Phases of matter are usually identified through spontaneous symmetry breaking, especially regarding unconventional superconductivity and the interactions from which it originates. In that context, the superconducting state of the quasi-two-dimensional and strongly correlated perovskite Sr2RuO4 is considered to be the only solid-state analogue to the superfluid 3He-A phase1,2, with an odd-parity order parameter that is unidirectional in spin space for all electron momenta and breaks time-reversal symmetry. This characterization was recently called into question by a search for an expected ‘split’ transition in a Sr2RuO4 crystal under in-plane uniaxial pressure, which failed to find any such evidence; instead, a dramatic rise and a peak in a single-transition temperature were observed3,4. Here we use nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy of oxygen-17, which is directly sensitive to the order parameter via hyperfine coupling to the electronic spin degrees of freedom, to probe the nature of superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 and its evolution under strain. A reduction of the Knight shift is observed for all strain values and at temperatures below the critical temperature, consistent with a drop in spin polarization in the superconducting state. In unstrained samples, our results contradict a body of previous NMR work reporting no change in the Knight shift5 and the most prevalent theoretical interpretation of the order parameter as a chiral p-wave state. Sr2RuO4 is an extremely clean layered perovskite and its superconductivity emerges from a strongly correlated Fermi liquid, and our work imposes tight constraints on the order parameter symmetry of this archetypal system.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data that support the findings of this study can be accessed at http://www.pa.ucla.edu/content/sr2ruo4-knightshift. Additional information is available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Rice, T. M. & Sigrist, M. Sr2RuO4: an electronic analogue of 3He? J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7, L643–L648 (1995).
Mackenzie, A. P. & Maeno, Y. The superconductivity of Sr2RuO4 and the physics of spin–triplet pairing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 657–712 (2003).
Hicks, C. W. et al. Strong increase of T c of Sr2RuO4 under both tensile and compressive strain. Science 344, 283–285 (2014).
Steppke, A. et al. Strong peak in T c of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure. Science 355, eaaf9398 (2017).
Ishida, K. et al. Spin-triplet superconductivity in Sr2RuO4 identified by 17O Knight shift. Nature 396, 658–660 (1998).
Oguchi, T. Electronic band structure of the superconductor Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 51, 1385–1388 (1995).
Mackenzie, A. P. et al. Quantum oscillations in the layered perovskite superconductor Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3786–3789 (1996).
Maeno, Y. et al. Superconductivity in a layered perovskite without copper. Nature 372, 532–534 (1994).
Luke, G. M. et al. Time-reversal symmetry-breaking superconductivity in Sr2RuO4. Nature 394, 558–561 (1998).
Xia, J., Maeno, Y., Beyersdorf, P. T., Fejer, M. M. & Kapitulnik, A. High resolution polar Kerr effect measurements of Sr2RuO4: evidence for broken time-reversal symmetry in the superconducting state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167002 (2006).
Leggett, A. J. A theoretical description of the new phases of liquid 3He. Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331–414 (1975).
Yonezawa, S., Kajikawa, T. & Maeno, Y. First-order superconducting transition of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 077003 (2013).
Hassinger, E. et al. Vertical line nodes in the superconducting gap structure of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. X 7, 011032 (2017).
Kittaka, S. et al. Searching for gap zeros in Sr2RuO4 via field-angle-dependent specific-heat measurement. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 87, 093703 (2018).
Björnsson, P. G., Maeno, Y., Huber, M. E. & Moler, K. A. Scanning magnetic imaging Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 72, 012504 (2005).
Hicks, C. W. et al. Limits on superconductivity-related magnetization in Sr2RuO4 and PrOs4Sb12 from scanning SQUID microscopy. Phys. Rev. B 81, 214501 (2010).
Watson, C. A., Gibbs, A. S., Mackenzie, A. P., Hicks, C. W. & Moler, K. A. Micron-scale measurements of low anisotropic strain response of local T c in Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 98, 094521 (2018).
Sunko, V. et al. Direct observation of a uniaxial stress-driven Lifshitz transition in Sr2RuO4. npj Quantum Mater. 4, 46 (2019).
Luo, Y. et al. Normal state 17O NMR studies of Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial stress. Phys. Rev. X 9, 021044 (2019).
Hicks, C. W., Barber, M. E., Edkins, S. D., Brodsky, D. O. & Mackenzie, A. P. Piezoelectric-based apparatus for strain tuning. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 065003 (2014).
Kittaka, S. et al. Angular dependence of the upper critical field of Sr2RuO4. Phys. Rev. B 80, 174514 (2009).
Volovik, G. E. Superconductivity with lines of GAP nodes: density of states in the vortex. JETP Lett. 58, 469–473 (1993).
Li, Y. S. et al. High precision heat capacity measurements on Sr2RuO4 under uniaxial pressure. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.07597 (2019).
Vollhardt, D. & Woelfle, P. The Superfluid Phases of Helium 3 (CRC Press, 1990).
Matano, K., Kriener, M., Segawa, K., Ando, Y. & Zheng, Q. G. Spin-rotation symmetry breaking in the superconducting state of CuxBi2Se3. Nat. Phys. 12, 852–854 (2016).
Veenstra, C. N. et al. Spin-orbital entanglement and the breakdown of singlets and triplets in Sr2RuO4 revealed by spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 127002 (2014).
Hoult, D. I. in eMagRes (eds Harris, R. K. & Wasylishen, R. L.) (John Wiley & Sons, 2007).
We thank M. Ikeda and S. Kivelson for conversations. We particularly appreciate discussions with K. Ishida and Y. Maeno about the implications of our findings, and K. Ishida for reproducing our results. A.P. acknowledges support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through a Feodor Lynen Fellowship. Y.L. acknowledges support by the 1000 Youth Talents Plan of China. N.K. acknowledges support from JSPS KAKENHI (number JP18K04715) and JST-Mirai Program (number JPMJMI18A3) in Japan. S.R. is supported in part by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, contract DEAC02-76SF00515. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (DMR-1709304) and by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) programme of Los Alamos National Laboratory under project number 20170204ER.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Peer review information Nature thanks Catherine Kallin, Guo-qing Zheng and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Extended data figures and tables
a, Ru dxy and hybridizing O p orbitals at the Y point, which dominate the formation of the γ band. NMR shifts are measured at the O(1) and O(1′) sites. b, Compressive a-axis stress shifts the γ-band Fermi surface to the zone boundary at Y. vHs, van Hove singularity. c, Strain device. The enlarged view highlights the Sr2RuO4 single crystal mounted between the piezoelectric actuators, with B0 parallel to the b axis and the compressive stress along the a axis, εaa. The NMR coil covers the free part of ~1 mm length.
a, Power reflected from the tank circuit during magnetic-field sweeps. The steepest slope of δρT(B0) corresponds to the Bc2 values shown in Fig. 1. The broadening of the superconducting transition was modelled by a Gaussian strain distribution of half-width δε/εaa ≈ 10% (pink lines). b, The fitting curves also match with the corresponding derivative d(δρT)/dB0. For clarity, only a subset of the measured fields is shown.
a, Measurements of the reflected power δρT at low strain indicate that Bc2 has a minimum near UPiezo = 0 V. b, The derivative d(δρT)/dB0 illustrates that the Bc2 value associated with the largest rate of change at the transition midpoint first decreases when reducing the compression (UPiezo changing from −20 V to 0 V), followed by a slight increase upon tensile strain (UPiezo changing from 0 V to +12 V). c, The coil impedance was measured at the transition midpoint (B0 fixed at Bc2, as indicated in the inset), providing a sensitive measure of modifications upon changing the strain. Bc2 was determined by a field sweep at intervals of 20 V or less, and then B0 was set to the new transition midpoint. The results (solid blue squares) were corrected for the different B0 values, yielding one half of a parabola centred around [−10 V, 10 V], very similar to the strain dependence of Tc reported in ref. 3 (dashed black line).
a, The transient components of the reflected power are plotted as a function of pulse energy E and time τ after the pulse (see Fig. 4). CW, continuous wave; IP, in-phase; Q, quadrature. b, The magnetic-field dependence of the reflected power was recorded at E = 0.8 μJ. The changes in δρT(B0) for increasing B0 from the measurement field (0.7107 T) to B0 > Bc2 match well with the time-dependent recovery in a, as indicated by the horizontal dotted lines. Both channels (IP and Q) indicate a variation in δρT that results from a transition between normal and superconducting states around τ ≈ 100 μs.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Strain dependence of 17O Knight shifts in the superconducting and normal states.
Comparison of shifts in the normal and superconducting states for strains covering the range εaa = [0, εv]. The top and bottom parts of the figure show the O(1′) and O(1) sites, respectively. The normal-state results (indicated by black and red solid symbols) were recorded at 4.3 K and two different field strengths19. Open symbols correspond to an equilibrium temperature of 20 mK, which is within the superconducting state for sufficiently high Tc, realized by large strain and small magnetic field. Blue and orange symbols correspond to field strengths of 0.7107 T and 1.1573 T, respectively. The results for B0 = 1.9980 T are shown in green (εaa = εv; see Fig. 2).
About this article
Cite this article
Pustogow, A., Luo, Y., Chronister, A. et al. Constraints on the superconducting order parameter in Sr2RuO4 from oxygen-17 nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 574, 72–75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1596-2
Nature Physics (2021)
Nature Communications (2021)
npj Quantum Materials (2021)
Nature Reviews Physics (2021)
Nature Physics (2021)