Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Enzyme-catalysed [6+4] cycloadditions in the biosynthesis of natural products

Abstract

Pericyclic reactions are powerful transformations for the construction of carbon–carbon and carbon–heteroatom bonds in organic synthesis. Their role in biosynthesis is increasingly apparent, and mechanisms by which pericyclases can catalyse reactions are of major interest1. [4+2] cycloadditions (Diels–Alder reactions) have been widely used in organic synthesis2 for the formation of six-membered rings and are now well-established in biosynthesis3,4,5,6. [6+4] and other ‘higher-order’ cycloadditions were predicted7 in 1965, and are now increasingly common in the laboratory despite challenges arising from the generation of a highly strained ten-membered ring system8,9. However, although enzyme-catalysed [6+4] cycloadditions have been proposed10,11,12, they have not been proven to occur. Here we demonstrate a group of enzymes that catalyse a pericyclic [6+4] cycloaddition, which is a crucial step in the biosynthesis of streptoseomycin-type natural products. This type of pericyclase catalyses [6+4] and [4+2] cycloadditions through a single ambimodal transition state, which is consistent with previous proposals11,12. The [6+4] product is transformed to a less stable [4+2] adduct via a facile Cope rearrangement, and the [4+2] adduct is converted into the natural product enzymatically. Crystal structures of three pericyclases, computational simulations of potential energies and molecular dynamics, and site-directed mutagenesis establish the mechanism of this transformation. This work shows how enzymes are able to catalyse concerted pericyclic reactions involving ambimodal transition states.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Cycloadditions in natural product biosynthesis.
Fig. 2: DFT-computed free energies for the [6+4], [4+2] and [3,3]-Cope reactions.
Fig. 3: Crystal structures of three enzymes and catalytic sites for the bispericyclic reaction.

Data availability

Atomic coordinates of StmD, NgnD and 101015D have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) with accession codes 6A5G, 6A5F and 6A5H. The crystallographic data of compounds 6 and 8 have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/) with CCDC numbers 1843311 and 1843314. The DNA sequence of the ngn gene cluster has been deposited in GenBank with the accession number MH544245.

References

  1. 1.

    Jamieson, C. S., Ohashi, M., Liu, F., Tang, Y. & Houk, K. N. The expanding world of biosynthetic pericyclases: cooperation of experiment and theory for discovery. Nat. Prod. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NP00075A (2018).

  2. 2.

    Takao, K., Munakata, R. & Tadano, K. Recent advances in natural product synthesis by using intramolecular Diels–Alder reactions. Chem. Rev. 105, 4779–4807 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Jeon, B. S., Wang, S.-A., Ruszczycky, M. W. & Liu, H. W. Natural [4 + 2]-cyclases. Chem. Rev. 117, 5367–5388 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kim, H. J., Ruszczycky, M. W., Choi, S. H., Liu, Y. N. & Liu, H. W. Enzyme-catalysed [4+2] cycloaddition is a key step in the biosynthesis of spinosyn A. Nature 473, 109–112 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tian, Z. et al. An enzymatic [4+2] cyclization cascade creates the pentacyclic core of pyrroindomycins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 259–265 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ohashi, M. et al. SAM-dependent enzyme-catalysed pericyclic reactions in natural product biosynthesis. Nature 549, 502–506 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hoffmann, R. & Woodward, R. B. Selection rules for concerted cycloaddition reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 87, 2046–2048 (1965).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Palazzo, T. A., Mose, R. & Jørgensen, K. A. Cycloaddition reactions: why is it so challenging to move from six to ten electrons? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 10033–10038 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mose, R. et al. Organocatalytic stereoselective [8+2] and [6+4] cycloadditions. Nat. Chem. 9, 487–492 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yu, P., Patel, A. & Houk, K. N. Transannular [6+4] and ambimodal cycloaddition in the biosynthesis of heronamide A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13518–13523 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Patel, A. et al. Dynamically complex [6+4] and [4+2] cycloadditions in the biosynthesis of spinosyn A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 3631–3634 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yang, Z. et al. Influence of water and enzyme SpnF on the dynamics and energetics of the ambimodal [6+4]/[4+2] cycloaddition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E848–E855 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang, B. et al. Discovery, biosynthesis, and heterologous production of streptoseomycin, an anti-microaerophilic bacteria macrodilactone. Org. Lett. 20, 2967–2971 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Snyder, W. C. & Rinehart, K. L. Biosynthesis of nargenicin and nodusmicin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 787–789 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Whaley, H. A., Chidester, C. G., Mizsak, S. A. & Wnuk, R. J. Nodusmicin: the structure of a new antibiotic. Tetrahedron Lett. 21, 3659–3662 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rasmussen, R. R., Scherr, M. H., Whittern, D. N., Buko, A. M. & McAlpine, J. B. Coloradocin, an antibiotic from a new Actinoplanes. II. Identity with luminamicin and elucidation of structure. J. Antibiot. 40, 1383–1393 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Čikoš, A. et al. Reinvestigation of the branimycin stereochemistry at position 17-C. Org. Lett. 18, 780–783 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Cane, D. E. & Luo, G. L. Biosynthesis of polyketide antibiotics. Incorporation of a pentaketide chain elongation intermediate into nargenicin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 6633–6634 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Seeman, J. I. Effect of conformational change on reactivity in organic chemistry. evaluations, applications, and extensions of Curtin–Hammett/Winstein–Holness kinetics. Chem. Rev. 83, 83–134 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Medvedev, M. G. et al. Quantifying possible routes for SpnF-catalyzed formal Diels–Alder cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3942–3945 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Siegel, J. B. et al. Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels–Alder reaction. Science 329, 309–313 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hare, S. R. & Tantillo, D. J. Post-transition state bifurcations gain momentum – current state of the field. Pure Appl. Chem. 89, 679–698 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Hong, Y. J. & Tantillo, D. J. Biosynthetic consequences of multiple sequential post-transition-state bifurcations. Nat. Chem. 6, 104–111 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yang, Z. et al. Relationships between product ratios in ambimodal pericyclic reactions and bond lengths in transition structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 3061–3067 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Holm, L. & Laakso, L. M. Dali server update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W351–W355 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sciara, G. et al. The structure of ActVA-Orf6, a novel type of monooxygenase involved in actinorhodin biosynthesis. EMBO J. 22, 205–215 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mori, T. et al. Molecular basis for the unusual ring reconstruction in fungal meroterpenoid biogenesis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 1066–1073 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Clarkson, W. D. et al. Nuclear protein import is decreased by engineered mutants of nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2) that do not bind GDP-Ran. J. Mol. Biol. 272, 716–730 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sultana, A. et al. Structure of the polyketide cyclase SnoaL reveals a novel mechanism for enzymatic aldol condensation. EMBO J. 23, 1911–1921 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lundqvist, T. et al. Crystal structure of scytalone dehydratase — a disease determinant of the rice pathogen, Magnaporthe grisea. Structure 2, 937–944 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Battye, T. G. G., Kontogiannis, L., Johnson, O., Powell, H. R. & Leslie, A. G. W. iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 271–281 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Terwilliger, T. C. et al. Decision-making in structure solution using Bayesian estimates of map quality: the PHENIX AutoSol wizard. Acta Crystallogr. D 65, 582–601 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Adams, P. D., Mustyakimov, M., Afonine, P. V. & Langan, P. Generalized X-ray and neutron crystallographic analysis: more accurate and complete structures for biological macromolecules. Acta Crystallogr. D 65, 567–573 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Emsley, P. & Crispin, M. Structural analysis of glycoproteins: building N-linked glycans with Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 256–263 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Ministry of Science and Technology (2018YFC1706200), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21572100, 21803030, 81522042, 81773591, 81530089, 81673333, 21861142005, 21761142001 and 21661140001), the National Thousand Young Talents Program, the Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor Plan, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20170631) in China, and the US National Institutes of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health (GM 124480). We are grateful to the High Performance Computing Center of Nanjing University for doing the numerical calculations in this paper on its blade cluster system. We thank the staff at beamlines BL17U1 and BL18U1 of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility and the National Supercomputing Center in Wuxi for their support.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks Fedor Novikov, Satish Nair and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.Z., Y.L., R.X.T. and H.M.G. conceived the project. B.Z. and K.B.W. performed all in vivo and in vitro experiments. W.W., H.Y.Q. and R.H.J. performed fermentation, compound isolation and characterization. X.W., F.L., X.Z. and Y.L. conducted the computational studies. J.S. performed LC–MS analysis. L.Y.L., H.H. and K.X. performed NMR experiments. B.Z. and J.Z. carried out the protein crystallographic studies. All authors contributed to the discussion and interpretation of the results. B.Z., K.B.W., K.N.H., Y.L. and H.M.G. prepared the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kendall N. Houk or Yong Liang or Ren Xiang Tan or Hui Ming Ge.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Comparative analysis of the stm and ngn gene clusters.

a, Structure of streptoseomycin (1) and structurally related natural products nargenicin (2), coloradocin, nodusmicin and branimycin. b, The stm gene cluster from S. seoulensis A01 and the ngn gene cluster from N. argentinensis ATCC 31306. c, Proposed biosynthetic pathway for 1. d, Proposed biosynthetic pathway for 2.

Extended Data Fig. 2 LC–MS analysis of chemical complementation in the ΔstmA mutant strain.

The experiments were independently repeated twice with similar results.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Time-course 1H NMR spectra for a mixture of 6 and 7.

Spectra were obtained at room temperature. 1H NMR signals highlighted in red are those from 7.

Extended Data Fig. 4 LC–MS analysis of product formation in both in vivo and in vitro enzymatic reactions.

a, b, Time-course analysis of chemical complementation of 6 in the ΔstmA mutant strain. EIC corresponding to 6 and 7 (m/z = 369.0, [M + Na]+) (a); EIC corresponding to 1 (m/z = 622.2, [M + Na]+) (b). c, LC–MS analysis of the production of 68 in mutants and in complementary strains. d, LC–MS analysis of the production for 68 in enzymatic reactions. TE* indicates the StmC/ACP-TE. The experiments were independently repeated twice with similar results.

Extended Data Fig. 5 In vitro biochemical characterization of the efficiency of thioesterase-catalysed macrolactonization and the effects of varying concentrations of StmD in enzymatic cycloaddition.

a, Thioesterase- and cyclase-catalysed tandem reactions. b, LC–MS analysis of different thioesterase-catalysed macrolactonization. c, Effects of varying concentrations of StmD on enzymatic cycloaddition. Each reaction mixture (50 μl 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 7.0) contained 10 μM StmC/ACP-TE and 200 μM substrate 10, and (i) 0 μM StmD, (ii) 10 μM StmD, (iii) 20 μM StmD, (iv) 40 μM StmD, (v) 80 μM StmD, (vi) 100 μM StmD. (vii) Standard solution of compounds 6, 7 and 8. TE* indicates the StmC/ACP-TE. The experiments were independently repeated three times with similar results.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Sequence alignment of StmD, NgnD and three homologous proteins 101015D, F601D and Root369D.

The secondary structure elements of NgnD are presented at the top. Blue cylinders and green arrows indicate the α-helices and β-strands, respectively. The proteins 101015D (WP_040742972), F601D (WP_057609890) and Root369D (WP_077974259) are from N. tenerifensis NBRC 101015, S. tsukubaensis F601 and Streptomyces sp. Root369, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Distributions of reactive trajectories initiated from ambimodal transition states TS-1 and TS-3.

a, TS-1. b, TS-3. Fifteen randomly chosen trajectories were plotted in each case. Trajectories leading to a [4+2] adduct are shown in red, and those leading to a [6+4] adduct are shown in blue. The table lists the 100 trajectories that we calculated.

Extended Data Fig. 8 The electrostatic potential analysis of the DFT-optimized transition-state structure TS-1.

The blue and red regions represent electrostatic potential regions of positive and negative potential (repulsive and attractive interactions, respectively) with a positive charge, with darker colour representing a ‘more positive’ or ‘more negative’ potential. Two views of TS-1 are shown from front and back.

Extended Data Fig. 9 Relative activity of NgnD and its site-specific mutants on enzymatic reactions.

Bars represent mean relative activity averaged over three reactions and error bars indicate the standard deviation. The experiments were independently repeated twice with similar results.

Extended Data Table 1 Data collection and refinement statistics (molecular replacement) of NgnD, StmD and 101015D

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text, Supplementary Figures 1-10, Supplementary Tables 1-13, Supplementary Data 1 and Supplementary References.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Wang, K.B., Wang, W. et al. Enzyme-catalysed [6+4] cycloadditions in the biosynthesis of natural products. Nature 568, 122–126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1021-x

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing