Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Spectroscopic confirmation of a mature galaxy cluster at a redshift of 2

Abstract

Galaxy clusters are the most massive virialized structures in the Universe and are formed through the gravitational accretion of matter over cosmic time1. The discovery2 of an evolved galaxy cluster at redshift z = 2, corresponding to a look-back time of 10.4 billion years, provides an opportunity to study its properties. The galaxy cluster XLSSC 122 was originally detected as a faint, extended X-ray source in the XMM Large Scale Structure survey and was revealed to be coincident with a compact over-density of galaxies2 with photometric redshifts of 1.9 ± 0.2. Subsequent observations3 at millimetre wavelengths detected a Sunyaev–Zel’dovich decrement along the line of sight to XLSSC 122, thus confirming the existence of hot intracluster gas, while deep imaging spectroscopy from the European Space Agency’s X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission (XMM-Newton) revealed4 an extended, X-ray-bright gaseous atmosphere with a virial temperature of 60 million Kelvin, enriched with metals to the same extent as are local clusters. Here we report optical spectroscopic observations of XLSSC 122 and identify 37 member galaxies at a mean redshift of 1.98, corresponding to a look-back time of 10.4 billion years. We use photometry to determine a mean, dust-free stellar age of 2.98 billion years, indicating that star formation commenced in these galaxies at a mean redshift of 12, when the Universe was only 370 million years old. The full range of inferred formation redshifts, including the effects of dust, covers the interval from 7 to 13. These observations confirm that XLSSC 122 is a remarkably mature galaxy cluster with both evolved stellar populations in the member galaxies and a hot, metal-rich gas composing the intracluster medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: HST image of the galaxy cluster XLSSC 122.
Fig. 2: Redshift histogram of all galaxies along the line of sight to XLSSC 122.
Fig. 3: Colour–magnitude diagram of all galaxies within the HST/WFC3 field of view.
Fig. 4: The luminosity-weighted age distribution of stars within red-sequence cluster galaxies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All HST data presented in this paper are publicly available at the Hubble Legacy Archive (https://hla.stsci.edu/). The programme number is 15267.

References

  1. Kravtsov, A. V. & Borgani, S. Formation of galaxy clusters. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 353–409 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Willis, J. P. et al. Distant galaxy clusters in the XMM Large Scale Structure survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 134–156 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mantz, A. B. et al. The XXL survey. V. Detection of the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect of the redshift 1.9 galaxy cluster XLSSU J021744.1–034536 with CARMA. Astrophys. J. 794, 157 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mantz, A. B. et al. The XXL survey. XVII. X-ray and Sunyaev–Zel’dovich properties of the redshift 2.0 galaxy cluster XLSSC 122. Astron. Astrophys. 620, A2 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bower, R. G., Lucey, J. R. & Ellis, R. S. Precision photometry of early-type galaxies in the Coma and Virgo clusters: a test of the universality of the colour–magnitude relation. II. Analysis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 254, 601–613 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hashimoto, T. et al. The onset of star formation 250 million years after the Big Bang. Nature 557, 392–395 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarazin, C. L. X-Ray Emission From Galaxy Clusters (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988).

  8. Roettiger, K., Stone, J. M. & Mushotzky, R. F. Anatomy of a merger: a numerical model of A754. Astrophys. J. 493, 62–72 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiang, Y.-K., Overzier, R. A. & Gebhardt, K. Ancient light from young cosmic cities: physical and observational signatures of galaxy proto-clusters. Astrophys. J. 779, 127 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrison, I. & Hotchkiss, S. A consistent approach to falsifying ΛCDM with rare galaxy clusters. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 7, 022 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gavazzi, R. et al. A weak lensing study of the Coma cluster. Astron. Astrophys. 498, L33–L36 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, T. B. et al. A massive core for a cluster of galaxies at a redshift of 4.3. Nature 556, 469–472 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bennett, C. L., Larson, D., Weiland, J. L. & Hinshaw, G. The 1% concordance Hubble constant. Astrophys. J. 794, 135 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brammer, G. GRIZLI: grism redshift and line analysis software. Astrophys. Source Code Library record ascl:1905.001 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brammer, G., Pirzkal, N., McCullough, P. & MacKenty, J. Time-Varying Excess Earth-Glow Backgrounds In The WFC3/IR Channel. Instrument Science Report WFC3 2014-03 (Space Telescope Science Institute, 2014).

  16. Brammer, G. Reprocessing WFC3/IR Exposures Affected by Time-Variable Backgrounds. Instrument Science Report WFC3 2016-16 (Space Telescope Science Institute, 2016).

  17. Stanford, S. A. et al. IDCS J1426.5+3508: discovery of a massive, infrared-selected galaxy cluster at z = 1.75. Astrophys. J. 753, 164 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kron, R. G. Photometry of a complete sample of faint galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 43, 305–325 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Horne, K. An optimal extraction algorithm for CCD spectroscopy. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 98, 609–617 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G. & Coppi, P. EAZY: A fast, public photometric redshift code. Astrophys. J. 686, 1503–1513 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruel, J. et al. Optical spectroscopy and velocity dispersions of galaxy clusters from the SPT-SZ Survey. Astrophys. J. 792, 45 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stanford, S. A., Eisenhardt, P. R. & Dickinson, M. The evolution of early-type galaxies in distant clusters. Astrophys. J. 492, 461–479 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gunn, J. E. & Gott, J. R. III On the infall of matter into clusters of galaxies and some effects on their evolution. Astrophys. J. 176, 1–19 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Butcher, H. & Oemler, A. Jr The evolution of galaxies in clusters. II. The galaxy content of nearby clusters. Astrophys. J. 226, 559–565 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung, S. et al. On the origin of gas-poor galaxies in galaxy clusters using cosmological hydrodynamic simulations. Astrophys. J. 865, 156 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Andreon, S. et al. JKCS 041: a Coma cluster progenitor at z = 1.803. Astron. Astrophys. 565, A120 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Newman, A. B. et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of the rich z = 1.80 galaxy cluster JKCS 041 using the WFC3 grism: environmental trends in the ages and structure of quiescent galaxies. Astrophys. J. 788, 51 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 344, 1000–1028 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Salpeter, E. E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Calzetti, D. et al. The dust content and opacity of actively star-forming galaxies. Astrophys. J. 533, 682–695 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Longhetti, M. et al. Dating the stellar population in massive early-type galaxies at z ~ 1.5. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 361, 897–906 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Strazzullo, V. et al. The red sequence at birth in the galaxy cluster Cl J1449+0856 at z = 2. Astrophys. J. 833, L20 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gobat, R. et al. WFC3 grism confirmation of the distant cluster Cl J1449+0856 at <z> = 2.00: quiescent and star-forming galaxy populations. Astrophys. J. 776, 9 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the builders of the XMM-LSS and XXL surveys, on whose work this paper is based. This work is based on observations made with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS5-26555. These observations are associated with programme number 15267. J.P.W. and E.S.N. acknowledge support from NSERC. R.E.A.C., E.S.N., S.W.A., A.L.K., A.M. and R.G.M. acknowledge support from NASA grant number HST-GO-15267.002-A. The Cosmic Dawn Center is funded by the Danish National Research Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.P.W., R.E.A.C. and E.S.N. analysed the data and wrote the paper. S.W.A., A.L.K., A.M., R.G.M., S.A.S. and G.B. provided guidance on the analysis and commented on the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. P. Willis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature thanks Florence Durret and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Example spectra of two member galaxies of XLSSC 122.

a, The brightest cluster galaxy (ID 526) as the black line with error bars with the best-fitting, redshifted galaxy template shown in red (see Methods). b, A fainter cluster member with strong emission lines (ID 1141) as the black line with error bars. Error bars indicate the 1-sigma measurement uncertainty. The vertical dashed lines show the observed frame location of [O ii] 3,727 Å, Hβ 4,861 Å and [O iii] 5,007 Å at a redshift of 1.963.

Extended Data Fig. 2 The luminosity-weighted stellar age versus the mass of red sequence cluster member galaxies.

Posterior distributions in mean stellar age (tw) and log stellar mass for the 19 ‘gold’ members of the cluster red sequence. Only SED models assuming AV = 0.0 are shown. Contours enclose 67% of the posterior probability for each galaxy. The horizontal dashed line indicates an age of 3.35 Gyr, that is, the age of the Universe at a redshift z = 1.98 in the assumed cosmological model.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The luminosity-weighted stellar age distributions for red-sequence cluster member galaxies.

Panels show posterior distributions in tw for each ‘gold’ member galaxy of XLSSC 122, having marginalized over Mstar. For convenience, the same colour scheme is employed as in Extended Data Fig. 2. In each panel the solid, dashed and dotted curves display, respectively, SED models characterized by AV = 0.0, 0.3 and 0.5. The vertical dashed line in each panel indicates the age of the Universe at z = 1.98.

Extended Data Table 1 Measured properties of confirmed members of XLSSC 122 and z = 1.93 structure

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Willis, J.P., Canning, R.E.A., Noordeh, E.S. et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of a mature galaxy cluster at a redshift of 2. Nature 577, 39–41 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1829-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1829-4

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing