Increased shear in the North Atlantic upper-level jet stream over the past four decades


Earth’s equator-to-pole temperature gradient drives westerly mid-latitude jet streams through thermal wind balance1. In the upper atmosphere, anthropogenic climate change is strengthening this meridional temperature gradient by cooling the polar lower stratosphere2,3 and warming the tropical upper troposphere4,5,6, acting to strengthen the upper-level jet stream7. In contrast, in the lower atmosphere, Arctic amplification of global warming is weakening the meridional temperature gradient8,9,10, acting to weaken the upper-level jet stream. Therefore, trends in the speed of the upper-level jet stream11,12,13 represent a closely balanced tug-of-war between two competing effects at different altitudes14. It is possible to isolate one of the competing effects by analysing the vertical shear—the change in wind speed with height—instead of the wind speed, but this approach has not previously been taken. Here we show that, although the zonal wind speed in the North Atlantic polar jet stream at 250 hectopascals has not changed since the start of the observational satellite era in 1979, the vertical shear has increased by 15 per cent (with a range of 11–17 per cent) according to three different reanalysis datasets15,16,17. We further show that this trend is attributable to the thermal wind response to the enhanced upper-level meridional temperature gradient. Our results indicate that climate change may be having a larger impact on the North Atlantic jet stream than previously thought. The increased vertical shear is consistent with the intensification of shear-driven clear-air turbulence expected from climate change18,19,20, which will affect aviation in the busy transatlantic flight corridor by creating a more turbulent flying environment for aircraft. We conclude that the effects of climate change and variability on the upper-level jet stream are being partly obscured by the traditional focus on wind speed rather than wind shear.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Annual-mean temperature trends in the North Atlantic at 250 hPa over the period 1979–2017.
Fig. 2: Vertical profiles of trends in the annual-mean north–south temperature difference across the North Atlantic over the period 1979–2017.
Fig. 3: Time series of annual-mean wind characteristics in the North Atlantic at 250 hPa over the period 1979–2017.
Fig. 4: Annual-mean trends in vertical shear in zonal wind in the North Atlantic at 250 hPa over the period 1979–2017.

Data availability

The NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data may be obtained from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) Earth System Research Laboratory (ESRL) Physical Sciences Division (PSD), Boulder, Colorado, USA ( The ERA-Interim and JRA-55 reanalysis data may be obtained from the Research Data Archive at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA ( and, respectively).

Code availability

The analytical computer codes are publicly available at


  1. 1.

    Wallace, J. M. & Hobbs, P. V. Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey (Academic Press, 2006).

  2. 2.

    Held, I. M. Large-scale dynamics and global warming. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 74, 228–241 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Thompson, D. W. J. & Solomon, S. Recent stratospheric climate trends as evidenced in radiosonde data: global structure and tropospheric linkages. J. Clim. 18, 4785–4795 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Allen, R. J. & Sherwood, S. C. Warming maximum in the tropical upper troposphere deduced from thermal winds. Nat. Geosci. 1, 399–403 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mitchell, D. M., Thorne, P. W., Stott, P. A. & Gray, L. J. Revisiting the controversial issue of tropical tropospheric temperature trends. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 2801–2806 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sherwood, S. C. & Nishant, N. Atmospheric changes through 2012 as shown by iteratively homogenized radiosonde temperature and wind data (IUKv2). Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 054007 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lorenz, D. J. & DeWeaver, E. T. Tropopause height and zonal wind response to global warming in the IPCC scenario integrations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 112, 1–11 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L06801 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Haarsma, R. J., Selten, F. & van Oldenborgh, G. J. Anthropogenic changes of the thermal and zonal flow structure over Western Europe and Eastern North Atlantic in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Clim. Dyn. 41, 2577–2588 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Francis, J. A. & Vavrus, S. J. Evidence for a wavier jet stream in response to rapid Arctic warming. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 014005 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Archer, C. L. & Caldeira, K. Historical trends in the jet streams. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L08803 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Pena-Ortiz, C., Gallego, D., Ribera, P., Ordonez, P. & Del Carmen Alvarez-Castro, M. Observed trends in the global jet stream characteristics during the second half of the 20th century. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 2702–2713 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Manney, G. L. & Hegglin, M. I. Seasonal and regional variations of long-term changes in upper-tropospheric jets from reanalyses. J. Clim. 31, 423–448 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Francis, J. A. Why are Arctic linkages to extreme weather still up in the air? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 2551–2557 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kalnay, E. et al. The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437–471 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dee, D. P. et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kobayashi, S. et al. The JRA-55 reanalysis: general specifications and basic characteristics. J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II 93, 5–48 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Williams, P. D. & Joshi, M. M. Intensification of winter transatlantic aviation turbulence in response to climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 644–648 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Williams, P. D. Increased light, moderate, and severe clear-air turbulence in response to climate change. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 34, 576–586 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Storer, L. N., Williams, P. D. & Joshi, M. M. Global response of clear-air turbulence to climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 9976–9984 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lee, S. & Kim, H. The dynamical relationship between subtropical and eddy-driven jets. J. Atmos. Sci. 60, 1490–1503 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hannachi, A., Woollings, T. & Fraedrich, K. The North Atlantic jet stream: a look at preferred positions, paths and transitions. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 138, 862–877 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Williams, P. D. Transatlantic flight times and climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 024008 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vallis, G. K., Zurita-Gotor, P., Cairns, C. & Kidston, J. Response of the large-scale structure of the atmosphere to global warming. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141, 1479–1501 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Woollings, T. & Blackburn, M. The North Atlantic jet stream under climate change and its relation to the NAO and EA patterns. J. Clim. 25, 886–902 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Stuecker, M. F., Bitz, C. M., Armour, K. C., Proistosescu, C. & Kang, S. M. Polar amplification dominated by local forcing and feedbacks. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 1076–1081 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fujiwara, M. et al. Introduction to the SPARC Reanalysis Intercomparison Project (S-RIP) and overview of the reanalysis systems. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 1417–1452 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Waugh, D. W., Sobel, A. H. & Polvani, L. M. What is the polar vortex and how does it influence weather? Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98, 37–44 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Shapiro, M. A. Turbulent mixing within tropopause folds as a mechanism for the exchange of chemical constituents between the stratosphere and troposphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 994–1004 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Maycock, A. C., Joshi, M. M., Shine, K. P. & Scaife, A. A. The circulation response to idealized changes in stratospheric water vapor. J. Clim. 26, 545–561 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


S.H.L. acknowledges support through a PhD studentship from the Natural Environment Research Council SCENARIO Doctoral Training Partnership (reference NE/L002566/1).

Author information




S.H.L. and P.D.W. jointly conceived the study. S.H.L. performed the data analysis and produced the figures with input from P.D.W. and T.H.A.F. All authors contributed to writing the manuscript. The authors discussed the results with each other at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D. Williams.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Peer review information Nature thanks Darryn Waugh and Elizabeth A. Barnes for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Vertical profiles of annual-mean trends in wind characteristics in the North Atlantic over the period 1979–2017.

ac, Trends in the vertical shear in the zonal wind. df, Trends in the zonal wind speed. Linear trends are calculated from the ERA-Interim (a, d), NCEP/NCAR (b, e) and JRA-55 (c, f) reanalysis datasets. Red and blue colours represent positive and negative trends, respectively. Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals in the slope of the ordinary least-squares regression (two-tailed t-test; n = 39). Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Annual-mean regional-maximum six-hourly vertical shear in zonal wind in the North Atlantic at 250 hPa over the period 1979–2017.

Data are presented from the ERA-Interim, NCEP/NCAR and JRA-55 reanalysis datasets. Also shown are the mean of the three reanalysis datasets and the linear trend in the mean. Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Annual-mean latitude of the core of the polar jet stream in the North Atlantic at 250 hPa over the period 1979–2017.

a, Annual-mean latitude of the regional-maximum six-hourly vertical shear in zonal wind. b, Annual-mean latitude of the regional-maximum six-hourly zonal wind speed. Data are presented from the ERA-Interim, NCEP/NCAR and JRA-55 reanalysis datasets. Also shown are the mean of the three reanalysis datasets and the linear trend in the mean, which has a statistically insignificant slope of –0.1° per decade (two-tailed t-test; P = 0.54; n = 39) (a) and 0.01° per decade (two-tailed t-test; P = 0.76;n = 39) (b). Source data

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.H., Williams, P.D. & Frame, T.H.A. Increased shear in the North Atlantic upper-level jet stream over the past four decades. Nature 572, 639–642 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing