Among extant vertebrates, mammals are distinguished by having a chain of three auditory ossicles (the malleus, incus and stapes) that transduce sound waves and promote an increased range of audible—especially high—frequencies1. By contrast, the homologous bones in early fossil mammals and relatives also functioned in chewing through their bony attachments to the lower jaw2. Recent discoveries of well-preserved Mesozoic mammals have provided glimpses into the transition from the dual (masticatory and auditory) to the single auditory function for the ossicles, which is now widely accepted to have occurred at least three times in mammal evolution3,4,5,6. Here we report a skull and postcranium that we refer to the haramiyidan Vilevolodon diplomylos (dating to the Middle Jurassic epoch (160 million years ago)) and that shows excellent preservation of the malleus, incus and ectotympanic (which supports the tympanic membrane). After comparing this fossil with other Mesozoic and extant mammals, we propose that the overlapping incudomallear articulation found in this and other Mesozoic fossils, in extant monotremes and in early ontogeny in extant marsupials and placentals is a morphology that evolved in several groups of mammals in the transition from the dual to the single function for the ossicles.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Nature Communications Open Access 26 October 2023
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The specimen (IMMNH-PV01699) studied here has been deposited in the Inner Mongolia Museum of Natural History. The data matrix for the phylogenetic analysis is deposited in MorphoBank (project number 3760); computed tomography data are deposited in MorphoSource at https://doi.org/10.17602/M2/M167344.
The Batch commands for the Bayesian analysis are included in the Supplementary Information.
Manley, G. A. & Sienknecht, U. J. in The Middle Ear: Science, Otosurgery and Technology (eds Puria, S. et al.) 7–30 (Springer, 2013).
Allin, E. F. & Hopson, J. A. in The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing (eds Webster, D. B. et al.) 587–614 (Springer, 1992).
Han, G., Mao, F., Bi, S., Wang, Y. & Meng, J. A Jurassic gliding euharamiyidan mammal with an ear of five auditory bones. Nature 551, 451–456 (2017).
Luo, Z.-X. et al. New evidence for mammaliaform ear evolution and feeding adaptation in a Jurassic ecosystem. Nature 548, 326–329 (2017).
Wang, H., Meng, J. & Wang, Y. Cretaceous fossil reveals a new pattern in mammalian middle ear evolution. Nature 576, 102–105 (2019).
Mao, F. et al. Integrated hearing and chewing modules decoupled in a Cretaceous stem therian mammal. Science 367, 305–308 (2020).
Luo, Z.-X. Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution. Nature 450, 1011–1019 (2007).
Meng, J. Mesozoic mammals of China: implications for phylogeny and early evolution of mammals. Natl Sci. Rev. 1, 521–542 (2014).
Zheng, X., Bi, S., Wang, X. & Meng, J. A new arboreal haramiyid shows the diversity of crown mammals in the Jurassic period. Nature 500, 199–202 (2013).
Bi, S., Wang, Y., Guan, J., Sheng, X. & Meng, J. Three new Jurassic euharamiyidan species reinforce early divergence of mammals. Nature 514, 579–584 (2014).
Meng, Q. J. et al. New gliding mammaliaforms from the Jurassic. Nature 548, 291–296 (2017).
Mao, F. Y. & Meng, J. A new haramiyidan mammal from the Jurassic Yanliao Biota and comparisons with other haramiyidans. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 186, 529–552 (2019).
Luo, Z.-X. Developmental patterns in Mesozoic evolution of mammal ears. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 355–380 (2011).
Meng, J., Wang, Y. & Li, C. Transitional mammalian middle ear from a new Cretaceous Jehol eutriconodont. Nature 472, 181–185 (2011).
Harper, T. & Rougier, G. W. Petrosal morphology and cochlear function in Mesozoic stem therians. PLoS ONE 14, e0209457 (2019).
Huttenlocker, A. K., Grossnickle, D. M., Kirkland, J. I., Schultz, J. A. & Luo, Z.-X. Late-surviving stem mammal links the lowermost Cretaceous of North America and Gondwana. Nature 558, 108–112 (2018).
Meng, J. et al. A comparative study on auditory and hyoid bones of Jurassic euharamiyidans and contrasting evidence for mammalian middle ear evolution. J. Anat. 236, 50–71 (2020).
Jenkins, F. A. Jr, Gatesy, S. M., Shubin, N. H. & Amaral, W. W. Haramiyids and Triassic mammalian evolution. Nature 385, 715–718 (1997).
Hahn, G. Neue Zähne von Haramiyiden aus der deutschen Ober-Trias und ihre Beziehungen zu den Multituberculaten. Palaeontographica Abt. A Paläozool. Stratigr. 142, 1–15 (1973).
Meng, J., Bi, S., Zheng, X. & Wang, X. Ear ossicle morphology of the Jurassic euharamiyidan Arboroharamiya and evolution of mammalian middle ear. J. Morphol. 279, 441–457 (2018).
Kermack, K. A., Mussett, F. & Rigney, H. W. The lower jaw of Morganucodon. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53, 87–175 (1973).
Mao, F., Liu, C., Chase, M. H., Smith, A. K. & Meng, J. Exploring ancestral phenotypes and evolutionary development of the mammalian middle ear based on Early Cretaceous Jehol mammals. Natl Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa188 (2020).
Kermack, K. A., Kermack, D. M., Lees, P. M. & Mills, J. R. E. New multituberculate-like teeth from the Middle Jurassic of England. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 43, 581–606 (1998).
Butler, P. M. & Hooker, J. R. New teeth of allotherian mammals from the English Bathonian, including the earliest multituberculates. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 50, 185–207 (2005).
Averianov, A. O. et al. Haramiyidan mammals from the Middle Jurassic of western Siberia, Russia. Part 1: Shenshouidae and Maiopatagium. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 39, e1669159 (2019).
Martin, T., Averianov, A. O. & Pfretzschner, H. U. Mammals from the Late Jurassic Qigu Formation in the southern Junggar Basin, Xinjiang, northwest China. Palaeobio. Palaeoenv. 90, 295–319 (2010).
Averianov, A. O. et al. A new euharamiyidan mammaliaform from the Lower Cretaceous of Yakutia, Russia. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 39, e1762089 (2020).
Krause, D. W. et al. Skeleton of a Cretaceous mammal from Madagascar reflects long-term insularity. Nature 581, 421–427 (2020).
Cifelli, R. L. & Davis, B. M. Jurassic fossils and mammalian antiquity. Nature 500, 160–161 (2013).
Bensley, B. A. On the identification of Meckelian and mylohyoid grooves in the jaws of Mesozoic and recent Mammalia. Univ. Tor. Stud. Biol. Ser. 3, 75–81 (1902).
Simpson, G. G. Mesozoic Mammalia. XII. The internal mandibular groove in Jurassic mammals. Am. J. Sci. 14, 461–470 (1928).
Burford, C. M. & Mason, M. J. Early development of the malleus and incus in humans. J. Anat. 229, 857–870 (2016).
Wible, J. R. & Spaulding, M. On the cranial osteology of the African palm civet, Nandina binotata (Gray, 1830) (Mammalia, Carnivora, Feliformia). Ann. Carnegie Mus. 82, 1–114 (2013).
Fleischer, G. Studien am Skelett des Gehörorgans der Säugetiere, einschließlich des Menschen. Saugetierkdl. Mitt. 21, 131–239 (1973).
Zeller, U. in Mammal Phylogeny: Mesozoic Differentiation, Multituberculates, Monotremes, Early Therians, and Marsupials (eds Szalay, F. S. et al.) 95–107 (Springer, 1993).
Doran, A. H. G. Morphology of the mammalian ossicula auditûs. Trans. Linnean Soc. Lond. 2nd Ser. Zool. 1, 371–497 (1878).
Luo, Z.-X., Chen, P., Li, G. & Chen, M. A new eutriconodont mammal and evolutionary development in early mammals. Nature 446, 288–293 (2007).
McClain, J. A. The development of the auditory ossicles of the opossum (Didelphys virgininia). J. Morphol. 64, 211–265 (1939).
Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Gemballa, S., Nummela, S., Smith, K. K. & Maier, W. Ontogenetic and phylogenetic transformations of the ear ossicles in marsupial mammals. J. Morphol. 251, 219–238 (2002).
Anson, B. J., Hanson, J. S. & Richany, S. F. Early embryology of the auditory ossicles and associated structures in relation to certain anomalies observed clinically. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 69, 427–447 (1960).
Whyte, J. R. et al. Fetal development of the human tympanic ossicular chain articulations. Cells Tissues Organs 171, 241–249 (2002).
Rodríguez-Vázquez, J. F., Yamamoto, M., Abe, S., Katori, Y. & Murakami, G. Development of the human incus with special reference to the detachment from the chondrocranium to be transferred into the middle ear. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 301, 1405–1415 (2018).
Anthwal, N., Fenelon, J. C., Johnston, S. D., Renfree, M. B. & Tucker, A. S. Transient role of the middle ear as a lower jaw support across mammals. eLife 9, e57860 (2020).
Luo, Z.-X., Gatesy, S. M., Jenkins, F. A., Jr, Amaral, W. W. & Shubin, N. H. Mandibular and dental characteristics of Late Triassic mammaliaform Haramiyavia and their ramifications for basal mammal evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E7101–E7109 (2015).
Luo, Z. & Crompton, A. W. Transformation of the quadrate (incus) through the transition from non-mammalian cynodonts to mammals. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 14, 341–374 (1994).
Rougier, G. W., Wible, J. R. & Novacek, M. J. Middle-ear ossicles of the multituberculate Kryptobaatar from the Mongolian Late Cretaceous: implications for the mammaliamorph relationships and the evolution of the auditory apparatus. Am. Mus. Novit. 3187, 1–43 (1996).
Goloboff, P. A., Farris, J. S. & Nixon, K. C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786 (2008).
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755 (2001).
Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129 (IEEE, 2010).
Yang, Z. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39, 306–314 (1994).
Lewis, P. O. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50, 913–925 (2001).
Wagner, P. J. Modelling rate distributions using character compatibility: implications for morphological evolution among fossil invertebrates. Biol. Lett. 8, 143–146 (2012).
Harrison, L. B. & Larsson, H. C. E. Among-character rate variation distributions in phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological characters. Syst. Biol. 64, 307–324 (2015).
Stadler, T. Sampling-through-time in birth–death trees. J. Theor. Biol. 267, 396–404 (2010).
Heath, T. A., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Stadler, T. The fossilized birth–death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E2957–E2966 (2014).
Gavryushkina, A., Welch, D., Stadler, T. & Drummond, A. J. Bayesian inference of sampled ancestor trees for epidemiology and fossil calibration. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003919 (2014).
Zhang, C., Stadler, T., Klopfstein, S., Heath, T. A. & Ronquist, F. Total-evidence dating under the fossilized birth–death process. Syst. Biol. 65, 228–249 (2016).
Cohen, K. M., Finney, S. C., Gibbard, P. L. & Fan, J.-X. The ICS international chronostratigraphic chart. Episodes 36, 199–204 (2013).
Burgin, C. J., Colella, J. P., Kahn, P. L. & Upham, N. S. How many species of mammals are there? J. Mamm. 99, 1–14 (2018).
Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).
Delignette-Muller, M. L. & Dutang, C. fitdistrplus: an R package for fitting distributions. J. Stat. Softw. 64, 1–34 (2004).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).
Gunnell, G. F. et al. Fossil lemurs from Egypt and Kenya suggest an African origin for Madagascar’s aye-aye. Nat. Commun. 9, 3193 (2018).
Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).
Hahn, G., Sigogneau-Russell, D. & Wouters, G. New data on Theroteinidae: their relations with Paulchoffatiidae and Haramiyidae. Geol. Paleontol. 23, 205–215 (1989).
King, B. & Beck, R. M. D. Tip dating supports novel resolutions of controversial relationships among early mammals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 287, 20200943 (2020).
Gates, G. R., Saunders, J. C., Bock, G. R., Aitkin, L. M. & Elliott, M. A. Peripheral auditory function in the platypus, Ornithorhynchus anatinus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56, 152–156 (1974).
Sansom, R. S., Choate, P. G., Keating, J. N. & Randle, E. Parsimony, not Bayesian analysis, recovers more stratigraphically congruent phylogenetic trees. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180263 (2018).
Hagenbach, E. Ueber ein besonderes, mit dem Hammer der Säugethiere in Verbindung stehendes Knöchelchen. Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wissensch. Medizin 1841, 46–54 (1841).
Maier, W. & Ruf, I. The anterior process of the malleus in Cetartiodactyla. J. Anat. 228, 313–323 (2016).
Broom, R. On the structure of the skull in Chrysochloris. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 86, 449–458 (1916).
We thank P. Bowden for his illustrations; S. Xie for specimen preparation; Z. Yin and T. Stecko for computed tomography scanning; and X. Xu for assistance and discussion. The study was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (41688103,41728003), the Double First-Class joint programme of Yunnan Science and Technology Department and Yunnan University (2018FY001-005), China–Myanmar Joint Laboratory for Ecological and Environmental Conservation and US National Science Foundation grant DEB 1654949.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature thanks Robin Beck, Simone Hoffmann and Guillermo Rougier for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Cladograms to illustrate various hypotheses regarding haramiyidan relationships.
The Middle Jurassic Tiaojishan haramyidans are here included in Euharamiyida10 (a junior synonym of Haramiyida66 in our phylogenetic analysis (Supplementary Information)). Clades considered to be close relatives of euharamiyidans are in blue in each tree (simplified from the originals). a, Euharamiyidans are in a monophyletic Haramiyida, positioned outside of Mammalia (parsimony and Bayesian analyses in ref. 4). b, Euharamiyidans are in a monophyletic Haramiyida, positioned within Mammalia in Allotheria with multituberculates; the gondwanatherian Vintana (not shown) is within Trechnotheria (parsimony and Bayesian analyses in ref. 3). c, Haramiyidans are polyphyletic; euharamiyidans fall within Mammalia in Allotheria with multituberculates, and Thomasia and Haramiyavia form a clade with tritylodontids outside Mammaliaformes; gondwanatherians (not shown) are sister to multituberculates (parsimony analysis in ref. 28). d, Haramiyidans are polyphyletic; euharamiyidans fall within Mammalia, and Thomasia and Haramiyavia form a clade with tritylodontids outside Mammaliaformes; the gondwanatherian Vintana (not shown) is within Euharamiyida (tip-dated Bayesian analysis in ref. 67). A, Allotheria; M, Mammalia; Mf, Mammaliaformes; T, Theria.
a–c, Upper left dentition in buccal (a), occlusal (b) and lingual (c) views. d–f, Lower left dentition in buccal (d), occlusal (e) and lingual (f) views. Regarding the numbering of the incisors, all haramiyidans for which the dentition is known have one upper and lower incisor (except for Xianshou linglong with two upper incisors10). The distal enlarged incisor was identified as I2 with a tiny I1 mesial to it; the lower incisor was identified as i2 as it occludes with upper I2. DI2, deciduous upper incisor; di2, deciduous lower incisor; I2, upper incisor; i2, lower incisor; M1, upper first molar; m1, lower first molar; M2, upper second molar; m2, lower second molar; P3, upper third premolar; P4, upper fourth premolar; p4, lower fourth premolar.
a, Skull in lateral view. b, Cranium in dorsal view. c–e, Left mandible in occlusal (c), lateral (d) and medial (e) views. an, angular process; cc, coronoid crest; co, mandibular condyle; cp, coronoid process; DI2, deciduous upper incisor; di2, deciduous lower incisor; ethf, ethmoidal foramen; fr, frontal; iof, infraorbital foramen; ju, jugal; lac, lacrimal; m1, lower first molar; m2, lower second molar; maf, masseteric fossa; mas, mandibular symphysis; mef, mental foramen; mf, mandibular foramen; mx, maxilla; na, nasal; P3, upper third premolar; p4, lower fourth premolar; pa, parietal; pmx, premaxilla; ptf, pterygoid fossa; smx, septomaxilla; sq, squamosal; vc, ventral crest.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Reconstructions of auditory apparatus in V. diplomylos on the basis of the holotype versus the referred specimen.
a, Reconstruction on the basis of the Vilevolodon holotype4, which has more-fragmentary auditory elements: the incus is shown with a trochlea and dorsal plate (as in Morganucodon) (Fig. 3a) in a rostrocaudal incudomallear articulation, and the malleus includes ossified Meckel’s cartilage and surangular. b, c, Reconstruction on the basis of the Vilevolodon referred specimen (IMMNH-PV01699A) with well-preserved auditory elements in ventral (b) and dorsal (c) views: the incus is flat and has a dorsoventral incudomallear articulation, and the malleus does not have an ossified Meckel’s cartilage or surangular. Colours for the auditory elements are as in Fig. 1.
a–c, e, h, Arboroharamiya allinhopsoni, left auditory apparatus. a, Photograph of the holotype in ventral view (derived from extended data figure 5a of ref. 3). b, c, Reconstruction in ventral (b) and dorsal (c) views (modified from extended data figure 5e, f of ref. 3). e, h, The reconstruction proposed in this Article, in ventral (e) and dorsal (h) views (Supplementary Information). d, g, Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Carnegie Museum 50815), left auditory apparatus rendered from computed tomography scans in ventral (d) and dorsal (g) views. f, i, Vilevolodon diplomylos (IMMNH-PV01699A), left auditory apparatus in ventral (f) and dorsal (i) views. The crus breve of the incus in e and h is based on ref. 17. Colours for the auditory elements are as in Fig. 1; stapes in purple; tympanic membrane (grey) is reconstructed on the ventral views in b, d35,68, f. ac, anterior crus of ectotympanic; al, anterior limb of ectotympanic; apm, anterior process of malleus; asa, anterior process of surangular; cb, crus breve; fv, fenestra vestibuli; gf, glenoid fossa; hy, hyoid element; ic, incus; lp, lenticular process; mab, mallear body; mm, manubrium of malleus; mp, medial process of malleus; oc, occipital condyle; pc, posterior crus of ectotympanic; pf, perilymphatic foramen; pic, stapedial process of incus; pism, process for insertion of stapedius muscle of stapes; pl, posterior limb of ectotympanic; pm, promontorium; ppr, paroccipital process of petrosal; prs, posterior ridge of surangular; pss, posterior surface of surangular; ptp, posttympanic process of squamosal; rl, reflected lamina of ectotympanic; rtm, ridge for attachment for anterior part of tympanic membrane; sa, surangular; sf, stapedius fossa; spg, groove for stapedial artery; st, stapes; tm, transverse part of malleus; ts, tympanic sulcus; ty-d, lateral ectotympanic part presumably equivalent to dorsal part of angular; ty-r, ectotympanic part presumably equivalent to reflected lamina.
a–c, Qishou jintzang, the so-called left ectotympanic in ventral (a) and dorsal (b) views, derived from figure 8c, d of ref. 17; interpreted here as the left malleus with broken anterior process and incus in dorsal view (c). d, Arboroharamiya allinhopsoni, the so-called left ectotympanic in ventral view, derived from figure 3 of ref. 17. e, f, Tachyglossus aculeatus (Carnegie Museum 50812), isolated left ectopterygoid bone and the left basicranium in ventral view. g, Arboroharamiya jenkinsi, the so-called left ectotytmpanic in ventral view, derived from figure 7c of ref. 17. h, i, Ornithorhynchus anatinus (Carnegie Museum 50815), isolated left ectopterygoid bone and the left basicranium in ventral view. Colours for the auditory elements are as in Fig. 1. api, anterior prominence of incus; apm(br), anterior process of malleus (broken); arty, anterior edge of ectotympanic; cb, crus breve; cfm, contact area for malleus; ep, ectopterygoid; frt, fracture; mm, manubrium of malleus; prty, posterior edge of ectotympanic; rtm, ridge for attachment of anterior part of tympanic membrane; sp, stapedial process of incus; ty-d, lateral ectotympanic part presumably equivalent to dorsal part of angular; ty-r, ectotympanic part presumably equivalent to reflected lamina.
Extended Data Fig. 7 Simplified strict-consensus parsimony tree, highlighting relationships and relative ages of key mammalian groups.
The full tree is shown in Extended Data Fig. 8. Nodes are not time-calibrated. A, Allotheria; C, Cladotheria; El, Eleutherodontidae; Eu, Eutriconodonta; G, Gondwanatheria; Ha, Haramiyida; M, Mammalia; Mf, Mammaliaformes; Mt, Multituberculata; Sp, Spalacotherioidea; T, Theria; Tr, Trechnotheria.
The dataset comprises 130 taxa and 509 morphological characters. The strict consensus tree of 30 equally most-parsimonious trees was found in TNT47. Consensus tree length = 2,871; consistency index = 0.300; retention index = 0.784. The simplified version of this consensus tree is presented in Extended Data Fig. 7. The allotherians (Haramiyavia, Cifelliodon, haramiyidans, multituberculates and gondwanatherians) are highlighted in blue. A, Allotheria; Au, Australosphenida; C, Cladotheria; El, Eleutherodontidae; Eu, Eutriconodonta; G, Gondwanatheria; Ha, Haramiyida; M, Mammalia; Mf, Mammaliaformes; Mt, Multituberculata; Sp, Spalacotherioidea; T, Theria; Tr, Trechnotheria.
Fifty-per-cent majority rule consensus tree for Mesozoic mammals from a tip-dated analysis using Bayesian inference in MrBayes64. Tip-dating analysis confirms that mammals originated in the late Triassic (213.82 million years ago (207.98, 221.48 95% highest posterior density intervals)); however, the topology is different from the strict-consensus tree inferred from the parsimony analysis69. Allotherians are in blue.
a, Right malleus, incus and gonial on postnatal days 0, 12 and 30 of the didelphid marsupial Monodelphis domestica in medial view (redrawn from ref. 39), anterior to the left and dorsal to the top. Incus is initially dorsal to the malleus and shifts caudally in later ontogenetic stages. b, Left malleus of the juvenile felid carnivoran Felis pardus (Carnegie Museum of Natural History (CM) 21006) in ventral view, medial to the left and anterior to the top, showing the ossiculum accessorium mallei70 or processus internus praearticularis71. c, Left ear region of newborn golden mole Amblysomus corriae in ventral view, medial to the left and anterior to the top (modified from ref. 72), showing the small, rod-like dermal element medial to the gonial that is posited to be the surangular. Colours for the ossicles are as in Fig. 1.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, J., Wible, J.R., Guo, B. et al. A monotreme-like auditory apparatus in a Middle Jurassic haramiyidan. Nature 590, 279–283 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03137-z
This article is cited by
Nature Communications (2023)