Direct recognition of invading pathogens by innate immune cells is a critical driver of the inflammatory response. However, cells of the innate immune system can also sense their local microenvironment and respond to physiological fluctuations in temperature, pH, oxygen and nutrient availability, which are altered during inflammation. Although cells of the immune system experience force and pressure throughout their life cycle, little is known about how these mechanical processes regulate the immune response. Here we show that cyclical hydrostatic pressure, similar to that experienced by immune cells in the lung, initiates an inflammatory response via the mechanically activated ion channel PIEZO1. Mice lacking PIEZO1 in innate immune cells showed ablated pulmonary inflammation in the context of bacterial infection or fibrotic autoinflammation. Our results reveal an environmental sensory axis that stimulates innate immune cells to mount an inflammatory response, and demonstrate a physiological role for PIEZO1 and mechanosensation in immunity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Stem Cell Research & Therapy Open Access 26 August 2023
Cellular mechanotransduction in health and diseases: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic targets
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy Open Access 31 July 2023
Combination therapy with ultrasound and 2D nanomaterials promotes recovery after spinal cord injury via Piezo1 downregulation
Journal of Nanobiotechnology Open Access 15 March 2023
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Pritchard, M. T., Li, Z. & Repasky, E. A. Nitric oxide production is regulated by fever-range thermal stimulation of murine macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 78, 630–638 (2005).
Anand, R. J. et al. Hypoxia causes an increase in phagocytosis by macrophages in a HIF-1α-dependent manner. J. Leukoc. Biol. 82, 1257–1265 (2007).
Ip, W. K. E. & Medzhitov, R. Macrophages monitor tissue osmolarity and induce inflammatory response through NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasome activation. Nat. Commun. 6, 6931 (2015).
Littlewood-Evans, A. et al. GPR91 senses extracellular succinate released from inflammatory macrophages and exacerbates rheumatoid arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 213, 1655–1662 (2016).
Palm, N. W. & Medzhitov, R. Pattern recognition receptors and control of adaptive immunity. Immunol. Rev. 227, 221–233 (2009).
Huse, M. Mechanical forces in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 679–690 (2017).
Hsiai, T. K. et al. Monocyte recruitment to endothelial cells in response to oscillatory shear stress. FASEB J. 17, 1648–1657 (2003).
McWhorter, F. Y., Davis, C. T. & Liu, W. F. Physical and mechanical regulation of macrophage phenotype and function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 1303–1316 (2015).
Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010).
Murthy, S. E. et al. The mechanosensitive ion channel Piezo2 mediates sensitivity to mechanical pain in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaat9897 (2018).
Gudipaty, S. A. et al. Mechanical stretch triggers rapid epithelial cell division through Piezo1. Nature 543, 118–121 (2017).
Wang, S. et al. Endothelial cation channel PIEZO1 controls blood pressure by mediating flow-induced ATP release. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 4527–4536 (2016).
Delmas, P., Hao, J. & Rodat-Despoix, L. Molecular mechanisms of mechanotransduction in mammalian sensory neurons. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 139–153 (2011).
Schipke, K. J., To, S. D. F. & Warnock, J. N. Design of a cyclic pressure bioreactor for the ex vivo study of aortic heart valves. J. Vis. Exp. (54):3316 (2011).
Li, J. et al. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature 515, 279–282 (2014).
He, Y., Hara, H. & Núñez, G. Mechanism and regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 1012–1021 (2016).
Tannahill, G. M. et al. Succinate is an inflammatory signal that induces IL-1β through HIF-1α. Nature 496, 238–242 (2013).
Yamashita, K., Discher, D. J., Hu, J., Bishopric, N. H. & Webster, K. A. Molecular regulation of the endothelin-1 gene by hypoxia. Contributions of hypoxia-inducible factor-1, activator protein-1, GATA-2, and p300/CBP. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12645–12653 (2001).
Lee, J. J. et al. Hypoxia activates the cyclooxygenase-2-prostaglandin E synthase axis. Carcinogenesis 31, 427–434 (2010).
Palazon, A., Goldrath, A. W., Nizet, V. & Johnson, R. S. HIF transcription factors, inflammation, and immunity. Immunity 41, 518–528 (2014).
Varia, M. A. et al. Pimonidazole: a novel hypoxia marker for complementary study of tumor hypoxia and cell proliferation in cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol. 71, 270–277 (1998).
Mekhail, K., Gunaratnam, L., Bonicalzi, M.-E. & Lee, S. HIF activation by pH-dependent nucleolar sequestration of VHL. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 642–647 (2004).
Glogowska, E. et al. Novel mechanisms of PIEZO1 dysfunction in hereditary xerocytosis. Blood 130, 1845–1856 (2017).
Miyamoto, T. et al. Functional role for Piezo1 in stretch-evoked Ca2+ influx and ATP release in urothelial cell cultures. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 16565–16575 (2014).
Stow, L. R., Jacobs, M. E., Wingo, C. S. & Cain, B. D. Endothelin-1 gene regulation. FASEB J. 25, 16–28 (2011).
Li, M. et al. Endothelin-1 induces hypoxia inducible factor 1α expression in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 586, 3888–3893 (2012).
Liu, Y. V. et al. Calcineurin promotes hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression by dephosphorylating RACK1 and blocking RACK1 dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 37064–37073 (2007).
Cheng, T.-H. et al. Reactive oxygen species mediate cyclic strain-induced endothelin-1 gene expression via Ras/Raf/extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway in endothelial cells. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 33, 1805–1814 (2001).
Bailis, W. et al. Distinct modes of mitochondrial metabolism uncouple T cell differentiation and function. Nature 571, 403–407 (2019).
Lindsey, A. S. et al. Analysis of pulmonary vascular injury and repair during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection-induced pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pulm. Circ. 9, 1–13 (2019).
Novak, J., Georgakoudi, I., Wei, X., Prossin, A. & Lin, C. P. In vivo flow cytometer for real-time detection and quantification of circulating cells. Opt. Lett. 29, 77–79 (2004).
Abram, C. L., Roberge, G. L., Hu, Y. & Lowell, C. A. Comparative analysis of the efficiency and specificity of myeloid-Cre deleting strains using ROSA-EYFP reporter mice. J. Immunol. Methods 408, 89–100 (2014).
Mack, M. et al. Expression and characterization of the chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5 in mice. J. Immunol. 166, 4697–4704 (2001).
Phillips, J. E. et al. Bleomycin induced lung fibrosis increases work of breathing in the mouse. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 25, 281–285 (2012).
Ashcroft, T., Simpson, J. M. & Timbrell, V. Simple method of estimating severity of pulmonary fibrosis on a numerical scale. J. Clin. Pathol. 41, 467–470 (1988).
Wu, J. et al. Inactivation of mechanically activated Piezo1 ion channels is determined by the C-terminal extracellular domain and the inner pore helix. Cell Rep. 21, 2357–2366 (2017).
Abshire, M. Y., Thomas, K. S., Owen, K. A. & Bouton, A. H. Macrophage motility requires distinct α5β1/FAK and α4β1/paxillin signaling events. J. Leukoc. Biol. 89, 251–257 (2011).
Young, S. R. L., Gerard-O’Riley, R., Kim, J.-B. & Pavalko, F. M. Focal adhesion kinase is important for fluid shear stress-induced mechanotransduction in osteoblasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 24, 411–424 (2009).
Bassotti, G. et al. Gastrointestinal motility disorders in inflammatory bowel diseases. World J. Gastroenterol. 20, 37–44 (2014).
Rajamäki, K. et al. Extracellular acidosis is a novel danger signal alerting innate immunity via the NLRP3 inflammasome. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 13410–13419 (2013).
We thank J. Alderman, C. Lieber, C. Hughes, E. H.-P. and P. Rainey for help in facilitating this work; B. Kazmierczak for providing the P. aeruginosa; M. Roulis for insightful comments and reagents; L. Orr for helpful insight regarding statistical analysis; I. Odell for help with computational software; C. Rothlin and Dr. C. Abraham for continued support and feedback as this work progressed; P.-M. Chen for help and reagents related to hypoxia studies. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Blavatnik Family Foundation (R.A.F.). This work was supported in part by the Searle Scholars Program, the Leukemia Research Foundation, the Gruber Foundation and the NIH (R01GM122984). R.J. was supported in part by the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation. M.A.S. was supported by the NIH (HL RO1 75092). A.G.S. was supported in part by an NIH training grant (T32 GM007499) and the American Society for Microbiology.
: R.A.F. is a scientific advisor to GlaxoSmithKline, a consultant for Hatteras Venture Partners and a shareholder and consultant for Zai Lab Ltd. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature thanks Seth Alper, Luke O’Neill, Sarah Walmsley and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Extended data figures and tables
a, Schematic of CHP bioreactor showing side view. b, Graph of pressure regimes used within the pressure chamber. c, RT–qPCR analysis of Piezo1 in unstimulated BMDMs from Piezo1fl/fl (WT) and Piezo1ΔLysM mice. Data are presented as five biological replicates from two independent experiments. d, RT–qPCR analysis of Piezo1fl/fl BMDMs treated with static pressure at the indicated magnitude or with CHP for 6 h. Data are presented as four biological replicates from two independent experiments. e, Immunoblot analysis of HIF1α and β-tubulin from Piezo1fl/fl BMDMs treated with static pressure at the indicated magnitude or with CHP for 6 h. Data are representative of two independent experiments. f, ELISA of IL-1β from Piezo1fl/fl and Piezo1ΔLysM BMDMs treated with CHP alone (NT), 10 ng ml−1 LPS with 5 h CHP followed by 1 h CHP, 5 h CHP followed by 1 h nigericin (10 μM) in CHP, or 10 ng ml−1 LPS for 5 h followed by 1 h nigericin (10 μM) with CHP. Data are presented as three biological replicates. Data in c, d, f are mean ± s.e.m.; significance is determined by unpaired two-tailed t-test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001).
a, Representative confocal microscopy of BMDMs treated for 6 h in either normoxic conditions or in a hypoxic chamber (2% O2). Cells were treated with pimonidazole (20 μM) for 1 h before completion of treatment. Upon completion, cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained with monoclonal antibody against pimonidazole. Data are representative of two independent experiments. b, Confocal microscopy of BMDMs treated for 6 h in either static, CHP or hypoxic chamber (0.5% O2). Cells were treated with 20 μM pimonidazole 1 h before completion of treatment. Upon completion, cells were fixed, permeabilized and stained with monoclonal antibody against pimonidazole. Data are representative of two independent experiments. c, RT–qPCR analysis of BMDMs treated with cyclical hydrostatic pressure, 2% O2 or cyclical hydrostatic pressure with 2% O2 for 6 h. Data are presented as three biological replicates. d, RT–qPCR analysis of Hif1a in BMDMs following CHP. Data are presented as four biological replicates. Data are from two independent experiments. e, Representative immunoblot analysis of HIF2α and β-tubulin from BMDMs treated with static pressure, CHP or DMOG (200 μM) for 6 h. Data in c, d are mean ± s.e.m.; significance is determined by unpaired two-tailed t-test.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Cyclical hydrostatic pressure-induced HIF1α protein is stabilized independent of acidity.
a, Intracellular pH measurements using pHrodo intracellular pH indicator dye for final 30 min of treatment. Piezo1fl/fl (n = 3) and Piezo1ΔLysM (n = 3) cells were treated with CHP for the indicated periods or with low-pH cell medium for 6 h. b, pH measurements of supernatant from Piezo1fl/fl (n = 3) and Piezo1ΔLysM (n = 3) BMDM culture treated with CHP for the indicated periods. Data in a, b, are mean ± s.e.m.; significance is determined by unpaired two-tailed t-test.
Extended Data Fig. 4 Kinetics and sufficiency of cyclical hydrostatic pressure induced HIF1α stabilization and transcriptional response.
a, Representative immunoblot analysis of HIF1α and β-tubulin from BMDMs in CHP with 5 μM GsMTx4 (Gsm) for 6 h, then washed three times in DMEM before further CHP stimulation. Data are representative of two independent experiments. b, Immunoblot analysis of HIF1α and β-tubulin from BMDMs in CHP for 6 h, pretreated with 10 μM BAPTA-AM for 30 min. Data are representative of two independent experiments. c, Immunoblot analysis of HIF1α and β-tubulin in BMDMs. Piezo1fl/fl (WT) or Piezo1ΔLysM (KO) were cultured in CHP for 6 h along with 3 μg ml BFA. Cells were then washed with DMEM three times and further subjected to additional CHP stimulation. Supernatant (sup) was then clarified and transferred to WT or KO BMDMs cultured in static pressure for two additional hours. Data are representative of two independent experiments. d, Representative immunoblot analysis of HIF1α and β-tubulin from BMDMs treated with 100 μM chloroquine (ChlQ) or 50 μM MG132 for 6 h with CHP. Data are representative of two independent experiments. e, RT–qPCR analysis of Edn1 from Hif1afl/fl and Piezo1ΔLysM BMDMs treated with CHP for 1 h or 6 h. Data are presented as three biological replicates. f, g, RT–qPCR analysis of Piezo1fl/fl (f) or Piezo1ΔLysM (g) BMDMs cultured in 6 h of treatment 200 μM DMOG, 6 h of CHP, 2 h of CHP followed by 4 h of no treatment (NT), 2 h of static pressure followed by 4 h of 200 μM DMOG, or 2 h CHP followed by 4 h of 200 μM DMOG. Data are representative of three biological replicates. Data are mean ± s.e.m.
a–c, RT–qPCR analysis of known mammalian mechanosensory ion channels from monocytes (a), alveolar macrophages (b) or neutrophils (c) sorted from lungs of mice infected with P. aeruginosa or PBS for 6 h. Data are represented as fold increase over neutrophil expression for each gene. Data are representative of four biological replicates. Data are mean ± s.e.m.
a, Representative flow cytometry of lungs from Piezo1fl/fl (top; n = 9) or Piezo1ΔLysM (bottom; n = 9) mice infected intranasally with P. aeruginosa for 6 h. The lymphoid lineage is TCRβ+NK1.1+B220+CD19+CD90.2+TCRγδ+. Data are representative of two independent experiments. b, c, Infiltrating monocyte quantification in terms of percentage(b) and total numbers (c) following 6 h of intranasal P. aeruginosa infection of Piezo1fl/fl (n = 7) or Piezo1ΔLysM (n = 7) mice. Data are representative of two independent experiments. d, Representative intracellular flow cytometry histograms of HIF1α from total lung interstitial monocytes of Piezo1fl/fl and Piezo1ΔLysM mice infected intranasally with P. aeruginosa for 6 h. Data are from two independent experiments. e, MFI of HIF1α from in vivo-labelled CD45.2+ circulatory monocytes from Piezo1fl/fl (n = 7) or Piezo1ΔLysM (n = 6) mice infected with P. aeruginosa for 6 h. Data are from two independent experiments. f, MFI of HIF1α from tissue-infiltrated and circulatory monocytes from mice infected with P aeruginosa intranasally (n = 7) or intraperitoneally (n = 8) for 6 h. Data are from two independent experiments. g, RT–qPCR analysis from BMDMs treated with oscillatory shear stress for 6 h. Data are representative of three biological replicates. Data in b, c, e–g are mean ± s.e.m.; significance is determined by unpaired two-tailed t-test (****P < 0.0001).
a, CFUs from liver of Piezo1fl/fl mice infected intranasally with P. aeruginosa for 24 h, pre-treated with 25 μg EDN1-blocking antibody (n = 5) or isotype control (n = 6) intranasally 6 h before infection. Data are from two independent experiments. b, CFUs from liver of Piezo1ΔLysM mice infected intranasally with P. aeruginosa for 24 h treated with vehicle (n = 10) or 10 μg rEDN1 (n = 9) at the time of infection. Data are from two independent experiments. c, d, CFUs from lung(c) or liver(d) of Piezo1fl/fl mice infected intranasally with P. aeruginosa for 24 h, pre-treated with vehicle (n = 10) or 100 mg per kg (body weight) bosentan (n = 8) intraperitoneally 3 h before infection. Data are from two independent experiments. Data are mean ± s.e.m.; significance is determined by unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney U-test (*P < 0.05,**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001).
Cyclical force signals via PIEZO1 in myeloid cells, resulting in Ca2+ influx and AP-1-induced EDN1 expression. Ednrb signalling then drives HIF1α stabilization and proinflammatory transcriptional upregulation.
Extended Data Fig. 9 Infiltrating monocytes recognize cyclical hydrostatic pressure in the lung via PIEZO1 to trigger neutrophil-mediated bacterial clearance.
Recruited monocytes recognize cyclical force via PIEZO1 in the lung and secrete EDN1 to drive HIF1α stabilization and CXCL2 expression to induce neutrophilia and bacterial clearance.
About this article
Cite this article
Solis, A.G., Bielecki, P., Steach, H.R. et al. Mechanosensation of cyclical force by PIEZO1 is essential for innate immunity. Nature 573, 69–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1485-8
This article is cited by
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2023)
Combination therapy with ultrasound and 2D nanomaterials promotes recovery after spinal cord injury via Piezo1 downregulation
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2023)
Intravital measurements of solid stresses in tumours reveal length-scale and microenvironmentally dependent force transmission
Nature Biomedical Engineering (2023)
Nature Reviews Bioengineering (2023)