Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Investigation of the fine structure of antihydrogen

An Author Correction to this article was published on 18 May 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

At the historic Shelter Island Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in 1947, Willis Lamb reported an unexpected feature in the fine structure of atomic hydrogen: a separation of the 2S1/2 and 2P1/2 states1. The observation of this separation, now known as the Lamb shift, marked an important event in the evolution of modern physics, inspiring others to develop the theory of quantum electrodynamics2,3,4,5. Quantum electrodynamics also describes antimatter, but it has only recently become possible to synthesize and trap atomic antimatter to probe its structure. Mirroring the historical development of quantum atomic physics in the twentieth century, modern measurements on anti-atoms represent a unique approach for testing quantum electrodynamics and the foundational symmetries of the standard model. Here we report measurements of the fine structure in the n = 2 states of antihydrogen, the antimatter counterpart of the hydrogen atom. Using optical excitation of the 1S–2P Lyman-α transitions in antihydrogen6, we determine their frequencies in a magnetic field of 1 tesla to a precision of 16 parts per billion. Assuming the standard Zeeman and hyperfine interactions, we infer the zero-field fine-structure splitting (2P1/2–2P3/2) in antihydrogen. The resulting value is consistent with the predictions of quantum electrodynamics to a precision of 2 per cent. Using our previously measured value of the 1S–2S transition frequency6,7, we find that the classic Lamb shift in antihydrogen (2S1/2–2P1/2 splitting at zero field) is consistent with theory at a level of 11 per cent. Our observations represent an important step towards precision measurements of the fine structure and the Lamb shift in the antihydrogen spectrum as tests of the charge–parity–time symmetry8 and towards the determination of other fundamental quantities, such as the antiproton charge radius9,10, in this antimatter system.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Expected antihydrogen energy levels.
Fig. 2: The ALPHA-2 central apparatus.
Fig. 3: 1S–2P fine-structure spectrum of antihydrogen.
Fig. 4: Comparison of antihydrogen and hydrogen transition frequencies.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from J.S.H. on reasonable request.

Change history

References

  1. 1.

    Lamb, W. E., Jr & Retherford, R. C. Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method. Phys. Rev. 72, 241–243 (1947).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tomonaga, S. On a relativistically invariant formulation of the quantum theory of wave fields. Prog. Theor. Phys. 1, 27–42 (1946).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Schwinger, J. On quantum-electrodynamics and the magnetic moment of the electron. Phys. Rev. 73, 416–417 (1948).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Feynman, R. P. Space–time approach to quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. 76, 769–789 (1949).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Schweber, S. S. QED and the Men who Made it: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger, and Tomonaga (Princeton Univ. Press, 1994).

  6. 6.

    Ahmadi, M. et al. Observation of the 1S–2P Lyman-α transition in antihydrogen. Nature 561, 211–215 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ahmadi, M. et al. Characterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen. Nature 557, 71–75 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kostelecký, V. A. & Vargas, A. J. Lorentz and CPT tests with hydrogen, antihydrogen, and related systems. Phys. Rev. D 92, 056002 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Crivelli, P., Cooke, D. & Heiss, M. W. Antiproton charge radius. Phys. Rev. D 94, 052008 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Eriksson, S. Precision measurements on trapped antihydrogen in the ALPHA experiment. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A 376 20170268 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dirac, P. A. M. The quantum theory of the electron. Proc. R. Soc. A 117, 610–624 (1928).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kinoshita, T. Quantum Electrodynamics (World Scientific, 1990).

  13. 13.

    Karshenboim, S. G. Precision physics of simple atoms: QED tests, nuclear structure and fundamental constants. Phys. Rep. 422, 1–63 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Brodsky, S. J. & Parsons, R. G. Precise theory of the Zeeman spectrum for atomic hydrogen and deuterium and the Lamb shift. Phys. Rev. 163, 134–146 (1967).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ahmadi, M. et al. Antihydrogen accumulation for fundamental symmetry tests. Nat. Commun. 8, 681 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Capra, A. & ALPHA Collaboration. Lifetime of magnetically trapped antihydrogen in ALPHA. Hyperfine Interact. 240, 9 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ahmadi, M. et al. Observation of the hyperfine spectrum of antihydrogen. Nature 548, 66–69 (2017); erratum 553, 530 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Michan, J. M., Polovy, G., Madison, K. W., Fujiwara, M. C. & Momose, T. Narrowband solid state VUV coherent source for laser cooling of antihydrogen. Hyperfine Interact. 235, 29–36 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Andresen, G. B. et al. Trapped antihydrogen. Nature 468, 673–676 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Andresen, G. B. et al. Confinement of antihydrogen for 1,000 seconds. Nat. Phys. 7, 558–564 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ahmadi, M. et al. Observation of the 1S–2S transition in trapped antihydrogen. Nature 541, 506–510 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ahmadi, M. et al. Enhanced control and reproducibility of non-neutral plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 025001 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Maury, S. The antiproton decelerator: AD. Hyperfine Interact. 109, 43–52 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Murphy, T. J. & Surko, C. M. Positron trapping in an electrostatic well by inelastic collisions with nitrogen molecules. Phys. Rev. A 46, 5696–5705 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Surko, C. M., Greaves, R. G. & Charlton, M. Stored positrons for antihydrogen production. Hyperfine Interact. 109, 181–188 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Luiten, O. J. et al. Lyman-α spectroscopy of magnetically trapped atomic hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 544–547 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Eikema, K. S. E., Walz, J. & Hänsch, T. W. Continuous coherent Lyman-α excitation of atomic hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5679–5682 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gabrielse, G. et al. Lyman-α source for laser cooling antihydrogen. Opt. Lett. 43, 2905–2908 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Stracka, S. Real-time detection of antihydrogen annihilations and applications to spectroscopy. EPJ Web Conf. 71, 00126 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Donnan, P. H., Fujiwara, M. C. & Robicheaux, F. A proposal for laser cooling antihydrogen atoms. J. Phys. B 46, 025302 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pohl, R. et al. The size of the proton. Nature 466, 213–216 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Beyer, A. et al. The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen. Science 358, 79–85 (2017).

    ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Fleurbaey, H. et al. New measurement of the transition frequency of hydrogen: contribution to the proton charge radius puzzle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 183001 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    The ALPHA Collaboration & Charman, A. E. Description and first application of a new technique to measure the gravitational mass of antihydrogen. Nat. Commun. 4, 1785 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Amole, C. et al. In situ electromagnetic field diagnostics with an electron plasma in a Penning–Malmberg trap. New J. Phys. 16, 013037 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rasmussen, C. Ø., Madsen, N. & Robicheaux, F. Aspects of 1S–2S spectroscopy of trapped antihydrogen atoms. J. Phys. B 50, 184002 (2017); corrigendum 51 099501 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Melezhik, V. S. & Schmelcher, P. Quantum energy flow in atomic ions moving in magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1870–1873 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kramida, A. E. A critical compilation of experimental data on spectral lines and energy levels of hydrogen, deuterium, and tritium. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 96, 586–644 (2010); erratum 126, 295–298 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mohr, P. J., Newell, D. B. & Taylor, B. N. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035009 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Parthey, C. G. et al. Improved measurement of the hydrogen 1S–2S transition frequency. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 203001 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lundeen, S. R. & Pipkin, F. M. Measurement of the Lamb shift in hydrogen n = 2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 232–235 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hagley, E. W. & Pipkin, F. M. Separated oscillatory field measurement of hydrogen 2S1/2–2P3/2 fine structure interval. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1172–1175 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by: the European Research Council through its Advanced Grant programme (J.S.H.); CNPq, FAPERJ, RENAFAE (Brazil); NSERC, ALPHA-g/CRUCS CFI, NRC/TRIUMF, EHPDS/EHDRS (Canada); FNU (Nice Centre), Carlsberg Foundation (Denmark); ISF (Israel); STFC, EPSRC, the Royal Society and the Leverhulme Trust (UK); DOE, NSF (USA); and VR (Sweden). We are grateful for the efforts of the CERN AD team, without which these experiments could not have taken place. We thank P. Djuricanin (University of British Columbia) for extensive help with the laser system and calibrations. We thank J. Tonoli and the CERN staff, as well as T. Mittertreiner and the UBC staff, for extensive, time-critical help with machining and electrical works. We thank the staff of the Superconducting Magnet Division at Brookhaven National Laboratory for collaboration and for the fabrication of the trapping magnets. We thank C. Marshall (TRIUMF) for work on the ALPHA-2 cryostat. We thank F. Besenbacher (Aarhus) for timely support in procuring the ALPHA-2 external solenoid. We thank T. Miller (Ohio) for advice on the initial development of the pulsed laser system. We thank A. Kostelecky and G. Drake for discussions on the theoretical aspects of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Consortia

Contributions

This study was based on data collected using the ALPHA-2 antihydrogen trapping apparatus, designed and constructed by the ALPHA Collaboration using methods developed by the entire collaboration. The entire collaboration participated in the operation of the apparatus and the data-taking activities. Pulsed Lyman-α spectroscopy was first proposed by M.C.F. and developed further by T.M., F.R., J.M.M., R.C., A.E., A.K. and M.C.F. The original laser was designed by T.M. and tested by J.M.M. and T.M. The laser system at CERN was implemented, commissioned and operated by J.M.M., R.C., A.E., A.K. and T.M. The simulation program for laser interaction with magnetically trapped atoms was developed by F.R. The microwave techniques and ECR magnetometry were developed by T.F., M.E.H. and W.N.H. The positron accumulator is the responsibility of C.J.B., M.C., M.S., C.A.I. and D.P.v.d.W. The annihilation detector system was developed by A.C., M.C.F., D.R.G., L.K., J.T.K.M., S.M., K.O., A.O. and P.P. Detailed analysis of the antiproton annihilation detector data was done by J.T.K.M., A.E. and A.O. The frequency determination and the evaluation of its uncertainty was performed by T.M., M.C.F., A.K., A.E., R.C., R.I.T. and A.O. The manuscript was written by T.M., M.C.F. and J.S.H., with significant input from A.K., R.C., A.E., A.O., J.T.K.M., M.E.H., N.M., C.Ø.R. and F.R. The manuscript was edited and improved by the entire collaboration.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. C. Fujiwara or J. S. Hangst or T. Momose.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Determination of transition frequencies.

ad, For each series, the experimental data (filled black circles with error bars) are plotted with fits of various models (red lines) discussed in Methods. The experimental data are normalized to the total number of the detected antihydrogen atoms and a laser power of 5 nW. Also shown are the results of standard simulations (open blue squares with error bars), similarly normalized to the total number of simulated atoms, illustrating the degree of agreement between the data and the simulations, without any tuning parameters. Some discrepancies in the amplitudes can be observed, which may point to errors in our laser power estimates. We note that because our frequency-fitting procedure allows variations in the relative amplitudes, the fits are largely insensitive to the amplitude differences (Methods). Error bars represent 1σ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

The ALPHA Collaboration. Investigation of the fine structure of antihydrogen. Nature 578, 375–380 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2006-5

Download citation

Further reading

  • Considerations about photons and antiphotons

    • Martin Rivas

    Indian Journal of Physics (2021)

  • Laser cooling of antihydrogen atoms

    • C. J. Baker
    • , W. Bertsche
    • , A. Capra
    • , C. Carruth
    • , C. L. Cesar
    • , M. Charlton
    • , A. Christensen
    • , R. Collister
    • , A. Cridland Mathad
    • , S. Eriksson
    • , A. Evans
    • , N. Evetts
    • , J. Fajans
    • , T. Friesen
    • , M. C. Fujiwara
    • , D. R. Gill
    • , P. Grandemange
    • , P. Granum
    • , J. S. Hangst
    • , W. N. Hardy
    • , M. E. Hayden
    • , D. Hodgkinson
    • , E. Hunter
    • , C. A. Isaac
    • , M. A. Johnson
    • , J. M. Jones
    • , S. A. Jones
    • , S. Jonsell
    • , A. Khramov
    • , P. Knapp
    • , L. Kurchaninov
    • , N. Madsen
    • , D. Maxwell
    • , J. T. K. McKenna
    • , S. Menary
    • , J. M. Michan
    • , T. Momose
    • , P. S. Mullan
    • , J. J. Munich
    • , K. Olchanski
    • , A. Olin
    • , J. Peszka
    • , A. Powell
    • , P. Pusa
    • , C. Ø. Rasmussen
    • , F. Robicheaux
    • , R. L. Sacramento
    • , M. Sameed
    • , E. Sarid
    • , D. M. Silveira
    • , D. M. Starko
    • , C. So
    • , G. Stutter
    • , T. D. Tharp
    • , A. Thibeault
    • , R. I. Thompson
    • , D. P. van der Werf
    •  & J. S. Wurtele

    Nature (2021)

  • Fundamental symmetry tested using antihydrogen

    • Randolf Pohl

    Nature (2020)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing