Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Constraints on the superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4 from oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance


Phases of matter are usually identified through spontaneous symmetry breaking, especially regarding unconventional superconductivity and the interactions from which it originates. In that context, the superconducting state of the quasi-two-dimensional and strongly correlated perovskite Sr2RuO4 is considered to be the only solid-state analogue to the superfluid 3He-A phase1,2, with an odd-parity order parameter that is unidirectional in spin space for all electron momenta and breaks time-reversal symmetry. This characterization was recently called into question by a search for an expected ‘split’ transition in a Sr2RuO4 crystal under in-plane uniaxial pressure, which failed to find any such evidence; instead, a dramatic rise and a peak in a single-transition temperature were observed3,4. Here we use nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of oxygen-17, which is directly sensitive to the order parameter via hyperfine coupling to the electronic spin degrees of freedom, to probe the nature of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 and its evolution under strain. A reduction of the Knight shift is observed for all strain values and at temperatures below the critical temperature, consistent with a drop in spin polarization in the superconducting state. In unstrained samples, our results contradict a body of previous NMR work reporting no change in the Knight shift5 and the most prevalent theoretical interpretation of the order parameter as a chiral p-wave state. Sr2RuO4 is an extremely clean layered perovskite and its superconductivity emerges from a strongly correlated Fermi liquid, and our work imposes tight constraints on the order parameter symmetry of this archetypal system.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Strain dependence of the upper critical field of Sr2RuO4.
Fig. 2: Knight shift K versus temperature T, measured at the van Hove singularity (εaa = εv).
Fig. 3: Zero-strain 17O NMR spectra of Sr2RuO4 for varying pulse energy.
Fig. 4: Transient effects following radiofrequency pulses for εaa = 0.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study can be accessed at Additional information is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Rice, T. M. & Sigrist, M. Sr2RuO4: an electronic analogue of 3He? J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7, L643–L648 (1995).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Mackenzie, A. P. & Maeno, Y. The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin–triplet pairing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657–712 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hicks, C. W. et al. Strong increase of T c of Sr2RuO4 under both tensile and compressive strain. Science 344, 283–285 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Steppke, A. et al. Strong peak in T c of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure. Science 355, eaaf9398 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ishida, K. et al. Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 identified by 17O Knight shift. Nature 396, 658–660 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Oguchi, T. Electronic band structure of the superconductor Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 51, 1385–1388 (1995).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mackenzie, A. P. et al. Quantum oscillations in the layered perovskite superconductor Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3786–3789 (1996).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maeno, Y. et al. Superconductivity in a layered perovskite without copper. Nature 372, 532–534 (1994).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Luke, G. M. et al. Time-reversal symmetry-breaking superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. Nature 394, 558–561 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xia, J., Maeno, Y., Beyersdorf, P. T., Fejer, M. M. & Kapitulnik, A. High resolution polar Kerr effect measurements of Sr2RuO4: evidence for broken time-reversal symmetry in the superconducting state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167002 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Leggett, A. J. A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid 3He. Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331–414 (1975).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yonezawa, S., Kajikawa, T. & Maeno, Y. First-order superconducting transition of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 077003 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hassinger, E. et al. Vertical line nodes in the superconducting gap structure of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. X 7, 011032 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kittaka, S. et al. Searching for gap zeros in Sr2RuO4 via field-angle-dependent specific-heat measurement. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 87, 093703 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Björnsson, P. G., Maeno, Y., Huber, M. E. & Moler, K. A. Scanning magnetic imaging Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 72, 012504 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hicks, C. W. et al. Limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 81, 214501 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Watson, C. A., Gibbs, A. S., Mackenzie, A. P., Hicks, C. W. & Moler, K. A. Micron-scale measurements of low anisotropic strain response of local T c in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 98, 094521 (2018).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sunko, V. et al. Direct observation of a uniaxial stress-driven Lifshitz transition in Sr2RuO4. npj Quantum Mater. 4, 46 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Luo, Y. et al. Normal state 17O NMR studies of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial stress. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021044 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hicks, C. W., Barber, M. E., Edkins, S. D., Brodsky, D. O. & Mackenzie, A. P. Piezoelectric-based apparatus for strain tuning. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 065003 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kittaka, S. et al. Angular dependence of the upper critical field of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 80, 174514 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Volovik, G. E. Superconductivity with lines of GAP nodes: density of states in the vortex. JETP Lett. 58, 469–473 (1993).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Li, Y. S. et al. High precision heat capacity measurements on Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure. Preprint at (2019).

  24. 24.

    Vollhardt, D. & Woelfle, P. The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3 (CRC Press, 1990).

  25. 25.

    Matano, K., Kriener, M., Segawa, K., Ando, Y. & Zheng, Q. G. Spin-rotation symmetry breaking in the superconducting state of CuxBi2Se3. Nat. Phys. 12, 852–854 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Veenstra, C. N. et al. Spin-orbital entanglement and the breakdown of singlets and triplets in Sr2RuO4 revealed by spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 127002 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hoult, D. I. in eMagRes (eds Harris, R. K. & Wasylishen, R. L.) (John Wiley & Sons, 2007).

Download references


We thank M. Ikeda and S. Kivelson for conversations. We particularly appreciate discussions with K. Ishida and Y. Maeno about the implications of our findings, and K. Ishida for reproducing our results. A.P. acknowledges support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through a Feodor Lynen Fellowship. Y.L. acknowledges support by the 1000 Youth Talents Plan of China. N.K. acknowledges support from JSPS KAKENHI (number JP18K04715) and JST-Mirai Program (number JPMJMI18A3) in Japan. S.R. is supported in part by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, contract DEAC02-76SF00515. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (DMR-1709304) and by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) programme of Los Alamos National Laboratory under project number 20170204ER.

Author information




Y.L., A.P., A.P.M. and S.E.B. conceived and designed the experiments. D.A.S., N.K., F.J., C.W.H. and A.P.M. prepared the crystal. E.D.B. characterized the sample and performed the spin labelling. A.P. and Y.L. performed the NMR measurements, supported by Y.-S.S. and A.C.; A.P., Y.L., C.W.H., A.P.M., S.R. and S.E.B. discussed the data, interpreted the results and wrote the paper with input from all authors. The time-synchronous reflection experiments were performed by S.E.B., A.P. and A.C.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Pustogow or Yongkang Luo or S. E. Brown.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Peer review information Nature thanks Catherine Kallin, Guo-qing Zheng and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 RuO2 plane, with dxyp hybridizing orbitals and experimental setup.

a, Ru dxy and hybridizing O p orbitals at the Y point, which dominate the formation of the γ band. NMR shifts are measured at the O(1) and O(1′) sites. b, Compressive a-axis stress shifts the γ-band Fermi surface to the zone boundary at Y. vHs, van Hove singularity. c, Strain device. The enlarged view highlights the Sr2RuO4 single crystal mounted between the piezoelectric actuators, with B0 parallel to the b axis and the compressive stress along the a axis, εaa. The NMR coil covers the free part of ~1 mm length.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Estimation of strain gradients.

a, Power reflected from the tank circuit during magnetic-field sweeps. The steepest slope of δρT(B0) corresponds to the Bc2 values shown in Fig. 1. The broadening of the superconducting transition was modelled by a Gaussian strain distribution of half-width δε/εaa ≈ 10% (pink lines). b, The fitting curves also match with the corresponding derivative d(δρT)/dB0. For clarity, only a subset of the measured fields is shown.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Tuning of the crystal to zero strain.

a, Measurements of the reflected power δρT at low strain indicate that Bc2 has a minimum near UPiezo = 0 V. b, The derivative d(δρT)/dB0 illustrates that the Bc2 value associated with the largest rate of change at the transition midpoint first decreases when reducing the compression (UPiezo changing from −20 V to 0 V), followed by a slight increase upon tensile strain (UPiezo changing from 0 V to +12 V). c, The coil impedance was measured at the transition midpoint (B0 fixed at Bc2, as indicated in the inset), providing a sensitive measure of modifications upon changing the strain. Bc2 was determined by a field sweep at intervals of 20 V or less, and then B0 was set to the new transition midpoint. The results (solid blue squares) were corrected for the different B0 values, yielding one half of a parabola centred around [−10 V, 10 V], very similar to the strain dependence of Tc reported in ref. 3 (dashed black line).

Extended Data Fig. 4 Transient effects associated with normal-state response.

a, The transient components of the reflected power are plotted as a function of pulse energy E and time τ after the pulse (see Fig. 4). CW, continuous wave; IP, in-phase; Q, quadrature. b, The magnetic-field dependence of the reflected power was recorded at E = 0.8 μJ. The changes in δρT(B0) for increasing B0 from the measurement field (0.7107 T) to B0 > Bc2 match well with the time-dependent recovery in a, as indicated by the horizontal dotted lines. Both channels (IP and Q) indicate a variation in δρT that results from a transition between normal and superconducting states around τ ≈ 100 μs.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Strain dependence of 17O Knight shifts in the superconducting and normal states.

Comparison of shifts in the normal and superconducting states for strains covering the range εaa = [0, εv]. The top and bottom parts of the figure show the O(1′) and O(1) sites, respectively. The normal-state results (indicated by black and red solid symbols) were recorded at 4.3 K and two different field strengths19. Open symbols correspond to an equilibrium temperature of 20 mK, which is within the superconducting state for sufficiently high Tc, realized by large strain and small magnetic field. Blue and orange symbols correspond to field strengths of 0.7107 T and 1.1573 T, respectively. The results for B0 = 1.9980 T are shown in green (εaa = εv; see Fig. 2).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pustogow, A., Luo, Y., Chronister, A. et al. Constraints on the superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4 from oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 574, 72–75 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing