Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Direct limits on the interaction of antiprotons with axion-like dark matter


Astrophysical observations indicate that there is roughly five times more dark matter in the Universe than ordinary baryonic matter1, and an even larger amount of the Universe’s energy content is attributed to dark energy2. However, the microscopic properties of these dark components remain unknown. Moreover, even ordinary matter—which accounts for five per cent of the energy density of the Universe—has yet to be understood, given that the standard model of particle physics lacks any consistent explanation for the predominance of matter over antimatter3. Here we present a direct search for interactions of antimatter with dark matter and place direct constraints on the interaction of ultralight axion-like particles (dark-matter candidates) with antiprotons. If antiprotons have a stronger coupling to these particles than protons do, such a matter–antimatter asymmetric coupling could provide a link between dark matter and the baryon asymmetry in the Universe. We analyse spin-flip resonance data in the frequency domain acquired with a single antiproton in a Penning trap4 to search for spin-precession effects from ultralight axions, which have a characteristic frequency governed by the mass of the underlying particle. Our analysis constrains the axion–antiproton interaction parameter to values greater than 0.1 to 0.6 gigaelectronvolts in the mass range from 2 × 10−23 to 4 × 10−17 electronvolts, improving the sensitivity by up to five orders of magnitude compared with astrophysical antiproton bounds. In addition, we derive limits on six combinations of previously unconstrained Lorentz- and CPT-violating terms of the non-minimal standard model extension5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton.
Fig. 2: Results of the signal detection.
Fig. 3: Exclusion limits for the axion–antiproton interaction.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analysed for this study will be made available on reasonable request.

Code availability

The analysis codes will be made available on reasonable request.


  1. Bertone, G., Hooper, D. & Silk, J. Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints. Phys. Rep. 405, 279–390 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Frieman, J. A., Turner, M. S. & Huterer, D. Dark energy and the accelerating Universe. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 46, 385–432 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dine, M. & Kusenko, A. Origin of the matter–antimatter asymmetry. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1–30 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smorra, C. et al. A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature 550, 371–374 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding, Y. & Kostelecky, V. A. Lorentz-violating spinor electrodynamics and Penning traps. Phys. Rev. D 94, 056008 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Safronova, M. S., Budker, D., DeMille, D., Kimball, D. & Derevianko, A. Search for new physics with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, P. W. et al. Experimental searches for the axion and axion-like particles. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 65, 485–514 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, J. E. & Carosi, G. Axions and the strong CP problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 557–601 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stadnik, Y. V. & Flambaum, V. V. Searches for new particles including dark matter with atomic, molecular and optical systems. Preprint at (2018).

  10. Gabrielse, G. et al. Precision mass spectroscopy of the antiproton and proton using simultaneously trapped particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3198–3201 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmadi, M. et al. Chacterization of the 1S–2S transition in antihydrogen. Nature 557, 71–75 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hori, M. et al. Buffer-gas cooling of antiprotonic helium to 1.5 to 1.7 K, and antiproton-to-electron mass ratio. Science 354, 610–614 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ulmer, S. et al. High-precision comparison of the antiproton-to-proton charge-to-mass ratio. Nature 524, 196–199 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider, G. et al. Double-trap measurement of the proton magnetic moment at 0.3 parts per billion precision. Science 358, 1081–1084 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Greenberg, O. W. CPT violation implies violation of Lorentz invariance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 231602 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marsh, D. J. E. Axion cosmology. Phys. Rep. 643, 1–79 (2016).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Catena, R. & Ullio, P. A novel determination of the local dark matter density. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 8, 004 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stadnik, Y. V. & Flambaum, V. V. Axion-induced effects in atoms, molecules, and nuclei: parity nonconservation, anapole moments, electric dipole moments, and spin-gravity and spin-axion momentum couplings. Phys. Rev. D 89, 043522 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abel, C. et al. Search for axionlike dark matter through nuclear spin precession in electric and magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. X 7, 041034 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Legacy Archive for Microwave Background Data Analysis (LAMBDA) Tools (NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, 2014).

  21. Smorra, C. et al. BASE – The Baryon Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 224, 3055–3108 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagahama, H. et al. Sixfold improved single particle measurement of the magnetic moment of the antiproton. Nat. Commun. 8, 14084 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dehmelt, H. & Ekström, P. Proposed g−2/δω z experiment on single stored electron or positron. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 18, 727–728 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tanabashi, M. et al. Review of particle physics. Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, T. et al. Search for axionlike dark matter with a liquid-state nuclear spin comagnetometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191302 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Centers, G. P. et al. Stochastic amplitude fluctuations of bosonic dark matter and revised constraints on linear couplings. Preprint at (2019).

  27. Raffelt, G. G. in Axions (eds Kuster M. et al.) 51–71 (Springer, 2008).

  28. Keil, W. et al. Fresh look at axions and SN 1987A. Phys. Rev. D 56, 2419–2432 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Dyck, R. S., Schwinberg, P. B. & Dehmelt, H. G. New high-precision comparison of electron and positron g factors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 26 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bennett, G. W. et al. Search for Lorentz and CPT violation effects in muon spin precession. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 091602 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smorra, C. et al. Observation of individual spin quantum transitions of a single antiproton. Phys. Lett. B 769, 1 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mooser, A. et al. Direct high-precision measurement of the magnetic moment of the proton. Nature 509, 596 (2014).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge technical support by the Antiproton Decelerator group, CERN’s cryolab team and all other CERN groups providing support to Antiproton Decelerator experiments. We acknowledge discussions with Y. Ding about the SME limits, and we thank A. Schwenk and K. Hebeler for sharing computing equipment for the Monte Carlo studies. We acknowledge financial support by RIKEN, MEXT, the Max Planck Society, the Max Planck–RIKEN–PTB Center for Time, Constants and Fundamental Symmetries, the European Union (Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 721559), the Humboldt Program, the CERN fellowship programme and Helmholtz Gemeinschaft. Y.V.S. was supported by a Humboldt Research Fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and by the World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI), MEXT, Japan. D.B. acknowledges support by the DFG Reinhart Koselleck project, the ERC Dark-OsT advanced grant (project 695405), the Simons Foundation and the Heising-Simons Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



S.U., Y.V.S. and C.S. initiated the project. C.S. analysed the experimental data and Y.V.S. provided their theoretical interpretation and derived the constraints, which were discussed with D.B. The manuscript was written by S.U., C.S. and Y.V.S. and edited by D.B. All authors discussed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to C. Smorra or S. Ulmer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Peer review information Nature thanks Gianpaolo P. Carosi and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains a merged PDF containing the supplementary discussion, supplementary tables and supplementary figures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smorra, C., Stadnik, Y.V., Blessing, P.E. et al. Direct limits on the interaction of antiprotons with axion-like dark matter. Nature 575, 310–314 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing