan lavas. Nature 448, 684–687 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Devey, C. W. et al. Active submarine volcanism on the Society hotspot swell (West Pacific): a geochemical study. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 95, 5049–5066 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Dodson, A., Kennedy, B. M. & DePaolo, D. J. Helium and neon isotopes in the Imnaha Basalt, Columbia River Basalt Group: evidence for a Yellowstone plume source. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 150, 443–451 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Parai, R. & Mukhopadhyay, S. How large is the subducted water flux? New constraints on mantle regassing rates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 317–318, 396–406 (2012).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Parai, R. & Mukhopadhyay, S. Xenon isotopic constraints on the history of volatile recycling into the mantle. Nature 560, 223–227 (2018); publisher correction 563, E28 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Johnson, B. & Goldblatt, C. The nitrogen budget of Earth. Earth Sci. Rev. 148, 150–173 (2015); corrigendum 165, 377–378 (2017)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Ader, M. et al. Interpretation of the nitrogen isotopic composition of Precambrian sedimentary rocks: assumptions and perspectives. Chem. Geol. 429, 93–110 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Goldblatt, C. et al. Nitrogen-enhanced greenhouse warming on early Earth. Nat. Geosci. 2, 891–896 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Nishizawa, M., Sano, Y., Ueno, Y. & Maruyama, S. Speciation and isotope ratios of nitrogen in fluid inclusions from seafloor hydrothermal deposits at 3.5 Ga. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 254, 332–344 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Marty, B., Zimmermann, L., Pujol, M., Burgess, R. & Philippot, P. Nitrogen isotopic composition and density of the Archean atmosphere. Science 342, 101–104 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Allègre, C. J., Staudacher, T. & Sarda, P. Rare gas systematics: formation of the atmosphere, evolution and structure of the Earth’s mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 81, 127–150 (1987).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Avice, G., Marty, B. & Burgess, R. The origin and degassing history of the Earth’s atmosphere revealed by Archean xenon. Nat. Commun. 8, 15455 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Pinti, D. L., Hashizume, K. & Matsuda, J.-i. Nitrogen and argon signatures in 3.8 to 2.8 Ga metasediments: clues on the chemical state of the Archean ocean and the deep biosphere. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65, 2301–2315 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Marty, B. & Humbert, F. Nitrogen and argon isotopes in oceanic basalts. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 152, 101–112 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Li, L. & Bebout, G. E. Carbon and nitrogen geochemistry of sediments in the Central American convergent margin: insights regarding subduction input fluxes, diagenesis, and paleoproductivity. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 110, B11202 (2005).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Schultz, L. & Franke, L. Helium, neon, and argon in meteorites: a data collection. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 39, 1889–1890 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Kerridge, J. F. Carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in carbonaceous chondrites: abundances and isotopic compositions in bulk samples. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 49, 1707–1714 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Marty, B. et al. Origins of volatile elements (H, C, N, noble gases) on Earth and Mars in light of recent results from the ROSETTA cometary mission. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 441, 91–102 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by the Deep Carbon Observatory through Sloan Foundation grant numbers G-2018-11346 and G-2017-9815 to E.D.Y. The Deep Carbon Observatory also supported field trips via grant numbers G-2016-7206 and G-2017-9696 to P. H.B. We thank S. Mukhopadyay for providing a sample of popping rock; K. Farley for lending equipment; and J. Dottin, M. Bonifacie, V. Busigny, P. Cartigny and A. Shahar for helpful discussions.

Author information




E.D.Y. designed the study. J.L. made the nitrogen isotopologue measurements of all mantle-derived samples and most cratonic samples, interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript with feedback from E.D.Y. E.D.Y. and J.L. constructed the box models. I.E.K. made nitrogen isotopologue measurements of some of the cratonic samples. P.H.B., D.V.B., M.W.B., T.P.F. and A.C. measured noble gas abundances and isotope ratios in mantle-derived samples. O.W. and T.G. measured major element chemistry in cratonic gases. P.H.B., D.V.B., M.W.B., T.P.F. and B.M. conducted field trips and sample collection in Yellowstone, USA. D.V.B., M.W.B. and B.M. conducted a field trip and sample collection in Eifel, Germany. P.H.B., A.S. and S.A.H. conducted a field trip and sample collection in Iceland. B.M. and T.P.F. conducted a field trip and sample collection in East Africa. T.P.F. conducted a field trip and sample collection in Hawaii. B.S.L., O.W. and T.G. conducted multiple field trips and sample collections in the Kidd Creek and Sudbury mines, Canada. G.A. assisted in acquiring data for popping rocks. M.D.K. contributed popping rock samples. All authors contributed to the final manuscript preparation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to J. Labidi or E. D. Young.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Rita Parai and Yuji Sano for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Probability density plots for N2/36Ar, N2/3He and δ15N based on literature data and our study.

The relative probabilities are scaled so that each probability is visible on the same plot. The probability densities for δ15N are taken from the mean and standard deviation of the reported measured values in the cases of Yellowstone and Eifel. The δ15N MORB3,49,86 and metasediment12,14,15,87 data were compiled from the literature. The probability densities for molecular ratios were calculated by taking the ratios of Monte Carlo draws for numerator and denominator and propagating nominal 20% errors assigned to each molecular concentration. Literature data for chondritic N2/36Ar were obtained using N and 36Ar concentrations in individual chondrites19,88,89. The dataset includes all major types of carbonaceous, enstatite and ordinary chondrites. No systematic difference could be observed between chondrite groups. Using this global dataset, we find that chondritic estimates used earlier3,90 for N2/36Ar cannot be replicated. N2/36Ar and N2/3He estimates for metasediments are from Sano et al.32, assuming a normal distribution for the uncertainties. The convective mantle N2/3He and N2/36Ar data are from ref. 11 and references cited in Extended Data Fig. 5.

Extended Data Fig. 2 3He/4He of Icelandic gases plotted against their 4He/20Ne ratios normalized to air.

Literature data50 illustrate a three-component mixing with air, the convective mantle and the plume mantle. The convective mantle endmember is characterized by 3He/4He of 8 RA and a relatively high 4He/20Ne relative to air44. The plume component is characterized by primordial 3He/4He values of up to 30 RA and a 4He/20Ne value lower than the convective mantle50,51. On this plot, our 11 samples have compositions with clear contributions from the three endmembers.

Extended Data Fig. 3 N2/He and N2/3He ratios versus δ15N in gases from Iceland, Yellowstone, Ayrolaf, Eifel and Hawaii.

Top, values for N2/He versus δ15N for air, the convective mantle and cratonic gases compared with the samples from this study are shown. This is a similar plot to that in Fischer et al.8 except that cratonic gases are shown for the first time, to our knowledge. The extremely low N2/He ratio for cratonic gases derived here results from substantial accumulation of 4He over geological times. See the Supplementary Discussion for definitions of the cratonic gases based on samples from the Canadian Shield (data in Supplementary Table 2). In this space, data are usually interpreted as representing ternary mixtures. However, this plot fails to account for the processes occurring in hydrothermal systems, whereby the extremely low δ15N values are from isotopically fractionated N2 degassing from geothermal waters, not mixing with mantle components (see main text). Bottom, we show the values for N2/3He versus δ15N for air, the convective mantle and cratonic gases compared with samples from this study. This is a similar plot to that in Sano et al.32 except that cratonic gases are defined (see the Supplementary Information). The samples with low N2/3He values relative to the cratonic endmember can be assumed to receive negligible cratonic nitrogen (see the main text and Supplementary Discussion on Yellowstone). The mantle gases are taken from ref. 3.

Extended Data Fig. 4 84Kr/36Ar and 132Xe/36Ar ratios versus δ15N in gases from hydrothermal systems with near-atmospheric values.

84Kr/36Ar, 132Xe/36Ar and δ15N values are shown for Iceland and Yellowstone samples for which we have heavy noble gas data and Δ30 values of 16‰ and higher. In the two plots, the data define a negative trend, implying that nitrogen loss causing δ15N variations occurs together with preferential Kr (top) and Xe (bottom) losses relative to argon. This is in contrast with predictions based on solubilities obtained in ideal conditions, where both Kr and Xe are expected to be more soluble than Ar29. We suggest that this represents degassing of air-saturated water under extreme temperature and pressure conditions, where gas solubilities deviate considerably from behaviour governed by Henry’s Law29. Here, the data would require Kr (and Xe) to become more insoluble than Ar.

Extended Data Fig. 5 N2/36Ar ratios versus 40Ar/36Ar ratios in basalts and rocks from the Kola plume.

Data are from the literature2,3,4,86 and illustrate mixing between mantle gases and air, most probably as the result of the introduction of air into rock cracks during eruption or sample handling. The highest 40Ar/36Ar ratio recorded in basalt crushing experiments with simultaneous N2/36Ar measurements is 42,366 ± 9,713. At this value, the corresponding N2/36Ar ratio is \({4.2}_{-1.5\,}^{+2.0}\times {10}^{6}\), which was assigned to the convective mantle86. The convective mantle is more likely to have a 40Ar/36Ar ratio of 25,000 ± 2,000 (ref. 44). At this 40Ar/36Ar ratio, the corresponding N2/36Ar value becomes \({2.0}_{-1.2\,}^{+1.0}\times {10}^{6}\). At a 40Ar/36Ar value of 5,000 (refs. 2,4), the plume N2/36Ar value would be lower, at \({0.4}_{-0.2\,}^{+0.2}\times {10}^{6}\). However, at the 40Ar/36Ar value of 10,000 suggested by recent studies51, we obtain N2/36Ar = \({0.7}_{-0.3\,}^{+0.5}\times {10}^{6}\) for the plume according to the correlation between N2/36Ar and 40Ar/36Ar.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Mass balance applied to account for Eifel and Yellowstone, in terms of δ15N, N2/36Ar and N2/3He.

δ15N values of Eifel and Yellowstone are shown, as derived from Fig. 1. N2/36Ar and N2/3He values of Eifel and Yellowstone are also shown, as derived from Figs. 2, 3. Recycled components have high elemental ratios, according to ref. 32. These ratios might be even higher if N was less devolatilized than noble gases during slab devolatilization. Note that this would not change our conclusion, since the mixing curve would remain identical. a, In the N2/3He space, the position of Eifel and society basalts can be explained with a simple two-component mixing between the convective mantle and some recycled component. The values for the three Society basalts are taken from ref. 4. The dataset was filtered to show only basalts with the lowest levels of air contamination. We only used the three basalts with 40Ar/36Ar > 5,000. For this to work for Yellowstone, anomalously high δ15N would be required (see b). An alternative mixing requires a 3He-rich reservoir to be postulated with a low N2/3He ratio. We illustrate this speculation with a δ15N of –5‰, like that of the convective mantle. However, other δ15N values (typically between −10 and +10‰) would also fit the Yellowstone data. This is because N in the Yellowstone source would mostly be accounted for by the recycled component, not the 3He-rich endmember forced with a low N2/3He ratio b, In the N2/36Ar space, Eifel can be explained by conventional mixing. If such mixing involves the known convective mantle, Yellowstone requires a recycled endmember with a δ15N > 50‰, which is implausible. Again, for a mixing to account for the data, one would have to assign the 3He-rich reservoir with a low N2/36Ar ratio.

Extended Data Fig. 7 The evolution of δ15N and nitrogen abundances in the convective mantle and at the Earth’s surface as a function of time.

Various cases with time-dependent solutions are explored. Curves are calculated as for Fig. 4 (main text) using a two-box model described in the Methods and main text. Here, three cases are modelled on the basis of the combination of various temporal variations in volcanic outgassing and subduction fluxes shown in the bottom panel. Modern fluxes are taken from ref. 13. The blue curves (right) are for the surface (air + continental crust), and the red curves (left) are for the convective mantle. As in Fig. 4, the starting composition for the mantle was chosen to have an enstatite chondrite-like δ15N (ref. 6), and various initial N abundances. A critical result of the model is that varying fluxes can easily match the N abundances for the mantle and the surface, as well as the isotope composition of N in the surface. However, similar to the case where constant fluxes are used (Fig. 4), relatively high subduction fluxes pushes the N isotope cycle towards a steady state in which the mantle would have a higher average δ15N value than that of the surface, contrary to the relationship observed today. The model shown as Case 3 provides an acceptable match to the modern observations, where the mantle has a δ15N value of −1‰, after starting at −40‰. However, this predicts that the mantle evolves considerably through time in terms of δ15N. Thus, if correct, this prediction requires all peridotitic diamonds to be formed in roughly the past 500 Myr. However, peridotitic diamonds found in cratonic lithospheres as old as 3.3 Gyr old are dominated by a δ15N mode at −5‰ (ref. 18), seemingly ruling out the Case 3 model.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table 1

Nitrogen and noble gas data for the springs and fumaroles studied. All the nitrogen data were acquired at UCLA. Noble gas data were acquired in various labs (see legend).

Supplementary Table 2

Nitrogen and noble gas data for cratonic samples studied here (see supplementary discussion). All the nitrogen isotope data were acquired at UCLA. Noble gas data were acquired at the university of Toronto (see legend).

Supplementary Table 3

Nitrogen isotope data for air standards of varying sizes. Data were acquired at UCLA over the course of this study.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Labidi, J., Barry, P.H., Bekaert, D.V. et al. Hydrothermal 15N15N abundances constrain the origins of mantle nitrogen. Nature 580, 367–371 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2173-4

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.