Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Transparent ferroelectric crystals with ultrahigh piezoelectricity

Abstract

Transparent piezoelectrics are highly desirable for numerous hybrid ultrasound–optical devices ranging from photoacoustic imaging transducers to transparent actuators for haptic applications1,2,3,4,5,6,7. However, it is challenging to achieve high piezoelectricity and perfect transparency simultaneously because most high-performance piezoelectrics are ferroelectrics that contain high-density light-scattering domain walls. Here, through a combination of phase-field simulations and experiments, we demonstrate a relatively simple method of using an alternating-current electric field to engineer the domain structures of originally opaque rhombohedral Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 (PMN-PT) crystals to simultaneously generate near-perfect transparency, an ultrahigh piezoelectric coefficient d33 (greater than 2,100 picocoulombs per newton), an excellent electromechanical coupling factor k33 (about 94 per cent) and a large electro-optical coefficient γ33 (approximately 220 picometres per volt), which is far beyond the performance of the commonly used transparent ferroelectric crystal LiNbO3. We find that increasing the domain size leads to a higher d33 value for the [001]-oriented rhombohedral PMN-PT crystals, challenging the conventional wisdom that decreasing the domain size always results in higher piezoelectricity8,9,10. This work presents a paradigm for achieving high transparency and piezoelectricity by ferroelectric domain engineering, and we expect the transparent ferroelectric crystals reported here to provide a route to a wide range of hybrid device applications, such as medical imaging, self-energy-harvesting touch screens and invisible robotic devices.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Phase-field simulations of the domain structures and evolution of [001]-oriented rhombohedral PMN-28PT single crystals via d.c. and a.c. poling.
Fig. 2: Analysis of the domain structures for the [001]-oriented PMN-28PT crystals.
Fig. 3: Comparison of the properties of a.c.-poled and conventional d.c.-poled [001]-oriented PMN-28PT crystals.
Fig. 4: Phase-field simulations of the effect of domain size on the polarization, free-energy density and properties of the PMN-28PT crystal.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

References

  1. 1.

    Wang, L. V. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nat. Photon. 3, 503–509 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chen, X. et al. Transparent lead lanthanum zirconate titanate (PLZT) ceramic fibers for high-frequency ultrasonic transducer applications. Ceram. Int. 42, 18554–18559 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tshering, C. & Tshering, D. Renewable mobile charger using piezoelectric transducer. Res. J. Recent Sci. 7, 20–23 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sette, D. et al. Transparent piezoelectric transducers for large area ultrasonic actuators. In 2017 IEEE 30th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). 793–796 (IEEE, 2017).

  5. 5.

    Modarres, A., Ramstein, C., Cruz-Hernandez, J. M., Danny, A. & Grant, A. G. Transparent composite piezoelectric combined touch sensor and haptic actuator. US Patent 2011/0261021 A1 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Thalhammer, G., McDougall, C., MacDonald, M. P. & Ritsch-Marte, M. Acoustic force mapping in a hybrid acoustic-optical micromanipulation device supporting high resolution optical imaging. Lab Chip 16, 1523–1532 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Niederhauser, J. J., Jaeger, M., Hejazi, M., Keppner, H. & Frenz, M. Transparent ITO coasted PVDF transducer for optoacoustic depth profiling. Opt. Commun. 253, 401–406 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wada, S., Yako, K., Kakemoto, H., Tsurumi, T. & Kiguchi, T. Enhanced piezoelectric properties of barium titanate single crystals with different engineered-domain sizes. J. Appl. Phys. 98, 014109 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hlinka, J., Ondrejkovic, P. & Marton, P. The piezoelectric response of nanotwinned BaTiO3. Nanotechnology 20, 105709 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ahluwalia, R., Lookman, T., Saxena, A. & Cao, W. Domain-size dependence of piezoelectric properties of ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. B 72, 014112 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jaffe, B., Cook, W. R. & Jaffe, H. Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic, 1971).

  12. 12.

    Damjanovic, D. Comments on origins of enhanced piezoelectric properties in ferroelectrics. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 56, 1574–1585 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sun, E. W. & Cao, W. W. Relaxor-based ferroelectric single crystals: growth, domain engineering, characterization and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 65, 124–210 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang, S. J. et al. Advantages and challenges of relaxor-PT ferroelectric crystals for electroacoustic transducers—a review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 68, 1–66 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Haertling, G. H. Ferroelectric ceramics: history and technology. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, 797–818 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ruan, W. et al. Large electro-optic effect in La-doped 0.75Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.25PbTiO3 transparent ceramic by two-stage sintering. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 2128–2131 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Glazer, A. M., Lewis, J. G. & Kaminsky, W. An automatic optical imaging system for birefringent media. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 452, 2751–2765 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shvartsman, V. & Kholkin, A. Domain structure of 0.8Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.2PbTiO3 studied by piezoresponse force microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 69, 014102 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bai, F., Li, J. & Viehland, D. Domain hierarchy in annealed (001)-oriented Pb (Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-x% PbTiO3 single crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2313–2315 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sato, Y., Hirayama, T. & Ikuhara, Y. Real-time direct observations of polarization reversal in a piezoelectric crystal: Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 studied via in situ electrical biasing transmission electron microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 187601 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kleemann, W. Relaxor ferroelectrics: cluster glass ground state via random fields and random bonds. Phys. Stat. Sol. B 251, 1993–2002 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bokov, A. A. & Ye, Z. G. Recent progress in relaxor ferroelectrics with perovskite structure. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 31–52 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Krogstad, M. J. et al. The relation of local order to material properties in relaxor ferroelectrics. Nat. Mater. 17, 718–724 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Takenaka, H., Grinberg, I., Liu, S. & Rappe, A. M. Slush-like polar structures in single-crystal relaxors. Nature 546, 391–395 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wan, X. M., Luo, H. S., Wang, J., Chan, H. L. W. & Choy, C. L. Investigation on optical transmission spectra of (1–x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-xPbTiO3 single crystals. Solid State Commun. 129, 401–405 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wemple, S. Polarization fluctuations and the optical-absorption edge in BaTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 2, 2679–2689 (1970).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ogawa, T., Matsushita, M. & Tachi, Y. Domain controlled piezoelectric single crystal and fabrication method therefor. US Patent 2003/0178914 A1 (2003).

  28. 28.

    Yamashita, Y., Yamamoto, N., Hosono, Y. & Itsumi, K. Piezoelectric transducer, ultrasonic probe, and piezoelectric transducer manufacturing method. US Patent 2015/0372219 A1 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Chang, W. Y. et al. Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of 0.7Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.3PbTiO3 single crystal poled using alternating current. Mater. Res. Lett. 6, 537–544 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Xu, J. et al. Piezoelectric performance enhancement of Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-0.25PbTiO3 crystals by alternating current polarization for ultrasonic transducer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 182901 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Budimir, M., Damjanovic, D. & Setter, N. Piezoelectric response and free-energy instability in the perovskite crystals BaTiO3, PbTiO3, and Pb(Zr,Ti)O3. Phys. Rev. B 73, 174106 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sluka, T., Tagantsev, A. K., Damjanovic, D., Gureev, M. & Setter, N. Enhanced electromechanical response of ferroelectrics due to charged domain walls. Nat. Commun. 3, 748 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xiang, Y., Zhang, R. & Cao, W. Optimization of piezoelectric properties for [001]c poled 0.94 Pb (Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.06 PbTiO3 single crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 092902 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li, F. et al. Transparent ferroelectric crystals with ultrahigh piezoelectricity. Provisional US Patent 16/541,309 (2019).

  35. 35.

    Li, F., Wang, L., Jin, L., Xu, Z. & Zhang, S. J. Achieving single domain relaxor-PT crystals by high temperature poling. CrystEngComm 16, 2892–2897 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Wan, X. M., Chan, H. L. W., Choy, C. L., Zhao, X. & Luo, H. Optical properties of (1–x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-xPbTiO3 single crystals studied by spectroscopic ellipsometry. J. Appl. Phys. 96, 1387–1391 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wan, X. M. et al. Refractive indices and linear electro-optic properties of (1–x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-xPbTiO3 single crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 5233–5235 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wang, J., Shi, S. Q., Chen, L.-Q., Li, Y. & Zhang, T. Y. Phase-field simulations of ferroelectric/ferroelastic polarization switching. Acta Mater. 52, 749–764 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wang, J., Wang, B. & Chen, L.-Q., Understanding, predicting, and designing ferroelectric domain structures and switching guided by the phase-field method. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 49, 127–152 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Khakpash, N., Khassaf, H., Rossetti, G. A. Jr & Alpay, S. P. Misfit strain phase diagrams of epitaxial PMN-PT films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 082905 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li, F., Jin, L., Xu, Z., Wang, D. & Zhang, S. J. Electrostrictive effect in Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-x PbTiO3 crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 152910 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Li, F. et al. The origin of ultrahigh piezoelectricity in relaxor-ferroelectric solid solution crystals. Nat. Commun. 7, 13807 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Towns, J. et al. XSEDE: accelerating scientific discovery. Comput. Sci. Eng. 16, 62–74 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Nystrom, N. A., Levine, M. J., Roskies, R. Z. & Scott, J. R. Bridges: a uniquely flexible HPC resource for new communities and data analytics. In Proc. 2015 Annual Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (ACM, 2015); https://doi.org/10.1145/2792745.2792775.

Download references

Acknowledgements

F.L. and Z.X. acknowledge the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 51922083, 51831010 and 51761145024), the development programme of Shaanxi province (grant number 2019ZDLGY04-09) and the 111 Project (B14040). B.W. and L.Q.C. acknowledge the support of the US National Science Foundation under the grant number DMR-1744213 and Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) grant number DMR-1420620. N.Z. thanks the NSFC for support under grant number 1604123. The computer simulations were performed on the ICS-ACI Computing Systems at Pennsylvania State University through the Penn State Institute for Cyber Science and at the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment cluster supported by National Science Foundation grant number ACI-1548562; the Bridges system was used, which is supported by NSF award number ACI-1445606 at the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Centre under the allocation DMR170006. S.Z. thanks the ONRG (grant number N62909-18-12168) and ARC (grant number FT140100698) for support. T.R.S. was supported by the US ONR.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The work was conceived and designed by S.Z., L.Q.C. and F.L. C.Q. performed the piezoelectric and optical experiments. F.L. and Z.X. supervised the piezoelectric and dielectric measurements. N.Z. and F.L. supervised the optical experiments. B.W. performed the phase-field simulations and discussed with F.L. L.Q.C. supervised the simulation work. J.L. assisted with the piezoelectric measurements. N.Z. and D.W. performed XRD experiments. Y.W. and H.T. assisted with the optical measurements. F.L. drafted the manuscript, S.Z., N.Z., L.Q.C. and T.R.S. revised the manuscript and all authors discussed the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhuo Xu or Long-Qing Chen or Fei Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Wook Jo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Schematic diagrams of the projections of optical indicatrices on both sides of a domain wall.

a, 109° domain wall; b, 71° domain wall. The prerequisite for the light scattering and reflection at an interface is the difference in refractive indices between the optical media on each side of the interface. As shown here, the principal axes of the optical indicatrix projected on the (001) plane are the same for domains on each side of a 109° domain wall. Thus, no and ne do not change as the light crosses a 109° domain wall, resulting in the absence of light scattering and/or reflection. In contrast, the principal axis of the optical indicatrix projected on the (001) plane rotates by 90° as the light travels across a 71° domain wall, resulting in the alternating of refractive indices no and ne. This is the reason that 71° domain walls scatter and/or reflect the light.

Extended Data Fig. 2 The variation in various energies of PMN-28PT during the first four cycles of a.c. poling.

The data are obtained by phase-field simulations. Here we plot the normalized energies, which are dimensionless.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Effects of system size and mechanical boundary conditions on the a.c.- and d.c.-poled domain structures from phase-field simulations.

a, Effects of system size (at the clamped boundary condition). b, Effects of the mechanical boundary condition (the scale of the simulation is 512 × 512 nm).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Characterization of the domain size along the poling direction for [001]-oriented rhombohedral PMN–PT crystals.

a, PLM images on the (100) face for [001]-poled PMN-28PT crystals under a.c. poling. b, PLM images on the (100) face for [001]-poled PMN-28PT crystals under d.c. poling. c, Distribution of the thickness of laminar domains for the a.c.-poled sample measured from a. d, Distribution of the thickness of laminar domains for the d.c.-poled sample measured from b. The thickness of the samples is around 100 μm. As shown in this figure, no clear difference is observed for the thickness of laminar domains between a.c.- and d.c.-poled samples.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Pseudo-Voight fittings of the {222} diffraction peaks at high-2θ.

a,b, The unpoled sample. c,d, The d.c.-poled sample. e,f, The a.c.-poled sample. a,c,e, The intensity of the patterns accumulated along Ω. b,d,f, The intensity of the patterns accumulated along 2θ.

Extended Data Fig. 6

Effective light absorption coefficients of a.c.- and d.c.-poled PMN-28PT crystals.

Extended Data Fig. 7 The temperature stability of a.c.- and d.c.-poled PMN-28PT crystals.

a, d33, ε33T/ε0 and k33 as a function of temperature. The dwelling time for each testing temperature is 10 min. b, Domain structure of a.c.-poled PMN-28PT crystals as a function of temperature. The temperature is increased from 25 to 100 °C at a rate of 1 °C min−1. The dwelling time for each testing temperature is 30 min.

Extended Data Fig. 8 PLM images of [001]-oriented PMN-28PT crystals with different poling conditions.

ad, Images obtained from the crystals poled by an a.c. electric field at frequencies of 0.1 Hz (a), 1 Hz (b), 10 Hz (c) and 100 Hz (d), respectively. e, f, Enlargements of the regions in b and c, respectively. gi, Images obtained from the crystals poled by a d.c. electric field. g, i, Magnifications of the two regions circled in h. The thickness of the samples is 0.5 mm. There are numerous cross-like domain walls in d.c.-poled samples, whereas these types of domain wall are removed by an a.c. electric field.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Dielectric permittivity and piezoelectric coefficient of the a.c.-poled PMN-28PT crystal as a function of the cycle number and frequency.

a, Dielectric permittivity as a function of the cycle number. b, Dielectric permittivity as a function of the frequency. c, Piezoelectric coefficient as a function of the frequency. Five samples are used for each frequency. The error bars indicate the s.d. of the corresponding data.

Extended Data Table 1 Electromechanical and electro-optical properties of [001]-oriented PMN-28PT crystals via a.c.- and d.c.-poling

Supplementary information

Video 1

Domain evolution of the [001]-oriented PMN-28PT crystal during AC-poling. This is a video obtained from a phase-field simulation of domain evolution under an AC electric field. In the video, the colours represent ferroelectric domains with different polarization directions as illustrated in Fig. 1 of the main text.

Video 2

Domain evolution of the [001]-oriented PMN-28PT crystal during the reversal of the polarity of electric field. This video presents the domain evolution of an enlarged local region in supplementary video 1.

Video 3

Domain evolution of the [001]-oriented PMN-28PT crystal during DC-poling. This is a video obtained from a phase-field simulation of domain evolution under a DC electric field. In the video, the colours represent ferroelectric domains with different polar directions as illustrated in Fig. 1 of the main text.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, C., Wang, B., Zhang, N. et al. Transparent ferroelectric crystals with ultrahigh piezoelectricity. Nature 577, 350–354 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1891-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing