Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Elpistostege and the origin of the vertebrate hand

An Author Correction to this article was published on 08 July 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

The evolution of fishes to tetrapods (four-limbed vertebrates) was one of the most important transformations in vertebrate evolution. Hypotheses of tetrapod origins rely heavily on the anatomy of a few tetrapod-like fish fossils from the Middle and Late Devonian period (393–359 million years ago)1. These taxa—known as elpistostegalians—include Panderichthys2, Elpistostege3,4 and Tiktaalik1,5, none of which has yet revealed the complete skeletal anatomy of the pectoral fin. Here we report a 1.57-metre-long articulated specimen of Elpistostege watsoni from the Upper Devonian period of Canada, which represents—to our knowledge—the most complete elpistostegalian yet found. High-energy computed tomography reveals that the skeleton of the pectoral fin has four proximodistal rows of radials (two of which include branched carpals) as well as two distal rows that are organized as digits and putative digits. Despite this skeletal pattern (which represents the most tetrapod-like arrangement of bones found in a pectoral fin to date), the fin retains lepidotrichia (fin rays) distal to the radials. We suggest that the vertebrate hand arose primarily from a skeletal pattern buried within the fairly typical aquatic pectoral fin of elpistostegalians. Elpistostege is potentially the sister taxon of all other tetrapods, and its appendages further blur the line between fish and land vertebrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Complete specimen of E. watsoni MHNM 06-2067.
Fig. 2: Pectoral girdle and fin of E. watsoni MHNM 06-2067.
Fig. 3: Pectoral fin of E. watsoni MHNM 06-2067.
Fig. 4: Comparative anatomy of pectoral limb endoskeleton and humerus of stem-tetrapod fish and early tetrapods.
Fig. 5: Phylogenetic analyses of elpistostegalian relationships, based on undated Bayesian and parsimony approaches.

Data availability

Morphological data are deposited in MorphoBank at https://morphobank.org/index.php/Projects/ProjectOverview/project_id/3480. The complete character-by-taxon matrix, PAUP* and MrBayes scripts as well as full trees are presented in the Supplementary Information and available to download as source data files.

Change history

References

  1. Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H. & Jenkins, F. A. Jr. A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature 440, 757–763 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vorobyeva, E. & Schultze, H.-P. in Origins of the Higher Groups of Tetrapods. Controversy and Consensus (eds Schultze, H.-P. & Trueb, L.) 68–109 (Cornell Univ. Press, 1991).

  3. Schultze, H.-P. & Arsenault, M. The panderichthyid fish Elpistostege: a close relative of tetrapods? Palaeontology 28, 293–309 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Westoll, T. S. Ancestry of the tetrapods. Nature 141, 127–128 (1938).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Jenkins, F. A. Jr. The pectoral fin of Tiktaalik roseae and the origin of the tetrapod limb. Nature 440, 764–771 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clément, G. & Lebedev, O. Revision of the early tetrapod Obruchevichthys Vorobyeva, 1977 from the Frasnian (Upper Devonian) of the north-western East European platform. Paleontol. J. 48, 1082–1091 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ahlberg, P. E. Elginerpeton pancheni and the earliest tetrapod clade. Nature 373, 420–425 (1995).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Niedźwiedzki, G., Szrek, P., Narkiewicz, K., Narkiewicz, M. & Ahlberg, P. E. Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian period of Poland. Nature 463, 43–48 (2010).

    PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boisvert, C. A. The pelvic fin and girdle of Panderichthys and the origin of tetrapod locomotion. Nature 438, 1145–1147 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Jenkins, F. A. in Great Transformations in Vertebrate Evolution (eds Dial, K.P. et al.) 70–83 (Univ. of Chicago Press, 2015).

  11. Hohn-Schulte, B., Preuschoft, H., Witzel, U. & Distler-Hoffmann, C. Biomechanics and functional preconditions for terrestrial lifestyle in basal tetrapods, with special consideration of Tiktaalik roseae. Hist. Biol. 25, 167–181 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Callier, V., Clack, J. A. & Ahlberg, P. E. Contrasting developmental trajectories in the earliest known tetrapod forelimbs. Science 324, 364–367 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clack, J. A. Devonian climate change, breathing, and the origin of the tetrapod stem group. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 510–523 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brazeau, M. D. & Ahlberg, P. E. Tetrapod-like middle ear architecture in a Devonian fish. Nature 439, 318–321 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Downs, J. P., Daeschler, E. B., Jenkins, F. A. Jr & Shubin, N. H. The cranial endoskeleton of Tiktaalik roseae. Nature 455, 925–929 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Clack, J. A. Gaining Ground: the Origin and Evolution of Tetrapods (Indiana Univ. Press, 2012).

  17. Lee, M. S. Y. Stability of higher taxa in phylogenetic nomenclature - some comments on Moore (1998). Zool. Scr. 28, 361–366 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Anderson, J. S. Use of well-known names in phylogenetic nomenclature: a reply to Laurin. Syst. Biol. 51, 822–827 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boisvert, C. A., Mark-Kurik, E. & Ahlberg, P. E. The pectoral fin of Panderichthys and the origin of digits. Nature 456, 636–638 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Boisvert, C. A. The humerus of Panderichthys in three dimensions and its significance in the context of the fish-tetrapod transition. Acta Zoologica 90, 297–305 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vorobyeva, E. I. & Tsessarskii, A. A. The evolution of vertebrae in rhipidistians. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 67, 735–747 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Witzmann, F. Morphological and histological changes of dermal scales during the fish-to-tetrapod transition. Acta Zoologica 92, 281–302 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Jenkins, F. A. Jr. Pelvic girdle and fin of Tiktaalik roseae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 893–899 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Béchard, I., Arsenault, F., Cloutier, R. & Kerr, J. The Devonian placoderm fish Bothriolepis canadensis revisited with three-dimensional digital imagery. Palaeontol. Electronica 17, 1–19 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Long, J. A. The structure and relationships of a new osteolepiform fish from the Late Devonian of Victoria, Australia. Alcheringa 9, 1–22 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Coates, M. I. The Devonian tetrapod Acanthostega gunnari Jarvik: postcranial anatomy, basal tetrapod interrelationships and patterns of skeletal evolution. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci. 87, 363–421 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ahlberg, P. E., Luksevics, E. & Lebedev, O. The first tetrapod finds from the Devonian (Upper Famennian) of Latvia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 343, 303–328 (1994).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cloutier, R. & Arratia, G. in Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates (eds Arratia, G. et al.) 217–270 (Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, 2004).

  29. Clack, J. A. New material of the early tetrapod Acanthostega from the Upper Devonian of East Greenland. Palaeontology 31, 699–724 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ahlberg, P. E., Clack, J. A., Luksevics, E., Blom, H. & Zupiņs, I. Ventastega curonica and the origin of tetrapod morphology. Nature 453, 1199–1204 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lebedev, O. A. & Coates, M. I. The postcranial skeleton of the Devonian tetrapod Tulerpeton curtum Lebedev. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 114, 307–348 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carroll, R. L. & Holmes, R. B. in Fins to Limbs. Evolution, Development, and Transformation (ed. Hall, B.K.) 185–224 (The Chicago Univ. Press, 2007).

  33. Cuervo, R., Hernández-Martínez, R., Chimal-Monroy, J., Merchant-Larios, H. & Covarrubias, L. Full regeneration of the tribasal Polypterus fin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3838–3843 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Andrews, S. M. & Westoll, T. S. The postcranial skeleton of Eusthenopteron foordi Whiteaves. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 68, 207–329 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ahlberg, P. E. in Studies on Fossil Tetrapods (eds Barrett, P.M. & Milner, A.R.) 17–29 (The Palaeontological Association, 2011).

  36. Holland, T. Pectoral girdle and fin anatomy of Gogonasus andrewsae Long, 1985: implications for tetrapodomorph limb evolution. J. Morphol. 274, 147–164 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Coates, M. I. The origin of vertebrate limbs. Dev. Suppl. 1, 169–180 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stewart, T. A., Bhat, R. & Newman, S. A. The evolutionary origin of digit patterning. Evodevo 8, 21 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Johanson, Z. et al. Fish fingers: digit homologues in sarcopterygian fish fins. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 308B, 757–768 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gehrke, A. R. et al. Deep conservation of wrist and digit enhancers in fish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 803–808 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. Woltering, J. M., Noordermeer, D., Leleu, M. & Duboule, D. Conservation and divergence of regulatory strategies at Hox loci and the origin of tetrapod digits. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001773 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Nakamura, T., Gehrke, A. R., Lemberg, J., Szymaszek, J. & Shubin, N. H. Digits and fin rays share common developmental histories. Nature 537, 225–228 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Godfrey, S. J. The postcranial skeletal anatomy of the Carboniferous tetrapod Greererpeton burkemorani Romer, 1969. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 323, 75–133 (1989).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. Cope, E. D. On the phylogeny of the Vertebrata. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 30, 278–281 (1892).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Standen, E. M., Du, T. Y. & Larsson, H. C. E. Developmental plasticity and the origin of tetrapods. Nature 513, 54–58 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhu, M., Ahlberg, P. E., Zhao, W. J. & Jia, L. T. A Devonian tetrapod-like fish reveals substantial parallelism in stem tetrapod evolution. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1470–1476 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Swartz, B. A marine stem-tetrapod from the Devonian of western North America. PLoS ONE 7, e33683 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Swofford, D. L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analyses Using Parsimony (*And Other Methods) (Sinauer Associates, 2003).

  49. Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Shubin, N. H., Daeschler, E. B. & Coates, M. I. The early evolution of the tetrapod humerus. Science 304, 90–93 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Parc National de Miguasha—especially O. Matton, J. Kerr and F. Charest—for the loan of the specimen, and the special opportunity to work on this material; J. Willet for the skilful mechanical preparation of the specimen; A. E. Latimer and T. Senden for access to high-resolution micro-computed tomography; M. Coates and T. Grünbaum for comments and suggestions; S. Cumbaa for providing access to a Tiktaalik cast at the Canadian Museum of Nature; E. B. Daeschler and N. H. Shubin for discussions and providing us with casts of the skull, pectoral girdle and fin of Tiktaalik; and the Centre de Développement et de Recherche en Imagerie Numérique (CDRIN) for providing access to computer facilities The X-ray high-energy tomography was done by M. Colbert and J. A. Maisano. Some images were provided by J. Kerr and C. Rodrigue. This work was funded by a Research Laboratory in Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology at UQAR (Power Corporation), a Chantier 3 grant from Ministry of Education, Leasure, and Sports (Government of Québec) to R.C. and I.B., Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) discovery grants to R.C., and Flinders University international exchange grant to R.C. J.A.L. and M.S.Y.L. acknowledge an Australian Research Council (ARC) DP grant; J.A.L. also acknowledges Flinders Strategic Professor Fund for travel to Canada in 2014/2016.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.C. conceived the project. A.M.C., I.B., R.N. and V.R. performed the image processing, including computerized tomography restorations. R.C. and J.A.L. defined the phylogenetic characters and coded the matrix. M.S.Y.L. and R.C. conducted the phylogenetic analyses. R.C. and J.A.L. discussed the results and prepared the manuscript, with input from M.S.Y.L. and A.M.C. J.A.L. prepared the illustrations from images provided by R.C., A.M.C., V.R. and I.B.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Cloutier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Per Ahlberg and Marcus Davis for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Complete specimen of E. watsoni MHNM 06-2067, with close-up views of skull, anocleithrum and supracleithrum, and pectoral fins.

a, Complete prepared specimen in dorsal view (high-resolution image). b, Close-up view of main skull block 8, showing spiracles and tabular horns. Photograph with ammonium chloride whitening. c, Close-up view of right anocleithrum and supracleithrum (scl). Photograph with ammonium chloride whitening. d, Ventral view of pectoral fins from blocks 8, 9 and 10.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Pectoral-fin endoskeleton of E. watsoni MHNM 06-2067, restored using Mimics v.18 from micro-computed tomography data.

af, Views of the left humerus: a, dorsal; b, preaxial (anteroventral); c, oblique preaxial; d, ventral; e, dorsal; f, ventral (distal) view. g, h, Close-up view of distal pectoral-fin elements in ventral (g) and dorsal (h) views. cap, caput humeri; d.rad, distal radials; ect.f, ectepicondyle foramen; h.r, humeral ridge; lat.d, latissimus dorsi process; m.pec, pectoralis muscle; rad, radius; rad. 1–6, preaxial–postaxial radial rows 1–6; rad.f, radial facet; sh.d, scapula–humeral depression; ul.f, ulnar facet.

Extended Data Fig. 3 E. watsoni lower jaw features restored from micro-computed tomography data.

a, b, MHNM 06-2067 in lateral view. a, Whole jaw. b, Close-up view of anterior region, individual bones and teeth segmented using Mimics v.18. c, d, MHNM 06-538, left lower jaw in dorsal view (c), and right lower jaw and symphyseal area of left jaw in dorsal view (d), volume rendered using Drishti v.2.6. ad.f, adsymphysial fang; adp, adsymphysial plate; cor.f, coronoid fang; den.f, dentary fang; pmx, premaxilla; pra, prearticular; sym, symphysis.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Phylogenetic relationships of Elpistostege and other tetrapodomorphs.

Core tetrapods shown in red, elpistostegalian-grade taxa in blue and outgroups in grey. a, Undated Bayesian analysis using MrBayes49. Majority-rule consensus of 32,000 post-burnin trees (mean log-likelihood of 1,694.88). Numbers at nodes refer to posterior probabilities. See Supplementary Information for full details of analysis, and the executable MrBayes script. b, Parsimony analysis using PAUP*48. Strict consensus of all 216 most-parsimonious trees (445 steps). Numbers at nodes denote bootstrap percentages, based on 200 replicates. See Supplementary Information for full details of analysis and the executable PAUP* script.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains phylogenetic data, methods used and character coding discussions.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

MrBayes executable file (including formatted data), screen log, and consensus tree in Nexus/FigTree format. Multiple files (zipped).

Supplementary Data 2

PAUP executable files, all 216 MPTs, and consensus tree in Nexus/FigTree tree. Multiple files (zipped).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cloutier, R., Clement, A.M., Lee, M.S.Y. et al. Elpistostege and the origin of the vertebrate hand. Nature 579, 549–554 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2100-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2100-8

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing