Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Publisher Correction: Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution

The Original Article was published on 18 November 2020

Correction to: Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2908-2 Published online 18 November 2020

In Fig. 2b of the print version of this Article, owing to a production error, the horizontal axis was labelled 5, 10, 1, 520 and 25 rather than 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25. The online versions (HTML, PDF) are correct so the Article has not been corrected online.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Detre Teschner or Travis E. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nong, H.N., Falling, L.J., Bergmann, A. et al. Publisher Correction: Key role of chemistry versus bias in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nature 589, E8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03141-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03141-3

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing