Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An X-ray chimney extending hundreds of parsecs above and below the Galactic Centre


Evidence has mounted in recent decades that outflows of matter and energy from the central few parsecs of our Galaxy have shaped the observed structure of the Milky Way on a variety of larger scales1. On scales of 15 parsecs, the Galactic Centre has bipolar lobes that can be seen in both the X-ray and radio parts of the spectrum2,3, indicating broadly collimated outflows from the centre, directed perpendicular to the Galactic plane. On larger scales, approaching the size of the Galaxy itself, γ-ray observations have revealed the so-called ‘Fermi bubble’ features4, implying that our Galactic Centre has had a period of active energy release leading to the production of relativistic particles that now populate huge cavities on both sides of the Galactic plane. The X-ray maps from the ROSAT all-sky survey show that the edges of these cavities close to the Galactic plane are bright in X-rays4,5,6. At intermediate scales (about 150 parsecs), radio astronomers have observed the Galactic Centre lobe, an apparent bubble of emission seen only at positive Galactic latitudes7,8, but again indicative of energy injection from near the Galactic Centre. Here we report prominent X-ray structures on these intermediate scales (hundreds of parsecs) above and below the plane, which appear to connect the Galactic Centre region to the Fermi bubbles. We propose that these structures, which we term the Galactic Centre ‘chimneys’, constitute exhaust channels through which energy and mass, injected by a quasi-continuous train of episodic events at the Galactic Centre, are transported from the central few parsecs to the base of the Fermi bubbles4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: X-ray emission from the central 300 pc by 500 pc of the Milky Way.
Fig. 2: Latitudinal variation of the physical parameters of the Galactic Centre X-ray plasma.
Fig. 3: Physical properties of the Galactic Centre chimneys.

Data and code availability

The datasets analysed during the current study and the software to perform the analysis are available in the XMM-Newton, Chandra and ROSAT repository:,, and


  1. Ponti, G., Morris, M. R., Terrier, R. & Goldwurm, A. in Cosmic Rays in Star-Forming Environments (eds Torres, D. & Reimer, O.) 331–369 (Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings Vol. 34, Springer, Berlin, 2013).

  2. Morris, M. et al. Deep X-ray imaging of the central 20 parsecs of the Galaxy with Chandra. Astron. Notes Suppl. 324, 167–172 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao, J.-H., Morris, M. R. & Goss, W. M. A new perspective of the radio bright zone at the Galactic Center: feedback from nuclear activities. Astrophys. J. 817, 171–187 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Su, M., Slatyer, T. R. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Giant gamma-ray bubbles from Fermi-LAT: active galactic nucleus activity or bipolar galactic wind? Astrophys. J. 724, 1044–1082 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Snowden, S. L. et al. ROSAT Survey diffuse X-ray background maps. II. Astrophys. J. 485, 125–135 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bland-Hawthorn, J. & Cohen, M. The large-scale bipolar wind in the Galactic Center. Astrophys. J. 582, 246–256 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sofue, Y. & Handa, T. A radio lobe over the Galactic Centre. Nature 310, 568–569 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Law, C. J. A multiwavelength view of a mass outflow from the Galactic Center. Astrophys. J. 708, 474–484 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ponti, G. et al. The XMM-Newton view of the central degrees of the Milky Way. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 172–213 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Genzel, R., Eisenhauer, F. & Gillessen, S. The Galactic Centre massive black hole and nuclear star cluster. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3121–3195 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kataoka, J. et al. Suzaku observations of the diffuse X-ray emission across the Fermi bubbles’ edges. Astrophys. J. 779, 57–73 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heard, V. & Warwick, R. S. XMM-Newton observations of the Galactic Centre Region—II. The soft-thermal emission. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 434, 1339–1354 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chevalier, R. A. & Clegg, A. W. Wind from a starburst galaxy nucleus. Nature 317, 44–45 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heckman, T. M., Armus, L. & Miley, G. K. On the nature and implications of starburst-driven galactic superwinds. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 74, 833–868 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Suchkov, A. A., Balsara, D. S., Heckman, T. M. & Leitherer, C. Dynamics and X-ray emission of a galactic superwind interacting with disk and halo gas. Astrophys. J. 430, 511–532 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krumholz, M. R., Kruijssen, J. M. D. & Crocker, R. M. A dynamical model for gas flows, star formation and nuclear winds in galactic centres. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 1213–1233 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rees, M. J. Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 106 to 108 solar masses in nearby galaxies. Nature 333, 523–528 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Generozov, A., Stone, N. C. & Metzger, B. D. Circumnuclear media of quiescent supermassive black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 775–796 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu, J. R. et al. Stellar populations in the central 0.5 pc of the Galaxy. II. The initial mass function. Astrophys. J. 764, 155–172 (2013).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris, M. The Galactic Center magnetosphere. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 54, 1–9 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Crocker, R. M., Jones, D. I., Melia, F., Ott, J. & Protheroe, R. J. A lower limit of 50 microgauss for the magnetic field near the Galactic Centre. Nature 463, 65–67 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eatough, R. P. et al. A strong magnetic field around the supermassive black hole at the centre of the Galaxy. Nature 501, 391–394 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mauerhan, J. C., Muno, M. P., Morris, M. R., Stolovy, S. R. & Cotera, A. Near-infrared counterparts to Chandra X-ray sources toward the Galactic Center. II. Discovery of Wolf-Rayet stars and O supergiants. Astrophys. J. 710, 706–728 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong, H., Wang, Q. D. & Morris, M. R. A multiwavelength study of evolved massive stars in the Galactic Centre. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 425, 884–906 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Strickland, D. K. & Stevens, I. R. Starburst-driven galactic winds—I. Energetics and intrinsic X-ray emission. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 314, 511–545 (2000).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Crocker, R. M. & Aharonian, F. Fermi bubbles: giant, multibillion-year-old reservoirs of Galactic Center cosmic rays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 101102 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kataoka, J. et al. X-ray and gamma-ray observations of the Fermi bubbles and NPS/loop I structures. Galaxies 6, 27 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lacki, B. C. The Fermi bubbles as starburst wind termination shocks. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 444, L39–L43 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bland-Hawthorn, J., Maloney, P. R., Sutherland, R. S. & Madsen, G. J. Fossil imprint of a powerful flare at the Galactic Center along the Magellanic stream. Astrophys. J. 778, 58–74 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts, S. R., Jiang, Y.-F., Wang, Q. D. & Ostriker, J. P. Towards self-consistent modelling of the Sgr A* accretion flow: linking theory and observation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466, 1477–1490 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Spitzer, L. Jr Theories of the hot interstellar gas. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 28, 71–101 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jenkins, E. B. Coronal gas in the Galaxy. I—A new survey of interstellar O vi. Astrophys. J. 219, 845–860 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Savage, B. D. & de Boer, K. S. Observational evidence for a hot gaseous Galactic corona. Astrophys. J. 230, L77–L82 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferrière, K. M. The interstellar environment of our galaxy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 1031–1066 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cox, D. P. The three-phase interstellar medium revisited. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 43, 337–385 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Strüder, L. et al. The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: the pn-CCD camera. Astron. Astrophys. 365, L18–L26 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Turner, M. J. L. et al. The European Photon Imaging Camera on XMM-Newton: the MOS cameras. Astron. Astrophys. 365, L27–L35 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Haberl, F. et al. The XMM-Newton survey of the Small Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 545, A128 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Garmire, G. P., Bautz, M. W., Ford, P. G., Nousek, J. A. & Ricker, G. R. Jr. Advanced CCD imaging spectrometer (ACIS) instrument on the Chandra X-ray Observatory. Proc. SPIE 4851, 28–44 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Fruscione, A. et al. CIAO: Chandra’s data analysis system. Proc. SPIE 6270, 62701V (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hofmann, F., Sanders, J. S., Nandra, K., Clerc, N. & Gaspari, M. Thermodynamic perturbations in the X-ray halo of 33 clusters of galaxies observed with Chandra ACIS. Astron. Astrophys. 585, A130 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. Markevitch, M. et al. Chandra spectra of the soft X-ray diffuse background. Astrophys. J. 583, 70–84 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sanders, J. S. Contour binning: a new technique for spatially resolved X-ray spectroscopy applied to Cassiopeia A. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 371, 829–842 (2006).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Arnaud, K. A. XSPEC: The first ten years. In Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V Vol. 101, 17 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, 1996).

  45. Foster, A. R., Ji, L., Smith, R. K. & Brickhouse, N. S. Updated atomic data and calculations for X-ray spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. 756, 128–139 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Anders, E. & Grevesse, N. Abundances of the elements—meteoritic and solar. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 197–214 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Eisenhauer, F. et al. A geometric determination of the distance to the Galactic Center. Astrophys. J. 597, L121–L124 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Uchida, K. I., Morris, M. R., Serabyn, E. & Bally, J. AFGL 5376: a strong, large-scale shock near the Galactic Center. Astrophys. J. 421, 505–516 (1994).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Blanton, M. C. The Galactic Center lobe: new 14 GHz GBT observations. PhD thesis, Univ. North Carolina at Chapel Hill (2008).

  50. Churazov, E., Forman, W., Jones, C. & Böhringer, H. Asymmetric, arc minute scale structures around NGC 1275. Astron. Astrophys. 356, 788–794 (2000).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Fabian, A. C. Observational evidence of active galactic nuclei feedback. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 455–489 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Baganoff, F. K. et al. Chandra X-ray spectroscopic imaging of Sagittarius A* and the central parsec of the Galaxy. Astrophys. J. 591, 891–915 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang, Q. D. et al. Dissecting X-ray-emitting gas around the center of our Galaxy. Science 341, 981–983 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Yuan, F. & Narayan, R. Hot accretion flows around black holes. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 52, 529–588 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. Koyama, K. Diffuse X-ray sky in the Galactic center. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 70, R1, (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sofue, Y. The Galactic Center lobe. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 37, 697–713 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is dedicated to the memory of A. M. Ponti, who contributed to its realization by focusing the energy and motivation of G.P. G.P. thanks A. Merloni for discussions and the Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie Heidelberg for hospitality. This research has made use of data obtained both with XMM-Newton, an ESA science mission with instruments and contributions directly funded by ESA Member States and NASA, and with the Chandra Data Archive and software provided by the Chandra X-ray Center. G.P. and F. Hofmann acknowledge financial support from the Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie/Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (BMWI/DLR; grants FKZ 50 OR 1604, FKZ 50 OR 1715 and FKZ 50 OR 1812) and the Max Planck Society. A.G. and R.T. acknowledge support from CNES and ANR (grant ANR-17-CE31-0014) and M.R.M. acknowledges support from NASA.

Reviewer information

Nature thanks Masha Chernyakova and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



G.P. and M.R.M. conceived and successfully proposed the two XMM-Newton large projects that led to this work. F. Haberl ran and improved the advanced mosaicking pipeline for XMM-Newton data developed by the high-energy group at MPE. F. Hofmann performed the mosaicking of the Chandra data, and implemented the contour-binned spectral extraction technique and advanced smoothing techniques. G.P. and F. Hofmann performed the spectral analysis. E.C. verified all analysis tasks employing an alternative pipeline. G.P., F. Hofmann, E.C. and M.R.M. led the interpretation, modelling and discussion of this work and together they wrote the manuscript. F. Haberl, K.N., R.T., M.C. and A.G. read and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Ponti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Diffuse Galactic Centre X-ray emission at different scales.

a, ROSAT (0.9–2-keV energy band) large-scale map of the Galactic Centre. The X-ray counterparts of the Fermi bubbles are strong X-ray emitters. The edges (white ellipses) are clearly detected on scales of several degrees, whereas they become confused (because of the short exposure of 200–300 s and soft X-ray energy band) close to the plane. The red dashed line indicates the XMM-Newton area covered by our survey. b, XMM-Newton map zooming into the central degrees of the Milky Way. The magenta dashed line intersects both chimneys, passing through Sgr A*. The map shows the X-ray emissivity within the 1.5–2.6-keV energy band (see Extended Data Fig. 2). c, Schematic view of the main diffuse X-ray-emitting features within the central 500 pc or so from Sgr A*. The red star and the yellow ellipses indicate the position of Sgr A* and of Sgr A’s ±15-pc bipolar lobes. The large violet ellipses indicate the location and extension of the X-ray counterpart of the Galactic Centre lobe with shell-like morphology (the northern chimney), of its eastern protrusion and of its roughly symmetric southern counterpart (the southern chimney). The orange filled ellipse, the two red circles and the red ellipse indicate the location of the Arc super-bubble (SB), the Quintuplet and Arches clusters and the super-bubble candidate G359.77–0.09 (ref. 8). The pink regions indicate the location of the edges to the Fermi bubbles. The dotted circles and solid ellipses indicate the position of bright X-ray sources with intense dust-scattering halos (DSH) and known supernova remnants (SNR). d, Chandra RGB map zooming into the central tens of parsecs of the Galaxy. The ±15-pc lobes are clearly visible (orange). The dashed circles have radii of 1 pc, 5 pc and 15 pc.

Extended Data Fig. 2 X-ray emission from the central degrees of the Milky Way.

Bright X-ray emission traces the coherent edge brightened shell-like feature, dubbed the northern chimney, located north of Sgr A* and characterized by a diameter of about 160 pc. On the opposite side, the southern chimney appears as a bright linear feature. Bright X-ray emission is observed at high latitude (\(\left|b\right|\) 1°), corresponding to the X-ray counterparts of the Fermi bubble. The magenta dashed line intersects both chimneys, passing through Sgr A*. The map shows the X-ray emissivity within the 1.5–2.6-keV energy band. The contours indicate the location of the radio Galactic Centre lobe as it appears in the background-filtered surface brightness map at 10.55 GHz (see ref. 56). Point sources have been removed. Larger circles have been excised to remove the dust-scattering haloes around bright sources.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Continuum-subtracted S xv line emission.

The map highlights sources characterized by bright soft X-ray emission lines, such as diffuse thermally emitting plasma. On the other hand, point sources and dust-scattering halos are efficiently removed. The white dashed tilted line indicates a linear ridge, about 450 pc long, that appears to run west of the chimneys.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Chandra 1–2 keV map of the Galactic Centre.

The same structures seen in the XMM-Newton 1.5–2.6-keV image (Extended Data Fig. 2, footprint indicated by red dashed box) are observed also in the shallower Chandra image. Although the 1–2-keV band map is more affected by neutral absorption towards the plane compared with the 1.5–2.6-keV band (Extended Data Fig. 2), we display it here in order to emphasize the residual high-latitude emission (for example, inside the Fermi bubbles). GX 3+1 is an accreting X-ray binary.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Chandra spectra (with relative extraction regions) used to derive the physical properties of the chimneys.

a, b, Chandra spectra used to derive the latitudinal profiles at l = 0° and shown in Fig. 2 for the southern (a) and northern (b) sides, respectively. c, XMM-Newton 1.5–2.6 keV emission map in greyscale, showing the extraction areas of the Chandra spectra used to derive the latitudinal profiles at l = 0°, with colours corresponding to those of the spectra. The areas at l ≈ −0.7° indicate the extraction regions of the spectra used to derive the grey constraints in Fig. 2. d, e, XMM-Newton spectra used to derive the latitudinal profiles of the diffuse emission in Fig. 2. The error bars represent 1σ.

Extended Data Fig. 6 XMM-Newton spectra (with relative extraction regions) used to derive the physical properties of the chimneys.

b, c, XMM-Newton spectra used to measure the longitudinal profiles shown in Extended Data Fig. 7. a, XMM-Newton 1.5–2.6-keV map displaying the regions used to extract the spectra corresponding to a longitudinal cut through the northern shell (at b ≈ 0.7°) and through the jet-like feature (at b ≈ −1.2°). The error bars represent 1σ.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Longitudinal profiles of the physical properties of the chimneys.

From top to bottom, temperature, density and pressure profiles are shown as a function of longitude cutting through the northern and southern chimneys at latitudes b ≈ 0.7° and b ≈ −1.2° (see Extended Data Fig. 6). Positive values indicate Galactic west (‘west’ is ‘right’ as in an image in Galactic coordinates b and l). Black squares and red circles indicate the longitudinal cut through the northern and southern chimneys, respectively. The densities have been estimated assuming a volume V = (PA)3/2, where PA is the projected area. Vertical error bars represent 1σ uncertainties; horizontal error bars show the radial range of the extraction regions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ponti, G., Hofmann, F., Churazov, E. et al. An X-ray chimney extending hundreds of parsecs above and below the Galactic Centre. Nature 567, 347–350 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing