Understanding which species and ecosystems will be most severely affected by warming as climate change advances is important for guiding conservation and management. Both marine and terrestrial fauna have been affected by warming1,2 but an explicit comparison of physiological sensitivity between the marine and terrestrial realms has been lacking. Assessing how close populations live to their upper thermal limits has been challenging, in part because extreme temperatures frequently drive demographic responses3,4 and yet fauna can use local thermal refugia to avoid extremes5,6,7. Here we show that marine ectotherms experience hourly body temperatures that are closer to their upper thermal limits than do terrestrial ectotherms across all latitudes—but that this is the case only if terrestrial species can access thermal refugia. Although not a direct prediction of population decline, this thermal safety margin provides an index of the physiological stress caused by warming. On land, the smallest thermal safety margins were found for species at mid-latitudes where the hottest hourly body temperatures occurred; by contrast, the marine species with the smallest thermal safety margins were found near the equator. We also found that local extirpations related to warming have been twice as common in the ocean as on land, which is consistent with the smaller thermal safety margins at sea. Our results suggest that different processes will exacerbate thermal vulnerability across these two realms. Higher sensitivities to warming and faster rates of colonization in the marine realm suggest that extirpations will be more frequent and species turnover faster in the ocean. By contrast, terrestrial species appear to be more vulnerable to loss of access to thermal refugia, which would make habitat fragmentation and changes in land use critical drivers of species loss on land.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
The upper thermal-tolerance data and extirpation data that support the findings of this study are available at Zenodo under the identifier: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2576197. Any other relevant data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Custom analysis scripts are available at Zenodo under the identifier: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2576197.
Poloczanska, E. S. et al. Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 919–925 (2013).
Parmesan, C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669 (2006).
Ma, G., Rudolf, V. H. W. & Ma, C. S. Extreme temperature events alter demographic rates, relative fitness, and community structure. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 1794–1808 (2015).
Easterling, D. R. et al. Climate extremes: observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289, 2068–2074 (2000).
Sunday, J. M. et al. Thermal-safety margins and the necessity of thermoregulatory behavior across latitude and elevation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5610–5615 (2014).
Lima, F. P. et al. Loss of thermal refugia near equatorial range limits. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 254–263 (2016).
Potter, K. A., Woods, H. A. & Pincebourde, S. Microclimatic challenges in global change biology. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 2932–2939 (2013).
Wiens, J. J. Climate-related local extinctions are already widespread among plant and animal species. PLoS Biol. 14, e2001104 (2016).
Luck, G. W., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 331–336 (2003).
IPCC. In Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A.) 2–34 (IPCC, 2014).
Finnegan, S., Heim, N. A., Peters, S. E. & Fischer, W. W. Climate change and the selective signature of the Late Ordovician mass extinction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6829–6834 (2012).
Penn, J. L., Deutsch, C., Payne, J. L., & Sperling, E. A. Temperature-dependent hypoxia explains biogeography and severity of end-Permian marine mass extinction. Science 362, eaat1327 (2018).
Vasseur, D. A. et al. Increased temperature variation poses a greater risk to species than climate warming. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 20132612 (2014).
Dillon, M. E., Wang, G. & Huey, R. B. Global metabolic impacts of recent climate warming. Nature 467, 704–706 (2010).
Deutsch, C. A. et al. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6668–6672 (2008).
Bonebrake, T. C. & Deutsch, C. A. Climate heterogeneity modulates impact of warming on tropical insects. Ecology 93, 449–455 (2012).
Comte, L. & Olden, J. D. Climatic vulnerability of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 718–722 (2017).
Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 686–690 (2012).
Pörtner, H. O. & Knust, R. Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance. Science 315, 95–97 (2007).
Pörtner, H. O. et al. In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 411–484 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
Gunderson, A. R. & Stillman, J. H. Plasticity in thermal tolerance has limited potential to buffer ectotherms from global warming. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 282, 20150401 (2015).
Seebacher, F., White, C. R. & Franklin, C. E. Physiological plasticity increases resilience of ectothermic animals to climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 61–66 (2015).
Diamond, S. E. et al. A physiological trait-based approach to predicting the responses of species to experimental climate warming. Ecology 93, 2305–2312 (2012).
Hamblin, A. L., Youngsteadt, E., López-Uribe, M. M. & Frank, S. D. Physiological thermal limits predict differential responses of bees to urban heat-island effects. Biol. Lett. 13, 20170125 (2017).
Hoffmann, A. A. Physiological climatic limits in Drosophila: patterns and implications. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 870–880 (2010).
Huey, R. B. et al. Why tropical forest lizards are vulnerable to climate warming. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276, 1939–1948 (2009).
Gunderson, A. R. & Leal, M. A conceptual framework for understanding thermal constraints on ectotherm activity with implications for predicting responses to global change. Ecol. Lett. 19, 111–120 (2016).
Gunderson, A. R., Dillon, M. E. & Stillman, J. H. Estimating the benefits of plasticity in ectotherm heat tolerance under natural thermal variability. Funct. Ecol. 31, 1529–1539 (2017).
Schloss, C. A., Nuñez, T. A. & Lawler, J. J. Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8606–8611 (2012).
Parmesan, C., Root, T. L. & Willig, M. R. Impacts of extreme weather and climate on terrestrial biota. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 443–450 (2000).
Donat, M. G. et al. Updated analyses of temperature and precipitation extreme indices since the beginning of the twentieth century: the HadEX2 dataset. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 2098–2118 (2013).
Reynolds, R. W. et al. Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Clim. 20, 5473–5496 (2007).
Kennedy, J. J., Brohan, P. & Tett, S. F. B. A global climatology of the diurnal variations in sea-surface temperature and implications for MSU temperature trends. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, 1–5 (2007).
Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Global analysis of thermal tolerance and latitude in ectotherms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278, 1823–1830 (2011).
Scholander, P. F., Flagg, W., Walters, V. & Irving, L. Climatic adaptation in arctic and tropical poikilotherms. Physiol. Zool. 26, 67–92 (1953).
Morley, S. A. et al. Rates of warming and the global sensitivity of shallow water marine invertebrates to elevated temperature. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 96, 159–165 (2016).
Urban, H. J. Upper temperature tolerance of ten bivalve species off Peru and Chile related to El Niño. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 107, 139–145 (1994).
Zerebecki, R. A. & Sorte, C. J. B. Temperature tolerance and stress proteins as mechanisms of invasive species success. PLoS ONE 6, e14806 (2011).
Ansell, A. D. & McLachlan, A. Upper temperature tolerances of three molluscs from South African sandy beaches. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 48, 243–251 (1980).
Madeira, D., Narciso, L., Cabral, H. N. & Vinagre, C. Thermal tolerance and potential impacts of climate change on coastal and estuarine organisms. J. Sea Res. 70, 32–41 (2012).
Vinagre, C. et al. Effect of temperature in multiple biomarkers of oxidative stress in coastal shrimp. J. Therm. Biol. 41, 38–42 (2014).
Prentice, E. F. & Schneider, D. E. Respiration and thermal tolerance of the Dungeness crab, Cancer magister Dana. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 63, 591–597 (1979).
Kennedy, V. S. & Mihursky, J. A. Upper temperature tolerances of some estuarine bivalves. Chesap. Sci. 12, 193–204 (1971).
Lutterschmidt, W. I. & Hutchison, V. H. The critical thermal maximum: history and critique. Can. J. Zool. 75, 1561–1574 (1997).
Sinclair, B. J. et al. Can we predict ectotherm responses to climate change using thermal performance curves and body temperatures? Ecol. Lett. 19, 1372–1385 (2016).
Willmott, C. J. & Matsuura, K. Terrestrial air temperature: 1900–2014 gridded monthly time series (v.4.01) http://climate.geog.udel.edu/~climate/html_pages/download.html#T2014, accessed September 2016.
Danielson, J. J. & Gesch, D. B. Global Multi-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010). Report No. 2011-1073 (U.S. Geological Survey, 2011).
Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R 2nd edn (Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2017).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2nd edn (Springer, New York, 2002).
Bakken, G. S. Measurement and application of operative and standard operative temperatures in ecology. Am. Zool. 32, 194–216 (1992).
Kearney, M. & Porter, W. Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecol. Lett. 12, 334–350 (2009).
Kearney, M., Shine, R. & Porter, W. P. The potential for behavioral thermoregulation to buffer “cold-blooded” animals against climate warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3835–3840 (2009).
Kearney, M. R. & Porter, W. P. NicheMapR – an R package for biophysical modelling: the microclimate model. Ecography 40, 664–674 (2017).
Chamberlain, S. rnoaa: ‘NOAA’ Weather Data from R. R package version 0.7.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rnoaa. (2017).
Menne, M. J., Durre, I., Vose, R. S., Gleason, B. E. & Houston, T. G. An overview of the global historical climatology network-daily database. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 29, 897–910 (2012).
Sears, M. W. et al. Configuration of the thermal landscape determines thermoregulatory performance of ectotherms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10595–10600 (2016).
Grigg, G. C., Drane, C. R. & Courtice, G. P. Time constants of heating and cooling in the eastern water dragon, Physignathus lesueruii, and some generalizations about heating and cooling in reptiles. J. Therm. Biol. 4, 95–103 (1979).
Denny, M. W. Air and Water: The Biology and Physics of Life’s Media (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1993).
Locarnini, R. A. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2013, Volume 1: Temperature (National Oceanographic Data Center, Silver Spring, 2013).
Freitas, C., Olsen, E. M., Knutsen, H., Albretsen, J. & Moland, E. Temperature-associated habitat selection in a cold-water marine fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 628–637 (2016).
Holland, K. N., Brill, R. W., Chang, R. K. C., Sibert, J. R. & Fournier, D. A. Physiological and behavioural thermoregulation in bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). Nature 358, 410–412 (1992).
Freitas, C., Olsen, E. M., Moland, E., Ciannelli, L. & Knutsen, H. Behavioral responses of Atlantic cod to sea temperature changes. Ecol. Evol. 5, 2070–2083 (2015).
Aspillaga, E. et al. Thermal stratification drives movement of a coastal apex predator. Sci. Rep. 7, 526 (2017).
Brownscombe, J. W., Cooke, S. J. & Danylchuk, A. J. Spatiotemporal drivers of energy expenditure in a coastal marine fish. Oecologia 183, 689–699 (2017).
Hight, B. V. & Lowe, C. G. Elevated body temperatures of adult female leopard sharks, Triakis semifasciata, while aggregating in shallow nearshore embayments: evidence for behavioral thermoregulation? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 352, 114–128 (2007).
Watson, W. H., III, Schaller, S. Y. & Chabot, C. C. in Biology and Conservation of Horseshoe Crabs (eds Tanacredi, J. T. et al.) 131–147 (Springer US, Boston, 2009).
Jury, S. H. & Watson, W. H. Seasonal and sexual differences in the thermal preferences and movements of American lobsters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 70, 1650–1657 (2013).
Herrera, F. D., Ramirez, F. B., Sevilla, B. B. & Farfán, C. Behavioral thermoregulation of Bulla gouldiana (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia: Cephalaspidea). J. Therm. Biol. 21, 319–322 (1996).
Díaz, F. et al. Thermal preference and tolerance of green abalone Haliotis fulgens (Philippi, 1845) and pink abalone Haliotis corrugata (Gray, 1828). Aquacult. Res. 37, 877–884 (2006).
McCauley, D. J. et al. Marine defaunation: animal loss in the global ocean. Science 347, 1255641 (2015).
Elder, L. E. & Seibel, B. A. The thermal stress response to diel vertical migration in the hyperiid amphipod Phronima sedentaria. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 187, 20–26 (2015).
Werner, T. & Buchholz, F. Diel vertical migration behaviour in Euphausiids of the northern Benguela current: seasonal adaptations to food availability and strong gradients of temperature and oxygen. J. Plankton Res. 35, 792–812 (2013).
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. FishBase version 12/2017 http://www.fishbase.org, accessed December 2017.
Boettiger, C., Chamberlain, S., Temple Lang, D. & Wainwright, P. rfishbase: R Interface to ‘FishBase’'. R package version 126.96.36.199 https://github.com/ropensci/rfishbase (2016).
Diamond, S. E. et al. A physiological trait-based approach to predicting the responses of species to experimental climate warming. Ecology 93, 2305–2312 (2012).
Dong, Y.-w. et al. Untangling the roles of microclimate, behaviour and physiological polymorphism in governing vulnerability of intertidal snails to heat stress. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 284, 20162367 (2017).
Huey, R. B. et al. Predicting organismal vulnerability to climate warming: roles of behaviour, physiology and adaptation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 367, 1665–1679 (2012).
Kingsolver, J. G., Diamond, S. E. & Buckley, L. B. Heat stress and the fitness consequences of climate change for terrestrial ectotherms. Funct. Ecol. 27, 1415–1423 (2013).
Sinervo, B. et al. Erosion of lizard diversity by climate change and altered thermal niches. Science 328, 894–899 (2010).
Collins, M. et al. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Sillmann, J., Kharin, V. V., Zwiers, F. W., Zhang, X. & Bronaugh, D. Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: part 2. Future climate projections. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 2473–2493 (2013).
Gentemann, C. L. & Minnett, P. J. Radiometric measurements of ocean surface thermal variability. J. Geophys. Res. 113, C08017 (2008).
Munday, P. L., Donelson, J. M. & Domingos, J. A. Potential for adaptation to climate change in a coral reef fish. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 307–317 (2017).
Donelson, J. M. Development in a warm future ocean may enhance performance in some species. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 472, 119–125 (2015).
Donelson, J. M., Munday, P. L., McCormick, M. I. & Pitcher, C. R. Rapid transgenerational acclimation of a tropical reef fish to climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 30–32 (2012).
Hoffmann, A. A. & Sgrò, C. M. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470, 479–485 (2011).
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D. & Schielzeth, H. The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20170213 (2017).
Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: Piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).
Chen, B. Patterns of thermal limits of phytoplankton. J. Plankton Res. 37, 285–292 (2015).
Beaugrand, G., Luczak, C. & Edwards, M. Rapid biogeographical plankton shifts in the North Atlantic Ocean. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 1790–1803 (2009).
Hiddink, J. G., Burrows, M. T. & García Molinos, J. Temperature tracking by North Sea benthic invertebrates in response to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 117–129 (2015).
Nye, J. A., Link, J. S., Hare, J. A. & Overholtz, W. J. Changing spatial distribution of fish stocks in relation to climate and population size on the Northeast United States continental shelf. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 393, 111–129 (2009).
Perry, A. L., Low, P. J., Ellis, J. R. & Reynolds, J. D. Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308, 1912–1915 (2005).
Pitt, N. R., Poloczanska, E. S. & Hobday, A. J. Climate-driven range changes in Tasmanian intertidal fauna. Mar. Freshw. Res. 61, 963–970 (2010).
Rubal, M., Veiga, P., Cacabelos, E., Moreira, J. & Sousa-Pinto, I. Increasing sea surface temperature and range shifts of intertidal gastropods along the Iberian Peninsula. J. Sea Res. 77, 1–10 (2013).
Franco, A. M. A. et al. Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species’ low-latitude range boundaries. Glob. Chang. Biol. 12, 1545–1553 (2006).
Hickling, R., Roy, D. B., Hill, J. K. & Thomas, C. D. A northward shift of range margins in British Odonata. Glob. Chang. Biol. 11, 502–506 (2005).
Parmesan, C. et al. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399, 579–583 (1999).
Wu, J. Detecting and attributing the effects of climate change on the distributions of snake species over the past 50 years. Environ. Manage. 57, 207–219 (2016).
Wu, J. Can changes in the distribution of lizard species over the past 50 years be attributed to climate change? Theor. Appl. Climatol. 125, 785–798 (2016).
We thank P. Falkowski, A. Gunderson, R. Huey, H. John-Alder, F. Joyce, G. Saba, B. Seibel, M. Tingley and members of the Pinsky laboratory for discussions; and D. L. Forrest for assistance with data compilation. This research was partially conducted on a research exchange at the University of Oslo, supported by the Nordforsk-funded project ‘Green Growth Based on Marine Resources: Ecological and Socio-Economic Constraints (GreenMAR)’. We also acknowledge support from the Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow program, National Science Foundation projects OCE-1426891, DEB-1616821 and EAR-1151022, the Benioff Ocean Initiative, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Biodiversity Research Centre at the University of British Columbia. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling (which was responsible for producing CMIP5) and thank the climate modelling groups for making the output of their models available. The US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provided coordinating support and led the development of software infrastructure for CMIP5, in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
Nature thanks Michael Burrows, Mark Payne, Anthony Richardson and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Fig. 1 Adjustment to account for the acclimatization temperatures used in laboratory experiments.
a, b, For land (a) and ocean (b) separately, the points show the average summer temperature used for acclimatization calculations (black) at each collection site, ordered from smallest to largest, the experimental acclimatization temperature (grey), the experimentally measured thermal-tolerance maximum (Tmax, blue) and the acclimatization-adjusted thermal-tolerance maximum (Tmax′, purple). c, Tmax′ adjusted with species-specific acclimatization response ratios (ARRs, n = 69 species) is compared against Tmax′ adjusted with ARRs averaged within realms. The grey line is a 1:1 line.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Uncertainty in the location of peaks or valleys in GAMM fits for terrestrial ectotherms.
a–c, Clusters of graphs for extreme hot values of body temperatures in thermal refugia (Tb, protected) (a), hot thermal-tolerance limits (Tmax′) (b) and TSM (c) across latitudes. Each cluster of graphs has three parts: (1) the centre graph shows the fitted effect against latitude from a GAMM (dark line), and 50 samples from the fitted smoother (grey lines); (2) the top histogram shows uncertainty in the locations of the peaks (a, b) or valleys (c) detected from 1,000 samples from the fitted smoother; and (3) the right-hand histogram shows uncertainty in the number of peaks or valleys detected. d, Average TSM is plotted against the mid-point of each 10° latitude band. Error bars show s.e.m. Fewer data points create larger error bounds near the equator. n = 299 species.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Effects of alternative emission scenarios and acclimatization on TSMs for the end of the twenty-first century (2081–2100).
a, Projected extreme hot hourly air- or water-surface temperatures from RCP8.5 or RCP2.6 scenarios. Shaded regions show ±1 s.d. n = 1,454 (terrestrial), 689,769 (ocean RCP8.5) or 689,381 (ocean RCP2.6) grid cells. b, Future TSMs without acclimatization. c, Future TSMs with acclimatization. Shaded ribbons show ± 1 s.e. from GAMM fits (b, c). n = 382 species for GAMM fits (b, c).
a, b, Warm TSMs across latitudes for terrestrial (a) and marine (b) species with alternative temperature calculations (annual average, summer average, warmest month and warmest hour). Physiological tolerance measurements were from acute laboratory exposures (minutes to hours), and acute environmental temperature extremes are therefore arguably most-appropriate for calculating TSM. TSMs from the most-acute temporal scale (hours) revealed a different latitudinal pattern than from the more-aggregated scales, in part because they better capture short-duration thermal extremes. However, in all calculations marine species had narrower TSMs. c, d, Warm TSM calculations for marine species (c) or for terrestrial species (d), with (solid line) or without (dashed line) accounting for behavioural thermoregulation. The latter case is appropriate if behavioural thermoregulation is not possible (for example, thermal refugia are not accessible). Negative thermal safety on land indicates that these habitats are not habitable during midday heat for durations that bring body temperatures close to equilibrium. Note that calculations in a and b do not account for acclimatization or behavioural thermoregulation, to enable clear comparison across timescales. Calculations in c and d include acclimatization to summer temperatures. In all plots, shaded ribbons show ±s.e. from GAMM fits. n = 387 (warmest hour, no marine thermoregulation, or exposed or full sun) or 390 (warmest month, summer average or annual average) species for GAMM fits.
Extended Data Fig. 5 Relationship between physiological maximum (Tmax) and optimum (Topt) temperature across species.
Data are shown from studies15,26,90 that measured Tmax and Topt across species of phytoplankton, insects and lizards. The line is from a linear model with Tmax as the response variable and Topt as the explanatory term (linear regression r2 = 0.77, F = 1,036 with 1 and 310 degrees of freedom, two-sided P < 10−15 with no corrections for multiple comparisons, n = 312 species). All data are plotted in transparent grey so that overlapping data points appear as darker circles. The dashed line is a 1:1 relationship.
About this article
Cite this article
Pinsky, M.L., Eikeset, A.M., McCauley, D.J. et al. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature 569, 108–111 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1132-4
This article is cited by
Marine heatwaves as drivers of biological and ecological change: implications of current research patterns and future opportunities
Marine Biology (2024)
Nature Climate Change (2023)
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2023)
Thermal tolerance and vulnerability to warming differ between populations of wild Oncorhynchus mykiss near the species’ southern range limit
Scientific Reports (2023)