Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Gram-scale bottom-up flash graphene synthesis


Most bulk-scale graphene is produced by a top-down approach, exfoliating graphite, which often requires large amounts of solvent with high-energy mixing, shearing, sonication or electrochemical treatment1,2,3. Although chemical oxidation of graphite to graphene oxide promotes exfoliation, it requires harsh oxidants and leaves the graphene with a defective perforated structure after the subsequent reduction step3,4. Bottom-up synthesis of high-quality graphene is often restricted to ultrasmall amounts if performed by chemical vapour deposition or advanced synthetic organic methods, or it provides a defect-ridden structure if carried out in bulk solution4,5,6. Here we show that flash Joule heating of inexpensive carbon sources—such as coal, petroleum coke, biochar, carbon black, discarded food, rubber tyres and mixed plastic waste—can afford gram-scale quantities of graphene in less than one second. The product, named flash graphene (FG) after the process used to produce it, shows turbostratic arrangement (that is, little order) between the stacked graphene layers. FG synthesis uses no furnace and no solvents or reactive gases. Yields depend on the carbon content of the source; when using a high-carbon source, such as carbon black, anthracitic coal or calcined coke, yields can range from 80 to 90 per cent with carbon purity greater than 99 per cent. No purification steps are necessary. Raman spectroscopy analysis shows a low-intensity or absent D band for FG, indicating that FG has among the lowest defect concentrations reported so far for graphene, and confirms the turbostratic stacking of FG, which is clearly distinguished from turbostratic graphite. The disordered orientation of FG layers facilitates its rapid exfoliation upon mixing during composite formation. The electric energy cost for FG synthesis is only about 7.2 kilojoules per gram, which could render FG suitable for use in bulk composites of plastic, metals, plywood, concrete and other building materials.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: FG synthesized from various carbon sources.
Fig. 2: FJH critical parameters.
Fig. 3: Molecular dynamics simulations.
Fig. 4: Scaling up and applications of CB-FG.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Allen, M. J., Tung, V. C. & Kaner, R. B. Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem. Rev. 110, 132–145 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yi, M. & Shen, Z. A review on mechanical exfoliation for the scalable production of graphene. J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 11700–11715 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hernandez, Y. et al. High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 563–568 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Eda, G., Fanchini, G. & Chhowalla, M. Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 270–274 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Li, D. et al. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 101–105 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lin, L., Peng, H. & Liu, Z. Synthesis challenges for graphene industry. Nat. Mater. 18, 520–524 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ferrari, A. C. et al. Raman spectrum of graphene and graphene layers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187401 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ferrari, A. C. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun. 143, 47–57 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Malard, L. M., Pimenta, M. A., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 473, 51–87 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ni, Z. H. et al. Probing charged impurities in suspended graphene using Raman spectroscopy. ACS Nano 3, 569–574 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Garlow, J. A. et al. Large-area growth of turbostratic graphene on Ni (111) via physical vapor deposition. Sci. Rep. 6, 19804 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Niilisk, A. et al. Raman characterization of stacking in multi-layer graphene grown on Ni. Carbon 98, 658–665 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li, Z. Q. et al. X-ray diffraction patterns of graphite and turbostratic carbon. Carbon 45, 1686–1695 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Franklin, R. E. Crystallite growth in graphitizing and non-graphitizing carbons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 209, 196–218 (1951).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stankovich, S. et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45, 1558–1565 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Cai, M., Thorpe, D., Adamson, D. H. & Schniepp, H. C. Methods of graphite exfoliation. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 24992–25002 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Miandad, R. et al. Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste: moving toward pyrolysis based biorefineries. Front. Energy Res. 7, 27 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gibb, B. C. Plastics are forever. Nat. Chem. 11, 394–395 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Parfitt, J., Barthel, M. & Macnaughton, S. Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 3065–3081 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Gustavsson, J., Cederberg, C., Sonesson, U., van Otterdijk, R. & Meybeck, A. Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention (FAO, 2011);

  21. 21.

    Jambeck, J. R. et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347, 768–771 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yao, Y. et al. Carbothermal shock synthesis of high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles. Science 359, 1489–1494 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Advincula, P. A. et al. Accommodating volume change and imparting thermal conductivity by encapsulation of phase change materials in carbon nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 2461–2467 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chakrabarti, A. et al. Conversion of carbon dioxide to few-layer graphene. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 9491–9493 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lin, J. et al. Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat. Commun. 5, 5714 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nepal, A., Singh, G. P., Flanders, B. N. & Sorensen, C. M. One-step synthesis of graphene via catalyst-free gas-phase hydrocarbon detonation. Nanotechnology 24, 245602 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Huang, J. Y. et al. Real-time observation of tubule formation from amorphous carbon nanowires under high-bias Joule heating. Nano Lett. 6, 1699–1705 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Harris, P. J. F. Engineering carbon materials with electricity. Carbon 122, 504–513 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Luong, D. X. et al. Laser-induced graphene fibers. Carbon 126 472–479 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Stuart, S. J., Tutein, A. B. & Harrison, J. A. A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 6472–6486 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Brenner, D. W. et al. A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 783–802 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xu, Y. et al. Liquid-phase exfoliation of graphene: an overview on exfoliation media, techniques, and challenges. Nanomaterials 8, 942 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    O’Neill, A., Khan, U., Nirmalraj, P. N., Boland, J. & Coleman, J. N. Graphene dispersion and exfoliation in low boiling point solvents. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 5422–5428 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Dong, L. et al. A non-dispersion strategy for large-scale production of ultra-high concentration graphene slurries in water. Nat. Commun. 9, 76 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Liu, J., Li, Q. & Xu, S. Reinforcing mechanism of graphene and graphene oxide sheets on cement-based materials. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31, 04019014 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Krystek, M. et al. High-performance graphene-based cementitious composites. Adv. Sci. 6, 1801195 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank G. A. Lopez Silva for preparing the schematic of the FJH process, J. Li for preparing the olive oil soot, Oxbow Calcining International LLC for donating the calcined coke, Ergon Asphalt and Emulsions, Inc. for donating the rubber-tyre-derived carbon black, and Neroval LLC for donating the biochar. K.V.B. and B.I.Y. thank the National Science Foundation (NSF) for support (CBET-1605848) and B. Sastri of the US Department of Energy for discussions. R.S. thanks the partial support of NSF-DMR 1709051. J.M.T. thanks the US Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-19-1-0296) for support.

Author information




D.X.L. discovered the FJH conversion of carbon materials to graphene, designed and built the FJH apparatus, designed and built the spectrometer for temperature determination, acquired most of the data, and wrote most of the manuscript. K.V.B. conducted the mechanistic theory calculations under the guidance of B.I.Y. W.A.A. and P.A.A. fabricated some FG samples, and blended and tested the polymer blends. M.G.S. obtained the SEM images and wrote parts of Supplementary Information, especially regarding FG morphology. C.K. assisted with the design of the FG apparatus and the spectrometer, and wrote parts of Supplementary Information regarding turbostratic graphene. R.V.S. obtained most of the TEM images and all of the selected-area electron diffraction data. W.C. and H.G. obtained some of the TEM images. M.R. built and tested the lithium-ion capacitor. C.K. and V.M. assisted D.X.L. in the design and safety features of the FJH system. E.A.M. performed the thermogravimetric analysis. Z.W. obtained the surface area. M.B. obtained the cement and polymer composite data under the guidance of R.S. All aspects of the research were overseen by J.M.T., who co-wrote some sections of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rouzbeh Shahsavari or Boris I. Yakobson or James M. Tour.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The FG synthesis process is the intellectual property of Rice University. J.M.T., D.X.L. and V.M. will be stockholders in Universal Matter Ltd, a company licensing the FG intellectual property of Rice University and scaling up this process. At the time of the writing and submission of this manuscript, the license to Universal Matter has not been consummated. C-Crete Technologies owns intellectual property on the strengthening of graphene–cement/concrete composites. V.M. is now employed by Universal Matter. D.X.L. and J.M.T. will remain full time with Rice University, whereas D.X.L. might be employed by Universal Matter in two years. All conflicts of interest for J.M.T. and D.X.L. are managed through regular disclosure to the Rice University Office of Sponsored Programs and Research Compliance.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Loh Kian Ping and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures 1–21 and Supplementary Tables 1–3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luong, D.X., Bets, K.V., Algozeeb, W.A. et al. Gram-scale bottom-up flash graphene synthesis. Nature 577, 647–651 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing